Tuesday, October 22, 2013

CDF could soon fault the SSPX for not accepting the Cushing interpretation of Vatican Council II

The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF), Vatican could soon be faulting the Society of St.Pius X(SSPX). It would be  for not accepting the CDF's irrational interpretation of  Vatican Council II. The CDF uses  Cushingism, and claimsg the dead are visible to us on earth.
 
Four priests of the SSPX, Italy with whom I have spoken to in Rome, and who accept Vatican Council as a historical fact, say that LG 8( elements of sanctifcation and grace), LG 16 (invincible ignorance),UR 3 (imperefect communion with the church) etc are not known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. So in reality, for them, there could not be any exception to the dogma on exclusive salvation, even, if the CDF claims that there are and suggests that they are mentioned in Vatican Council II.
Seminario di Econe - ordinazioni 29 giugno 2009
When the SSPX priests from Albano say that LG 16, LG 8, UR 3 etc are not known exceptions in 2013 to the dogma on salvation, they are using Feeneyism,in the interpretation of Council texts. With Feeneyism, which says there are no visible exceptions, Vatican Council II is traditional and non ambigous.It is in agreement with the Syllabus of Errors on the subjects of other religions and Christian communities.

The Vatican Curia does not interpret the Council with Feeneyism, and is expected to fault the SSPX, for not endorsing the un-real Cushing interpretation. This  version of the Council  alleges that those saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16) etc are physically visible to us on earth. So it is assumed wrongly that they are known exceptions to the dogma on salvation and the Syllabus.

The SSPX is expected to accept Vatican Council II, a term used in a general sense, without specifying which of the two interpretations it refers to.

Even a young Catholic , with no knowledge of theology, would know that Archbishop Gerhard Muller's position is ridiculous.if we cannot see the dead then how can these cases be exceptions? Where does Vatican Council II say that we can see exceptions to the dogma or that these cases are visible exceptions? It does not.

Archbishop Muller could want the SSPX to accept Vatican Council II with the dead man walking theory.It is a false premise on which he basis his theology.

The SSPX has a right to canonical status since their traditional position is in agreement with Vatican Council II, interpreted with Feeneyism. The CDF has to acknowledge this. They also have to accept Vatican Council II in public, interpreted with Feeneyism since it is rational, whereas Cushingism is not.
 -Lionel Andrades
http://www.sanpiox.it/public/index.php?option=com_content&view=featured&Itemid=149

3 Absolutely Terrifying Visions of Hell

3 Absolutely Terrifying Visions of Hell
http://www.aleteia.org/en/religion/article/3-absolutely-terrifying-visions-of-hell-5574001

Priebke Funeral- Interview with Fr.Pierpaolo Petrucci, District Superior,SSPX, Albano

Funeral Priebke - Interview with Fr Pierpaolo Petrucci

 
Marco Bongi

Rev. Don Pierpaolo ,a  few days back there was media " storm " relaetd to the funeral of the former commander Erich Priebke , one of the authors of the terrible massacre of the Fosse Ardeatine.We seek to finally dispel the controversy and exploitation. There have been in fact, in those heated days , superficial information. Let us try to clarify.

D.1 - When and by whom have you  been asked to celebrate the funeral of the deceased ?
R. On Monday morning, the lawyer appointed by the family to take care of the funeral phoned us to ask our readiness for the funeral set at Tuesday, October 15 , with all the necessary authorizations from the civil authorities . The ceremony was to be celebrated in private and to be a purely religious act , without any emphasis or media or ideological manipulation.
For this it was necessary to exercise the greatest discretion we scrupulously observed it .

D.
2 - Why , in front of the ban imposed by the Vicariate of Rome , you have allowed the celebration ? R. The refusal of the vicariate for a funeral tobe grant to a baptized person who has received the sacraments of Confession and the Eucharist , whatever were his faults and sins , is not consistent with the law of the Church and to Catholic doctrine . After learning that Priebke had been baptized and received the sacraments , this act(of the Vicariate) we thought was a serious injustice to the deceased and the family. We also wanted there to be a gesture of reparation and respect of equal weight.
 

D. 3 - Almost all the news organizations have reported that Erik Priebke  never repented of his conduct displayed during the Second World War. The press release of the Fraternity instead refers to a Catholic who died after being reconciled with God. Can you explain how things really are ? R. There seems to be a willingness to cultivate hatred by a section of the Press who claim the right to determine who can and who can not be forgiven , dictating laws to the Church. They  impose their criteria on who has the right to a religious funeral and decide to expose those who do not want to bend to a media lynching.

