From the blog TradCatKnight
May 18, 2018
Cardinal Burke: Catholics must let
Christ reign as King in face of
‘apostasy’ within Church
DOES THIS NOW MEAN BURKE
REJECTS VATICAN 2'S HERESY OF
RELIGIOUS LIBERTY? AFTER ALL
VATICAN 2 IS APOSTASY....
REJECTS VATICAN 2'S HERESY OF
RELIGIOUS LIBERTY? AFTER ALL
VATICAN 2 IS APOSTASY....
Lionel : Vatican Council II interpreted
with a false premise, which I call Vatican
Council II (Cushingite) results in a
rupture with Tradition(EENS, Syllabus of
Errors etc).
with a false premise, which I call Vatican
Council II (Cushingite) results in a
rupture with Tradition(EENS, Syllabus of
Errors etc).
Vatican Council II without the false
premise, which I call Vatican Council II
( Feeneyite) is in harmony with EENS,
Syllabus of Errors, the past exclusivist
ecclesiology of the Catholic Church,
ecumenism of return etc.
premise, which I call Vatican Council II
( Feeneyite) is in harmony with EENS,
Syllabus of Errors, the past exclusivist
ecclesiology of the Catholic Church,
ecumenism of return etc.
Cardinal Burke has referred to false
religions and has said that the true
Church of Christ subsists in only
the Catholic Church(LG 8, Vatican
Council II) so he infers that there is
nothing in Vatican Council II to
contradict what he stated on March
18,2018 at the Voice of the Family
Conference in Rome.
religions and has said that the true
Church of Christ subsists in only
the Catholic Church(LG 8, Vatican
Council II) so he infers that there is
nothing in Vatican Council II to
contradict what he stated on March
18,2018 at the Voice of the Family
Conference in Rome.
There is nothing in Vatican Council
II to contradict what he said about
other religions being false and the
Catholic Church being the true
Church of Christ?
II to contradict what he said about
other religions being false and the
Catholic Church being the true
Church of Christ?
Yes.But only if he is referring to
Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite).
This is Vatican Council II interpreted
without the false premise.
Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite).
This is Vatican Council II interpreted
without the false premise.
Trad Cat Knight like the other
sedevacantists interpret Vatican
Council II with the false premise,
as do the liberals. So LG 8 etc would
refer to known, non Catholics,
saved outside the Church. So this
would be a rupture with EENS
and the rest of Tradition.
sedevacantists interpret Vatican
Council II with the false premise,
as do the liberals. So LG 8 etc would
refer to known, non Catholics,
saved outside the Church. So this
would be a rupture with EENS
and the rest of Tradition.
But what if LG 8 refers to unknown
non Catholics in 2018 saved outside
the Church, as I interpret it ? What if
LG 8 refers only to a hypothetical
case ? Then LG 8 would not be an
exception to the dogma EENS
and the past exclusivist
understanding of salvation.Since an
invisible person who does not exist
in our reality could not be exception
to the dogma EENS.
non Catholics in 2018 saved outside
the Church, as I interpret it ? What if
LG 8 refers only to a hypothetical
case ? Then LG 8 would not be an
exception to the dogma EENS
and the past exclusivist
understanding of salvation.Since an
invisible person who does not exist
in our reality could not be exception
to the dogma EENS.
Since Cardinal Burke has not
rejected Vatican Council II and has
also said that other religions are
false and the Catholic Church is the
true Church of Christ, it indicates
that he supports Vatican Council
II ( Feneeyite), Vatican Council II
without the invisible people are
objectvely visible reasoning.
rejected Vatican Council II and has
also said that other religions are
false and the Catholic Church is the
true Church of Christ, it indicates
that he supports Vatican Council
II ( Feneeyite), Vatican Council II
without the invisible people are
objectvely visible reasoning.
It means Cardinal Burke is affirming
LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2,
GS 22 etc but as being only
hypothetical cases.In reality they
cannot be anthing else for us humans.
LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2,
GS 22 etc but as being only
hypothetical cases.In reality they
cannot be anthing else for us humans.
He is also affirming the baptism
of desire, the baptism of blood and
being saved in invincible ignorance
as only being hypothetical cases.
They can only be speculatioin,
theoretical possibilities and things
hoped for, for us human beings.
In individual cases they can only
be known to God. So they are
not exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.
They never ever were exceptions to
EENS according to the
missionaries and Magisterium of the
16th cnetury.
of desire, the baptism of blood and
being saved in invincible ignorance
as only being hypothetical cases.
They can only be speculatioin,
theoretical possibilities and things
hoped for, for us human beings.
In individual cases they can only
be known to God. So they are
not exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.
They never ever were exceptions to
EENS according to the
missionaries and Magisterium of the
16th cnetury.
So Cardinal Burke has not rejected
Vatican Council II ( without the false
premise) and he accepts EENS
( interpreted without the false
premise). So he has an exclusivist
understanding of the Catholic Church
on the issue of salvation at least.
Vatican Council II ( without the false
premise) and he accepts EENS
( interpreted without the false
premise). So he has an exclusivist
understanding of the Catholic Church
on the issue of salvation at least.
He supports EENS , Vatican Council
II, Catechism of the Catholic Church,
Catechisms of Trent and Pius X, all
without the false premise.So the
ecclesiology of the Church before
and after Vatican Council II is the
same.
II, Catechism of the Catholic Church,
Catechisms of Trent and Pius X, all
without the false premise.So the
ecclesiology of the Church before
and after Vatican Council II is the
same.
He has now set a new theological
and doctrinal model for the
sedevacantists and traditionalists
to follow.They can affirm
tradition and Vatican Council II
(Feeneyite).
and doctrinal model for the
sedevacantists and traditionalists
to follow.They can affirm
tradition and Vatican Council II
(Feeneyite).
He has also indicated that the
liberals can no more cite
Vatican Council II as a rupture
with Tradition, by using a false
premise.-Lionel Andrades
liberals can no more cite
Vatican Council II as a rupture
with Tradition, by using a false
premise.-Lionel Andrades
Catholics must consciously place themselves under the “Kingship of Christ” in the face of enemies of the Church today attempting to “infiltrate the life of the Church herself and to corrupt the Bride of Christ by an apostasy from the Apostolic Faith,” Cardinal Raymond Burke indicated at a talk today in Rome.
The Cardinal, one of the dubia signers and a foremost defender of orthodoxy within the Church today, told participants at the annual Rome Life Forum that Christ as King reigns over his Bride the Church, over the world, and must also reign over human hearts.
These words of St. Paul “refer to the order and peace, the eternal salvation, for which God the Father sent His only-begotten Son to take our human nature and to suffer, die, rise from the dead and ascend to the right hand of Father,” he said.
“They refer to the Mystery of Faith, which assures us that Christ, seated at the Right Hand of the Father in glory, remains with us on earth, pouring forth, from His glorious pierced Heart, without measure and without cease, the sevenfold gift of the Holy Spirit upon His Mystical Body, the Church, that is, into human hearts,” he added.
The Cardinal said that “in Christ is realized the right order of all things, the union of heaven and earth, as God the Father intended from the beginning.”
“It is the obedience of God the Son Incarnate which reestablishes, restores, the original communion of man with God and, therefore, peace in the world. His obedience unites once again all things, ‘things in heaven and things on earth,’” he added.
Burke stressed that Christ’s Kingship over human hearts is not some “ideal to which only a few can attain but to which all are called.”
“It is, rather, a reality of divine grace which helps even the weakest and the most tried human subject to attain an heroic degree of virtue, if he or she only cooperates with divine grace,” he said.
A number of Catholic theologians loyal to the perennial teaching of the Church on marriage, the moral life, and reception of the sacraments have expressed concern over novel teachings from the highest levels within the Church that present the moral life as only an “ideal” to be aimed at, rather than a reality that is binding on all.
