Monday, December 4, 2017

Cardinal Ratzinger made an objective mistake in Redemptoris Missio (graphics)














































-Lionel Andrades

Be aware of the crude interpretation of Vatican Council II done by Christopher Ferrara, Roberto dei Mattei, Atila Guimares and others


One should not superficially read Vatican Council II and crudely interpret it as a rupture with Tradition, so Vatican Council II (Ad Gentes 7 and Lumen Gentium 14) would be negating the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and also supporting it at the same time.The error in this reading lies in not discerning that this was the mistake made in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston and it was the error repeated by the liberal theologians at Vatican Council II.



1) One interpretation of Vatican Council II is that of the liberal theologians which is supported by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) and the two popes.It interprets hypothetical cases1 as being non hypothetical.They are interpreted as being known examples of salvation outside the Church.Pope Benedict XVI alluded to this in March 2016(Avvenire).He was still trying to prop up the error of his friends.He reiterated that there was known salvation outside the Church and suggested that Vatican Council II mentions this.

Since the baptism of desire(BOD),baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) are examples of known salvation for him, there are passages which contradict EENS and there are other passages  which are orthodox and do not contradict EENS.This is how Pope Benedict,cardinals Muller and Ladaria,archbishops Pozzo and Di Noia, cardinals Burke and Brandmuller,Catholic Answers and Church Militant TV interpret Vatican Council II and continue the reasoning of the 1949-Letter.

2.The second interpretation has BOD, BOB and I.I as not being known exceptions of salvation outside the Church.They are not concrete cases in 2017. They are accepted as possibilities.Being possibilities they cannot be exceptions to EENS.They can be accepted as speculative and hypothetical cases but no connection must be made with the old ecclesiology and Feeneyite EENS.
So when we read the passages in Vatican Council II which mention hypothetical cases 2 we must not crudely and superficially interpret them as being exceptions to Tradition or exceptions to the orthodox passages.
This is a rational reading of Vatican Council II.We do not mix up hypothetical cases as being non hypothetical, invisible people as being visible,possibilities as being explicit and objective in real life.Then Vatican Council II would not be saying,as Pope Benedict did in March 2016(with reference to  Vatican Council II and EENS)that there is salvation outside the Church.Since humanly speaking,there cannot be known salvation outside the Church.In the same way, Pope Francis cannot tell us that the Argentinian couple who have divorced and remarried and who are mentioned in the Acta Apostolica Sedis(AAS) will be going to Heaven or are already saved.How can he know? How can he judge an exception to the general rule on mortal sin? Similarly Pope Francis cannot say that someone outside the Church, a Protestant or Buddhist,is a saint and  and will not be going to Hell.How can he know of an exception? If there is an exception it can only be known to God.
So when we read Vatican Council II it is important not to read it with 'the double meaning',the 'for and against orthodoxy'method.This was the personal inference of Rahner and Ratzinger and the other liberal theologians.

So go ahead and affirm Vatican Council II.In no passage does it mention a single case of known salvation outside the Church.
If it is possible that someone will be saved outside the Church in 2017 then it is also possible that someone will not be saved.Possibilities are like thin air.They are not concrete with reference to EENS and the old exclusivist ecclesiology.
So we must be aware of the crude interpretation of Vatican Council II done by Roberto dei Mattei, Christopher Ferarra , Atila Guimares and others in their books on Vatican Council II.They use the 'double approach' of Rahner and Ratzinger.This was possible by mistaking BOD, BOB and I.I as not being invisible but visible and then inferring further that they excluded the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.
When you read Vatican Council II interpret the passages as I do.Vatican Council II is then no more a rupture with Tradition.

Know that there was an in principle error  made in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office and it can be avoided when reading Vatican Council II.This cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit.-Lionel Andrades


1.
Baptism of desire(BOD),baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance of the Gospel through no fault of ones own( I.I).

2.UR 3, NA 2,GS 22,LG 16, LG 8 etc



DECEMBER 3, 2017

Repost : No denial from Cardinal Ladaria, CDF : schism from the Left over Vatican Council II


http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/12/repost-no-denial-from-cardinal-ladaria.html

DECEMBER 4, 2017

Vatican has no objections

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/12/vatican-has-no-objections.html


A Mother Writes – Francis Does Not Answer

A Mother Writes – Francis Does Not Answer

02:10
A Normal Mother: Marco Tosatti writes about a mother who in February 2016 sent a letter to Pope Francis. She never received a reply, not even an acknowledgement of receipt. The woman introduced herself to Francis as a “normal mother” of two daughters, neither divorced nor lesbian and adds, “For that reason I am afraid that you may perhaps not send me an answer.”