Erich Priebke , baptized a Protestant, converted to Catholicism after the war. He converted with his wife and was baptized with his children.During his life he followed Catholic teaching under several priests. During his imprisonment, under house arrest in 2002, he applied for and obtained the chance to attend Holy Mass. Until the end of his life he would regularly receive the sacraments of Confession and the Eucharist .

On his return to Italy , during the public hearing before the Military Tribunal of Rome held on April 3, 1996, he read a letter in front of the families of the victims in which he expressed his condolences.He regretted the horrific act of obedience that he had to follow under the circumstances : "I feel from my heart the need to express my condolences for the pain of the relatives of the victims of the Fosse Ardeatine .... As a believer, I have never forgotten this tragic event , for me the order to participate in that action was a great tragedy ... I think of the dead with veneration and I feel united with the living in their grief ."
 

In his last interview given last July, in the midst of historical considerations is certainly questionable, there are moral considerations of the utmost importance. They are those that affect a priest . When asked by the reporter who asks him if he justifies anti-Semitism , Priebke replies: "No (...) I repeat anti Semitism, is indiscriminate hate (...) as an old man deprived of his liberty , I have always rejected  hate. I do not even want to hate those who hated me . I speak only of the right to criticize and explain the reasons for it . "

Message incomplete

http://www.sanpiox.it/public/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1097:funerali-priebke-intervista-a-don-pierpaolo-petrucci&catid=53&Itemid=50
 

Four priests of the SSPX, Albano are defying the Vatican Curia's interpretation of the Council

So we have SSPX priests who accept Vatican Council II as a historical reality, as does Econe, and who interpret Vatican Council II (LG 16, LG 8) as not being exceptions to AG 7 of Vatican Council II.
 
The Society of St.Pius X(Albano) (Fraternità Sacerdotale San Pio X )priests to whom I have spoken to  have accepted an interpretation of Vatican Council II text - but it is not the interpretation of Archbishops Muller and Di Noia of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) and Ecclesia Dei.
The Italian SSPX priests agree that invincible ignorance (LG 16) and being saved in imperfect communion with the Church(UR 3) are not known exceptions in 2013 to all needing faith and baptism for salvation(AG 7).
Archbishop Gerhard Muller in an interview with the National Catholic Register (NCR)  said that only those who know (LG 14) need to enter the Church and so this has changed the old interpretation of the dogma.Not every one needs to enter the Church in the present times but only those who know!? This is a new doctrine.The CDF President is implying that LG 14 refers to persons who are known exceptions in 2013.

Similarly in another interview with the National Catholic Register's Edward Pentin, Archbishop Augustine Di Noia, at that time the Vice President of Ecclesia Dei,CDF said that LG 8 , being saved with 'many elements of sanctification and truth', found outside the visibile limits of the Church, was a known exception to the traditional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.So for him LG 8 would also contradict AG 7.AG 7 would also contradict itself.
On the other hand Fr.Gabriel of the SSPX,Albano, who offered Mass at the SSPX chapel in Rome last Sunday,  said that there are no known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
It is the same Vatican Council II but we have two different interpretations from two groups of Catholic religious.
 
For Archbishops Muller and Di Noia Vatican Council II refer to known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (LG 14,LG 8).For Fr.Aldo Rossi, Prior, SSPX, Albano there are no known exceptions.There can be no known exceptions for him! It is impossible.It is something very evident for Fr.Rossi.
 
The difference between the two interpretations is the difference between Cushingism and Feeneyism.With Cushingism parts of the Council are ambigous and parts are traditional.With Feeneyism there is no ambiguity.
 
So we have SSPX priests who accept Vatican Council II as a historical reality, as does Econe, and who interpret Vatican Council II (LG 16, LG 8) as not being exceptions to AG 7 of Vatican Council II. Neither would AG 7 and LG 14 contradict itself for them, since there can be no known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus in the present times.
-Lionel Andrades

Medugorje

Video: Medugorje is a false apparition
http://ghyheart.wordpress.com/


December 11, 2012
Medugorje comment
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/12/medugorje-comment.html#links
 
 
I think Our Lady is appearing in Medugorje in a special way
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/04/i-think-our-lady-is-appearing-in.html#links
-Lionel Andrades
 
P.s There is a video on Medugorje (Medugorje is a false apparition ) narrated by John Vennari in which he affirms the defined dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. Yet he does not correct the leadership of the Society of St.Pius X(SSPX), with whom he is associated,  when the SSPX say that being saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire are known exceptions in the present time to the defined dogma.
Also he interprets LG 16 (invincible ignorance) as being an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and to Ad Gentes 7 (all need faith and baptism for salvation). So he also maintains  that Vatican Council II contradicts the traditional teaching on other religions and ecumenism. This is the very point on which he is critical of Medugorje.
 
