The liberal progressivist ideology depends upon the False Premise. Without the False Premise President Sergio Mattarella and Prime Minister Mario Draghi become rigid traditionalists as Catholics and would not be approved by the Left. The powerful lobbies would look for someone else to replace them. So Mattarella and Draghi interpret Vatican Council II with the Fake Premise to create a break with Catholic Tradition. Their Oath of Office was with a False Premise and this was unethical for a President and Prime Minister of Italy.
Irrespective if they are Catholic or not they use a Fake Premise to interpret Vatican Council II, the Creeds and Catechisms when this can be avoided. I avoid it. I use the Rational Premise. So the old theology, the old exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church is the same as before and after Vatican Council II. Even a non Catholic can interpret Vatican Council II like me. He simply has to avoid confusing what is physically invisible (LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3 etc) as being physically visible and personally known in 1965-2022.There are no known cases. Since if anyone is saved in the present times it would only be known to God. In general we cannot see a baptism of desire case.
So it is simple. The Rational Premise (invisible cases are invisible) produces a traditional conclusion. But the Rational Premise is not politically correct.A break with Tradition is wanted.
Now with the False Premise, as Catholics President Mattarella and Prime Minister Draghi cannot affirm the Athanasius Creed (since there are visible exceptions for them). They cannot affirm the Syllabus of Errors. There is the same problem. With the alleged practical exceptions the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus is also made obsolete.
With the Rational Premise there are no exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II for these exclusivist Church Documents. But if Mattarella and Draghi affirm them, it will be the end of their liberalism/ progressivism. They would no more be politically correct with the Left, whom they now represent in the Italian Parliament.
But their False Premise changes the understanding of the Nicene Creed and so how can they claim to be Catholic? Their Oath of Office was made as Catholics. Was it valid ?
The President and Prime Minister’s Offices need to clarify that only the Rational Premise is being used by the Italian Heads of State to interpret Catholic Magisterial Documents including Vatican Council II. So the two political leaders are Catholic and are also honest and ethical.
Presently Mattarella and Draghi’s ‘progressivism’ is based upon a public fraud. How can they claim to be members of the Catholic religion ?
They reject 1) Vatican Council II (Rational), 2) the Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Rational) 3) the Nicene Creed ( Rational) 4) the Athanasius Creed ( Rational) 5) the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( rational, with the baptism of desire being only hypothetical and invisible) 6) the Syllabus of Errors ( rational, i.e. there are no practical exceptions for an ecumenism of return ) 7) the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( Rational, with 29Q ( invincible ignorance ) not contradicting 24 Q and 27 Q( outside the Church no salvation).
Presently they do not proclaim the Social Reign of Christ the King in all politics with the non separation of the State with the Catholic Church’s traditional beliefs.
Their understanding of the First Commandment is indifferent and syncretistic.
It may be mentioned that Gloria Polo discovered after she was killed by a lightning bolt in the University of Bogota, Colombia grounds that it is important to be a Catholic to go to Heaven. Jesus gave her a second chance; she could come back to earth and was not judged and condemned.For her, abortion, which Mattarella and Draghi support, is a mortal sin . She saw Hell.
Similarly Alphonse Ratisbonne, a Jewish financier, was shown by Our Lady at the church Sant Andrea della Fratte, Rome, the beauty of the Catholic Church and its importance for the salvation of all people. He became a Catholic priest and a missionary in the Middle East.
Catholics are the new people of God (Nostra Aetate 4, Vatican Council II). They have the Jewish Messiah promised by the Jewish Prophets. The Catholic Church is a continuation of the Jewish religion, whose adherents are still waiting for the Messiah. The New Testament follows the Old Testament in the Bible.
The Catholic Church still teaches today in Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church, like at the times of the Jesuit missionaries in the 16th century, that in Heaven there are only Catholics. They are there with faith and the baptism of water (Ad Gentes 7, Catechism of the Catholic Church (845, 846, 1257 etc).
