Thursday, October 25, 2012

BISHOP WILLIAMSON ASSUMES THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE IS EXPLICIT FOR US-SO VATICAN COUNCIL II IS MODERNIST. ARCHBISHOP LEFEBVRE COULD HAVE MADE THE SAME ERROR

In his response to the two questions Bishop Richard Williamson, says 'the Church holds the doctrine of the baptism of desire'.Implicit or explicit baptism of desire ? Baptism of desire known to us or known only to God ? He does not clarify.
Here are the two questions I asked him.
1) Do we personally know the dead saved in invincible ignorance, a good conscience (LG 16) etc ?

2) Since we do not know any of these cases, there are no known exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ?

Does he personally know any of the dead saved with the baptism of desire ? Can he see the dead? Are they visible to him? He has either not understood the question or may be he has understood the baptism of desire as always explicit for us.

I think he has always understood the baptism of desire as visible for us.So it is an explicit exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. So could not answer the two questions.

Since the baptism of desire, invincible ignorance and a good conscience are always visible for him  he assumed that these cases, and Vatican Council II,contradicts the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and also the Syllabus of Errors.

So Vatican Council II is modernist for him.If these cases were not visible then the Council would affirm the dogma and Tradition.This could have been the basic problem faced by Archbishop Lefebvre too.

The Society of St.Pius X(SSPX) Chapter (July 19,2012) may have realized this mistake and so has affirmed the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and mentioned there are no exceptions.The baptism of desire is not an exception.-Lionel Andrades 

BISHOP RICHARD WILLIAMSON RESPONDS TO THE TWO QUESTIONS : EXCLUSIVE

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/10/bishop-richard-williamson-responds-to.html#links