Wednesday, July 4, 2012

CDF THERE ARE TWO INTERPRETATIONS OF VATICAN COUNCIL II - YOURS IS THE FALSE ONE



SSPX MUST CLEARLY REJECT DI NOIA'S VERSION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II: ANNOUNCE LUMEN GENTIUM 8 & 16 ARE NOT EXPLICITLY KNOWN

Who is in schism?

SSPX would be protesting Augustine Di Noia’s statement on extra ecclesiam nulla salus - if they understood it!

SAINTLY LOOKING LUTHERANS AND ANGLICANS NEED TO ENTER THE CATHOLIC CHURCH : FR.LEONARD FEENEY'S COMMUNITY COMMENTS ON ABP. AUGUSTINE DI NOIA'S STATEMENT

ARCHBISHOP AUGUSTINE DI NOIA SUGGESTS THAT THE ANTI-SEMITIC VERSION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II IS AN ALTERNATIVE FOR THE SSPX

ARCHBISHOP AUGUSTINE DI NOIA SAYS VATICAN COUNCIL II HAS NOT WEAKENED THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS

Traditionalist model of Vatican Council II is anti Semitic

Vatican Council II holds the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus is information being blocked out by Rorate Caeli: Threats of anti-Semitism?

MEDIA NOT ASKING THE SSPX AND VATICAN THE RIGHT QUESTIONS : BASIS FOR THE TENSION IS NOT VATICAN COUNCIL II

-Lionl Andrades

SSPX MUST CLEARLY REJECT DI NOIA'S VERSION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II: ANNOUNCE LUMEN GENTIUM 8 & 16 ARE NOT EXPLICITLY KNOWN

The SSPX must respond to the Ecclesia Dei's interpretation of Vatican Council II indicated in the NCR interview.

The Vice President of Ecclesia Dei believes LG 8 and LG 16 are not implicitly known but explicit for us. So LG 8 and LG 16 refer to exceptions to the traditional interpretation of the dogma.

The SSPX could just announce that they reject the leftist version of Vatican Council II and are considering an interpretation of the Council in which LG 8 and LG 16 are implicit to us and known only to God.

The leftist interpretation of Vatican Council II is flawed since it assumes LG 8 and LG 16 are explicit exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

Integrity demands that the Vatican cardinals and the Ecclesia Dei themself make the announcement on LG 8 and LG 16 not being defacto known to  us. So Lumen Gentium,Vatican Council II  cannot be  explicit exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma defined three times as the Archbishop implies.
Neither is LG 8,LG 16 an  exception to Ad Gentes 7,Vatican Council II which says all need Catholic Faith and the baptism of water for salvation.
-Lionel Andrades

WHEN YOU HAVE A WINNING CARD YOU HAVE TO PLAY IT!

When you have a winning Ace in a game of cards you have to play it. You have to put the card down on the table for the others to see.

The SSPX has a winning Ace but if they don't put the winning card on the table there is nothing I can do.I am helpless.

I can only keep writing.

If the SSPX members have a trump card and they don't play it what am I to do ?

What are we to do, those of us who understand ?

Just wait?!
-Lionel
 
 
Picture - playing cards 
- ace and king 
of spades. fotosearch 
- search stock 
photos, pictures, 
wall murals, images, 
and photo clipart

Who is in schism?

There is an interpretation of Vatican Council II which has a continuity with the past and is not a hermeneutic of rupture. This understanding of Vatican Council II is not that of Archbishop Augustine Di Noia, the new Vice President of Ecclesia Dei.

So if the American Archbishop considers not accepting Vatican Council II as being in schism,as he told Edward Pentin of the National Catholic Register, then, it is he who is rejecting the rational interpretation of the Council.He needs to affirm Vatican Council II.

From the interview with Pentin, who asked the all important question on the salvation dogma, Di Noia clearly indicates that his interpretation of Vatican Council II is  without the hermeneutic of continuity.

His reference to saintly Lutheran and Anglicans and the grace coming to those who are not Catholics is the give away sign.

He believes LG 8 and LG 16 are not implicitly known but explicit for us. So LG 8 and LG 16 refer to exceptions to the traditional interpretation of the dogma.This is the small clue to two interpretations of Vatican Council II and will decide who is in schism.


Since commonsense tells us that we do not personally know who has Sanctifying Grace among non Catholics and that  those saved in invincible ignorance and with a good conscience are always implicit for us, LG 16 and LG 8 are always implicit. They are explicit only for God.

So we can have an interpretation of Vatican Council II with either:-

1) Implicit LG 8, LG 16.

2) Explicit LG 8, LG 16.

Archbishop Di Noia is clearly using the explicit Lumen Gentium 8 and 16 interpretation of Vatican Council II.

Those Catholics who interpret Vatican Council II with implicit LG 8,LG 16 are in accord with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, since LG 8,LG 16 are not explicit exceptions to the dogma.They are in accord with Tradition.So there is a continuity with the past.Vatican Council II is in accord with the traditional teaching on ecclesiology, other religions, ecumenism etc.

This interpretation has the hermeneutic of continuity that Pope Benedict XVI addressed and which Archbishop Augustine Di Noia mentioned in the NCR interview.

There cannot be two interpretations of Vatican Council II at the same time. We have to choose one.

We cannot choose the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II which says LG 16, LG 8 are explicit and known to us.So we are left with only one interpretation of the Council.

This is not the interpretation of Archbishop Di Noia,nor of the cardinals Luiz Ladaria and Kurt Koch and neither of Bishops Bernard Fellay , Richard Williamson etc.

They hold the irrational version of Vatican Council II.

If tomorrow , the Society of St.Pius X (SSPX) says LG 8,LG 16 is always implicit , every configuration on this issue changes.
-Lionel Andrades