Saturday, May 26, 2018

Marcia per la Vita - Roma 19 maggio 2018

Cardinal Raymond Burke has set an example for the sedevacantists too.

Image result for Photo of Cardinal Burke Voice of the Family COnference
Cardinal Raymond Burke has set an example for the sedevacantists too. He has showed them that they can affirm the Social Reign of Christ the King and the exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church and also Vatican Council II (Feeneyite).

Vatican Council II ( Cushingite), the only interpretation of Vatican Council II which the sedevacantists would know , would be a rupture with the exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church, the Syllabus of Errors and extra ecclesiam nulla salus. Since there is known salvation outside the Church with Cushingism, the teaching on mission would change and there would be no need to proclaim the Social Reign of Christ the King.-Lionel Andrades


FEENEYISM


   CUSHINGISM

 FALSE PREMISE




Cardinal Burke: False religions that permit abortion should be suppressed



Repost : Even members of the Lay Movements in the Catholic Church can proclaim the necessity of the Social Reign of Christ the King



TUESDAY, MAY 22, 2018


Repost : The beauty of the Catholic Church is not there in any other religion says a Catholic priest.There cannot be Christ without the Catholic Church



MAY 22, 2018
Repost : Catholic political party needed in England

TUESDAY, MAY 22, 2018


Repost : "There are no physically visible cases of the BOD,BOB and I.I in 2018" nor " LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, NA 2, UR 3, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to only hypothetical cases " so Vatican Council II does not contradict the Syllabus of Errors (Graphics)



Cardinal Raymond Burke could meet the leaders of Forza Nuova and Militia Christi in Italy just as he met Matteo Salvini : Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation could be explained


MAY 23, 2018


Left and right schism


MAY 23, 2018


In a secular state which allows freedom of religion there could be pro-Catholic political parties, supporting the faith and moral teachings of the Catholic Church, and affirming in their manifesto the Social Reign of Christ the King



THURSDAY, MAY 24, 2018


Cardinal Burke's reference to false religions not being paths to salvation is from Vatican Council II



THURSDAY, MAY 24, 2018


Cardinal Raymond Burke contradicts Cardinal Luiz Ladaria's heretical statement : interprets Lumen Gentium 8 rationally and traditionally


 MAY 24, 2018


Cardinal Burke has affirmed the exclusive understanding of salvation and also Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) : it supports the teaching on the Social Reign of Christ the King


 THURSDAY, MAY 24, 2018
Cardinal Raymond Burke has set an example for Catholics in general and traditionalists in particular since he has affirmed what I call Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) and rejected Vatican Council II (Cushingite)

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/05/cardinal-raymond-burke-has-set-example.html
___________________________________



 MAY 26, 2018




When the Most Holy Family Monastery(MHFM), sedevacantists affirm EENS the Vatican Curia,Catholics Answers and others could not defend themselves theologically http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/05/when-most-holy-family-monasterymhfm.html



MARCH 27, 2018









Sedevacantists can inform the Vatican and local bishops tht they are no more in sedevacantism because of Vatican Council II

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/03/sedevacantists-can-inform-vatican-and.html



















































































































































































