Saturday, October 29, 2022

'You Have Chosen Death’

 

You Have Chosen Death’

Not since the early days of Medjugorje, and perhaps during the brutal Serbian-Croatian conflict, which surrounded the town, has there been quite so stark a monthly message.

“Dear children,” it starts, as always, on the twenty-fifth of each month. Then:

“The Most High permits me to be with you, and to be joy for you and the way in hope, because mankind has decided for death.

“That is why He sent me to keep instructing you that without God you do not have a future. Little children, be instruments of love for all those who have not come to know the God of love. Witness joyfully your faith and do not lose hope in a change of the human heart. I am with you and am blessing you with my motherly blessing. Thank you for having responded to my call.”

It was these words — “mankind has decided for death” and “without God you do not have a future” — that sounded, if not a final warning, a message hearkening to a new and perhaps ominous stage of the apparitions.

Those apparitions of Mary — the first week of which have been formally authenticated by a Vatican Commission (involving one more apparition than at Fatima) — are usually brimming with optimism and hopefulness, with joy, even when serious events surround humankind, for Our Lady sees from the joyous perspective of Heaven.

But not this month of October. Not this month of both the Rosary and spiritual warfare. Not this time of constant nuclear threats by Russia, as the brutal war it provoked in Ukraine continues to generate carnage.

Was it related mainly to the war? Abortion, manipulation of embryos, and euthanasia also come to mind. The Culture of Life versus the Culture of Death, as John Paul II said. This is the overarching theme. Despite the over-ruling of Roe v. Wade, most of the world, and still a large number in the United States, continue, including now by pill, to exterminate the unborn. There are moves to codify abortion or open mobile clinics, circumventing the Supreme Court ruling.

The Polish translation of the message is yet more stark. “May the Most High allow me to be with you and be your joy and way of hope, for mankind has chosen to die. That is why He sent me to teach you that without God there is no future. Children, be instruments of love for all those who have not met God. Witness your faith and do not lose hope of a change in the human heart. I am with you and bless you with a motherly blessing.”

On September 25, 1991, as former Yugoslavia headed into civil war, the Virgin said, “Dear children! Today in a special way I invite you all to prayer and renunciation. For now as never before satan wants to show the world his shameful face by which he wants to seduce as many people as possible onto the way of death and sin. Therefore, dear children, help my Immaculate Heart to triumph in the sinful world. I beseech all of you to offer prayers and sacrifices for my intentions so I can present them to God for what is most necessary. Forget your desires, dear children, and pray for what God desires, and not for what you desire. Thank you for having responded to my call.”

In 1996 it seemed related to eternal destinations: “Choose life and not death of the soul,” she said on March 25 of that year.

In 2003: ““Dear children! Particularly at this holy time of penance and prayer, I call you to make a choice. God gave you free will to choose life or death.”

Important: that admonition not to lose hope. In other words, it’s not likely a prediction so much, again, as a warning.

But the Polish translation — “chosen to die” — does not seem related to abortion but to something coming in the future, with no mere humans knowing what is being planned in secret, in the midst of ongoing military hostilities. Instead of the unborn, it seems directed to the death of those alive and conscious.

Be instruments of love toward non-believers, she seemed to be saying. For in messages to another seer (the monthly one is to Marija Pavlovic-Lunetti), she has often referred to atheists as “those who have not yet come to know the love of God.” (We’ll address this more at the retreat Saturday.)

And so it goes, as the pandemic winds down and then erupt again in another form — thankfully nothing like three years ago — but as the war continues, in a most unpredictable fashion, at the same time as there are rumblings in nature: On Tuesday, a small but loud quake in San Francisco that was described as sounding like thunder.

[Footnote: seer Pavlovic has commented, “I believe that it is understood as spiritual death because too many people today in the world and in the wealthy part of Europe live without their own spirit anymore. When we lack spirit, we are mostly like walking dead. I believe that the Holy Spirit is missing in the hearts of this drifting mankind, through wars, depressions, going towards all these ideologies of selfishness and without building a future through the family, the children who today are considered more like a burden than a real treasure. Our Lady in several messages has invited us not to be afraid to have a large family and put our trust and rely more on God.”]

[resources: Michael Brown retreat, 10/29]

Archbishop Vigano and Bishop Schneider want division in the Church otherwise they could be hit with a leftist excommunication as it was for Fr. Leonard Feeney and Archbishop Lefebvre.

 

FR.LEONARD FEENEY'S EXCOMMUNICATION WAS POLITICAL

Fr.Leonard Feeney was saying that there are no physically visible cases of the baptism of desire. This is reality. It is a fact. His excommunication was political by the Left. The Archbishop of Boston and Pius XII were saying that invisible cases of the BOD were visible examples of salvation.