If Vatican Council II has exceptions for him then there are exceptions also to the dogma on exclusive salvation.
 

Questions And Answers on Salvation by Rev.Michael Muller - not contradicted by Vatican Council II

Questions And Answers on Salvation

by Rev. Michael Muller, C.SS.R.
(This article was first published in 1875)

1. Do all admit that the Catholic Church is the first and the oldest Church, and, consequently the Church established by Jesus Christ?
That the Catholic Church is the first and oldest and consequently the Church established by Jesus Christ, is and must be admitted by all, because it is a fact clearly proven by Scripture and by history.
2. Who bear witness to this fact?
The Jews and the Gentiles bear witness to it, and even Protestants themselves acknowledge it, because, if asked why they call themselves Protestants, they answer: “Because we protest against the Catholic Church.”
3. What follows from this answer?
That the Catholic Church is older than Protestantism; otherwise they could not have protested against her.
4. If we go still farther back and ask the Greeks how they came into existence, what will be their answer?
The Greek Church must answer: “We began by separating from the Catholic Church in the ninth century.”
5. What follows from this?
That the Catholic Church existed for eight hundred years before the Greek Church began, and consequently, it is older than the Greek Church.
6. If we thus go back to the very days of the Apostles, what do we find everywhere in regard to the manner in which religious sects arose?
If we go back to the days of the Apostles, we find that every sect separated from the Catholic Church, and therefore we see Calvinists, Kilhamites, Quakers, Shakers, Panters, Seekers, Jumpers, Reformed Methodists, German Methodists, Wesleyan Methodists, Baptists, Particular Baptists, Hardshell Baptists, Softshell Baptists, Forty-Gallon Baptists, Sixty-Gallon Baptists, Mennonites, Millerites, Universalists, Congregationalists, Presbyterians, Mormons, Christian Perfectionists, etc., etc., etc.
7. Is it not all the same to God whatever religion a person professes?
If it were all the same to God whatever religion a person professes, God would not have forbidden, in the First Commandment, to worship Him in any other than in the true religion. Nor would Christ have solemnly declared: “He who will not hear the Church let him be to thee as the heathen and the publican.” (Matt. 18:17.)
8. Who, then, will be saved?
Christ has solemnly declared that only those will be saved who have done God’s will on earth as explained, not by private interpretation, but by the infallible teaching of the Roman Catholic Church. “Not everyone,” says Christ, “who saith to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ shall enter the kingdom of heaven; but he that doth the will of My Father Who is in heaven, he shall enter the kingdom of heaven.” (Matt. 7:21.) The will of the heavenly Father is that all men hear and believe His Son, Jesus Christ. “This is My beloved Son. Hear Him.” (Luke 9:35.)
9. Must, then, all who wish to be saved, die united to the Catholic Church?
All those who wish to be saved, must die united to the Catholic Church. For out of her there is no salvation, because only she teaches what Jesus Christ requires of everyone to be saved, and because only to her did Christ leave the means to obtain all the graces necessary for salvation. Hence Jesus said to His Apostles and to all their lawful successors: “Go and teach all nations: teach them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you. He that believeth not all these things shall be condemned.”
Our Divine Savior says: “No one can come to the Father, except through Me.”If we then wish to enter heaven, we must be united to Christ – to His [Mystical] Body, which is the Church, as Saint Paul says. Therefore outside the Church there is no salvation.
Again, Jesus Christ says: “Who-ever will not hear the Church, look upon him as a heathen and a publican,” a great sinner. Therefore outside the Church there is no salvation.
Holy Scripture says: “The Lord added daily to the Church such as should be saved.” (Acts 2:47.) Therefore the Apostles believed and the Holy Scriptures teach that there is no salvation out of the Church.
10. What did Saint Augustine and the other Bishops of Africa, at the Council of Zirta, in 412, say about the salvation of those who die outside the Roman Catholic Church?
“Whosoever,” they said, is separated from the Catholic Church, however commendable in his own opinion his life may be, he shall for the very reason that he is separated from the union of Christ not see life, but the wrath of God abideth on him.” (John 3:36.)
11. What does Saint Cyprian say about the salvation of those who die outside of the Roman Catholic Church?
Saint Cyprian says: “He who has not the Church for his mother cannot have God for his Father.” And with him the Fathers of the Church in general say that, “as all those who were not in the ark of Noah perished in the waters of the deluge, so shall perish all who are out of the true Church.”
12. Who are out of the pale of the Roman Catholic Church?
Out of the pale of the Roman Catholic Church are all unbaptized and all excommunicated persons, all apostates, unbelievers, and heretics.
Infidels and Apostates
13. How do we know that unbaptized persons are not saved?