Evil: The mother writes that her two daughters hear on TV from Francis’ mouth that – quote – “to avoid a pregnancy is in certain cases not an absolute evil.” She points out that her daughters were quick to conclude that accordingly artificial contraception and fornication are likewise no evil. The mother scolds Francis, “Holy Father, are you aware of the evil produced by your words in those who listen to you?”

Francis’ Mother: At the end of her letter the woman asks Pope Francis a question, “In your opinion, is your mother, who is certainly watching you from heaven and now knows the whole truth, happy with you today?”

Hilary Thesis: The journalist Hilary White published on her blog whatisupwiththesynod.com, what she calls the Hilary Thesis. It argues that Francis’ pontificate is intended by God to “winnow” the faithful, to force people finally to choose a side and get off the “conservative” fence, to stop trying to appear “moderate”. White concludes, “Be a traditionalist and don’t apologise.”

Fr. Imbarrato's pro-life arrest Saturday

Fr. Imbarrato's pro-life arrest Saturday

720 × 960
On Saturday, December 4 three Red Rose Rescues took place - in Alexandria, Virginia, Washington, D.C and West Bloomfield, Michigan - in an effort to save babies from abortion.

Red Rose Rescues are based on the model presented by pro-life hero, Mary Wagner, a Canadian citizen who enters abortion clinics with literature and a red and white rose, encouraging women to reject abortion and accept help to give their baby life. Those participating are arrested and given a future court date.
https://www.gloria.tv/language/S2mQ8XjTcSwL3q8noxk8XEbJo

Repost :Social Reign of Christ the King can be seen based on Cushingite or Feeneyite theology, Vatican Council II with the false premise or without it.

NOVEMBER 26, 2017

The Social Reign of Christ the King can be seen based on Cushingite or Feeneyite theology, Vatican Council II with the false premise or without it.

The Social Reign of Christ the King can be seen based on Cushingite or Feeneyite theology, Vatican Council II with the false premise or without it.One does not have to be a traditionalist who rejects Vatican Council II(premise-free).Traditionalists should not reject Vatican Council II( premise-free).
Yes reject Vatican Council II(Cushingite)which would infer that there is known salvation outside the Church and so the past ecclesiology of the Church is rejected upon which is based the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King.Vatican Council (Cushingite) must continue to be rejected by the traditionalists. All Catholics should reject it.

For me the Social Reign of Christ the King means encouraging every one to be Catholic, without forcing them.So the political laws must be based on traditional Catholic doctrine and theology.Outside the Church there is no known salvation.So it is important for every one to save their soul and be a member of the Catholic Church.Vatican Council II states all need faith and baptism for salvation(Ad Gentes 7)
Catholics should only vote for Catholic political parties which affirm the Social Reign of Christ the King based on Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Vatican Council II.
This is extra ecclesiam nulla salus without the premise and Vatican Council II without the premise.
In the CMTV Download program on the Social Reign of Christ the King it is said every one does not need to be a Catholic. Bradley Eli interpretsextra ecclesiam nulla salus and Vatican Council II with Cushingite theology.So for him the baptism of desire etc as refers to known examples of people saved outside the Church.Known? Where are these known examples? So since for him and the CMTV team, and the rest of Detroit, there are known exceptions to the traditional exclusivisit theology of the Catholic Church, every one does not need to be a member of the Church for salvation. So proclaiming the Social Reign of Christ the King, with their new theology,Cushingite theology, is not a priority in a pluralistic state for them.





