Saturday, June 1, 2013

Cardinal Luiz Ladaria S.J Secretary of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith is still in heresy :visible to us baptism of desire and invincible ignorance contradicts a defined dogma.

Implicit for us baptism of desire and invincible ignorance is a possibility. Explicit for us baptism of desire etc is heresy.It's heresy since it contradicts the thrice defined dogma which says all need to convert into the Church for salvation.
 
The Secretary fo the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) also seems unaware that most of the Catholic apologists today are in heresy, since they believe that the baptism of desire etc is explicit for us.Since it is explicit for them it contradicts extra ecclesiam nulla salus.The Church Councils made a mistake for them!
 
See the talk on Outside the Church No Salvation on Youtube by the apologist Robert Sungenis. He assumes that these cases are explicit for us.
 
Similarly the apologists on Catholic Answers and EWTN make the same error.They do not realize that they are promoting heresy.
 
Fr.Brian Harrison also assumes that these cases are exceptions to the dogma. So they are explicit for him.
 
The problem is not with the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance but how you interpret it- visible for us or invisible for us.
 
If you say that the baptism of desire is visible for us then this is irrational.You cannot see the dead.If it is visible for us then it contradicts the dogma. This is heresy.
 
Even the present Secretary of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, the Jesuit, Cardinal Luiz Ladaria has made the same error in two theological papers of the International Theological Commission (ITC).They can be read on the Internet at the Vatican website of the ITC.
 
The collected papers are published by the ITC  in a book Documenti. Cardinal William Levada, former Prefect of the CDF wrote the preface for the book and did not detect the error.'How can the Prefect of the CDF teach heresy, perhaps it was an oversight?'- one may ask.
The present CDF Prefect Archbishop Gerhard Muller has made the same mistake in an interview given to the National Catholic Register.
 
It is heresy to assume that there are known exceptions to the dogma and that the Councils which defined the dogma made a mistake. Or that this is a negation of Jesus' teaching on all needing the baptism of water for salvation.
 
This error was not corrected forthrightly and clearly by Pope Pius XII and the popes who followed him,perhaps for political reasons.
 
Cardinal Luiz Ladaria's error was overlooked by Pope Benedict XVI.
-Lionel Andrades

Odds are that Pope Francis 'blew it' in the atheist comment




The odds are that Pope Francis 'blew it' in the recent comment on the atheist doing good. However lets give him the benefit of the doubt since he recently also said that Jesus cannot be found outside the Catholic Church, as St.Ignatius of Loyola understood it.
Being a Jesuit today, the pope could have assumed that an implicit and invisible for us case of an atheist being saved, is explicit and visible for him and us.So this case of an atheist being saved is an explicit exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Jesuits St.Ignatius of Loyola, St.Robert Bellarmine and St.Francis Xavier.It would also be an exception to the teachings of the past popes.
According to the Jesuit saints, an atheist needs Catholic Faith and the baptism of water for salvation (Cantate Domino, Council of Florence 1441 etc.) Pope Francis does not know any exception.
 
If practically he does not know any such case why mention it in theory?
Magisterial documents and the Jesuits saints, besides other saints, say all non Catholics need to convert and Pope Francis does not know any atheist who does not need to convert.For salvation just faith is not enough. The atheist needs Catholic Faith and the baptism of water (AG 7,CCC 846) in the present times.
Talk to a Jesuit on this subject today and the odds are ,with a straight face he will  tell you he can see an atheist saved in the present times, may be even more than one, whom he personally knows.
-Lionel Andrades
(First Saturday)

Photo: Pope Francis arrives before his his weekly audience in St. Peter's Square, Vatican May 29. (CNS photo/Giampiero Sposito, Reuters)

Fr.Thomas Rosica at the Vatican Press Office has a heretical teaching: even contradicts Vatican Council II

Being saved in inculpable ignorance of the Gospel is implicit for us, it is known only to God and it is a possibility.Being saved in explicit for us invincible ignorance or atheism is irrational and a heresy.It is heresy since it contradicts the thrice defined dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, which says all need to convert into the Church for salvation.It does not mention any exceptions.
Fr.Thomas Rosica at the Holy See's Press Office is in heresy for assuming there are explicit to us cases saved in invincible ignorance or atheism which are exceptions to Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II, the Catechism of the Catholic Church 846 and the dogma on salvation, all with the same message.
Being saved with implicit-to-us atheism would only be a possibility known to God, if there ever was such a case.We do not know even if there is a single such case. Being saved with explicit- for- us atheism is irrational and a heresy.It contradicts Vatican Council II (AG 7) and the defined dogma which says all need to convert into the Church  and not just those who are aware or who are in ignorance- as if we could know these cases.
 
Fr.Thomas Rosica will not say all need 'faith and baptism' for salvation but instead states 'only those who know'.(LG 14).
Those 'who are aware of the Church but do not enter' will be condemned and those in ignorance who will be saved, are two categories, known only to God. These are implicit-for- us cases. We would not know if there was a single case this year or the years past.They are explicit only for God.
Fr.Rosica assumes these cases are explicit for us. So for him it contradicts the traditional teaching on salvation.This is irrational. He cannot see the dead. This is also a first class heresy.
 
Since in the Nicene Creed we pray 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sin'. One known baptism, the baptism of water. For Fr.Rosica there are more than one known baptism, for the forgiveness of sin and for salvation.An atheist can be saved and this would be known to him.A non Catholic could be saved in invincible ignorance and this case would also personally be known to him(otherwise how could it contradict the dogma).These cases contradict the dogma for him, since they are known to him. He can see and meet the dead.
 
This is heresy.Wedo not know any atheist or person saved in invincible ignorance in 2013. So we do not know any exception to Vatican Council II (AG 7) and the dogma which Pope Pius XII called an 'infallible teaching'(Letter of the Holy Office 1949).
Fr.Rosica has made this heretical position public on the Internet.
All salvation mentioned in Vatican Council II is implicit for us. This is a given. So if it is assumed that these cases are explicit for us;that we can see the dead, and if this is used as a premise,it is irrational and the theoloy which follows will be irrational and heretical.This is the error of Fr.Thomas Rosica.
 
The Vatican Press Office contradicts Tradition. Fr.Rosica contradicts St.Ignatius of Loyola, St.Francis of Assisi, St.Robert Bellarmine and the popes, on extra ecclesiam nulla salus, which is in perfect agreement with Vatican Council II.
Could someone take up this issue canonically with the Vatican's Press Office ?
-Lionel Andrades
(First Saturday)