Pope Pius XII was a Cushingite and not Feeneyite in Mystici Corporis. He accepted the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office which used the Irrational Premise to interpret the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance. This was Cushingite and not Feeneyite. Then he did not support Fr. Leonard Feeney in public. Pius XII died and did not lift the excommunication

 

In the Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed we profess that the Church is One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic: she is one not only in her diffusion across the entire world, but also in the passage of time and in the unfolding of events. The faithful Catholic is in communion not only with the Church of his own time, but he must necessarily also be in communion with the Church of all times: with the Church of the catacombs, of Constantine, of Saint Bernard, of Saint Pius V and Blessed Pius IX. The lex credendi – and the lex orandi that expresses it – cannot be susceptible to adulterations dictated by the latest fashions or contingencies. 

https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/abp-vigano-faithful-catholics-will-escape-the-authoritarian-suppression-of-the-latin-mass/?

utm_source=top_news&utm_campaign=catholic

How can the Church be Apostolic with the use of the irrational premise to change theology in the Catholic Church?

Pope Pius XII was Cushingite and not Feeneyite in Mystici Corporis. He accepted the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office which used the Irrational Premise to interpret the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance. This was Cushingite and not Feeneyite.

Then he did not support Fr. Leonard Feeney in public. Pius XII died and did not lift the excommunication. Neither did the popes who followed, right through Vatican Council II.

Pope Paul VI lifted the excommunication after some 19 years without the priest recanting. He recited the Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation.

But there was a New Theology in the Church accepted by the traditionalists and liberals and the Jesuits.

For St. Thomas Aquinas and St. Augustine and the many saints over the centuries the BOD and I.I always referred to hypothetical case. They are also physically invisible. This is a given at all time. This is our human experience. Our reality. The saints did not project BOD and I.I as being objective exceptions for EENS. The EENS of St. Ignatius of Loyola did not have exceptions. This was apostolic.

But Archbishop Carlo Vigano and the SSPX bishops are not Apostolic when they project BOD and I.I as being exceptions for Feeneyite EENS.

They change the interpretation of Vatican 

Council II which I accept by interpreting rationally. I am a Feeneyite on Vatican Council II. I accept the Council but I interpret it rationally. So unlike the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican Council II, for me, is dogmatic, ecclesiocentric, traditional and rational. This is the ethical interpretation of Vatican Council II for me. -Lionel Andrades

Signore perdonaci quando rimaniamo freddi ed indifferenti guardando il Tuo crocifisso

Signore donaci lo Spirito di forza per lottare contro il male e fa che possiamo vincerlo con il Bene

Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and Fr. Leonard Feeney were excommunicated for their orthodoxy

 From Twitter 

Fr.Leonard Feeney was excommunicated for affirming the traditional interpretation of the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation, extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).He did not say that invisible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance were visible examples of salvation outside the Church and exceptions for EENS.

The excommunication of Fr.Leonard Feeney was political. Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre too was excommunicated for not accepting Vatican Council II with invisible cases of LG 14 and 16 being allegedly visible examples of salvation outside the Church and a break with EENS.

Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and Fr. Leonard Feeney were excommunicated because they did not accept the irrational and heretical interpretation of Lumen Gentium 14( baptism of desire) and Lumen Gentium 16( saved in invincible ignorance) y the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF), Vatican and the Left. They both had to accept invisible people as being being visible. Then they had to infer that these were known cases.

So the CDF has issued a Decree of Prohibitions against Brother Andre Marie micm and the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary at the St.Benedict Center, in Richmond, New Hampshire, USA, for not accepting invisible cases of being saved in invincible ignorance as being visible exceptions for Feeneyite EENS.

Also the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) were not granted canonical recognition by Pope Benedict XVI, who said it was a doctrinal issue, since the SSPX had to accept Vatican Council II as a break with EENS and not a continuity with EENS. They had to confuse what is invisible as being visible, as did the popes. 

The  Congregatio Mariae Reginae Immaculatae (CMRI) of Bishop Mark Pivarunas and the Most Holy Family Monastery of Peter and Michael Dimond in the USA, are not being invited into the Church by Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican. Since they all have to interpret LG 14 and 16 irrationally to create a break with Feeneyite EENS, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX etc, as do the CDF and the present two popes.

If the Franciscans of the Immaculate would interpret Vatican Council II with invisible cases of LG 14 and 16 as being physically visible exceptions for 12th century EENS they would hold the same Cushingite doctrinal position of the CDF and  the political popes.

The CMRI and MHFM cannot be invited into the Church since they are not liberals who confuse physically invisible cases as being physically visible as did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger and Pope John Paul II and now Pope Francis.

So today Life Site News and the German bishops interpret Vatican Council II with invisible cases of LG 14 and 16 being visible exceptions for the 12th century strict interpretation of EENS. They are liberals and so will not receive the political excommunication of the popes.

If they affirm LG 14 and 16 as being physically invisible cases and say that they accept Vatican Council II in harmony with the strict interpretation of EENS they could be politically excommunicated. The present two popes have accepted Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally.

There is no apology from the Jesuits for expelling Fr. Leonard Feeney from their community. The Jesuits today accept LG 14 and 16 as being physically visible examples of salvation outside the Church and so Lumen Gentium 14 and 16 are objective exceptions for EENS, as , EENS was interpreted by St. Ignatius of Loyola.

The Jesuits today also accept Vatican Council II being a break with Ignatian EENS since invisible cases of LG 14 and 16 are physically visible for them. If they were invisible then they could not be objective examples of salvation outside the Church and practical exceptions for EENS.

So we have a convoluted theology in the Church with what is physically invisible being mistaken as being visible examples of salvation outside the Church in the present times. This is the basis for the liberalism in faith and morals and is called 'the spirit of Vatican Council II'.

If the Franciscans of the Immaculate say physically invisible cases are invisible only they could be excommunicated for saying the obvious. There is a prohibition on saying what is invisible is only invisible. The popes follow this rule. Invisibile people are visibile?

Upholding the invisible people are visible confusion is the green pass for a Catholic to not be excommunicated. The St.Benedict Center in New Hampshire would not say this. So a Decree of Prohibitions has been issued against them. They interpret the baptism of desire (BOD) and invincible ignorance (II) like the saints Thomas Aquinas and Augustine- and not like the CDF.

Now with 'the reverse excommunication policy' the traditionalists and those who oppose the innovation in the Synods could be placed outside the Church. Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and Fr. Leonard Feeney were excommunicated for their orthodoxy.

There was a political and false excommunication of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and Fr.Leonard Feeney of Boston. The baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance always refers to physically invisible cases. So how could they be practical exceptions for Feeneyite EENS? -Lionel Andrades

 NOVEMBER 22, 2022

Bishop Michael Olsen, Dr. Taylor Marshall, Michael G.King and the faculty at the Fisher More College were interpreting Vatican Council II with the Irrational Premise, when the Latin Mass was banned

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/11/bishop-michael-olsenand-dr-taylor.html

NOVEMBER 21, 2022

Young Germans must produce a video showing how Bishop George Batzing is dishonest

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/11/young-germans-must-produce-video.html

 NOVEMBER 21, 2022

How can Bishop Georg Batzing continue to interpret Vatican Council II with an Irrational Premise to create a break with Catholic Tradition. This is unethical even by secular standards. How can he be trusted on other issues, finances etc.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/11/how-can-bishop-batzing-continue-to.html

NOVEMBER 19, 2022

Michael Lofton on Church Militant TV supports heresy and schism. It is with the False Premise that he gets his politically-correct liberalism

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/11/can-church-teach-heresy-analyzing.html