This was the theological formation of Bradley Eli  and he s repeats it.It is the same liberal theology of Dr. Robert Fastiggi and Dr.Ralph Martin and the Archbishop of Detroit.When they support a separation of Church and State we have the present Satanic secularism of our times.We have Catholics voting for the Left which is from Satan with its support of abortion etc.
-Lionel Andrades

1.

https://www.churchmilitant.com/video/episode/download-christ-the-king

theDownload
NOVEMBER 22, 2017—CHRIST THE KING
Restoring all things in Christ.
November 22, 2017

https://www.abortionno.org/cbr-store/unchrist-like-christian/

AUGUST 17, 2017


Bishops Fellay, Schneider are not proclaiming the Social Reign of Christ the King supported by Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite)http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/08/bishops-fellay-schneider-are-not.html

AUGUST 16, 2017

Bishop Athanasius Schneider does not proclaim the Catholic Faith honestly in Kazhkistan

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/08/bishop-athanasius-schneider-does-not.html

JULY 17, 2017

Catholic political parties must teach Catholics the faith which is not being taught by religious due to political pressurehttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/catholic-political-parties-must-teach.html


 MAY 3, 2017

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/05/andrzej-dudathe-president-of-poland.html

DECEMBER 19, 2016

Catholics will not vote for the Catholic political parties :The four cardinals are using an irrational philosophy to reject the traditional ecclesiology and interpret Vatican Council II with the same irrationality
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/12/catholics-will-not-vote-for-catholic.html

NOVEMBER 18, 2016

The two Catholic political organisations are Forza Nuova and Militia Christi. These two lay organisations should be supported in some way this feast of Christ the King

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/11/on-sunday-is-feast-of-christ-king-we.html

Vatican has no objections


The Vatican (CDF/Ecclesia Dei) has no objections.All religious communities can affirm the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and the past ecclesiology of the Catholic Church, along with Vatican Council II(premise free) and meet the doctrinal requirements for canonical status in the Catholic Church.This is the condition set for the SSPX.
They have no objections to Vatican Council II( Feeneyite) in which hypothetical cases Lumen Gentium 16,Unitatis Redintigratio 3,Nostra Aetate 2 etc are interpreted as being hypothetical.They are possibilities known only to God.
So they are not exceptions to the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS and the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.Vatican Council II is not a rupture with EENS according to the 16th century missionaries.This rational interpretation of Vatican Council II with a non traditional conclusion is accepted by the CDF for a canonical recognition of the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX).
Formal announcements have only to be made by the SSPX and the Vatican.
In the past it was said that the SSPX could not accept the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church ; the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS.       
When it was asked,'why ?',it would be said that 'Vatican Council II contradicts the past ecclesiology.'
When it was asked,'Where ?',it was  said, 'Lumen Gentium 16 for example.'
'How does Lumen Gentium 16 contradict EENS' it was asked of them?
They would reply, 'there are people saved invincible ignorance outside the Church, without faith and baptism.'
'So in other words these are known people saved outside the Church, you can name them?'
There is no answer.
Or they would say that 'possibilites in the past are known exceptions to the dogma EENS in the present times(2017)'.
This is irrational.
Now the Vatican has not contradicted reports which affirm Vatican Council II without the unknown- people- are- known premise.This premise-free interpretation of Vatican Council II is not a rupture with EENS and the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.-Lionel Andrades



DECEMBER 3, 2017



Repost : No denial from Cardinal Ladaria, CDF : schism from the Left over Vatican Council II

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/12/repost-no-denial-from-cardinal-ladaria.html



















DECEMBER 2, 2017

Image result for Photo r.Alessandro M Minutella

Fr.Alessandro M. Minutella and laity in Palermo could contact a Catholic judge for guidance

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/12/fralessandro-m-minutella-and-laity-in.html



DECEMBER 1, 2017



The lex orandi lex credendi of Catholics today is based on irrational Cushingite theology.The Feeneyite alternative is ignored by all.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/12/the-lex-orandi-lex-credendi-of_1.html




 NOVEMBER 29, 2017




No denial from Cardinal Ladaria and Bishop Fellay : two interpretations of Vatican Council II and theirs is the irrational one

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/11/no-denial-from-cardinal-ladaria-and.html


NOVEMBER 27, 2017
Ask Cardinal Ladaria a few questions when you meet him
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/11/ask-cardinal-ladaria-few-questions-when.html




 NOVEMBER 26, 2017



The Social Reign of Christ the King can be seen based on Cushingite or Feeneyite theology, Vatican Council II with the false premise or without it.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/11/the-social-reign-of-christ-king-can-be.html


DECEMBER 3, 2017




Repost : No denial from Cardinal Ladaria, CDF : schism from the Left over Vatican Council II

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/12/repost-no-denial-from-cardinal-ladaria.html