Catholics should be free to interpret all Church documents with Feeneyite theology and philosophy as it was done over the centuries in Hungary and the rest of Europe during the Austro-Hungarian Empire ( Graphics)

-Lionel Andrades

 OCTOBER 7, 2018

Repost : They have a choice in Hungary and Prime Minister Viktor Orban can ask that catechesis and catechism classes for children and adults be based on Vatican Council II Feeneyite and not Vatican Council II Cushingite

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/10/repost-they-have-choice-in-hungary-and.html

The entire theology of Pope Paul VI and the USCCB on Mixed Marriages was wrong.It was based upon an irrationality.The result is non traditional and heretical. It is the 'smoke of Satan' within the Catholic Church stoked by Pope Paul VI.

In addition to the sacred character of all valid marriages, still more must be said of marriages between a Catholic and another baptized Christian. According to our Catholic tradition, we believe such marriages to be truly sacramental.-Statement on the implementation of the Apostolic Letter on Mixed Marriages,USCCB(1970).
Lionel:

This is heretical but it must be expected since the USCCB and Pope Paul VI interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism.

There there is known salvation outside the Church for Cushingites.Theoretical cases are assumed to be objective. This is a typical Cushingite Reading. 

So the USCCB rejects  the Catechism of Pope Pius X which says Protestants are outside the Church and all need to be Catholic to be saved.

So how can a marriage to a Protestant or Orthodox Christian be a sacrament ?

This is an attack on the family and marriage.Sr. Lucia at Fatima predicted that in the end times, in the battle Satan will attack the family.

'The Apostolic Letter states that there exists between persons united in them a special "communion of spiritual benefits".These spiritual bonds in which couples are united are gounded in the "true, though imperfect, communion" which exists between the Catholic Church and all who believe in Christ and are properly baptized ( Decree on Ecumenism,n.3).'-- Statement on the Implementation of the Apostolic Letter ( Matrimonia Mixta),USCCB, ,p.17, St Paul's Books and Media, Boston, MA).

Lionel:

Cushingites at the USCCB, like Pope Paul VI, see the Decree on Ecumenism n.3( Unitatitis Redintigratio 3) as saying there are Christians saved outside the Catholic Church.They are saved without Catholic Faith.For Cushingites these are personally known people.So they become exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS),Since they exist in our reality they become exceptions.If they did not exist and were invisible they would not be exceptions to traditional EENS.

So the USSCB like Pope Paul VI takes it for granted that UR 3 refers to objective examples of salvation outside the Church. They are projected as exceptions to the past exclusive ecclesiology on salvation. So Protestants, Orthodox Christians, Pentecostals and Evangelicals do not need to convert into the Catholic Church for salvation.

They are not outside the Church and so the mixed marriage is considered to be a Sacrament.

There is an imperfect communion between Protestants and Catholics, according to the USCCB and this is sufficient for salvation.

A Feeneyite Reading of Vatican Council II would say the Decree on Ecumenism n. 3(UR 3) refers to theoretical and hypothetical Christians, saved outside the Catholic Church. Practically there are no such people in 2018. No human could detect and judge such a case over the last 50 years or during Vatican Council II.This is something obvious.

We cannot know of any Protestant, Orthodox Christian or Baptist saved in imperfect communion with the Catholic Church.

So the Catholic spouse in a mixed marriage is living in adultery.His spouse is outside the Catholic Church, the Mystical Body of Jesus, and so is oriented to Hell at the time of death.The marriage is not a Sacrament.


A marriage is a Sacrament only between two Catholics. There are only Catholics in Heaven.

So we see that the entire theology of Pope Paul VI and the USCCB on Mixed Marriages was wrong.It was based upon an irrationality.The result is non traditional and heretical. It is the 'smoke of Satan' within the Catholic Church stoked by Pope Paul VI.-Lionel Andrades

 OCTOBER 6, 2018

Smoke of Satan of Matrimonia Mista ( Mixed Marriages ) of Pope Paul VI  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/10/smoke-of-satan-of-pope-paul-vi-mixed.html

OCTOBER 6, 2018

USCCB interprets Vatican Council II with Cushingism. So mixed marriages are not adultery   http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/10/usccb-interprets-vatican-council-ii.html

 OCTOBER 6, 2018

The moto proprio of Pope Paul VI on Mixed Marriages is Cushingite.Since he did not know of a Vatican Council II, Feeneyite

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/10/the-moto-proprio-of-pope-paul-vi-on.html

Repost : BENEDICTINE TROUBLE

OCTOBER 2, 2018

BENEDICTINE TROUBLE

Michael and Peter Dimond at the Most Holy Family Monastery(MHFM), USA are lay Benedictines following the doctrines and theology of St. Benedict himself  and the monks of Mt. Cassino of his time.

