Thursday, February 29, 2024
Catholic Theology 3 : The liberalism of Pope Paul VI after Vatican Council II is not magisterial since it is based upon Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally. Vatican Council II is magisterial only when it is interpreted rationally
ONLY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH ( SOLAMENTE LA CHIESA CATTOLICA
The
liberalism of Pope Paul VI after Vatican Council II is not magisterial since it
is based upon Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally. Vatican Council II
is magisterial only when it is interpreted rationally i.e. invisible cases of
LG 8,14,15,16 UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, are not physically visible examples of
salvation outside the Church.This is common sense. Invisible people cannot be
exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).
The Papal Documents
which are Cushingite ( invisible people are physically visible) and not Feeneyite
( invisible people in 2024 are simply invisible) cannot be magisterial. Before
the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the
Archbishop of Boston, all Church Documents were only Feeneyite.They did not
confuse what is invisible as being visible.
I accept all the popes.My Parish Priest ,Fr. Paolo Boumis at the church San Agapito, Rome, also accepts all the popes, but he rejects the teachings of the popes, from Pius X and earlier because his interpretation of Vatican Council II is irrational.So there is a break with the ecclesiology (understanding of the Church) of the Middle Ages and the Early Church.The dogma outside the Church there is no salvation has exceptions for him.
His
liberalism is false.It has its foundation in a fake interpretation of Vatican
Council II. He knows that LG 8, 14, 15, 16 UR 3, NA 2 GS 22 etc, refer to
invisible cases in 2024.But like the Auxiliary
bishops and the cardinal of the Rome Vicariate he will not proclaim it in
public and teach it in his parish.
Since I
accept the teachings of the popes from Pius X and earlier and since I
accept Vatican Council II, rational, I expect Pope
Francis to do the same to be magisterial. He is not magisterial when he
interprets Vatican Council II irrationally to intentionally produce a rupture with the Magsteriuim over the
centuries. The Holy Spirit cannot teach what is irrational, non-traditional, heretical
and schismatic and so contradict the past Magisterum.
As a pope,
Pope Francis has only one option- it is to interpret Vatican Council II
rationally. He needs to announce that all Catholics must only accept Vatican
Council II interpreted rationally and so honestly and traditionally.
Cardinal Arthur Roche
must clarify that he was wrong in saying there is a new Magisterium in the
Church based upon Vatican Council II (irrational). Instead he must announce
that the Church returns to the old Magisterium, with Vatican Council (rational).
I can accept Cardinal Roche as a cardinal. However it is a mortal sin of faith to change the meaning of the Creeds, with Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church, interpreted irrationally.This is what he is presently doing and it cannot be accepted. He needs to end the scandal and receive absolution in the Holy Confession.Then all will be well. It is the same with Pope Francis and the other cardinals and the bishops.They simply have to come back to Vatican Council II rational and so to the Tradition of the Church.
POPE PAUL VI RECONCILED WITH PIUS X
Then the
Society of the St. Pius (SSPX) would have no problem with the ecclesiology of
the Church.It would be traditional. It would be the same before and after Vatican
Council II.
Pope Paul VI
would be reconciled with Pope Pius X.
Now the SSPX
publications are based upon Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally and so
are obsolete. Vatican Council II liberalism based upon an irrationality (
invisible people are visible) is obsolete. Even Cardinal Roche when he teaches
at the St. Anselm University in Rome, is now obsolete. Students at this
Benedictine university are not obliged to interpret Vatican Council II
irrationally. They have a rational choice.
GERMANS UNETHICAL
Why must the
Catholic Church in Germany interpret Vatican Council like the German Synod? The
Synods have their foundation in the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council
II. The German Catholic can reject it.It would also be unethical for the
Protestant church and the secular authorities in Germany to support the
deception. –Lionel Andrades
FEBRUARY 28, 2024
Wednesday, February 28, 2024
Video : Did Catholic Charismatic Evangelist Raise Woman From ‘Dead’? : She received the Baptism of the Holy Spirit
Did Catholic Charismatic Evangelist Raise Woman From ‘Dead’?
Catholic Theology 2 : We can now reconcile Pope Francis with Pope Pius X
FEBRUARY 27, 2024
ONLY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH ( SOLAMENTE LA CHIESA CATTOLICA
After over 60 years we discover that Vatican Council II no more
contradicts the Catechism of Pope Pius X. The Catholic Church returns to its
traditional theological position on other religions and salvation.
This is a disappointment for leftist journalists who still interpret LG
8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, as being physically visible examples of
salvation. They are seen as personally known non Catholics saved outside the
Church, without faith and the baptism of water. LG 8 etc are seen as practical
exceptions for the past exclusivist ecclesiology.
SSPX MISTAKES
1.The Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) bishops are correct when they reject Vatican Council II (irrational) but they must also interpret and accept Vatican Council (rational).
2.They also make a mistake in their Catechesis, with the Catechism of Pope Pius X (29 Q contradicts 27Q etc). Invisible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance do not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( 24 Q, 27Q).
3. They made the
same mistake on the Catechism of the Catholic Church (846-848 invisible cases
of being saved in invincible ignorance). They then reject this Catechism of Pope John Paul II, which they interpret irrationally, by confusing what is invisible as being visible.
4.The SSPX made the same mistake on the Athanasius Creed. They project
invisible cases as being visible and then project exceptions for this Creed, which says all need to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation.
5. The same mistake is made with the Nicene Creed. They interpret ‘I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins’ (Nicene Creed) as ‘I believe in three or more known baptisms for the forgiveness of sins, and they exclude the baptism of water. They are the baptisms of blood, desire etc.’ These baptisms have to exclude the baptism of water otherwise the SSPX emerges Feeneyite.
