Friday, August 4, 2023
When Fr.James Martin interprets the Council irrationally, like Pope Francis he does not qualify to speak to the youth. He is dishonest. He is not in communion with Jesus and His Mystical Body the Church. It is the same with Pope Francis. Interpreting the Council, Creeds, Catechisms etc irrationally, non traditionally, heretically and schismatically was an impediment to offering Holy Mass at the World Youth Day in Lisbon.
Fr.James
Martin sj addressed the youth at Lisbon without telling them to interpret
Vatican Council II rationally and so return to the old moral theology of the
Catholic Church, which says those living in mortal sin will not see the Kingdom
of God.
When LG
8,14, 15, 16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to hypothetical cases they do not contradict
the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church, which says homosexual
acts are mortal sins and that outside the Church there is no known salvation in
the present times.
The youth
also need to be told that abortion and contraception are mortal sins. This is
the traditional moral teaching of the Church.It is not contradicted by Vatican Council
II interpreted rationally.
.
Fr. Martin
should not be offering Holy Mass since he approves of the homosexual life style
and does not repent. He does not acknowledge homosexual acts as a sin in need
of repentance.
He can no
more justify these mortal sins with Vatican Council II, interpreted
irrationally, as ‘a revolution’ in the Church. He cannot pretend that there can
be a new mortal theology as if people do not know that the Council can be
interpreted rationally.
So when Fr.James Martin interprets
the Council irrationally, like Pope Francis he does not qualify to speak to the
youth. He is dishonest. He is not in communion with Jesus and His Mystical Body
the Church. It is the same with Pope Francis.
Interpreting
the Council, Creeds, Catechisms etc irrationally, non traditionally,
heretically and schismatically was an impediment to offering Holy Mass at the
World Youth Day in Lisbon.
- Lionel Andrades
Cómo tu Ángel Custodio puede Cambiar tu Vida / Forums: How Guardian Angels Change Your Life
Forums: How Guardian Angels Change Your Life
How can a pope be an apostolic pope who interprets Vatican Council II, the Nicene Creed, Athanasius Creed, Catechism of the Catholic Church etc irrationally and not rationally? How can there be a pope who approves the two interpretations of the Creeds, Councils, and Catechisms etc-one is rational and the other is irrational? He has to interpret Church Documents rationally. This is common sense.
How can
a pope be an apostolic pope who interprets Vatican Council II, the Nicene
Creed, Athanasius Creed, Catechism of the Catholic Church etc irrationally and
not rationally? How can there be a pope who approves the two interpretations of
the Creeds, Councils, and Catechisms etc-one is rational and the other is irrational?
He has to interpret Church Documents rationally. This is common sense.
How can we have a Prefect of the Dicastery of Doctrine and the Faith (DDF), Vatican, who does the same? The CDF/DDF also interprets Vatican Council II, the Creeds, Catechism of the Catholic Church and etc irrationally to produce a false break with Tradition. This is official heresy and schism. It cannot be magisterial or apostolic.
There is no clarification or correction from Archbishop Augustine di
Noia op, Secretary of the DDF.
Why is
there a political Decree of Prohibitions issued against the Slaves of the Immaculate
Heart of Mary at the St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire, USA when they accept
Vatican Council and the Catechism of the Catholic Church. They interpret CCC
847-848 (invincible ignorance etc) rationally. It is the DDF which must
interpret CCC 847-848 rationally and affirm that outside the Catholic Church
there is no salvation (AG 7, LG 14, CCC 845,846 etc).This error with the St.Benedict Center was approved by
Archbishop Augustine di Noia op.
- Lionel Andrades
JULY 28, 2023
Things have changed in the Church. You can know more tell me that you justify your liberalism with Vatican Council, since I can justify my orthodoxy, also with Vatican Council II
TALKS ON VATICAN COUNCIL II BEING IN HARMONY WITH TRADITION AND THERE BEING TWO INTERPRETATIONS OF THE COUNCIL, ONE IS RATIONAL AND THE OTHER IS IRRATIONAL.
If you are a group of Catholics, liberal or traditionalist, I am willing to speak about this subject. I can present the material on this blog in an orderly way for you to understand quickly what I keep writing about. I available am in Rome ( only Rome) and there is no charge. The information will be given free. It will be illustrated with some graphics and photos.
I am a Catholic and I affirm the teachings of the Catholic Church as I have said often on this blog.
The difference between me and Catholics in general and also the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, is that they interpret Vatican Council II, the Creeds, Catechisms, Councils etc irrationally and I am rational.
