Papa Francesco parla sul virus di COVID ma non sul virus di falsa premessa, nella interpretazione di Concilio Vaticano II

 Papa Francesco parla sul virus di COVID ma non sul virus di falsa premessa, nella interpretazione di Concilio Vaticano II.

Per me il Battesimo di Desiderio (BDD) e invisibile fisicamente.

Questa e la mia premessa.

Per la Curia di diocese, BDD e visibile. Questa e loro premessa.

E visibile per loro e cosi BDD e una eccezione per il dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS)e il Credo Niceno che dice che tutti bisogna Fede Cattolica per salvezza.

Per me salvezza nel invincibile ignoranza(I.I)fuori della Chiesa Cattolica, cioe senza fede e battisma, e invisible. Questa è la mia premessa.

Per loro Lumen Gentium 16 ( invincible ignoranza) referisce a casi visibile, oggetivo e non ipotetici.Per loro, una persona che esiste nel 1965-2021, per esempio, , qualquno conosociuto, puo diventa una eccezione per il dogma EENS e Credo Atanasio.

Ma dove e questi persone?

Chi e suoi nome?

C e nessuno. Solo Dio lo sa se una persona ha ricevuto salvezza fuori della Chiesa. Non c'e casi oggetivi sulla terra per noi.Ma questa e loro premessa.Invisibili casi sono invisibili.

Invisibili case non sono visibili eccezioni per il dogma EENS ecc.

Cosi per il Diocese, la stretta e 'rigorosa' interpretazione di EENS e osoleto.

BDD e II.I ci sono eccezioni per EENS. 

Invece io accetto BDD e I.I come ipotetici solo. Accetto BDD,I.I e EENS. Entrambi. Non c'e contradizione per me.

Qualcuno che è invisibili non puo diventa una pratica eccezione per EENS.

Ho accetto l'interpretazione tradizionale di EENS come i Gesuiti di 16° secoli.

Cosi Concilio Vaticano II (LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3 ecc.) è una rottura con EENS per vescovo Gino Reali e suo Curia, nel diocese di Porta Santa Rufina, Roma, ma non per me.

Perche nostri premesse sono differente.

In futuro Papa Francescoe e la Chiesa possono cambiare suoi interpretazione di Concilio Vaticano II . Fanno come me.

Diventeranno una Chiesa Cattolica zenza la falsa premessa.Una Chiesa vaccinata.

Ma oggi spesso io non posso faccio una discussione con altri Cattolici sulla Fede.Perche nostri premessa e inferenza sono differente.

Anche il nuovo moto proprio di Papa Francesco, Spiritus Domini, referisce a Concilio Vaticano II con la false premessa. Questa e una causa di divisione- dottrinale nella Chiesa.Con la falsa premessa che creo una false rottura con Tradizione  loro no sono onesta. Non e eticale. E una bugia proprio nella Chiesa.

I Giudici, secolari e Canonisti, fanno la stessa errore oggettivo.

Anche i Lefebvristi e sedevacantisti fanno la stessa errore. Usano la virus di false premessa, in una pandemia teologo nella Chiesa Cattolica.- Lionel Andrades

E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com

Blog. Eucharist and Mission

The Catholic political parties must know that Church and State are not separated when Vatican Council II is interpreted without the false premise.

 The Catholic political parties must know that Church and State are not separated when Vatican Council II is interpreted without the false premise. Since then there are no objective exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) which says all need faith and baptism for salvation. Since all need faith and baptism to avoid Hell and go to Heaven. The priority is the proclamation of Social Reign of the Christ the King in all political legislation and the non separation of Church and State in a Catholic Confessional State similar to the Papal States of Europe. -Lionel Andrades

A Cushingite cannot be a traditionalist.Since he or she will reject extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( EENS), the Athanasius Creed and the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church with the use of the false premise, which creates a New Theology.

 A  Cushingite cannot be a traditionalist.Since he or she will reject extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( EENS), the Athanasius Creed and the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church with the use of the false premise, which creates a New Theology. Similarly with the false premise and New Theology the Cushingite will accept the New Ecumenism, New Ecclesiology, New Evangelisation etc.

The traditionalists today will criticize the New Ecumenism but also interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise. So as Cushingites they will support the New Ecumenism. -Lionel Andrades

Se a casa tua si bestemmia o si maledice...

Help out Italian pro-lifers who will march for life in Rome in person

 

 

January 29, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) – The courageous men and women in Italy will not hold their 2021 March for Life “virtually,” and will publicly march as normal.

Just like the United States’ March for Life in D.C every year (except 2021), the lively march takes the message of the beauty of life through the streets of Rome. It brings together pro-lifers from all over Italy and provides a public witness to an otherwise silenced message.