TERMS EXPLAINED
Feeneyism: It is the old theology and philosophical reaoning which says there are no known exceptions past or present, to the dogma EENS.There are no explicit cases to contradict the traditional interpretation of EENS.
Cushingism: It is the new theology and philosophical reasoning, which assumes there are known exceptions, past and present, to the dogma EENS, on the need for all to formally enter the Church.It assumes that the baptism of desire etc are not hypothetical but objectively known.In principle hypothetical cases are objective in the present times.
Baptism of Desire (Feeneyite): It refers to the hypothetical case of an unknown catechumen who desires the baptism of water but dies before he receives it and is saved. Since this is an invisible case in our reality it is not relevant to the dogma EENS.
Baptism of Desire (Cushingite): It refers to the known case of a catechumen who desires the baptism of water but dies before he receives it and is saved. Since this is a visible case or the SSPX it is relevant to the dogma EENS.
Invincible Ignorance ( Feeneyite): This refers to the hypothetical case of someone allegedly saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church, since he was in ignorance.
Invincible Ignorance (Cushingite): This refers to the explicit case of someone allegedly saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church, since he was in ignorance.Since it is an exception to the dogma EENS it is assumed to be objectively known in particular cases.This reasoning is irrational.
Council of Florence: One of the three Councils which defined the dogma EENS.It did not mention any exceptions.It did not mention the baptism of desire. It was Feeneyite.
Liberal theologians: They reinterpreted the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance, as objective cases, known in the present times.They use Cushingism.
Vatican Council II (Cushingite): It refers to the interpretation of Vatican Council II withCushingism.LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer not to hypothetical but known cases in the present times. So Vatican Council II emerges as a break with the dogma EENS.
Vatican Council II (Feeneyite): It refers to the interpretation of Vatican Council II withFeeneyism.LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer to hypothetical cases, which are unknown personally in the present times.So Vatican Council II is not a break with EENS, the Syllabus of Errors, ecumenism of return, the Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite-one baptism),the teaching on the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation and the non separation of Church and State( since all need to convert into the Church to avoid Hell).
Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston: It assumed hypothetical cases were defacto known in the present times. So it presented the baptism of desire etc as an explicit exception, to the traditional interpretation of the dogma EENS.It censured Fr.Leonard Feeney and the St.Benedict Center.Since they did not assume that the baptism of desire referred to a visible instead of invisible case.The Letter made the baptism of desire etc relevant to EENs.From the second part of this Letter has emerged the New Theology.It was Cushingite.
Letter of the Holy Office 1949 ( Feeneyite). It means accepting the Letter as Feeneyite based on the first part,only .It supports Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.The traditional interpretatiion of the dogma EENS does not mention any exceptions.
Letter of the Holy Office ( Cushingite). It is based on the second part of the Letter.It rejects the traditional interpretation of EENS. Since it considers the baptism of desire ( Cushingite-explicit) and being saved in invincible ignorance ( Cushingite-explicit cases) as being exceptions to EENS ( Feeneyite).It worngly assumes hypothetical cases are objectively visible and so they are exceptions to the first part of the Letter.
Baltimore Catechism: It assumed that the desire for the baptism of an unknown catechumen, who dies before receiving it and was saved, was a baptism like the baptism of water. So it was placed in the Baptism Section of the catechism. In other words it was wrongly assumed that the baptism of desire is visible and repeatable like the baptism of water or that we can administer it like the baptism of water.The Baltimore Catechism is accepted with the confusion.It can be interpreted with Cushingism or Feeneyism.
Catechism of Pope X: It followed the Baltimore Catechism and placed the baptism of desire in the Baptism Section.It can be interpreted withCushingism or Feeneyism.
Nicene Creed ( Cushingite) ; It says 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins' and means there are more than three known baptisms. They are water, blood, desire, seeds of the Word etc.This is a Cushingite interpretation.
Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite): It says 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins and means there is one known baptism the baptism of water.It is Feeneyite.
New Theology: It refers to the new theology in the Catholic Church based on hypothetical cases being objective in the present times.So it eliminates the dogma EENS.With the dogma EENS made obsolete the ecclesiology of the Church changes. There is a new ecclesiology which is a break with Tradition.It's basis is Cushingism.
Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus ( Cushingite): .It refers to the dogma but with exceptions.All do not need to defacto convert into the Church in the present times, since there are exceptions.
Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus ( Feeneyite): It refers to the dogma as it was interpreted over the centuries.There are no known exceptions to all needing to formally enter the Church, with faith and baptism, to avoid Hell.
Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Cushingite): CCC 1257 contradicts the Principle of Non Contraduction. Also CCC 848 is based on the new theology and so is a rupture with the dogma EENS( Feeneyite).
Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Feeneyite): CCC 1257 does not contradict the Principle of Non Contradiction since there are no known exceptions to all needing the baptism of water for salvation. There are no known exceptions, since God is not limited to the Sacraments.
When CCC 846 states all who are saved are saved through Jesus and the Church,CCC 846 does not contradict the dogmatic teaching on all needin to formally enter the Church. CCC 846 does not contradict Ad Gentes 7 which states all need faith and baptism for salvatioon.

________________________