The Cardinal said that faithful Catholics must allow the Kingship of Christ to be exercised over their lives “most of all, through the conscience, ‘the voice of God’ expressing His law written upon every human heart.”
“The conscience, therefore, is not, as is often falsely understood and stated today, formed by the thoughts and desires of the individual but by the truth which ever purifies individual thoughts and desires, and directs them in conformity with the law of love of God and neighbor. Obedience to the Kingship of Christ is expressed by the resolve and effort to conform all of one’s thinking and speaking and acting to Christ alive for us in the living Apostolic Tradition,” he said.
Some dissident high-ranking prelates and theologians have portrayed conscience as a final and ultimate authority that must be followed even if it contradicts the laws of God and Church teaching.
Burke went on to stress how the Kingship of Christ applies not only to Christians, but to everyone on the world, including those who hold political office.
“The Kingship of Christ is, by nature, universal, that is, it extends to all men, to the whole world. It is not a kingship over only the faithful or over only the things of the Church, but over all men and all of their affairs,” he said.
“The kingship is exercised from the Heart of Christ in human hearts. It does not pretend to govern directly the world but to govern it through man,” he continued.
"Christians who do not pretend to govern the civil state by means of the Church at the same time are called to give an heroic public witness to the truth of the moral law, of the law of God. Thus, Christ’s Kingship is exercised by hearts one with His Royal Heart,” he added.
He encouraged Catholic families to enthrone an image of the Sacred Heart of Jesus in the home as a way of putting themselves under Christ’s reign.
“The Kingship of Christ in the home frees the members of the family and the family as a society to enjoy those rights and fulfill those duties, in accord with the will of God. The universality of the Kingship of Christ is reflected by the practice of enthroning the image of the Sacred Heart of Jesus in the home, and in the other places of our human endeavor.”
He also outlined how participation in the Eucharist is the “most perfect and efficacious means of the transformation of human hearts through union with the Heart of Christ, through submission to His Kingship of pure and selfless love.”
http://tradcatknight.blogspot.it/2018/05/cardinal-burke-catholics-must-let.html
MAY 27, 2018
Things couldn't be better for Cardinal
Raymond Burke
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/05/things
-couldnt-be-better-for-cardinal.html
-couldnt-be-better-for-cardinal.html
MAY 27, 2018
Liberals cannot criticize Cardinal RaymondBurke since he accepts Vatican Council II
( Feeneyite),in harmony with EENS
( Feeneyite),the Syllabus of Errors, an
ecumenism and the Social Reign of Christ
the King : traditionalists at conf. next
month support the New Theology
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/05/liberals-cannot-accuse-
cardinal-raymond.html
______________________________________________________
FEENEYISM
VATICAN COUNCIL II (FEENEYITE)
Cushing Additions (2)
http://eucharistandmission.blo gspot.it/2018/05/cardinal-burk e-false-religions-that.html
http://eucharistandmission.blo
cardinal-raymond.html
______________________________________________________
FEENEYISM
- Feeneyism (108)
- Feeneyism is the missing link (9)
- Feeneyism on Wikipedia (12)
- Feeneyism.Cushingism (7)
- Feeneyismo (9)
- Feeneyite Catechism of the Catholic
- Church 1995 (2)
- Feeneyite Catholic College (1)
- Feeneyite EENS (1)
- Feeneyite EENS Vatican Council II
- (Feeneyite) (4)
- Feeneyite Theology (1)
- Feeneyite Vatican Council II (1)
- Feeneyite-Cushingite Model (1)
- Feeneyites (4)
- Feeneyites were always correct (1)
CUSHINGISM
- Cushing Additions (2)
- Cushing heresy (5)
- Cushing-Jesuit Factual Error (22)
- Cushing-Jesuit Factual Error Examples
- in Vatican Council II (25)
- Cushingism (114)
- Cushingism and the Catholic popes(7)
- Cushingism in Vatican Council II (17)
- Cushingismo (6)
- Cushingite (3)
- Cushingite Bishops (1)
- Cushingite Theology (6)
- Cushingites (1)
- Cushingites must make the correction(1)
FALSE PREMISE
- False premise (19)
- False premise in Vatican Council II(80)
