A pope is not
a pope when he is in public mortal sin. To avoid the Anti Semitic charge and not have diplomatic relations broken with Israel and the OIC, Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and dishonestly.He produces a fake rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla
salus (EENS), the Athanasius Creed, the Nicene Creed, the past Catechisms, the Fourth Lateran Council and other Councils on traditional ecclesiocentrism. So now we don’t have a pope in communion with Jesus and His Church.He needs to end the
scandal.This is not
a permanent state.
He can receive absolution in the Sacrament of Reconciliation and end the mortal sin of
faith. He also needs to make a public announcement.
It is heresy
to reject the Athanasius Creed which says all need to be members of the
Catholic Church for salvation.
It is schism
with the past Magisterium when he projects fake exceptions for EENS etc. He does this by re-interpreting
LG 8, 14, 16 etc, irrationally.
He confuses invisible cases
of the baptism of desire etc as being visible examples of salvation, outside the
Church in the present times (1965-2023). In this way there are alleged objective exceptions for
the Fourth Lateran Council on EENS. This was the mistake in the 1949 Letter of
the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston. It was issued some time after the
creation of the new state of Israel and no pope corrected the error in the
text.
So now there
are two versions of Vatican Council II and Pope Francis chooses the irrational
option and cardinals in general, follow the error.
In this way they maintain
good relations with the pro- Masonic state of Israel and the Organization of Islamic
Cooperation. The pope cardinals and bishops are not labeled Anti Semitic by the
Jewish Left (ADL, B’nai Birth etc).There are no demands for the expulsion of
cardinals and bishops as in the case of Bishop Richard Williamson, who did not
violate any Church moral law.
Pope Francis
is now using his office to keep the cardinals in manifest public sin or be
expelled.He remains in public mortal sin and offers Holy Mass.
I interpret
Vatican Council II rationally. I avoid the error being made by Pope Francis,
the cardinals and bishops and the rest of the Catholic Church.
I was not
allowed to remain in two of Rome’s seminaries (2002-2003) or continue to study
at the pontifical university, Regina Apostolorum, in Rome. My scholarship from
Propaganda Fide was also cancelled by the Rector Fr. Juan Duennas l.c.
Since I was
affirming Feeneyite EENS it meant that I did not interpret Vatican Council
II irrationally. Unlike me, the faculty and students did not have a problem. They interpreted Vatican Council II
irrationally. So they could cite alleged exceptions for the dogma EENS
according to the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) and the Council of Florence
(1442). I was marked as a traditionalist even though I would go for Mass in
Italian and would affirm Vatican Council II.
If the
Legion of Christ priests at the PIMME seminary and university Regina Apostolorum, in Rome would also affirmed the dogma EENS like me, or allow me to
continue to study at their university UPRA, it would mean that they were Anti
Semitic, for the Jewish Left. So Cardinal Ratzinger, the then Prefect of the
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, would not allow this.
His
priority was to 'maintain good relations with the Jewish Left'. So he
excommunicated Bishop Williamson and had the SSPX expel him. The issue was the
Holocaust figure and not some ecclesiastical or moral
problem.So now they excommunicate you for being Anti Semitic as demanded by the ADL.
I am still
not allowed to study at the pontifical universities in Rome since I interpret
LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, as being
hypothetical only. This is something obvious. They can only be hypothetical for
us human beings.But in this way I am affirming Feeneyite EENS. I am supporting the Council of Florence and the past Catechisms. There is no rupture.
LG 8,14 and 16 etc refer to invisible and not physically visible people for me. So they are
not objective exceptions in 1965-2023 for the Athanasius Creed, the dogma EENS,
the Syllabus of Errors etc. Fr. Leonard Feeney had it right and Cardinal Richard Cushing made the public mistake.
There is no
rupture with Tradition for me. Instead with Ad Gentes 7 and Lumen Gentium 14 ( all need faith and baptism for salvation), Vatican
Council II has continuity with Tradition. LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 are not a
rupture with Ad Gentes 7 and Lumen Gentium 14.
But Pope
Francis cannot say this.
The cardinals cannot say this.
Those
cardinals and bishops who would interpret Vatican Council II rationally and honestly,
and affirm the past ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church, will have to be
expelled,, to maintain good relations with the Jewish Left rabbis. Vatican
Council II is a political issue. The 1949 LOHO was a political issue. The
Boston Heresy refers to the heresy of Pope Pius XII, Cardinal Richard Cushing
and the American Jesuits. Without the Boston Heresy, Vatican Council II
supports Feeneyite EENS. So without the heresy, the Church would still be saying after 1965 that
all need faith and baptism for salvation (AG 7/LG 16) and there are no objective exceptions in LG 8, NA 2, GS 22, UR 3 etc, for Feeneyite EENS. We don’t know and cannot
know anyone who is saved, for example, outside the visible boundaries of the Catholic
Church where ‘the true Church’ subsists (LG 8) Yet Cardinal Ladaria at the Placquet Deo Press Conference projected LG 8 as a rupture with the past ecclesiocentrism.
When Cardinal Ladaria does not accept the Athanasius Creed and the dogma EENS it is heresy. It is heresy according to the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
When he rejects the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) by interpreting Vatican Council II with the fake premise ( invisible non catholics are visible in the present times) this is heresy. It is heresy according to the Catechism of the Catholic Church. According to Canon Law all cardinals must affirm the teachings and de fide beliefs of the Church.
2089 Incredulity is the neglect of revealed truth or the willful refusal to assent to it. "Heresy is the obstinate post-baptismal denial of some truth which must be believed with divine and catholic faith, or it is likewise an obstinate doubt concerning the same; apostasy is the total repudiation of the Christian faith; schism is the refusal of submission to the Roman Pontiff or of communion with the members of the Church subject to him." - Catechism of the Catholic Church (emphasis added )
Cardinal
Ladaria obstinately rejects the Athanasius Creed. He obstinately does not
affirm the Fourth Lateran Council. He obstinately re-interprets the Nicene
Creed. He obstinately re-interprets the Vatican Council II irrationally.He obstinately re-interprets irrationally the baptism of desire and being saved in
invincible ignorance, mentioned in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the
Archbishop of Boston.
Pope Francis
does the same. - Lionel Andrades
CDF agrees with me
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/04/cdf-agrees-with-me.html
PISAI does not tell visiting Muslim professors that they do not interpret Vatican Council II rationally for fear of being accused of being Anti Semitic
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/04/pisai-does-not-tell-visiting-muslim.html
Posts