Jesus cannot be separated from the Catholic Church, His Mystical Body and neither from the Kingdom of God in its final times(Dominus Iesus, Pope John Paul II).Neither can Jesus be separated from national and international politics ( Quas Primas etc).
-Lionel Andrades
The relevant Italian Ministries must clarify that the President and Prime Minister do not interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents with a Fake Premise, to create a false and ideological break with Catholic Tradition.
The President and Prime Minister of Italy’s Oath of Office supports false pretensions and is dishonest. President Sergio Mattarella and Prime Minister Mario Dragi are posing as Catholics when they are not .This is an ethical issue. They use a False Premise to reject Catholic teachings. If they used the Rational Premise to interpret Magisterial Documents, they would have to affirm the past ecclesiocenterism of the Catholic Church. This would become a political and ideological issue and the lobby which supports them today would disown them. The Left would demand that they resign. Since they both would then be affirming the past ecclesiocentrism of the Church and would really be Catholics.
It is important to note that political leaders have been dismissed because of moral or criminal reasons. They were seen as dishonest or unethical.
The center right politician in France who was ahead of Macron in the polls before the elections, had to step aside when the administration found a fault in him. It is as unethical for Mattarella and Draghi to remain in office as alleged Catholics when they employ the False Premise, in public. The re-interpret Catholic de fide teachings and change their original meaning and are eligible to remain in office with this deception. This is not Catholic and neither is this honest. This is deception for political and anti-Catholic ideological reasons.
Also irrespective if Sergio Mattarella is a Catholic or not, he cannot use a False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and reject the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church and pretend that this is the norm for a President of Italy. This is a public scandal.
So many center right politicians in Italy have been disqualified by the Italian judiciary from holding political office, including Mayors of Rome. They did not support the Masonic and Satanic ideology. Now why does the judiciary allow President Mattarella and Prime Minister, educated at Catholic institutions, to re-interpret Church Documents with a False Premise, change their meaning for ideological reasons and then take an Oath of Office as President and Prime Minister respectively ?
The relevant Italian Ministries must clarify that the President and Prime Minister do not interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents with a Fake Premise, to create a false and ideological break with Catholic Tradition.
-Lionel Andrades
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/02/the-relevant-italian-ministries-must.html
Whether President Sergio Mattarella is a Catholic or not a Catholic, he is still using a False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and there is no denial from his office.
There are two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational. The conclusion of the rational interpretation is traditional and that of the irrational non-traditional, heretical and schismatic. Pope Francis chooses the irrational interpretation and then justifies Amoris Laetitia and giving the Eucharist to the divorced and re-married, like Silvio Berlusconi. So with the theology and ecclesiology changed and the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II being cited as the cause of the change, it is asked by the liberals and Masons, why cannot moral theology also be changed ?
But the interpretation of Vatican Council II with the False Premise is unethical, it is immoral too. Yet this is the false interpretation of President Sergio Mattarella who the other day took an Oath of Office as the President of Italy, still suggesting that he is a Catholic.
Whether he is a Catholic or not a Catholic, he is still using a False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and there is no denial from his office.
Based on Vatican Council II (Irrational) Matteralla and the liberals and Masons support LGBT mortal sins and pro abortion policies.
With the Fake Premise he rejects Magisterial Documents including the Athanasius Creed and this disqualifies him from claiming he is a Catholic. It also disqualifies Pope Francis from claiming he is the pope and a Catholic. They both need to correct the error and end the scandal.
Once they choose the Rational Premise, they return to the old theology and there are no practical exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II for the past ecclesiocentrism of the Church.LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc cannot be cited as practical exceptions any more for the Syllabus of Errors, by Pope Francis and President Sergio Mattarella.
To be a Catholic they need to accept Magisterial
Documents and interpret them rationally.-Lionel Andrades
How can President Sergio Mattarella make an Oath of Office as a Catholic when he interprets Vatican Council II with a False and not Rational Premise ?
