Sunday, January 6, 2019
Our Lady said at Fatima that in the end times there will be an apostasy in the Church ?
At Fatima did Our Lady say that the end times will be marked by an apostasy in the Church ? We can see it among the traditionalists Steve Skojec, Peter Kwaniewski, Fr. Brian Harrison Jospeh Shaw and others who do not want to affirm the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma exttra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).They prefer to say that invisible cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance are visible exceptions to EENS.
They do not want to be considered Anti Semitic and so Joseph Shaw the Chairman of the Latin Mass Society,England tells the Catholic Herald, U.K reporter that the past traditionalists may be Anti Semitic but the present-trads are not.He means it sincerely. Apostasy, heresy and sacrilege are not an issue for him as long as his employer and the local bishops supports it.
So he creates a rupture with the Magisterium in the 16th century on EENS by suggesting that he accepts EENS but with BOD, BOB and I.I being exceptions.So everyone does not need to enter the Catholic Church for him, for salvation.
For him the Nicene Creed he would now say " I believe not in one known baptism for the forgiveness of sins but three or more known baptisms. They are desire, blood and invincible ignorance and they exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church"
This is the first class heresy today's traditionalists support.This is being done so that they do not have to affirm EENS, the- 16th- century version.This is apostasy in the Church . It is present even among cardinals and bishops and popes.
So Steve Skojec would be comfortable to interpret the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( invincible ignorance) as contradicting the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius X ( EENS, ecumenism of return etc).He had no comment either way when I mentioned this in previous blog posts.
Peter Kwasniewski , Thomistic theologian, would interpret St. Thomas Aquinas contradicting himself. Since Aquinas affirmed the strict interpretation of EEN but when he mentioned the man in the forest in invincible ignorance to whom God would send a preacher, since he was to be saved, he has to pretend like the liberal theologians that this is a known person saved outside the Church. This is the irrationality Kwasniewski employs and does not deny it. Since if he denied it he would have to affirm the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS.
So when I wrote a series of reports recently on the Thomas More College of Liberal Arts in NH., USA, Phil Lawler and rest of the faculty just sat through it in silence. They knew what the implications would be.They do not want to affirm the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS.
So when I wrote a series of reports recently on the Thomas More College of Liberal Arts in NH., USA, Phil Lawler and rest of the faculty just sat through it in silence. They knew what the implications would be.They do not want to affirm the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS.
Now Skojec and Kwaniewski, like Fr. Brian Harrison can pretend that there are known exceptions to EENS and so no one can accuse them of being Anti-Semitic.
To remain politically correct with the Left the trads are supporting modernism.Hilary White recently wrote for the Remnant on modernism.She did not mention this issue.Michael Matt and Ann Barnhardt like her, support modernism by rejecting the Feeneyite interpretation of EENS.The New Profession of Faith is made with the new version of the Nicene Creed.It is supported by Canon Law.So to be a Catholic in good standing according to the 1983 Code of Canon Law, it is necessary to say that BOD,BOB and I.I are exceptions to EENS. In other words there are objective non Catholics seen and saved outside the Church.
Those who signed the Filial Correction and spoke at the Lepanto and Catholic Identity Conference do not want to interpret Vatican Council II and EENS with BOD, BOB and I.I just being hypothetical, theoretical and speculative cases.It would be dangerous for their careers or media.
Even after being informed Ryan Grant and the Rorate Caeli correspondents will not affirm Vatican Council II with hypothetical cases just being hypothetical.
Similarly Fr.John Zuhlsdorf in response to a false accusation by Michael Sean Winters wrote that Bishop Morlino ,the bishop of Madison and he, do not affirm EENS like Fr. Feeney.
We also know that Fr. Zuhlsdorf interprets Vatican Council II as a rupture with EENS.So when Pope Benedict had to say that EENS today is no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century, Fr. Zuhsldorf posted a meme saying, 'DON'T TOUCH'.
We also know that Fr. Zuhlsdorf interprets Vatican Council II as a rupture with EENS.So when Pope Benedict had to say that EENS today is no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century, Fr. Zuhsldorf posted a meme saying, 'DON'T TOUCH'.
For Fr.Leonard Feeney and me there are no practical examples of the BOD, BOB and I.I. Literally there are no baptism of desire cases. This is something obvious.
The apologist at EWTN John Martignoni agrees. He said that there are no cases of BOD, BOB and I.I and so they are not exceptions to EENS.Archbishop Thomas E. Gullickson and Fr. Stefano Visintin osb agree with him.