Continued

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/help-out-italian-pro-lifers-who-will-march-for-life-in-rome

Mio Figlio mi ha promesso che il male non vincerà mai, perché qui ci sie...

Sanborn and Fastiggi's interpretation of Vatican Council II is now obsolete

 In the debate on Ecclesiology between Bishop Donald Sanborn and Prof. Robert Fastiggi the latter accused the former of being in schism and said schism was a bad thing.The sedevacantist bishop asked how could they be in Tradition when they were following Tradition and not Vatican Council II.He could have been implying that Fastiggi was in schism with his acceptance of Vatican Council II.

But really both of them were using a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and so create schism  with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors.Theologicall they were projecting exceptions.

Now neither of the two are willing to affirm Feeneyite EENS with a Vatican Council II interpreted without the false premise.

Sanborn and Fastiggi's interpretation of Vatican Council II is now obsolete. -Lionel Andrades

The Latin Mass was really a non issue which the Franciscans of the Immaculate raised. Instead they should have interpreted Vatican Council II without the false premise and then asked Cardinal Braz de Avez, Fr. Sabino Adito and the other community of the Franciscans of the Immaculate to also do the same

 The Latin Mass was really a non issue which the Franciscans of the Immaculate raised. Instead they should have interpreted Vatican Council II without the false premise and then asked Cardinal Braz de Avez, Fr. Sabino Adito and the other community of the Franciscans of the Immaculate to also do the same.

It would be difficult for them to do so. 

Since they will have to go back to Tradition and the old ecclesiology of the Traditional Latin Mass.

I have been contact with them and I know how they think at Boccea, Rome.

Presently Pope Francis promotes the Latin Mass which is offered with the new ecclesiology created by the common false premise.-Lionel Andrades

2 febbraio: benedizione delle candele FESTA DELLA CANDELORA

There are two important points in my writing

 There are two important points in my writing 1) I cite Ad Gentes 7 ( all need faith and baptism for salvation ) to bring Vatican Council II in harmony with traditional exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. 2) I interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, as referring to hypothetical cases only. So they are not objective exceptions to Ad Gentes 7. Neither does Vatican Council II contradict extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), the Athanasius Creed ( all need Catholic faith for salvation) and the Catechism of of Pope Pius X ( 24Q, 27Q).

The result is that there is no theological opening for the New Ecumenism, New Theology, New Ecclesiology etc since there is no known salvation outside the Church mentioned in Vatican Council II while Ad Gentes 7 is in harmony with the traditional exclusivist ecclesiology. The Church is still ecclesiocentric while remaining Christocentric.

Since we are back to the old ecclesiology, without rejecting Vatican Council II, we can affirm the Social Reign of Christ the King in all political legislation. This is a priority to save souls from going to Hell since outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation.It is necessary that the Catholic Church, in its traditional teachings, and the State not be separated. -Lionel Andrades

Ralph Martin and Scott Hahn will continue to interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise until they get instructions from the USCCB not to do so

 Ralph Martin and Scott Hahn will continue to interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise until they get instructions from the USCCB not to do so. - Lionel Andrades

When you meet Roberto dei Mattei and Chris Ferrara ask them what has Jacques Maritain,John Courtney Murray, Karl Rahner and Yves Congar to do with Vatican Council II today ?

 

When you meet Roberto dei Mattei and Chris Ferrara ask them what has Jacques Maritain,John Courtney Murray, Karl Rahner and Yves Congar to do with Vatican Council II today ? 

If Prof.Mattei and Chris Ferrara assume LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are only hypothetical and theoretical cases ( and they cannot be anything else) then there are no exceptions in the Council-text, to the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX. There are no exceptions for the Catechism of Pope Paul X ( 24 Q, 27 Q). 

The Council supports Tradition?!

I appreciate the contribution of Prof. Mattei and Chris Ferrara for the Church. I was fortunate to read Chris Ferrara and Fr. Nicholas Gruner's writings when I would go to the parish house, as a youth.

I like to read the professor's writings, especially his knowledge of the social, political, and ecclesiastical history in Italy.

But now we have found the missing link. We now know what creates the rupture with Tradition and how we can avoid it. -Lionel Andrades

Signore Gesù liberaci con la forza del Tuo Amore Divino dalle nostre abi...

La mia vita è cambiata a Medjugorje - Testimonianza di Mara Santangelo

The Council Fathers at Vatican Council II assumed that unknown cases of non Catholics were known and then , at least some of the Council Fathers, built a new false theology upon this irrationality. This cannot be Magisterial.This is a major error in the Council- text

 The Council Fathers at Vatican Council II assumed that unknown cases of non Catholics were known and then , at least some of the Council Fathers, built a new false theology upon this irrationality. This cannot be Magisterial.This is a major error in the Council- text. -Lionel Andrades