The
Catholic Church is divided on doctrine and theology. In one group there are the
liberals, the Lefebvrists and Thucs who interpret Vatican Council II with the
Fake Premise to create a break with Tradition. In the other group is Sister
Maria Philomena MICM, Director of the St. Augustine Institute of Wisdom (SAI)
at the St. Benedict Center, Richmond, New Hampshire, USA.She interprets
Vatican Council II with a Rational Premise to create continuity with Tradition. -Lionel Andrades
______________________________
THERE ARE TWO INTERPRETATIONS OF VATICAN COUNCIL II AND MOST CATHOLICS ARE CHOOSING THE IRRATIONAL ONE.
-Lionel AndradesMAY 8, 2022
It is with the False Premise that Pope Francis wants to support liberalism, modernism, heresy and schism in the Church and he calls it ecclesial unity. This is leftist ideology brought into the liturgy
At the pontifical Institute of Liturgy, St. Anselm, Rome students have to learn how to interpret Vatican Council II with the False Premise only, so there is a false break with extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and so they do not have to be taught how to proclaim the Social Reign of Christ the King in all politics. Since Vatican Council II for the faculty is a break and not continuity with Tradition.
Instead with the False Premise in the interpretation of Vatican Council II alleged practical exceptions are created for the Syllabus of Errors of Pope PiusIX.
We know that with the Rational Premise there would be no exceptions in the text of the Council for the Syllabus of Errors, the Athanasius Creed and 16th century EENS of the missionaries.
The teaching at St. Anselm is political and with the False Premise the faculty creates a calculated break with traditional ecclesiocentrism.So the students are not shown how to proclaim the Social Reign of Christ the King at Holy Mass.
The Social Reign of Christ the King in all politics cannot be proclaimed at the Liturgical Institute since Vatican Council II is interpreted with the False Premise. The False Premise is obligatory to project false exceptions for the traditional theology on their being exclusive salvation in only the Catholic Church.
It is with the False Premise that Pope Francis wants to support liberalism, modernism, heresy and schism in the Church and he calls it ecclesial unity. This is leftist ideology brought into the liturgy and the Church. -Lionel Andrades
APRIL 27, 2022
Recapping the Jordan Peterson Dialogue : both use the False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents
FEBRUARY 5, 2020
____________________________________________________________
Pope Francis,Pope Benedict XVI, Cardinal Luiz Ladaria S.J and the traditionalist bloggers Louie Verrecchio, Ann Barnhardt and David Domet are in heresy according to the teachings of the Catholic Church.Since they interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents with a False Premise and do not deny it.It is the False Premise which creates heresy and schism.
1. EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS
They reject the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus when they use a false premise.
They reject the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus when they use a false premise.
Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus ( with the false premise).It refers to the dogma but with exceptions.All do not need to defacto convert into the Church in the present times, since there are exceptions.The baptism of desire( with the premise), baptism of blood( with the premise) and being saved in invincible ignorance( with the premise) are exceptions to dogma as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century.
Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus ( premise-free): It refers to the dogma as it was interpreted over the centuries.There are no known exceptions to all needing to formally enter the Church, with faith and baptism, to avoid Hell.Invisible for us baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance are not visible exceptions to all needing to be incorporated into the Catholic Church for salvation.This is heresy.
2.VATICAN COUNCIL II WITH A FALSE PREMISE
They then interpret Vatican Council II also with a false premise.So the Council is a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(premise-free).
They then interpret Vatican Council II also with a false premise.So the Council is a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(premise-free).
Vatican Council II (with the premise): It refers to the interpretation of Vatican Council II without the false premise.LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer not to hypothetical but known cases in the present times. So Vatican Council II emerges as a break with the dogma EENS.
Vatican Council II ( premise-free):It refers to the interpretation of Vatican Council II without the false premise.LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer to hypothetical cases, which are unknown personally in the present times.So Vatican Council II is not a break with EENS, the Syllabus of Errors, ecumenism of return, the Nicene Creed ( premise-free),the teaching on the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation and the non separation of Church and State( since all need to convert into the Church to avoid Hell).
This is heresy too.
3.NICENE CREED WITH A FALSE PREMISE
They then re-interpret the Nicene Creed with the false premise.This is first class heresy.
They then re-interpret the Nicene Creed with the false premise.This is first class heresy.
Nicene Creed ( with the false premise): It says 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins' and means there are more than three known baptisms when the false premise is used in the interpretation. They are water, blood, desire, seeds of the Word etc.This is an irrational but common understanding.
Nicene Creed ( premise-free): It says 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins and means there is one known baptism the baptism of water.
