The mainline Catholic Church has lost the Faith because they interpret Vatican Council II politically i.e. irrationally. If they re-interpret the
Council rationally the Church once again is in harmony with Unam Sanctam of
Pope Boniface VIII which defined the dogma outside the Church there is no
salvation (extra ecclesiam nulla salus-EENS).
The Parish Priests and the Rome Vicariate interpret Vatican Council II,
irrationally, purposefully, to please the police, who are enforcing the Leftist
agenda, within the Catholic Church.
This is not Magisterial.
It was Pope Boniface who founded the La Sapienza University, Rome where
today they interpret Vatican Council II, deceptively. They are academically
unethical, at the university’s Jurisprudence Department, for example.
Catholic in the pews do not know that LG 8,14,15,16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22
etc, refer to only hypothetical cases, always. They refer to invisible people
in 2023.So LG 8, 14, 15, 16 etc, are not practical exceptions for the dogma
EENS of Pope Boniface in Unam Sanctam.
La Sapienza follows the general ‘fanaticism of the Left’, the ‘extremism
of the Left’ and so does Pope Francis, the cardinals and bishops.
The political Left, within and outside the Church, will demand that a
Parish Priest be transferred , laicized or excommunicated , if he
interprets Vatican Council II rationally
( i.e. invisible cases of LG 8, 15, 16 etc are always invisible) in harmony
with Tradition. It is obligatory, politically, to present Vatican Council II as a break with
Tradition-even though it is not.
The La Sapienza University, like the Dominican, pontifical university-the
Angelicum, in Rome, has to interpret LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3,NA 2, GS 22 etc, as referring to objective, visible, non Catholics in
1965-2023, saved outside the Catholic Church, without Catholic faith and the
baptism of water. This is irrational. There are no such visible cases. If anyone
was saved as such it would only be known to God.
But they have to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally, by confusing
what is invisible as being visible. Only in this way they can create alleged
exceptions for Unam Sanctam of Pope Boniface VIII, the Syllabus of Errors of
Pope Pius IX and the Catechism of Pope
Pius X ( 24 Q).
The seminarians of the North
American College, Rome, have to study with this political ruse, at the
Angelicum, the University of St. Thomas Aquinas, Rome. Consecrated students,
men and women, accept this error at the Angelicum. To change the Catholic
faith, in its Creeds, Catechisms etc is a mortal sin of faith. The Creeds
cannot be changed for political reasons.
The Dominicans act as if all is normal. In good or bad conscience they
go along with the lie. Propaganda Fide, Vatican, pays for their free tuition,
board and lodging in Rome.
The faculty keep their teaching-right. They are allowed to stay on as
they teach a leftist approved version of Church history, a political
ecclesiology of the Catholic Church and generally a foreign faith.
This is possible, largely, by confusing what is invisible as being
visible and then producing the hermeneutic of rupture and not continuity with
the past.
I can interpret Vatican Council II rationally, what is invisible is
only invisible for me. So Vatican Council II has a continuity with the
traditional teaching on exclusive salvation in only the Catholic Church. So
there is a return to the traditional mission of the 16th century of
the Jesuits. There is a natural return to the missionary doctrines of St.
Francis Xavier, St. Robert Bellarmine and St. Ignatius of Loyola. The Church is
ecclesiocentric once again, by simply interpreting invisible cases as being
invisible.
- Lionel Andrades
Posts