- False reasoning from the Letter is all over
- Vatican Council II: Abp Lefebvre did not notice it - 1 (5)
- False reasoning from the Letter is all
- over Vatican Council II: Abp Lefebvre did not notice it -2 (2)
- False reasoning from the Letter is all
- over Vatican Council II: Abp Lefebvre did not notice it - 1 (2)
- False reasoning from the Letter is all
- over Vatican Council II: Abp Lefebvre did not notice it -3 (7)
- False Theology (3)
VATICAN COUNCIL II (FEENEYITE)
- Vatican Council (Feeneyite) (1)
- Vatican Council has passages which support
- EENS and no passages which contradict EENS (1)
- Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) (4)
- Vatican Council II (Feeenyite) (6)
- Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) (1)
- Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) in harmony
- with EENS(Feeneyite) (1)
- Vatican Council II Feeneyite (8)
- Vatican Council II is Feeneyite (11)
- Vatican Council II is Feeneyite for me.(1)
- Vatican Council II( premise free) (2)
- Vatican Council II ( premise-free) (1)
- Vatican Council II(premise free) (2)
- Vatican Council II(premise-free) (6)
- Vatican Council II (premise-free) (9)
- Vatican Council II/Feeneyite) (1)
VATICAN COUNCIL II (CUSHINGITE)
- Vatican Council II (Cushingite) (6)
- Vatican Council II Cushigite (1)
- Vatican Council II Cushingite (4)
- Vatican Council II(Cushingite). (7)
- Cushing heresy (5)
- Cushing-Jesuit Factual Error (22)
- Cushing-Jesuit Factual Error Examples
- in Vatican Council II (25)
- Cushingism (115)
- Cushingism and the Catholic popes(7)
- Cushingism in Vatican Council II (17)
- Cushingismo (6)
- Cushingite (3)
- Cushingite Bishops (1)
- Cushingite Theology (6)
- Cushingite Vatican Council II (1)
- Cushingites (1)
- Cushingites must make the correction(1)
- I accept (4)
- I agree (4)
- I am a Feeneyite who does not reject BOD (1)
- I am a Feeneyite who does not reject Vatican Council II (1)
- I am saying all who are in Heaven are there with the baptism of water in the Catholic Church this is the teaching of the dogma as it was interpreted over the centuries. (1)
________________________________
Cardinal Burke: False religions that
permit abortion should be suppressed
Repost : Even members of the Lay Movements in the Catholic Church can proclaim the necessity of the Social Reign of Christ the King
TUESDAY, MAY 22, 2018
Repost : The beauty of the Catholic Church is not there in any other religion says a Catholic priest.There cannot be Christ without the Catholic Church
MAY 22, 2018
Repost : Catholic political party needed in England
TUESDAY, MAY 22, 2018
Repost : "There are no physically visible cases of the BOD,BOB and I.I in 2018" nor " LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, NA 2, UR 3, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to only hypothetical cases " so Vatican Council II does not contradict the Syllabus of Errors (Graphics)
Cardinal Raymond Burke could meet the leaders of Forza Nuova and Militia Christi in Italy just as he met Matteo Salvini : Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation could be explained
MAY 23, 2018
Left and right schism
MAY 23, 2018
In a secular state which allows freedom of religion there could be pro-Catholic political parties, supporting the faith and moral teachings of the Catholic Church, and affirming in their manifesto the Social Reign of Christ the King
THURSDAY, MAY 24, 2018
THURSDAY, MAY 24, 2018
Cardinal Raymond Burke contradicts Cardinal Luiz Ladaria's heretical statement : interprets Lumen Gentium 8 rationally and traditionally
MAY 24, 2018
Cardinal Burke has affirmed the exclusive understanding of salvation and also Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) : it supports the teaching on the Social Reign of Christ the King
THURSDAY, MAY 24, 2018
Cardinal Raymond Burke has set an example for Catholics in general and traditionalists in particular since he has affirmed what I call Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) and rejected Vatican Council II (Cushingite)
http://eucharistandmission.blo gspot.it/2018/05/cardinal-raym ond-burke-has-set-example.html
__________________________________________________
TERMS EXPLAINED
Feeneyism: It is the old theology and
philosophical reaoning which says
there are no known exceptions past or
present, to the dogma EENS.There are
no explicit cases to contradict the
traditional interpretation of EENS.
