Monday, June 13, 2022

Di Buon Mattino, 7 giugno 2022 - I miracoli eucaristici

Recita del Santo Rosario sulla Collina delle Apparizioni - Medjugorje 11 giugno 2022

Pope Francis is still not asking Governments to stop interpreting Vatican Council II with the Red Column and to change to the rational Blue Column. It is unethical.

 

Pope Francis is still not asking the Governments in Italy,France and other countries to stop interpreting Vatican Council II with the Red Column and to change to the rational Blue Column. It is unethical.We now have a new discovery on Vatican Council II.

Similarly the Federal Ministry of Education in Germany and other countries must clarify that Vatican Council II is to only be interpreted with the Blue Column. Students must not use the False Premise of the Red Column.

With the Rational Premise, the whole Church goes back to Tradition and the division between those who attend the Latin Mass and those who attend the Novus Ordo Mass ends.

Pope Francis has taken another swipe at the Latin Mass the other day but if he chooses to interpret Vatican Council II with the Blue Column, then the ecclesiology of the Novus Ordo Mass would be traditional, like that of the missionaries and Magisterium in the 16th century.There would not be a division on Vatican Council II. The Council would be traditional like the theology of the Roman Missal.Presently Pope Francis uses the Red Column. So he objects when the traditionalists go back to Tradition and do not accept Vatican Council II interpreted with the Red Column.



The traditionalists at the Latin Mass, are gong back to Tradition and rejecting Vatican Council II interpreted with the Red Column.O.K. Understandable. But they must accept Vatican Council II with the Blue Column by choosing to interpret hypothetical cases as just being hypothetical.

Why are they still interpreting hypothetical cases ( LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2 etc) as being non hypothetical and objective examples of salvation outside the Church ? They are following the Left.

 If they interpreted Vatican Council II with the Blue Column then they would not have to reject Vatican Council II, since the Council would be traditional and exclusivist.There would not be practical exceptions mentioned in the Council for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Athanasius Creed.It would be the liberals who would be uncomfortable.

Presently there is no unity in the Church because the popes are using the Red Column to support liberalism and the conservatives cannot check this progressivism created with the Red Column.They also use the Red Column to interpret Vatican Council II etc.They are not aware of it.

This is also a secular issue. How can the Governments allow people in general to interpret Vatican Council II with a False Premise?

How can correspondents of the media in Rome, for example, continue to interpret Vatican Council II with a False Premise when they are aware of the Blue Column ? -Lionel Andrades


JUNE 12, 2022





We have a new discovery on Vatican Council II

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/06/we-have-new-discovery-on-vatican.html



_____________________________________









  
_________________________________________



    
___________________________________________


   
  



ATHANASIUS CREED

Image result for Athanasius Creed pHOTO


'Whosoever will be saved, before all things it is necessary that he hold the catholic faith. Which faith unless every one do keep whole and undefiled, without doubt he shall perish everlastingly...'

___________________________________








_____________________________________









Signore Ti Adoriamo: Tu ci hai fatto vedere che Dio non รจ solitudine ma Amore Donazione e Unione

The Most Holy Family Monastery interprets the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance with the Red Column.The make the same mistake with Vatican Council II

They are both interpreting the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance with the Red Right Hand Column. It is irrational and schismatic.
I have just watched the beginning as I see the drift in which the video is moving. 
Peter and Michael Dimond do not make the implicit-explicit, invisible-visible distinction.So if I was having a conversation with them, when we would speak about Lumen Gentium 16 ( invincible ignorance) then LG 16 would refer to a visible case in their mind but an invisible case in 2022. So we both would be speaking across to each other.

-Lionel Andrades












-Lionel Andrades





JUNE 12, 2022

We have a new discovery on Vatican Council II

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/06/we-have-new-discovery-on-vatican.html