For me there is only one, known and repeatable baptism, the
baptism of water. We cannot give any one the baptism of desire. It is known
only to God. It exists only in our mind.
6.The SSPX also interprets the Council of Florence (1442) and the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) irrationally.These Councils which defined the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation did not mention any exceptions.
These are big gaps in doctrine and theology and no one at the SSPX, here or abroad, is willing to respond, not even Bishop Bernard Fellay.
FSSP MASS WITH POPE PAUL VI ECCLESIOLOGY
At the Latin Mass of the FSSP church Santissima Trinitia dei Pellegrini,
Rome, the priests and congregation interpret Vatican Council II like the
liberals at the National Catholic Reporter. So their ecclesiology at the Latin
Mass is that of Pope Paul VI and Pope Pius X.
At the National Catholic Reporter, Michael Sean Winters and Christopher White have to force themselves to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and not talk about it. Their policy is: just ignore the rational interpretation.
The USCCB bishops continue to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally, and so there is a rupture with Pope Pius X – and so, they do not correct the National Catholic Reporter.
I can accept Pope Paul VI and Pope Pius X since Vatican Council II is rational and traditional for me. It is not a break with Tradition. I do not have to choose between Vatican Council II and the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation. They are compatible. I can accept both. In the same way I can accept Pope Francis and the popes before Pius X. Vatican Council II, rational, gives me the freedom to stay free from sedevacantism, Lefebvrism and the liberal-left ideology of Pope Francis based upon Vatican Council II ( irrational).I do not of course, accept Papal or Church Documents, based upon Vatican Council II, irrational. Only Vatica Council II, rational, can be Magisterial.- Lionel Andrades
FEBRUARY 27, 2024
I just believe that Mary has visited here - Bishop Joseph Strickland in Medugorje
https://marytv.tv/holy-spirit-moments/
The joy was there for days. In Medugorje I rediscovered Mary as a mother
https://marytv.tv/holy-spirit-moments/
Our Lady really took me by the hand and brought me back to her son
Tuesday, February 27, 2024
Catholic Theology 1 : ONLY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH ( SOLAMENTE LA CHIESA CATTOLICA
-Lionel Andrades
Chi non crederà sarà condannato" -Marco 16:16 SOLAMENTE LA CHIESA CATTOLICA
NOVEMBER 8, 2019
Chi non crederà sarà condannato" -Marco 16:16 SOLAMENTE LA CHIESA CATTOLICA
Andate in tutto il mondo e predicate il vangelop ad ogni creatura. Chi crederà e sara battezato sara salvo ma chi non crederà sarà condannato" -Marco 16:16
È dunque necessario che tutti si convertano al Cristo... ed a lui e alla Chiesa, suo corpo, siano incorporati attraverso il battesimo. Cristo stesso infatti, « ribadendo espressamente la necessità della fede e del battesimo (cfr. Mc 16,16; Gv 3,5), ha confermato simultaneamente la necessità della Chiesa, nella quale gli uomini entrano, per così dire, attraverso la porta del battesimo.-Ad Gentes 7, Concilio Vaticano II.
SOLAMENTE LA CHIESA CATTOLICA.
_______________________________________
È dunque necessario che tutti si convertano al Cristo conosciuto attraverso la predicazione della Chiesa, ed a lui e alla Chiesa, suo corpo, siano incorporati attraverso il battesimo. Cristo stesso infatti, « ribadendo espressamente la necessità della fede e del battesimo (cfr. Mc 16,16; Gv 3,5), ha confermato simultaneamente la necessità della Chiesa, nella quale gli uomini entrano, per così dire, attraverso la porta del battesimo. Per questo non possono salvarsi quegli uomini i quali, pur sapendo che la Chiesa cattolica è stata stabilita da Dio per mezzo di Gesù Cristo come istituzione necessaria, tuttavia rifiutano o di entrare o di rimanere in essa ». Benché quindi Dio, attraverso vie che lui solo conosce, possa portare gli uomini che senza loro colpa ignorano il Vangelo a quella fede « senza la quale è impossibile piacergli.-Ad Gentes 7, Concilio Vaticano II.
Nota: La frase 'conosciuto attraverso la predicazione della Chiesa' si riferisce a casi ipotetici. Non possiamo conoscere nessuno che sarà salvato da quando gli è stato fatto conoscere dalla predicazione della Chiesa. Non conosciamo nessuno che sarà salvato nell'ignoranza invincibile e senza fede e battesimo. Né conosciamo nessuno che sarà salvato perché sapevano che la Chiesa era necessaria e non era entrata o erano nell'ignoranza.Quindi i passaggi in rosso non contraddicono i passaggi in blu.
Tutti devono essere incorporati a lui dal battesimo e nella Chiesa che è il suo corpo.
_________________________________________
English translation
Therefore, all must be converted to Him, made known by the Church's preaching, and all must be incorporated into Him by baptism and into the Church which is His body. For Christ Himself "by stressing in express language the necessity of faith and baptism (cf. Mark 16:16; John 3:5), at the same time confirmed the necessity of the Church, into which men enter by baptism, as by a door. Therefore those men cannot be saved, who though aware that God, through Jesus Christ founded the Church as something necessary, still do not wish to enter into it, or to persevere in it." Therefore though God in ways known to Himself can lead those inculpably ignorant of the Gospel to find that faith without which it is impossible to please Him. -Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II
-Lionel Andrades
Posts