But the traditionalists at the St. Benedict Centers, the communities of Fr. Leonard Feeney do not proclaim this even though it is something obvious. It is common knowledge that we cannot see people saved in Heaven with the baptism of desire or with the baptism of blood and without the baptism of water.
The SBC no more affirm Feeneyite EENS perhaps because of persecution from the Left.
In the past they would project BOD, BOB and I.I theologically as not being exceptions to EENS.But they would not say that literally there are no known cases of BOD, BOB and I.I.
The SBC no more affirm Feeneyite EENS perhaps because of persecution from the Left.
In the past they would project BOD, BOB and I.I theologically as not being exceptions to EENS.But they would not say that literally there are no known cases of BOD, BOB and I.I.
Similarly the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary are silent on Vatican Council II. Literally there are no known cases saved outside the Church mentioned in Vatican Council II.So LG 8, LG 15 are not exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.But if they announce this would be affirming Feeneyite EENS and Vatican Council II in harmony with Feeneyite EENS.They too seek the approval of the local bishop and not run foul of laws supported by Satan and Left.
A few years have passed and Chris Ferrara and Roberto dei Mattei will not affirm Feeneyite EENS since they too do not want to be charged under Anti-Semitic laws. So they will allow Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church to be interpreted falsely and they will keep quiet.
The apostasy among the liberals and the ecclesiastics at the Vatican has been there.
But the traditionalists are the people who expect Pope Francis to be faithful to Catholic doctrine. They expect the same from the interpreters of doctrine at Medugorje. They would expect sound doctrine from Kiko Arguello and the Neo Catehecumenal Way.
They criticize Mass in the vernacular and now they wink and want to believe that the Catechism of Pope Pius X contradicts the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and it is no issue. The Nicene Creed can be reinterpreted and it is not modernisn. The Athanasius Creed can be rejected and it is not heresy.
With all these abberrations it would be normal for them to attend Mass in Latin and it would not be a sacrilege.
The apostasy among the liberals and the ecclesiastics at the Vatican has been there.
But the traditionalists are the people who expect Pope Francis to be faithful to Catholic doctrine. They expect the same from the interpreters of doctrine at Medugorje. They would expect sound doctrine from Kiko Arguello and the Neo Catehecumenal Way.
They criticize Mass in the vernacular and now they wink and want to believe that the Catechism of Pope Pius X contradicts the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and it is no issue. The Nicene Creed can be reinterpreted and it is not modernisn. The Athanasius Creed can be rejected and it is not heresy.
With all these abberrations it would be normal for them to attend Mass in Latin and it would not be a sacrilege.
-Lionel Andrades
JANUARY 5, 2019
Peter Kwasniewski and Steve Skojec are comfortable with the error : in this way they are not obligated to affirm Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/peter-kwasniewski-and-steve-skojec-are.html
JANUARY 5, 2019
Vatican Council II has a heretical theology but in a peculiar way it can be interpreted non heretically
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/vatican-council-ii-has-heretical.html
JANUARY 4, 2019
Peter Kwasniewski uses the irrational option to interpret Vatican Council II and other magisterial documents
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/peter-kwasniewski-uses-irrational.html
Homosexuality is to blame for sexual abuse, not Catholic church, claims German cardinal
Homosexuality is to blame for sexual abuse, not Catholic church, claims German cardinal
From the London Telegraph:
German cardinal on Friday provoked anger and controversy when he claimed the Catholic church was not responsible for sexual abuse by its clerics, and instead sought to pin the blame on homosexuality.
“What has happened in the church is no different from what is happening in society as a whole,” Cardinal Walter Brandmüller said. “The real scandal is that the Catholic church hasn’t distinguished itself from the rest of society.” A study commissioned by the German Bishops Conference and published last year found that more than 3,600 children were sexually abused by Catholic clergy in Germany between 1946 and 2014. But Cardinal Brandmüller claimed that only a “vanishingly small number” of clergy had committed abuses. He said the real problem was homosexuality and claimed it is “statistically proven” that there is a link between homosexuality and abuse. [For Full Story]
From Crux News:
He argued the real scandal was that church representatives hadn’t been different from the rest of society.
The cardinal also argued it was “statistically proven” that the clerical abuse crisis was linked to homosexuality. “It is no less unrealistic to forget or conceal that 80 percent of cases of abuse in the church environment affected male adolescents, not children,” Brandmüller said.
https://spiritdailyblog.com/news/cardinal-blames-homosexuality-not-church
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
