This is interpreting Church Documents with the Boston Heresy of Pope Pius XII.

 

1.If the Boston Heresy Case  refers to the heresy of Fr. Leonard Feeney ( as the Boston secular media suggested)  then Vatican Council II is a break with Tradition but 2.if it refers to the heresy of Pope Pius XII and Cardinal Richard Cushing,the archbishop of Boston, then Vatican Council II  is not a break with the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the rest of Tradition.

There are two paths.

The Church chose the wrong path.It chose the wrong option. It chose to interpret Vatican Council II etc with the False Premise of the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office. This was the Boston Heresy of Pope Pius XII. All the popes since then have chosen the wrong path.

There is the irrational interpretation of the cardinals and bishops and my rational interpretation.There is the irrational interpretation of the SSPX and sedevacantist bishops and my rational interpretation.

The German bishops chose the irrational interpretation but now they can choose the rational interpretation.

The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican chose the irrational option but now they can re-interpret Magisterial Documents rationally. They have a choice. It is the only ethical option, which is possible.

It was Pope Pius XII who was in heresy. He confused invisible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance as being visible exceptions for traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). He approved the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office which made this mistake. He brought in a New Theology which said outside the Church there is KNOWN SALVATION IN THE PRESENT TIMES. So doctrine on exclusive salvation was made obsolete.

The result : from Pope Paul  to Francis, invisible cases of Lumen Gentium 14 ( baptism of desire) and Lumen Gentium 16 ( invincible ignorance) were projected as visible exceptions for the traditional EENS, the Athanasius Creed , the Syllabus of Errors  ( ecumenism of return), Catechism of the Catholic Church 845,846, Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24Q, 27Q- outside the Church no salvation), the Council of Florence 1442 ( extra ecclesiam nulla slaus ) etc.This is interpreting Church Documents with the Boston Heresy of Pope Pius XII. - Lionel Andrades

Without the Boston Heresy of Pope Pius XII, Cardinal Richard Cushing and the Jesuits - the Franciscans of the Immaculate and the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) could interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

Without the Boston Heresy of Pope Pius XII, Cardinal Richard Cushing and the Jesuits- the Franciscans of the Immaculate and the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) could interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus. Without the error of the popes from Pius XII, Peter Kwasniewski, Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and the late Mons. Brunero Gherardino, would be affirming EENS, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors in harmony with Vatican Council II (rational). There would be no liberalism; Rome would have to come back to the Faith.

But today Cardinal Parolin like the German cardinals and bishops chooses the Boston Heresy of Pope Pius XII to reject the dogma EENS and the past ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church. This is political and it is approved by the Left.

Instead they should be opposing the Left and interpreting Vatican Council II rationally, without the 1949 mistake of Pius XII, Archbishop Lefebvre and Cardinal Cushing and the American Jesuits.- Lionel Andrades

Liberal theologian Michael Seewald interprets Vatican Council II with a fake premise and then says dogmas evolve and there is a doctrinal development.

Liberal theologian Michael Seewald interprets Vatican Council II with a fake premise and then says that dogmas evolve and there is a doctrinal development. If he did not choose the fake premise and inference to interpret Vatican Council II, the Creeds, Catechisms etc he would be a traditionalist and would be expelled by the University of Munich. Now he keeps his job with the unethical theology of Pope Benedict and the popes since Pius XII.

Without the Boston Heresy of Pope Pius XII and the popes who followed, Vatican Council II would affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, as it was known in Germany over the centuries.- Lionel Andrades

Michael Seewald, what are you thinking about right now?

Michael Seewald: About dogmas and their problems: How has official Christian teaching changed over time? For what reasons did she do this? What mechanisms were at work?

Michael Seewald is a professor of dogmatics and the history of dogmas at the University of Münster. In 2018 he published the book "Dogma in Transition" (Herder). Most recently he published "Theories of doctrinal development in the Catholic Church" (Cambridge University Press, 2023).

https://cathcon.blogspot.com/2023/03/leading-theologian-admits-hermeneutic.html

Feast of St.Joseph today : protector of the Catholic Church and destroyer of heresies

  

FUORI DELLA CHIESA CATTOLICA 

NON C’E SALVEZZA

(OUTSIDE THE CHURCH THERE IS NO SALVATION)

GIOV.3:5, MC.16:16

(JOHN 3:5, MARK 16:16)

CONCILIO VATICANO II (AG7/LG14)

(VATICAN COUNCIL II (Ad Gentes 7/ Lumen Gentes 14)

CATECHISMO DELLA CHIESA CATTOLICA (846)

(CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH 846)

CATECHISMO DEL TRENTO, CATECHISMO DEL PAPA PIO X,

(CATECHISM OF TRENT, CATECHISM OF POPE PIUS X)

CONCILIO LATERANO (1215), CONCILIO DI FIRENZE (1442)

(FOURTH LATERAN COUNCIL (1215), COUNCIL OF FLORENCE (1442))

Name: Lionel Andrades

https://twitter.com/AndradesLionel

E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com

Blog: eucharistandmission ( Lionel’s blog).               

 March 19, 2023 Feast day of St. Joseph

P.S: THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE (BOD), BAPTISM OF BLOOD(BOB) AND BEING SAVED IN INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE (I.I) ARE ALWAYS HYPOTHETICAL AND PHYSICALLY INVISIBLE CASES. SO THEY DO NOT CONTRADICT THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS (EENS).

THE BOD, BOB AND I.I ARE  NOT KNOWN PEOPLE IN PERSONAL CASES. THERE ARE NO PHYSICALLY VISIBLE CASES OF BEING SAVED IN INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE.SO THEY ARE NOT OBJECTIVE EXCEPTIONS FOR THE DOGMA EENS IN 1965-2023.

AD GENTES 7 AND LUMEN GENTIUM 14 SUPPORT THE DOGMA EENS .LG 8,14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 ETC ARE NOT PRACTICAL EXCEPTIONS FOR  AG 7/ LG 14 AND THE DOGMA EENS. THE COUNCIL HAS THE HERMENEUTIC OF CONTINUITY WITH THE SYLLABUS OF ERRORS, THE ATHANASIUS CREED AND THE CATECHISM OF POPE PIUS X ( 24Q,27Q).