That unbaptized persons are not saved, we know from Christ, Who said: “Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Ghost, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.” (John 3:5.) For God cannot unite Himself to such souls in heaven on account of original sin, with which they are defiled.
14. How do we know that persons justly excommunicated who are unwilling to do what is required of them before they are absolved, are not saved?
Persons justly excommunicated, who are not willing to do what is required of them before they are absolved, are not saved, because the sin of great scandal, for which they were as dead members expelled from the communion of the Church, excludes them from the kingdom of heaven.
15. Which Catholics are excommunicated?
All those Catholics are excommunicated, who are members of secret societies, which have been excommunicated [condemned] by the Church, such as Freemasonry, and other societies affiliated with it under various names.
16. Why have several Popes solemnly excommunicated all Freemasonry?
All Freemasons have been solemnly excommunicated by several Popes on account of the main object and spirit of Freemasonry, to establish heathenism or the Church of Satan all over the world:
  1. By upsetting governments to obtain for themselves the power of governing and making impious laws for their subjects;
  2. By trying to overthrow the Catholic Church, which teaches and maintains the rights and laws of God and civil society;
  3. By spreading immoral and impious principles through the infidel press and other satanic means;
  4. By establishing public schools for the infidel education of youth.
17. Is this main object and spirit known to all Freemasons?
This satanic object and spirit is known only to the members of the highest grades of Freemasonry. But it is sufficiently known to all from the works and speeches of Freemasons, and therefore every member, even of the lowest grade, is guilty of the foul deeds of this satanic society.
18. How do we know that apostates are not saved?
Apostates from the Catholic Faith are not saved, because to fall away from the Faith is a great sin, which makes one lose the kingdom of heaven.*
*Apostasy, or the failing away from the true Faith, is a kind of infidelity. As the virtue of true faith unites us with God, so the sin of apostasy separates us from Him. As the real loss of faith is a total separation from God and His Holy Church, it is called apostasy of perfidy. Whoever is guilty of this kind of apostasy, is deprived of grace and of all other means of salvation, for, “Faith is the life of the soul: the just man lives by faith.” (Rom. 1: 17.) “When the soul, the life of the body.” says Saint Thomas Aquinas, “has left the body, all its natural powers and physical organization begin to be dissolved. In like manner, when true faith, the life of the soul is totally destroyed, a mortal disorder, a spiritual contagion, pervades all the members and faculties of the body, which are the instruments of the soul.” Hence it is, that the apostate uses every faculty of his soul and body to pervert others, by inducing them to renounce the Faith which he himself has renounced to his own perdition. “It had been better for them (heretics and apostates) not to have known the way of justice than, after having known it, to turn away from it.” (II Peter 2: 21.) “Woe to you ungodly men,” says Holy Writ, “woe to you who have forsaken the law of the Most High Lord! If you be born, you shall be born in rnalediction, and if you die, in malediction shall be your position. The ungodly shall pass from malediction to destruction; the name of the ungodly shall be blotted out.” (Ecclus. xli: 11-14 )
19. How many kinds of infidels or unbelievers are there?
There are three kinds of infidels or unbelievers:
(1) Those who are guilty of the sin of infidelity;
(2) those who are not guilty of the sin of infidelity, but commit other great sins; and (3) those who are not guilty of the sin of infidelity, and live up to the dictates of their conscience.
20. What kind of infidels are guilty of the sin of infidelity?
All those unbaptized persons are guilty, who do not embrace the true religion, although the truths thereof have been sufficiently made known to them – like many of the Jews of whom our Lord said that they had no excuse for their sins, because He had spoken to them.
All those unbaptized persons are guilty, who have received sufficient light to know the truth, or at least to understand the danger of their position, and the obligation of making diligent inquiries to ascertain and embrace the truth, but neglect to do so.
And all those are guilty of the sin of infidelity, who willfully deny the truth and obstinately resist it.
21. Why is it that positive infidels are not saved?
Positive infidels are not saved because, “positive infidelity, being willful obstinacy, palpable contradiction, and public contempt of divine revelation and of the precepts of the Gospel, is one of the most grievous sins in the sight of God and of His Holy Church,” says Saint Thomas Aquinas.
22. Explain the grievousness of the sin of infidelity?
Mortal sin is a deviation from virtue and divine law. The most heinous sin, therefore, is that which separates man from God more than any other. Now, no sin causes a greater separation from God than that of positive infidelity. When the intellect is in error and abandons the knowledge of God, the will follows it and increases in malice in proportion as the intellect turns away from the path of truth, justice, and charity. Each step that such a man takes in the darkness of infidelity, increases the distance that separates him from God. A return from that dangerous course is very difficult, for when the intellect is in error and the will is filled with malice and depravity, all the bonds capable of uniting man to God are torn asunder.
