Pope Francis can no more support polygamy, LGBT-sex etc in the name of
Vatican Council II since the Council is Feeneyite. The Council must only be
interpreted rationally. It then only supports an ecumenism of return to the
Church, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to the Fourth Lateran
Council (1215) and the Athanasius Creed.
So the Council agrees with the theology of the old Roman Missal which is
ecclesiocentric. At the Novus Ordo, Latin, Melkite, Syro Malabar and other
rites, the Catholic Church returns to the past exclusivist ecclesiology. It
returns to Traditional Mission based upon exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.
This is the Conciliar teaching, before and after Vatican Council II, only when
the Council is interpreted rationally.
Catholics are free to interpret Vatican Council II rationally and
ethically and not like Rahner, Ratzinger, Congar, Murray, Balthazar, Kung,
Lefebvre and Paul VI.
The Dicastary for the Doctrine of the Faith, the USCCB, the Latin
Mass Societies in England and Wales, Una Voce and Coetus International, and also bishops conferences all over the world, have an obligation to also interpret the
Council only rationally. All the Catechetical Centers must employ only the rational
and not irrational premise to interpret Vatican Council II. Then the Council is
in harmony with the Magisterium over the centuries. We do not have to choose
between Vatican Council II and Tradition.
It is based upon EENS of the Fourth Lateran Council( which is not
contradicted by Vatican Council II, rational) that the Social Reign of Christ
the King in all political legislation is proclaimed, with the non separation of
the Catholic Church and the Catholic State. This is important to saved souls
from Hell.
The kerygma has to be proclaimed with traditional ecclesiocentrism and
there is no more ‘a development of doctrine’, since the Council does not permit
it.
- Lionel Andrades
Posts
