As a former liberal Louie Verrecchio interpreted Vatican Council II with Cushingism. Then as a Cushingite traditionalist he still interpreted Vatican Council II with Cushingism. So he still is a Cushingite member of the Conciliar Church

The jig is up, folks; the conciliar church is going to “ordain” women to the diaconate with an eye toward eventually creating women priests. The only question that remains concerns at what point in the future this will happen; provided, of course, that Our Lord doesn’t destroy the counterfeit church first.

Assuming that He does not, just imagine the lot of our conservative friends who dwell in Novus Ordo Land and the shock value of women all gussied up in their vestments reading the Gospel, assisting at the altar, imparting their blessings…

I say bring it on. The sooner this happens, the sooner more eyes will be opened to the fact that neither the Novus Ordo Missae nor the conciliar church are the least bit Catholic.

As Bishop Santin said, this will help the people very much!-Louie Verrecchio

https://akacatholic.com/diaconate-formation-women/

Louie Verrecchio is critical of the Concilliar Church as if the Lefbvrist traditionalist are not part of this Cushingite Conciliar Church.Louie has been influenced by the writings of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, who interpreted Vatican Council II as a rupture with the strict interpretation of EENS.So his interpretation of the Council is Cushingite like that of the liberals of the Cushingite Conciliar Church.

He will not change camp  and accept the non Cushingite Conciliar Church and it's not-so-common- interpretation-of Vatican Council II.Instead he will choose the interpretation of the Council, like that of the liberals and Masons.

As a former liberal Louie interpreted Vatican Council II with Cushingism. Then as a Cushingite traditionalist he still interpreted Vatican Council II with Cushingism. So he still is a Cushingite member of the Conciliar Church.-Lionel Andrades

Vatican Council II = extra ecclesiam nulla salus

When Jim Farell's report was posted on Church Militant TV (CMTV) his equation was Vatican Council II does not equal extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), Vatican Council II does not support EENS but rejects and opposes it. So Tradition which supported EENS was obsolete for him There was a new equation. Like most Catholics he would picture in his mind non Catholics being saved in invincible ignorance, in Heaven, without faith and baptism.

This is an imaginary picture.

In reality we humans, past or present, could not see or meet any such person, since a person saved can only be in Heaven. We on earth cannot see them in Heaven without faith and baptism.

Jim Farrell's article on CMTV was a propaganda piece, like the stuff Jimmy Akins  has to write on Catholics Answers , to please the Left and keep his job as an apologist.Similarly, Prof. Robert Fastiggi  has to criticize Fr. Leonard Feeney once in a while, to show he respects the political propaganda on Vatican Council II being a rupture with EENS- when in reality it cannot be so.

Many Catholics are influenced by the writings of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre , Michael Davies, Dietrich von Hildbrand,Plinio Correa and other well meaning traditionalists who interpreted the Council  as being a rupture with EENS.

This same mistake is there in the papal documents of Cardinal Ratzinger.Pope Paul VI and the popes who followed him also interpreted Vatican Council II as a break with EENS. This was a mistake.

Our primary reference today to support the past exclusivist ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return and the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation- is Vatican Council II. This is the Conciliar Church.-Lionel Andrades 

Gli strani fenomeni durante le apparizioni a Medjugorje

Ecco da dove sgorga la goccia del ginocchio del Cristo Risorto di Medjug...