If such men die in this disposition of mind they are infallibly lost, says Saint Thomas. “Without faith it is impossible to please God.” (Heb. 11:6.)
23. Which kind of infidels are not guilty of the sin of infidelity, but commit other grievous sins?
Those who are not guilty of the sin of infidelity, but commit other grievous sins, are all those unbaptized persons who never had an opportunity of knowing the true religion, or of becoming aware of the obligation of seeking and embracing it, but who do not live up to the dictates of their conscience.
24. Will this class of infidels be lost?
This class of infidels will be lost, not on account of their infidelity, which was no sin for them, but on account of other grievous sins which they committed against their conscience. “For whosoever have sinned without the law,” says Saint Paul, “shall perish without the law.” (Romans 2:12.)
25. Will those infidels be lost, who are not guilty of the sin of infidelity and live up to their conscience?
Of those infidels who are not guilty of the sin of infidelity and are faithful in obeying the voice of their conscience, Saint Thomas Aquinas says: “If anyone was brought up in the wilderness or among brute beasts, and if he followed the law of nature to desire what is good, and to avoid what is wicked, we should certainly believe that God, by an inward inspiration, would reveal to him what he should believe, or would send someone to preach the Faith to him, as He sent Peter to Cornelius.”
Heresy Explained
26. What is the meaning of the word “heretic”?
The word “heretic” is derived from the Greek, and means “a chooser.”
27. What is a heretic?
A heretic is any baptized person, professing Christianity, and choosing for himself what to believe and what not to believe as he pleases, in obstinate opposition to any particular truth which he knows is taught by the Catholic Church as a truth revealed by God.
28. How many things, then, are required to make a person guilty of the sin of heresy?
To make a person guilty of the sin of heresy, three things are required:
  1. He must be baptized and profess Christianity. This distinguishes him from a Jew and idolater;
  2. He must refuse to believe a truth revealed by God, and taught by the Church as so revealed;
  3. He must obstinately adhere to error, preferring his own private judgment in matters of faith and morals to the infallible teaching of the Catholic Church.
29. How many kinds of heretics (Protestants) are there?
There are three kinds of heretics:
  1. Those who are guilty of the sin of heresy;
  2. Those who are not guilty of the sin of heresy, but commit other grievous sins;
  3. Those who are not guilty of the sin of heresy and live up to the dictates of their conscience.
30. Who are guilty of the sin of heresy?
Of the sin of heresy are guilty:
  1. All those baptized persons, who profess Christianity and obstinately reject a truth revealed by God and taught by the Church as so revealed;
  2. Those who embrace an opinion contrary to Faith, maintain it obstinately, and refuse to submit to the authority of the Catholic Church;
  3. Those who willfully doubt the truth of an article of Faith, for by such willful doubt they actually question God’s knowledge and truth, and to do this is to be guilty of heresy;
  4. Those who know the Catholic Church to be the only true Church, but do not embrace her faith;
  5. Those who could know the Church, if they would candidly search, but who, through indifference and other culpable motives, neglect to do so;
  6. Those who, like the Anglicans, think that they approach very near the Catholic Church, because their prayers and ceremonies are like many prayers and ceremonies of the Catholic Church, and because their Creed is the Apostles’ Creed. These are heretics in principle, for, “The real character of rank heresy,” says St. Thomas Aquinas, “consists in want of submission to the divine teaching authority in the Head of the Church.”
31. Why are true heretics lost?
True heretics are lost because by rejecting the divine Teacher–the Catholic Church–they reject all divine teaching, to do which is one of the greatest sins. Hence Pope Pius IX spoke of Protestantism in all its forms as “the great revolt against God,” it being an attempt to substitute a human for a divine authority, and a declaration of the creature’s independence from the Creator. For this reason Holy Scripture condemns heresy in the strongest terms. “A man,” says St. Paul, “that is a heretic, after the first and second admonition, avoid; knowing that he who is such an one is subverted, and sinneth, being condemned by his own judgment.” (Tit. 3: 10) And again he says: “Though we, or an angel from heaven, preach a Gospel to you besides that which we have preached to you, let him be anathema,” that is, “accursed.” (Gal. 1:29).