I choose a rational premise and inference and so my conclusion is traditional.
The presentation could take 20 minutes or less.I will be available to answer questions.I do not have any new theology to offer. I simply avoid an irrational observation and we return to the old theology of the Magisterium and missionaries of the 16th century at the Latin Mass. This would be the general theology today, which is honest and rational, at every Mass and every Rite. It would have to be the lex orandi.
Please e-mail me at : lionelandrades10@gmail.com
p.s I do not have a telephone contact number and do not travel out of Rome.
ONLY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH SOLAMENTE LA CHIESA CATTOLICA
Lionel Andrades
Catholic lay man in Rome. Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.How can the Holy Spirit make an objective mistake ? So it is human error and not the Magisterium.
Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral.
It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms. There can be two interpretations.Catholics must choose the rational option.
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, nontraditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional?
It is unethical when the popes, cardinals and bishops choose the Irrational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents.
Blog: http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/
Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission)
E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com
Twitter : @LionelAndrades1
Why should religious communities in Rome and the rest of the world welcome an ‘apostolic visitor’ who does not interpret Vatican Council II rationally and honestly and so is not apostolic or magisterial?
Why
should religious communities in Rome and the rest of the world welcome an ‘apostolic visitor’ who does
not interpret Vatican Council II rationally and honestly and so is not
apostolic or magisterial?
The religious community must interpret the Council
with the rational premise, inference and traditional conclusion and then expect
the Vatican visitor to do the same. This should be the public credentials of
the Visitor.
The
Vatican visitation cannot expect the religious community to accept ‘the reforms
of Vatican Council II’ interpreted with the fake premise. With the rational
premise there are no reforms. The Visitor has to return to the past exclusivist
ecclesiology of the Church with Vatican Council II interpreted rationally.
It must
be obligatory for the Visitor, sent by the Vatican, to only interpret LG 8,14,
15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, in Vatican Council II as referring to non
objective, hypothetical cases in 2023. This is interpreting Vatican Council II rationally.
Pope Francis can no more support LGBT-sex, polygamy, married priests, women’s ordination and expect the religious communities and also future vocations to do the same.Since now the religious communities can interpret Vatican Council II rationally and the Council supports the past ecclesiocentrism and so traditional faith and morals.
The
Council supports the traditional proclamation of the Gospel with traditional
mission based upon exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. So this is the
theology the apostolic visitors must accept.
Religious communities like the Franciscans of the Immaculate and the Society of St.Pius X did the right thing when they rejected Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally. Now they must affirm Vatican Council II rational and ask all apostolic visitations to do the same before they begin their inspection. - Lionel Andrades
JULY 28, 2023
Things have changed in the Church. You can know more tell me that you justify your liberalism with Vatican Council, since I can justify my orthodoxy, also with Vatican Council II
TALKS ON VATICAN COUNCIL II BEING IN HARMONY WITH TRADITION AND THERE BEING TWO INTERPRETATIONS OF THE COUNCIL, ONE IS RATIONAL AND THE OTHER IS IRRATIONAL.
If you are a group of Catholics, liberal or traditionalist, I am willing to speak about this subject. I can present the material on this blog in an orderly way for you to understand quickly what I keep writing about. I available am in Rome ( only Rome) and there is no charge. The information will be given free. It will be illustrated with some graphics and photos.
I am a Catholic and I affirm the teachings of the Catholic Church as I have said often on this blog.
The difference between me and Catholics in general and also the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, is that they interpret Vatican Council II, the Creeds, Catechisms, Councils etc irrationally and I am rational.
I choose a rational premise and inference and so my conclusion is traditional.
The presentation could take 20 minutes or less.I will be available to answer questions.I do not have any new theology to offer. I simply avoid an irrational observation and we return to the old theology of the Magisterium and missionaries of the 16th century at the Latin Mass. This would be the general theology today, which is honest and rational, at every Mass and every Rite. It would have to be the lex orandi.
Please e-mail me at : lionelandrades10@gmail.com
p.s I do not have a telephone contact number and do not travel out of Rome.
ONLY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH SOLAMENTE LA CHIESA CATTOLICA
Lionel Andrades
Catholic lay man in Rome. Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.How can the Holy Spirit make an objective mistake ? So it is human error and not the Magisterium.
Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral.
It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms. There can be two interpretations.Catholics must choose the rational option.
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, nontraditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional?
It is unethical when the popes, cardinals and bishops choose the Irrational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents.
Blog: http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/
Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission)
E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com
Twitter : @LionelAndrades1
Posts