philosophical reaoning which says
there are no known exceptions past or
present, to the dogma EENS.There are
no explicit cases to contradict the
traditional interpretation of EENS.
Cushingism: It is the new theology and
philosophical reasoning, which
assumes there are known exceptions,
past and present, to the dogma EENS,
on the need for all to formally enter
the Church.It assumes that the baptism
of desire etc are not hypothetical
but objectively known.In principle
hypothetical cases are objective
in the present times.
philosophical reasoning, which
assumes there are known exceptions,
past and present, to the dogma EENS,
on the need for all to formally enter
the Church.It assumes that the baptism
of desire etc are not hypothetical
but objectively known.In principle
hypothetical cases are objective
in the present times.
Baptism of Desire (Feeneyite): It
refers to the hypothetical case
of an unknown catechumen who
desires the baptism of water but
dies before he receives it and is saved.
Since this is an invisible case in our
reality it is not relevant to the dogma
EENS.
refers to the hypothetical case
of an unknown catechumen who
desires the baptism of water but
dies before he receives it and is saved.
Since this is an invisible case in our
reality it is not relevant to the dogma
EENS.
Baptism of Desire (Cushingite): It
refers to the known case of a
catechumen who desires the baptism
of water but dies before he receives
it and is saved. Since this is a visible
case or the SSPX it is relevant to the
dogma EENS.
refers to the known case of a
catechumen who desires the baptism
of water but dies before he receives
it and is saved. Since this is a visible
case or the SSPX it is relevant to the
dogma EENS.
Invincible Ignorance ( Feeneyite):
This refers to the hypothetical case
of someone allegedly saved without
the baptism of water in the Catholic
Church, since he was in ignorance.
This refers to the hypothetical case
of someone allegedly saved without
the baptism of water in the Catholic
Church, since he was in ignorance.
Invincible Ignorance (Cushingite):
This refers to the explicit
case of someone allegedly
saved without the baptism of water
in the Catholic Church, since
he was in ignorance.Since it is an
exception to the dogma EENS it
is assumed to be objectively known
in particular cases.This reasoning
is irrational.
This refers to the explicit
case of someone allegedly
saved without the baptism of water
in the Catholic Church, since
he was in ignorance.Since it is an
exception to the dogma EENS it
is assumed to be objectively known
in particular cases.This reasoning
is irrational.
Council of Florence: One of the
three Councils which defined the
dogma EENS.It did not mention
any exceptions.It did not mention
the baptism of desire. It was Feeneyite.
three Councils which defined the
dogma EENS.It did not mention
any exceptions.It did not mention
the baptism of desire. It was Feeneyite.
Liberal theologians: They
reinterpreted the baptism of
desire and being saved in
invincible ignorance, as
objective cases, known in
the present times.They use
Cushingism.
reinterpreted the baptism of
desire and being saved in
invincible ignorance, as
objective cases, known in
the present times.They use
Cushingism.
Vatican Council II (Cushingite):
It refers to the interpretation of
Vatican Council II with Cushingism.
LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc
refer not to hypothetical but
known cases in the present
times. So Vatican Council II emerges
as a break with the dogma EENS.
It refers to the interpretation of
Vatican Council II with Cushingism.
LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc
refer not to hypothetical but
known cases in the present
times. So Vatican Council II emerges
as a break with the dogma EENS.
Vatican Council II (Feeneyite):
It refers to the interpretation of
Vatican Council II withFeeneyism.
LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer
to hypothetical cases, which
are unknown personally in the
present times.So Vatican Council
II is not a break with EENS, the
Syllabus of Errors, ecumenism of
return, the Nicene Creed
( Feeneyite-one baptism),the
teaching on the Social Reign of
Christ the King over all political
legislation and the non separation
of Church and State( since all
need to convert into the Church
to avoid Hell).
It refers to the interpretation of
Vatican Council II withFeeneyism.
LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer
to hypothetical cases, which
are unknown personally in the
present times.So Vatican Council
II is not a break with EENS, the
Syllabus of Errors, ecumenism of
return, the Nicene Creed
( Feeneyite-one baptism),the
teaching on the Social Reign of
Christ the King over all political
legislation and the non separation
of Church and State( since all
need to convert into the Church
to avoid Hell).
Letter of the Holy Office 1949
to the Archbishop of Boston:
It assumed hypothetical cases were
defacto known in the present times.
So it presented the baptism of
desire etc as an explicit
exception, to the traditional
interpretation of the dogma
EENS.It censured Fr.Leonard
Feeney and the St.Benedict
Center.Since they did not assume
that the baptism of desire
referred to a visible instead of
invisible case.The Letter made the
baptism of desire etc relevant
to EENs.From the second part
of this Letter has emerged
the New Theology.It was Cushingite.
to the Archbishop of Boston:
It assumed hypothetical cases were
defacto known in the present times.
So it presented the baptism of
desire etc as an explicit
exception, to the traditional
interpretation of the dogma
EENS.It censured Fr.Leonard
Feeney and the St.Benedict
Center.Since they did not assume
that the baptism of desire
referred to a visible instead of
invisible case.The Letter made the
baptism of desire etc relevant
to EENs.From the second part
of this Letter has emerged
the New Theology.It was Cushingite.
Letter of the Holy Office 1949
( Feeneyite). It means accepting
the Letter as Feeneyite based
on the first part,only .It
supports Fr. Leonard
Feeney of Boston.The traditional
interpretatiion of the dogma
EENS does not mention any
exceptions.
( Feeneyite). It means accepting
the Letter as Feeneyite based
on the first part,only .It
supports Fr. Leonard
Feeney of Boston.The traditional
interpretatiion of the dogma
EENS does not mention any
exceptions.
Letter of the Holy Office
( Cushingite). It is based on
the second part of the
Letter.It rejects the traditional
interpretation of EENS. Since
it considers the baptism of
desire ( Cushingite-explicit) and
being saved in invincible ignorance
( Cushingite-explicit cases) as
being exceptions to EENS
( Feeneyite).It worngly assumes
hypothetical cases are objectively
visible and so they are exceptions
to the first part of the Letter.
( Cushingite). It is based on
the second part of the
Letter.It rejects the traditional
interpretation of EENS. Since
it considers the baptism of
desire ( Cushingite-explicit) and
being saved in invincible ignorance
( Cushingite-explicit cases) as
being exceptions to EENS
( Feeneyite).It worngly assumes
hypothetical cases are objectively
visible and so they are exceptions
to the first part of the Letter.
Baltimore Catechism: It assumed
that the desire for the baptism
of an unknown catechumen,
who dies before receiving it and
was saved, was a baptism like the
baptism of water. So it was placed
in the Baptism Section of the
catechism. In other words it was
wrongly assumed that the baptism
of desire is visible and repeatable
like the baptism of water or that
we can administer it like the
baptism of water.The Baltimore
Catechism is accepted with the
confusion.It can be
interpreted with Cushingism or
Feeneyism.
that the desire for the baptism
of an unknown catechumen,
who dies before receiving it and
was saved, was a baptism like the
baptism of water. So it was placed
in the Baptism Section of the
catechism. In other words it was
wrongly assumed that the baptism
of desire is visible and repeatable
like the baptism of water or that
we can administer it like the
baptism of water.The Baltimore
Catechism is accepted with the
confusion.It can be
interpreted with Cushingism or
Feeneyism.