Heretics are lost because they have no divine Faith. “To reject but one article of Faith taught by the Church,” says St. Thomas Aquinas, “is enough to destroy Faith, as one mortal sin is enough to destroy Charity.” For the virtue of Faith does not consist merely in adhering to the Holy Scriptures, and in revering them as the Word of God; it consists principally in submitting our intellect and will to the divine authority of the true Church charged by Jesus Christ to expound them. “I would not believe the Holy Scriptures,” says St. Augustine, “were it not for the divine authority of the Church.” He, therefore, who despises and rejects this authority, cannot have true Faith. If he admits some supernatural truths, they are but simple opinions, as he makes those truths depend on his private judgment.
And as divine Faith is the beginning of salvation, the foundation and source of justification, and is found only in the true Church, it is clear that there is no salvation for one as long as he is a heretic.
Heresy denies all Faith
32. Have heretics faith in Jesus Christ?
Saint Thomas Aquinas says: “It is absurd for a heretic to say that he believes in Jesus Christ. To believe in a person is to give our full consent to his word and to all he teaches. True Faith, therefore, is absolute belief in Jesus Christ and in all he taught. Hence, he who does not adhere to all that Jesus Christ has prescribed for our salvation, has no more the doctrine of Jesus Christ and of His Church, than the pagans, Jews, and Turks have.” “He is,” says Jesus Christ, “but a heathen and a publican”; and therefore he will be condemned to hell.
33. Show how Protestants have no absolute faith in Christ.
Jesus Christ says: “Hear the Church.” “No,” say Luther and all Protestants, “do not hear the Church; protest against her with all your might.”
Jesus Christ says: “If anyone will not hear the Church, look upon him as a heathen and a publican.” “No,” says Protestantism, “if anyone does not hear the Church, look upon him as an apostle, an ambassador of God.”
Jesus Christ says: “The gates of hell shall not prevail against My Church.” “No,” says Protestantism. ” ‘Tis false, the gates of hell have prevailed against the Church for a thousand years and more.”
Jesus Christ has declared Saint Peter and every successor to Saint Peter–the Pope–to be His Vicar on earth. “No,” says Protestantism, “the Pope is Anti-Christ.”
Jesus Christ says: “My yoke is sweet, and my burden light.” (Matt. 11:30.) “No,” said Luther and Calvin, “it is impossible to keep the Commandments.”
Jesus Christ says: “if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.” (Matt. 19:17.) “No,” said Luther and Calvin, “faith alone, without good works, is sufficient to enter into life everlasting.”
Jesus Christ says: “Unless you do penance, you shall all likewise perish.” (Luke 3:3.) “No,” said Luther and Calvin, “fasting and other works of penance are not necessary in satisfaction for sin.”
Jesus Christ says: “This is my body.” “No,” said Calvin, “this is only the figure of Christ’s Body; it will become His Body as soon as you receive It.”
Jesus Christ says: “I say to you, that whosoever shall put away his wife, and shall marry another, committeth adultery; and he that shall marry her that is put away, committeth adultery.” (Matt. 19:9.) “No,” say Luther and all Protestants, to a married man, “you may put away your wife, get a divorce, and marry another.”
Jesus Christ says to every man: “Thou shalt not steal.” “No,” said Luther to secular princes, “I give you the right to appropriate to yourselves the property of the Roman Catholic Church.”
34. Do heretics speak in this manner also of the Holy Ghost and the Apostles?
They do. The Holy Ghost says in Holy Scripture: “Man knoweth not whether he be worthy of love or hatred.” (Eccles. 9:1.) “Who can say: My heart is clean, I am pure from sin?” (Prov. 20:9.) And, “Work out your salvation with fear and trembling” (Philip. 2:12). “No,” said Luther and Calvin, “but whosoever believes in Jesus Christ, is in the state of grace.”
Saint Paul says: “If I should have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, and have not charity, I am nothing.” (I Cor. 13:2.) “No,” said Luther and Calvin, “faith alone is sufficient to save us.”
Saint Peter says that in the Epistles of Saint Paul there are many things “hard to be understood, which the unlearned and unstable wrest, as also the other Scriptures, to their own perdition.” (II Pet. 3:16.) “No,” said Luther and Calvin, “the Scriptures are very plain, and easy to be understood.”
Saint James says: “Is anyone sick among you? Let him bring in the priests of the Church, and let them pray over him, anointing him with oil, in the name of the Lord” (Chapter 5, verse 14). “No,” said Luther and Calvin, “that is a vain and useless ceremony.”
35. Now, do you think God the Father will admit into heaven those who thus contradict His Son Jesus Christ, the Holy Ghost, and the Apostles?
No, He will let them have their portion with Lucifer in hell, who first rebelled against Christ, and who is the father of liars.
36. Can a Christian be saved, who has left the true Church of Christ, the Holy Catholic Church?
No, because the Church of Christ is the kingdom of God on earth, and he who leaves that kingdom, shuts himself out from the kingdom of Christ in heaven.
37. Have Protestants left the true Church of Christ?
Protestants left the true Church of Christ in their founders, who left the Catholic Church either through pride or through the passion of lust and covetousness.
38. What will be the punishment of those who willfully rebel against the Holy Catholic Church?
