German bishops are ripe for schism

The German bishops are openly rejecting the Church's teaching on mortal sin and the Eucharist and are giving the Eucharist to Protestants and the divorced and remarried.

For them there are exceptions to the traditional teaching  on salvation , based on the their irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II .

If you would tell them Protestants cannot receive the Eucharist they would tell you , like Pope Benedict, that there is salvation outside the Church according to Vatican Council II( UR 3 etc).So if ecclesiology can be changed says  the German Cardinal Walter Kasper  then why not mortal theology. Everything us open to change theologically.

The German Pope Benedict  confirmed this in 2016 when he said that EENS was no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century.Pope Benedict also cited Vatican Council II as being responsible for this change.The German bishops think the same.

Now the new Superior General of the SSPX  seems to realize that there is a precise mistake in Vatican Council II.It was  unknown to Bishop Bernard Fellay and Archbishop Lefebvre.There are literally thousands of reports on the Internet on this subject.The reports says there are no known exceptions to the dogma EENS mentioned in Vatican Council II.Catholics have been mis-reading Vatican Council II.The German bishops too have been mis-reading the Council.A rational reading of the Council support the past ecclesiology of the Church and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).

So now when the German bishops can no more cite UR 3 as an exception to the strict interpretation of EENS then what do they do they do?

Where are the citations in Vatican Council II to reject EENS and the past ecclesiology?

There are none . There were none.

What will be their reaction when the rank and file German Catholic points this out to them?

How can they say they were wrong  about Vatican Council these 50 years? How can they say Protestants are outside the Church according to Vatican Council II since they don't have Catholic faith with the baptism of water in the Catholic Church( AG 7, LG 14)?

So when this is told to them by the  media in Germany will they revert to the old irrational interpretation of the Council ?

Will they excommunicate those Catholics who endorse Vatican Council II but interpret it rationally?

Where will Cardinal Ladaria be in all this? Will he convert the German bishops or will he continue to support the error as he does presently ?

Will Archbishop Guido Pozzo offer Mass in Germany with the obsolete interpretation of Vatican Council II, since it is politically  correct?

Will the two popes agree theological or will the German bishops just quit the Church in a schism, supported by the Left ?   -Lionel Andrades



Tags from the right hand side bar :   Click to access

• German Bishops (1)
• German bishops and the Vatican are hiding a secret- 1 (5)
• German Bishops and Vatican Council II Feeneyite (6)
• German Bishops and Vatican Council II lies (9)
• German bishops and Vatican hide a secret (4)
• German bishops are ripe for schism(1)
• German bishops go into schism? (4)
• German bishops interpret Vatican Council II with philosophical error (6)
• German Bishops to go into schism ?(8)
• German Vocations and the lie (1)

• Graphics (German Bishops) (4)

Pope Francis' Holy Mass is a sacrilege for him even if it is valid : public mortal sins of faith, rejection of de fide doctrine with an irrational premise and inference

To understand how the present two popes and the ecclesiastics at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) are in heresy and  offer Holy Mass in sacrilege it is important to think clearly on some subjects.

It needs to be kept in mind that the baptism of desire ( BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance (I.I) never ever were exceptions t the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.This is fundamental.

Once this is understood it will be easier to see that  in Vatican Council II, LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, refer also to only hypothetical and theoretical cases. They are not references to non Catholics physically visible in 2018.They are not known people in the present times saved outside the Church.

Once this is clear and accepted we can interpret Catholic doctrine and theology clearly and rationally. We can avoid heresy and also observe that the Mass being offered by the two popes and ecclesiastics in general is a sacrilege for them.

Since they reason that BOD, BOB and I.I refer to known non Catholics saved outside the Church, EENS is obsolete.It is rejected.

They reject traditional traditional EENS and this was confirmed by Pope Benedict ( March 1,2016 Avvenire). In public he heretically said that the dogma EENS was no more, for him, like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century.

He also confirmed that Vatican Council II was a rupture with the dogma EENS as it was interpreted in the 16th century.

So Pope Benedict and Pope Francis do not interpret LG 8 etc in Vatican Council II as not being an exception to EENS. I is an exeption for them. It is a rupture with the past.A break with Tradition.

I instead affirm Vatican Council II in harmony with EENS. I am not rejecting Vatican Council II.
For the traditionalists  LG 8 etc are exceptions to traditional EENS.So they reject the Council. This is heresy for me.

For the liberals and ecclesiastics and popes too  LG 8 is an exception to EENS. So they accept Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition. This to is heresy for me.

I affirm Vatican Council II unlike the traditionalists and for me the Council is not a rupture with EENS as it is for the present two popes and the CDF.

The present  two popes and many of the traditionalists, have rejected the Athanasius Creed.It says outside the Church there is no salvation.For them outside the Church there is salvation.

They have changed the understanding of the Nicene Creed to, 'I believe in three or more known baptisms( desire, blood and ignorance) as they exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church'. This is first class heresy in the hierarchy of truths of Pope John Paul II.

