Wednesday, January 2, 2013

Bishop Bernard Fellay, like Archbishop Lefebvre and the Prefects of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith made a doctrinal error on the baptism of desire being visible to us. Could the SSPX also be wrong about the Holy Mass ?

Its clear now that Archbishop Lefebvre like Cardinal Ottaviani and the other Prefects of the Congeregation for the Doctrine of the Faith assumed that the baptism of desire was explicit and known to us and so an exception to the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.It was a simple mistake. They overlooked the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance not being known to us and so -  these cases could not be considered exceptions.They are not exceptions to anything.


But they all overlooked this!


Now Bishop Fellay assumes that invincible ignorance and a good conscience mentioned in LG 16 is an exception to the traditional teaching on other religions. So for the SSPX, true to the tradition that comes from their founder, they assume that Vatican Council II contradicts the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.


This is a doctrinal error of the SSPX and also the CDF. If the SSPX could be wrong on this issue could their understanding of the Novus Ordo Mass also be wrong ?


The criticism of the Novus Ordo Mass is based on the celebrant turning his back towards God, Latin not being used, the difference in the ordering of the words at the Consecration,the emphasis on the meal instead of the Sacrifice,the manner in which the priest hold the Eucharist.



The Holy Mass in the vernacular is still the Sacrifice of Jesus.


The SSPX bishops and priests are still allowing the dead man walking theory to wrongly influence their theology and understanding of Vatican Council II .Archbishop Lefebvre made the same mistake. This is heresy. It is a new doctrine.This is the heresy of rejecting extra ecclesiam nulla salus which Pope Pius XII called an infallible teaching, they offer Mass.



It is heresy to say that there are exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus. It is heresy and irrationality to allege, on the SSPX websites, that we know non Catholics now dead, who are saved with the baptism of desire and who are now walking on earth- hence they are exceptions to every one needing to enter the Church.


This is the same error as the liberals and the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith Prefects since the 1940's, an error which was also picked up by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre.


One SSPX priest quotes Archbishop Lefebvre using a terrible word for the Holy Mass. This is the Archbishop who was wrong in assuming that the dead are visible and are exceptions to a defined dogma. He could also be wrong about the Novus Ordo Mass.-Lionel Andrades