Those who willfully rebel against the Holy Catholic Church, will, like Lucifer and the other rebellious angels, be cast into the everlasting flames of hell. “He who will not hear the Church,” says Christ, “let him be to thee as the heathen and publican.” (Matt. 18:17.)
39. But if a Protestant should say: “I have nothing to do with Luther or Calvin or Henry VIII or John Knox, I go by the Bible,” what would you answer him?
In that case, you adopt, and go by, the principles and spirit of the authors of heresies, and you change the written Word of God into the word of man, because you interpret Holy Scripture in your own private manner, giving it that meaning which you choose to give it, and thus, instead of believing the Word of God, you believe rather your own private interpretation of it, which is but the word of man. Hence, Saint Augustine says: “You who believe what you please, and reject what you please, believe yourselves or your own fancy rather than the Gospel.”
Inculpable ignorance
40. Which Protestants are not guilty of the sin of heresy, but commit other great sins?
Those who are Protestants without their fault and who never had an opportunity of knowing better, are not guilty of the sin of heresy; but if they do not live up to the dictates of their conscience, they will be lost, not on account of their heresy, which for them was no sin, but on account of other grievous sins which they committed.
41. Will those heretics be saved, who are not guilty of the sin of heresy, and are faithful in living up to the dictates of their conscience?
Inculpable ignorance of the true religion excuses a heathen from the sin of infidelity, and a Protestant from the sin of heresy. But such ignorance has never been the means of salvation. From the fact that a person who lives up to the dictates of his conscience, and who cannot sin against the true religion on account of being ignorant of it, many have drawn the false conclusion that such a person is saved, or, in other words, is in the state of sanctifying grace, thus making ignorance a means of salvation or justification.
If we sincerely wish not to make great mistakes in explaining the great revealed truth, “Out of the Church there is no salvation,” we must remember:
  1. That there are four great truths of salvation, which everyone must know and believe in order to be saved;
  2. That no one can go to heaven unless he is in the state of sanctifying grace;
  3. That, in order to receive sanctifying grace, the soul must be prepared for it by divine Faith, Hope, Charity, true sorrow for sin with the firm purpose of doing all that God requires the soul to believe and to do, in order to be saved;
  4. That this preparation of the soul cannot be brought by inculpable ignorance. And if such ignorance cannot even dispose the soul for receiving the grace of justification, it can much less give this grace to the soul. Inculpable ignorance has never been a means of grace or salvation, not even for the inculpably ignorant people that live up to their conscience. But of this class of ignorant persons we say, with Saint Thomas Aquinas, that God in His mercy will lead these souls to the knowledge of the necessary truths of salvation, even send them an angel, if necessary, to instruct them, rather than let them perish without their fault. If they accept this grace, they will be saved as Catholics.
Other questions
42. But is it not a very uncharitable doctrine to say that no one can be saved out of the Church?
On the contrary, it is a very great act of charity to assert most emphatically, that out of the Catholic Church there is no salvation possible; for Jesus Christ and His Apostles have taught this doctrine in very plain language. He who sincerely seeks the truth is glad to hear it, and embrace it, in order to be saved.
43. But is it not said in Holy Scripture: “He that feareth God, and worketh justice, is acceptable to Him “?
This is true. But we must remember that he who fears God, will also believe all the truths that God has revealed, as Cornelius did (Acts, Chapter X). He believes Jesus Christ when He speaks to us through the pastors of His Church. But he who does not believe all the truths that God has revealed, but instead believes and rejects whatever he chooses, does not fear God, and cannot work justice. “He that believeth not the Son of God” – Jesus Christ – “maketh Him a liar,” says Saint John (I John 5:10); and will, on this account, be condemned to hell.
44. But are there not many who would lose the affections of their friends, their comfortable homes, their temporal goods, and prospects in business, were they to become Catholics? Would not Jesus Christ excuse them under such circumstances from becoming Catholics?
As to the affection of friends, Jesus Christ has solemnly declared: “He who loveth father or mother more than Me, is not worthy of Me; and he that loveth son or daughter more than Me, is not worthy of Me.” (Matt. 10:37.) And as to the loss of temporal gain He has answered: “What shall it profit a man if he gain the whole world and suffer the loss of his soul?” (Mark 8:36.)
45. But would it not be enough for such a one to be a Catholic in heart only, without professing his religion publicly?
No, for Jesus Christ has solemnly declared that, “He who shall be ashamed of Me and My words, of him the Son of Man shall be ashamed when He shall come in His majesty, and that of His Father, and of the holy angels.” (Luke 9:26.)