They interpret all the Catechisms irrationally where the BOD,BOB and I.I are mentioned.This creates a rupture with EENS, Syllabus of Errors ( ecumenism of return) and the past ecclesiology of the Church.

So a priest who changes all these teachings of the Church and offers Holy Mass would be in a sacrilege.

The same would apply to Pope Francis and Pope Benedict. Also Cardinal Ladaria and Archbishop Pozzo offer Holy Mass in sacrilege.
There is no denial from them.
They do not deny that they affirm the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS.
They do not say that they affirm Vatican Council II and the Catechism in harmony with the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma EENS and that Vatican Council II is Feeneyite at Ad Gentes 7.While LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc are not exceptions to AG 7. 
But LG 8 is an exception to AG 7 for them.Vatican Council II contradicts itself for them. Not for me.
They do not say that BOD, BOB and I.I refer to only hypothetical and theoretical cases. They are not objective examples of non Catholics saved outside the Church in the present times.
They will not affirm the Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation.
They will not interpret the Nicene Creed like the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century.
When they recite the Apostles Creed and say ' I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Holy Catholic Church' they mean the Holy Spirit teaches the Church to say there is known salvation outside the Church and that BOD, BOB and I.I refer to visible exceptions to EEBS. They are examples of non Catholics saved outside the Church.So the dogma EENS as taught by the Holy Spirit in the past is now obsolete...
This is all a mortal sin of faith just as there are mortal sins in morals.
So the Mass offered by Pope Francis, though valid,is a sacrilege for him.He is in public mortal sin and is automatically excommunicated.
He needs to acknoweldge his sins of faith. Be sorry for them and receive absolution in the Sacrament of Reconciliation and then end the scandal in public.
Even a pope can commit a sin and he needs to receive absolution in Confession.
This is not written not to condemn but so that a correction can be issued. The popes and the CDF simply have to announce that BOD,BOB and I.I refer to hypothetical cases only and not objective people saved outside the Church and everything will come into place. It is as simple as that.
-Lionel Andrades

NOVEMBER 23, 2018

Pope Francis simply has to interpret the BOD, BOB and I.I as not being exceptions to EENS : heresy and sacrilege end (Graphics )

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/11/pope-francis-sumply-has-to-interpret.html

NOVEMBER 23, 2018

Should not the cardinals and bishops also interpret BOD, BOB and I.I rationally and set an example for the pope?  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/11/should-not-cardinals-and-bishops-also.html

NOVEMBER 22, 2018

St.Alphonsus Liguori says that if a priest is in mortal sin do not go up to receive the Eucharist from him - but what about a pope ? https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/11/stalphonsus-liguori-says-that-if-priest.html

-Lionel Andrades

AUGUST 10, 2018

Chris Ferrara, Mons.Clifford Joseph Fenton, Fr. John Hardon, Plinio Corrêa de Oliveira, Michael Davis, Dietrich von Hildebrand, Attila Guimares, Fr. Nicholas Gruner, John Vennari and others did not know about it

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/08/chris-ferrara-monsclifford-joseph.html

__________________________________________
__________________________________________

This grieving girl witnessed her father travel from purgatory to heaven

All because she had three Masses said for the repose of his soul.

During the 17th century, a grieving young girl approached Benedictine Abbot Millán de Mirando at the monastery of Our Lady of Montserrat. She begged the abbot to say three Masses for her deceased father.

The young girl was totally convinced that these Masses would speed her father on his way to heaven, releasing him from the pains of purgatory. Moved by the girl’s child-like faith, the abbot said the first Mass the next day.

During the Mass the young girl was kneeling and as she looked up she saw her father near the altar where the priest was saying the Mass. She described her father as “kneeling, surrounded by frightening flames” and located at the bottom step of the altar. The priest was alerted to this miraculous phenomenon and he instructed the girl to place a piece of tissue where her father was kneeling. The tissue immediately started on fire for all to see, though the priest could not see the child’s father. This represented her father being purified by the flames of purgatory.

A second Mass was said for the repose of her father’s soul and again the little girl saw her father. This time he was up a step standing next to the deacon and was “dressed in a vibrantly colored suit.” At this stage her father was still in purgatory, but no longer touched by its flames.

At the third Mass she saw her father for the last time. During the Eucharistic celebration he was “dressed in a snow-white suit,” but then something extraordinary happened at the conclusion of Mass. The little girl exclaimed, “There is my father going away and rising into the sky!” She no longer had to worry about the soul of her father as she knew with confidence that he had reached the gates of heaven.

 

Read more:

5 Ways to pray for the Holy Souls in Purgatory

 

Read more:

3 Little-known details about Purgatory

 

Read more:

Masses for the Living: A True Act of Mercy, In Any Year

Continued
https://aleteia.org/2017/11/02/this-grieving-girl-witnessed-her-father-travel-from-purgatory-to-heaven/