-Lionel Andrades
Is the Oath of Office of President Matterella valid? His office needs to issue a clarification saying that the interpretation of Vatican Council II with the False Premise is unethical even if the popes do the same.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/02/is-oath-of-office-of-president.html
Is the Oath of Office of President Matterella valid? His office needs to issue a clarification saying that the interpretation of Vatican Council II with the False Premise is unethical even if the popes do the same.
President Sergio Mattarella is dishonest, may be in ignorance and so is innocent, since no one has corrected him in public and the cardinals make the same error.But intepreting Vatican Council II with a False Premise is not Catholic or ethical.
This was also the mistake of Pope Paul VI, Cardinal Alfredo Ottaviani, Cardinal Richard Cushing, Cardinal Bea and Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and the SSPX bishops. So no one could have told him about his mistake.
The editors of the leftist main line newspapers also use the same false premise as him to interpret Vatican Council II.
So is the Oath of Office of President Matterella valid? His office needs to issue a clarification saying that the interpretation of Vatican Council II with the False Premise is unethical even if the popes do the same.
A violation of the Principles of Non Contradiction is a violation even if the popes do the same. The Italian people must know.-Lionel Andrades
President Sergio Mattarella's Oath of Office was as a Catholic but how can he be a Catholic when he interprets Vatican Council II with a False Premise and not the Rational Premise ? How can a Catholic interpret all Church Documents with a Fake Premise as he does ?
President Sergio Mattarella's Oath of Office was as a Catholic but how can he be a Catholic when he interprets Vatican Council II with a False Premise and not the Rational Premise ? How can a Catholic interpret all Church Documents with a Fake Premise as he does? It is a false Oath of Office also for members of Parliament unless they interpret Vatican Council II rationally.
A Catholic is a person who has the traditional Catholic Faith, is baptized with water and follows the teachings of the Catholic Church. How can someone be a Catholic who interprets Vatican Council II, the Creeds, Catechisms, extra ecclesiam nulla salus etc with a Fake Premise to produce an irrational, non traditional and non Catholic conclusion, as does Mattarella.
For him Lumen Gentium 16 ( being saved in invincible ignorance) refers to a visible person in 1965-2022 and so is a practical exception for the Athanasius Creed which says all need to be members of the Catholic Church ( with faith and baptism) for salvation. For me Lumen Gentium 16 refers to an invisible and hypothetical person in the present times and so is not a practical exception for the Athanasius Creed.
For Mattarella, Lumen Gentium 14 (being saved with the baptism of desire) refers to a known non Catholic saved outside the Church without faith and the baptism of water. So he rejects the Athanasius Creed, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus etc. For me Lumen Gentium 14 refers to an unknown person and so is not an exception for the dogma EENS, the Athanasius Creed, Syllabus of Errors etc.
So for President Mattarella the Athanasius Creed, the dogma EENS and the Syllabus of Errors are obsolete and for me they are not obsolete.
How can he claim to be a Catholic when he rejects Magisterial Documents by using a False Premise (invisible people are visible)?
There are certain conditions when an election could be disqualified or a candidate elected or about to be elected is found in a moral or criminal state which disqualifies him. How can Mattarella be a Catholic, when he is not? How can he unethically interpret Church Documents and suggest that there is a break with Tradition, a Tradition which he rejects.
We have an Italian President who changes the meaning of the Nicene Creed and rejects the Athanasius Creed be given the Eucharist at Holy Mass? Silvio Berlusconi and Matteo Salvini who are divorced cannot receive the Eucharist at Holy Mass.
Without the False Premise he would have to say as a Catholic that outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation. Vatican Council II (Rational) says extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
President Mattarella interpret Vatican Council II schismatically, heretically and irrational and support the New Ecumenism, New Ecclesiology etc. In his Oath of Office this would not be ethical or coherent even by secular ethical standards.
He needs to affirm Magisterial Documents with a Rational Premise and then there would not be a rejection of Tradition as a Catholic.-Lionel Andrades
__________________________
Posts