46. But might not such a one safely put off being received into the Church till the hour of death?
To put off being received into the Church till the hour of death is to abuse the mercy of God, and to expose oneself to the danger of losing the light and grace of Faith, and die a reprobate.
47. What else keeps many from becoming Catholics?
Many know very well that, if they become Catholics, they must lead honest and sober lives, be pure, and check their sinful passions, and this they are unwilling to do. “Men love darkness rather than light,” says Jesus Christ, “because their deeds are evil.” There are none so deaf as those that will not hear.
48. What follows from the fact that salvation can be found only in the Roman Catholic Church?
It follows that it is very impious for anyone to think and to say that it matters little what a man believes provided he be an honest man.
49. What answer can you give to a man who speaks thus?
A man who says, “it matters little what a man believes, provided he be an honest man,” I would ask whether or not he believed that his honesty and justice were so great as that of the Scribes and Pharisees in the Gospel. They were constant in prayer; they paid tithes according to the law, gave great alms, fasted twice a week, and compassed the sea and land to make a convert and bring him to the knowledge of the true God.
50. What did Jesus Christ say of this justice of the Pharisees?
He says: “Unless your justice shall exceed that of the Scribes and Pharisees, you shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.” (Matt. 5:20.)
51. Was, then, the righteousness of the Pharisees very defective in the sight of God?
The righteousness of the Pharisees was most undoubtedly very defective. Their righteousness was all outward show and ostentation. They did good only to be praised and admired by men; but within their souls they were full of impurity and malice. They were lewd hypocrites, who concealed great vices under the beautiful appearance of love for God, charity to the poor, and severity to themselves. Their devotion consisted in exterior acts, and they despised all who did not live as they did. They were strict in the religious observances of human traditions, but scrupled not to violate the Commandments of God.
52. What are we then to think of those who say: “It matters little what a man believes, provided he be honest?”
Of those who say this, we think that their exterior honesty, like that of the Pharisees, may be sufficient to keep them out of prison, but not out of hell.
Pius IX answers
53. But did not Pope Pius IX say that all men, however alienated from Catholic union they remain, are alike in the way of salvation and may obtain life everlasting?
To this calumnious report of certain newspapers, Pope Pius IX replied: “in our times, many of the enemies of the Catholic Faith direct their efforts towards placing every monstrous opinion on the same level with the doctrine of Christ, or confounding it therewith; and so they try more and more to propagate that impious system of the indifference of religions. But quite recently–we shudder to say–certain men have not hesitated to slander us by saying that we share in their folly, favor that most wicked system, and think so benevolently of every class of mankind as to suppose that not only the sons of the Church, but that the rest also, however alienated from Catholic unity they may remain, are alike in the way of salvation, and may arrive at everlasting life. We are at a loss, from horror, to find words to express our detestation of this new and atrocious injustice that is done us.
We love, indeed, all mankind with the inmost affection of our heart, yet not otherwise than in the love of God and our Lord Jesus Christ, Who came to seek and to save that which had perished, Who died for all, Who wills all men to be saved, and to come to the knowledge of the truth; Who, therefore, sent His disciples into the whole world to preach the Gospel to every creature, proclaiming that those who should believe and be baptized should be saved, but that those who should not believe should be condemned.
Let those, therefore, who wish to be saved, come to the pillar and the ground of Faith, which is the Church; let them come to the true Church of Christ, which, in her bishops and in the Roman Pontiff, the chief head of all, has the succession of apostolical authority which has never been interrupted, which has never counted anything of greater importance than to preach, and by all means to keep and defend the doctrine proclaimed by the Apostles at Christ’s command.” (Allocution to the Cardinals held on December 17, 1847.)
54. What conclusion, therefore, should every non-Catholic draw from this conviction?
From this conviction, every non-Catholic should draw the practical conclusion to become a Catholic. For when there is a question about eternal salvation and eternal damnation, a sensible man will take the surest way to heaven.
 
 
Note: When Vatican Counciil II is interpreted with Feeneyism instead of the familar Cushingism it does not contradict what Fr.Michael Miller has written above. Since LG 16( invincible ignorance), LG 8(elements of sanctification and grace) are not known exceptions to AG 7( all need faith and baptism for salvation).There are no visible exceptions to the dogma on salvation according to Feeneyism
So the teaching of the Catholic Church on exclusive salvation is the same, before and after Vatican Council II.
-Lionel Andrades