This is rejected bythe former Abbot Primate Notker Wolf, a German, who resides at the Benedictine University of St. Anselm in Rome.(See 4:39 on the video below) It is rejected officially and publically by the Benedictines in general all over the world.
The MHFM, like St. Benedict, affirm the dogmaextra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and reject the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood (BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I)as being objective exceptions to EENS.It is the same as the Jesuit Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.But they would consider the official Benedictines at St. Anselm as being sectarian.Since they interpret BOD, BOB and I.I as referring to non Catholics saved outside the Church, thus contradicting the dogma EENS as it was known and taught by the Benedictines of the past.

Like the new communities of the Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate(F.I), former religious sisters, who still live in community as religious,but are registered as a society, Michael and Peter Dimond, live the religious life as Benedictines and attend the Traditional Latin Mass (TLM) as lay men.

While the the former Abbot Primate NotkerWolf offers Holy Mass as a religious, andholds the secular leftist interpretation of EENS and BOD,BOB and I.I.So he has rejected the strict interpretation of EENS according to the founder of his community.With a new ecclesiology, based upon visible for him BOD, BOB and I.I he offers the new Mass.This is a rupture with the ecclesiology of  the Mass as it was offered by the Benedictines before the Letter of the Holy Office(1949).

For me, the former Abbot Primate Notker Wolf, a Bavarian who ended his term in 2016,and still speaks on Catholic issues for the Benedictines and is the author of many books,represents a false church, with a false theology and philosophy, within the true Church.He does not affirm Vatican Council II( Feeneyite) which is in harmony with the ecclesiology of the Church during the time of St. Benedict. This is an error also of the MHFM.

So today, for vocations, the Benedictines would only accept candidates to the religious life who choose to affirm a rupture with the theology and philosophy of St. Benedict.

So candidates must choose to interpret Magisterial documentswith an irrationality.

Michael and Peter Dimond would have no chance to  join the Benedictines.Since they avoid the irrationality when interpreting EENS. Perhaps this could be a reason why the founder of the MHFM left the official Benedictines.

I too would have no chance of entering the Benedictines since for me invisible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I are not visible exceptions to EENS. Neither does Lumen Gentium 8 contradict EENS as it was known to the Magisterium and missionaries in the 16th century.For the Benedictines, it does contradict EENS.

Notker Wolf osb, cannot really call himself a Benedictine according to the Rule of St.Benedict, since heresy and schism would be a mortal sin for the original Benedictines.It is also unethical, a lie and deception to use an irrationality ( invisible non Catholics are physically visible to us human beings in general)  to reject the dogma EENS, the Syllabus of Errors ( ecumenism of return), the necessity of the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation and the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church which indicated the necessity of the non separation of Church and State, to save souls from going to Hell.

So the 'official' Benedictines are telling a lie in public, and this comes under the area of secular Italian law. 

Also according to Catholic Canon Law a juridical person, like an Abbot, is not permitted to publically reject the de fide teachings of the Catholic Church,nor tell a lie and not repent. 

He must correct the scandal before he offers Holy Mass.

I will e-mail this blog post to the Benedictines and would expect a reply from them.I would also like to ask them to answer these two additional questions, which are quite simple.

1. Can we humans physically see non Catholics saved with the the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and in invincible ignorance, with or without the baptism of water? My answer is obviously NO.

2.Can we humans physically see non Catholics saved outside the Church with 'elements of sanctification and truth'(LG 8),'invisible ignorance'(LG 16), the case of the unknown catechumen who desired the baptism of water before he died ( LG 14),non Catholics saved with 'good will' (GS 22),non Catholics saved with 'a ray of that Truth'(NA2) etc in 2018 or over the last 50 years ? My answer is NO.

Michael and Peter Dimond would also answer these questions with aNO.This is common sense.

-Lionel Andrades

http://test.anselmianum.com/facolta-di-teologia/professori-di-teologia/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Notker_Wolf

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/10/benedictine-trouble.html