Saturday, December 10, 2022
The sedevacantist bishops Donald Sanborn and Mark Pivarunas interpret Vatican Council II with an irrational premise to reject the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Tradition in general. This is conservative modernism. It is heretical and schismatic.They do not have the right to offer Mass without correcting this public scandal.
The sedevacantist bishops Donald Sanborn and Mark Pivarunas interpret Vatican Council II with an irrational premise to reject the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Tradition in general. This is conservative modernism. It is heretical and schismatic.They do not have the right to offer Holy Mass without correcting this public scandal.
NON SEDEVACANTIST ST. BENEDICT CENTER, NH CHOOSE THE RATIONAL PREMISE
On the other hand, the St. Benedict Center, Richmond,New Hampshire, USA, also traditionalists, choose the Rational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and affirm the traditional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus,.This is the interpretation of the missionaries in the 16th century.They are not sedevacantists.
The sedevacantist bishops do not deny that they are conservative modernists who choose to be politically correct with their irrational interpretation of VC2.
It is the same with other sedevacantists.
MOST HOLY FAMILY MONASTERY INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II WITH THE IRRATIONAL PREMISE TOO
It has been nearly a year for me on Twitter and the Most Holy Family Monastery of the Peter and Michael Dimond in the USA have not denied that they choose the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II.They do not choose the Rational Premise and Inference to interpret the Council.This is conservative or traditionalist modernism.
FR.ELDRACHER AND FR. DEPOSITO CHOOSE THE FALSE PREMISE TO INTERPRET VCII
Is it not heretical when Bishop Donald Sanborn, Colleen Eldracher, Fr.Eldracher and Fr. Deposito interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally? This is modernism. It is also the heresy of the present popes.They do not announce that they interpret LG 8,14 and 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II as being only hypothetical and theoretical cases. This would be enough. It would mean that LG 8 etc are not objective exceptions, for them, for Feeneyite EENS and the Athanasius Creed.
The sedevacantists are modernists when they interpret Vatican Council II with an Irrational and not Rational Premise and Inference.It is in this false way that they create a Non Traditional Conclusion.This is heresy and scandal.There is no denial from them.
SEDEVACANTIST PRIESTS AT THE MHT SEMINARY FLORIDA HAVE NO RIGHT TO OFFER HOLY MASS
At the Most Holy Trinity seminary, Florida, where they teach philosophy and theology, no one answers. They are accused of being modernists and no one denies it.
Brother Cory and Colleen Eldracher, who post on Twitter, interpret Vatican Council II with the Irrational Premise.They can choose to interpret the Council with the Rational Premise like the St. Benedict Center, NH.But the they would be affirming Feeneyite EENS which for years Bishop Sanborn and Fr. Anthony Cekada had criticized.The False Premise creates a rupture with Tradition, how can they call themselves traditionalist?
Posts