Catechism of Pope X: It followed
the Baltimore Catechism and placed
the baptism of desire in the Baptism
Section.It can be
interpreted withCushingism or
Feeneyism.
the Baltimore Catechism and placed
the baptism of desire in the Baptism
Section.It can be
interpreted withCushingism or
Feeneyism.
Nicene Creed ( Cushingite) ; It says
'I believe in one baptism for the
forgiveness of sins' and means
there are more than three
known baptisms. They are
water, blood, desire, seeds
of the Word etc.This is a
Cushingite interpretation.
'I believe in one baptism for the
forgiveness of sins' and means
there are more than three
known baptisms. They are
water, blood, desire, seeds
of the Word etc.This is a
Cushingite interpretation.
Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite): It
says 'I believe in one baptism
for the forgiveness of sins and
means there is one known
baptism the baptism of water.
It is Feeneyite.
says 'I believe in one baptism
for the forgiveness of sins and
means there is one known
baptism the baptism of water.
It is Feeneyite.
New Theology: It refers to the
new theology in the Catholic
Church based on hypothetical
cases being objective in the
present times.So it
eliminates the dogma EENS.
With the dogma EENS
made obsolete the
ecclesiology of the Church
changes. There is a new
ecclesiology which is a
break with Tradition.
It's basis is Cushingism.
new theology in the Catholic
Church based on hypothetical
cases being objective in the
present times.So it
eliminates the dogma EENS.
With the dogma EENS
made obsolete the
ecclesiology of the Church
changes. There is a new
ecclesiology which is a
break with Tradition.
It's basis is Cushingism.
Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus
( Cushingite): .It refers to
the dogma but with exceptions.
All do not need to defacto
convert into the Church in
the present times, since
there are exceptions.
( Cushingite): .It refers to
the dogma but with exceptions.
All do not need to defacto
convert into the Church in
the present times, since
there are exceptions.
Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus
( Feeneyite): It refers
to the dogma as it was
interpreted over the centuries.
There are no known exceptions
to all needing to formally
enter the Church, with faith
and baptism, to avoid Hell.
( Feeneyite): It refers
to the dogma as it was
interpreted over the centuries.
There are no known exceptions
to all needing to formally
enter the Church, with faith
and baptism, to avoid Hell.
Catechism of the
Catholic Church ( Cushingite):
CCC 1257 contradicts the
Principle of Non Contraduction.
Also CCC 848 is based on the new
theology and so is a rupture
with the dogma EENS( Feeneyite).
Catholic Church ( Cushingite):
CCC 1257 contradicts the
Principle of Non Contraduction.
Also CCC 848 is based on the new
theology and so is a rupture
with the dogma EENS( Feeneyite).
Catechism of the
Catholic Church ( Feeneyite):
CCC 1257 does not contradict
the Principle of Non Contradiction
since there are no known exceptions
to all needing the baptism of
water for salvation. There are no
known exceptions, since God is
not limited to the Sacraments.
Catholic Church ( Feeneyite):
CCC 1257 does not contradict
the Principle of Non Contradiction
since there are no known exceptions
to all needing the baptism of
water for salvation. There are no
known exceptions, since God is
not limited to the Sacraments.
When CCC 846 states all who
are saved are saved through
Jesus and the Church,CCC 846
does not contradict the dogmatic
teaching on all needin to
formally enter the Church.
CCC 846 does not contradict
Ad Gentes 7 which states all
need faith and baptism for salvatioon.
are saved are saved through
Jesus and the Church,CCC 846
does not contradict the dogmatic
teaching on all needin to
formally enter the Church.
CCC 846 does not contradict
Ad Gentes 7 which states all
need faith and baptism for salvatioon.
________________________