4.ALL MAGISTERIAL DOCUMENTS INTERPRETED WITH A FALSE PREMISE
They interpret all magisterial documents using a false premise which creates a rupture with the old exclusivist excclesiology of the Church. This is a magisterium gone wrong.
They interpret all magisterial documents using a false premise which creates a rupture with the old exclusivist excclesiology of the Church. This is a magisterium gone wrong.
Here is the chart which shows them in first class heresy and automatically excommunicated,according to the hierarchy of truths of Pope John Paul II.
_
1. DO NOT AFFIRM EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS (PREMISE -FREE).
They do not affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) quoted here.Since for them invisible cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance are visible exceptions to the dogma EENS.They use the irrational premise to interpret EENS.
They do not affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) quoted here.Since for them invisible cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance are visible exceptions to the dogma EENS.They use the irrational premise to interpret EENS.
“There is but one universal Church of the faithful, outside which no one at all is saved.” (Pope Innocent III, Fourth Lateran Council, 1215.)
"We declare, say, define, and pronounce that it is absolutely necessary for the salvation of every human creature to be subject to the Roman Pontiff.” ( Pope Boniface VIII, the Bull Unam Sanctam, 1302.)
“The most Holy Roman Church firmly believes, professes and preaches that none of those existing outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans, but also Jews and heretics and schismatics, can have a share in life eternal; but that they will go into the eternal fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels, unless before death they are joined with Her; and that so important is the unity of this ecclesiastical body that only those remaining within this unity can profit by the sacraments of the Church unto salvation, and they alone can receive an eternal recompense for their fasts, their almsgivings, their other works of Christian piety and the duties of a Christian soldier. No one, let his almsgiving be as great as it may, no one, even if he pour out his blood for the Name of Christ, can be saved, unless he remain within the bosom and the unity of the Catholic Church.” (Pope Eugene IV, the Bull Cantate Domino, 1441.) http://catholicism.org/category/outside-the-church-there-is-no-salvation
________________________________
2.THEY DO NOT AFFIRM VATICAN COUNCIL II AND THE CATECHISM (PREMISE-FREE).
They assume hypothetical references in theCatechism of the Catholic Church, Vatican Council II and the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 are non hypothetical and so are examples of objective cases, known people saved outside the Church.So these documents become a rupture with Tradition because of the use of the false premise.If they did not use the false premise there would not be a rupture with traditional EENS and the Syllabus of Errors.
They assume hypothetical references in theCatechism of the Catholic Church, Vatican Council II and the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 are non hypothetical and so are examples of objective cases, known people saved outside the Church.So these documents become a rupture with Tradition because of the use of the false premise.If they did not use the false premise there would not be a rupture with traditional EENS and the Syllabus of Errors.
3.THEY DO NOT AFFIRM THE SYLLABUS OF ERRORS
They do not affirm the Syllabus of Errors since they have rejected the old exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church upon which was based the Syllabus of Errors. So theologically there is no more an ecumenism of return and non Christians do not need to convert into the Church since there is known salvation outside the Church for the. They are in a rupture with the magisterium of the 16th century ?
They do not affirm the Syllabus of Errors since they have rejected the old exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church upon which was based the Syllabus of Errors. So theologically there is no more an ecumenism of return and non Christians do not need to convert into the Church since there is known salvation outside the Church for the. They are in a rupture with the magisterium of the 16th century ?
EXAMPLES OF THE HYPOTHETICAL REFERENCES IN THE CATECHISM WHICH FOR THEM ARE NOT HYPOTHETICAL.
1. 'God is not limited to the Sacraments'(CCC 1257).
'2.all salvation comes from Christ the Head through the Church which is his Body'(CC(CCC 846).
3. Those 'justified by faith in Baptism are incorporated into Christ; they therefore have a right to be called Christians'(CCC 818).
4. They are 'joined in many ways to the baptized who are honored by the name of Christian, but do not profess the Catholic faith in its entirety or have not preserved unity or communion under the successor of Peter."(CCC 838).
5. 'the plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator, in the first place amongst whom are the Muslims'(CCC 841).
__________________________________
EXAMPLES OF HYPOTHETICAL REFERENCES IN VATICAN COUNCIL II WHICH FOR THEM ARE NOT HYPOTHETICAL.
1. 'elements of sanctification and truth'in other religions(LG 8).
2..'good and holy' things in other religions(NA 2).
3..'a ray of that Truth which enlightens' all men(NA 2).
4.'imperfect communion with the Church(UR 3).
5.' people of good will in other religions'(GS 22).
6.' seeds of the Word'(AG 11).
7.'invincible ignorance'(LG 16).
8.'a good conscience'(LG 16) etc.
_________________
Posts