ARCHBISHOP LEFEBVRE'S EXCOMMUNICATION WAS LEFTIST

Even the excommunication of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre was political-left. He refused to accept Vatican Council II in which invisible cases of Lumen Gentium 14 and 16 etc were projected as visible exceptions for extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the rest of Tradition.



Pope John Paul II and Cardinal Ratzinger accepted it.They accepted Vatican Council II interpreted with the Irrational Premise to produce a non tratitional conclusion.

Pope Pius XII did not tell the Archbishop of Boston and the Jesuits that invisible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance were not visible exceptions for Feeneyite EENS. Instead they silenced the priest.

THEY DID NOT TELL ARCHBISHOP LEFEBVRE TO INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY

Pope John Paul II and Cardinal Ratzinger did not tell Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre that he could interpret Vatican Council II with invisible cases of LG 8,14 and 16 etc not being visible exceptions for Feeneyite EENS. So he could return to Tradition without rejecting Vatican Council II.

Today Archbishop Carlo Vigano and Bishop Athanasius Schneider will not tell traditionalists at the St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire, to interpret Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus rationally. They will not say in public that Vatican Council II is not a break with Feeneyite EENS.

POPES FRANCIS AND BENEDICT FOR POLITICAL REASONS ARE INTERPRETING VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONALLY.

Pope Francis and Pope Benedict for political reasons will not say that Vatican Council II does not contradict the Athanasius Creed which says all need Catholic faith for salvation. They want to pretend that LG 8, 14 and 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to visible cases. Irrational?!

For political reasons the popes and Archbishop Vigano and Bishop Schneider want division in the Church. Otherwise the bishops could be excommunicated like Fr. Leonard Feeney and Archbishop Lefebvre.

The ADL had also asked for the excommunication of Bishop Richard Williamson.Even though he committed no mortal sin of faith or morals Pope Benedict side lined him. Williamson was not obliged to accept Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally by Pope Benedict.This is the political interpretation of the Council.It is unethical.

Pope Benedict wanted Bishop Bernard Fellay to accept Vatican Council II as a break with EENS. Why? This is irrational and dishonest.

WE NOW KNOW HOW TO CREATE THE HERMENEUTIC OF CONTINUITY WITH TRADITION

Pope Pius XII after World War II allowed division to come into the Church. It can be ended today. Since we know how to always create the hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition.The Council is not ambiguous.Bishop Schneider said in one of his three interviews this month that the Council is ambiguous. He interpreted the Council as a break with Tradition. So he chose the Irrational Premise of the liberals.

THE PROFESSION OF FAITH IS DIFFERENT SINCE THE INTERPRETATION OF THE CREEDS IS DIFFERENT

It is because of the Irrational Premise, that the Profession of Faith of Mon.Nicola Bux and the bishops, is different from mine. We can have unity when he chooses to interpret Magisterial Documents rationally as I do.

For political left reasons Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II irrationally like Prof. Roberto dei Mattei of the Lepanto Institute, Archbishop Carlo Vigano and Bishop Athanasius Schneider. May be it is due to leftist coercion within and outside the Church.-Lionel Andrades

Rosario dalla Collina delle Apparizioni di Medjugorje con Padre Francesco Rizzi 29 ottobre 2022

Gesù risveglia in noi il desiderio di stare con Te

What is the Irrational Premise ?

 PantheraBlanca writes on Twitter

Please extrapolate this premise for less informed Catholics, myself included.


Lionel Andrades

I am following Aristotle's Logic.There is a premise, inference and conclusion.If Lumen Gentium 16, being saved in invincible ignorance, refers to a physically visible person this month for you and not for me then our premises are different.

Our premises are different when an invisible person for you is visible for me.Can you see someone saved as such? No we cannot.The person would be in Heaven and known only to God. So I cannot infer that Lumen Gentium 16 refers to a practical exception for extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).

For Lumen Gentium 16 to be a practical exception for Feeneyite EENS, it had to refer to a physically visible case. But it is invisible to me. So Lumen Gentium 16 does not contradict the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus, for me. My premise is LG 16 is invisible.

So my premise is something invisible(LG 16) is invisible, in my reality and that of other humans.But for Bishop Athanasis Schneider and Archbishop Carlo Vigano, LG 16 is a break with EENS.So it is visible. An invisible person cannot be an exception for EENS.







So the premise and inference of Archbishop Carlo Vigano and Bishop Athanasius Schneider is different, from mine. Our conclusions too would have to be different. Vatican Council II is not a rupture with EENS for me. Vatican Council II is a break with EENS for them and the popes.







How can they imply that invisible cases of non-Catholics saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16) are physically visible on earth too? Archbishop Vigano and Bishop Schneider violate the Principle of Non Contradiction of Aristotle. -Lionel Andrades