Sunday, March 27, 2016

Card. Ratzinger interpreted Vatican Council II with an irrationality when a rational option was available .He then excommunicated Abp. Lefebvre and the SSPX bishops for not accepting this heretical version of the faith

It was Cardinal Ratzinger who was in first class heresy and should have been checked by Pope John Paul II.

The CDF Prefect's excommunication of Archbishop Lefebvre was an injustice.

Marcel François Marie Joseph Lefebvre ( 29 November 1905 – 25 March 1991) was a French Roman Catholic archbishop. Following a career as an Apostolic Delegate for West Africa and Superior General of the Holy Ghost Fathers, he took the lead in opposing certain changes within the Church associated with the Second Vatican Council.
In 1970, Lefebvre founded the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX). In 1988, against the expressed prohibition of Pope John Paul II, he consecrated four bishops to continue his work with the SSPX. The Holy See immediately declared that he and the other bishops who had participated in the ceremony had incurred automatic excommunication under Catholic canon law. In 2009, 18 years after Lefebvre's death, Pope Benedict XVI lifted the excommunication of the four surviving bishops at their request but not to Lefebvre, therefore his excommunication remains until today.- Wikipedia

Pope Benedict XVI ( 16 April 1927) served as Pope of the Catholic Church from 2005 until his resignation in 2013. Benedict was elected on 19 April 2005 in a papal conclave following the death ofPope John Paul II and was inaugurated on 24 April 2005.
Ordained as a priest in 1951 in his native Bavaria, Ratzinger established himself as a highly regarded university theologian by the late 1950s and was appointed a full professor in 1958. After a long career as an academic and professor of theology at several German universities, he was appointed Archbishop of Munich and Freising andCardinal by Pope Paul VI in 1977, an unusual promotion for someone with little pastoral experience. In 1981, he settled in Rome when he became Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, one of the most importantdicasteries of the Roman Curia. From 2002 until his election as Pope, he was also Dean of the College of Cardinals, and as such, the primus inter pares among the Cardinals. Prior to becoming Pope, he was "a major figure on theVatican stage for a quarter of a century"; he had an influence "second to none when it came to setting church priorities and directions" as one of John Paul II's closest confidants.
He was originally a liberal theologian, but adopted conservative views after 1968...- Wikipedia


In 1988 when Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre was excommunicated Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger was implementing the Rahner-Ratzinger new theology based on an irrationality i.e there was known salvation outside the Church. He rejected the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus  with this irrationality, which was the basis of the new theology.As a theology he chose Cushingism ( there are known exceptions to EENS) instead of Feeneyism ( there are no known exceptions to EENS).He moved the Church away from the 16th century missionaries understanding of EENS. He had 'developed' the dogma EENS. Worse still he  now interpreted Vatican Council II with the new theology. So the Council was a break with the dogma EENS.There was a rupture with Tradition.
This means he had changed the Nicene Creed from 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins' to 'I believe in three or more known baptisms for the forgiveness of sins, water, desire and blood.'
The Athanasian Creed was made obsolete since there was salvation outside the Church for Cardinal Ratzinger, even though he did not know of any one saved without 'faith and baptism'.Neither could any one in the past have physically seen or known any case of salvation outside the Church but this was unknown or meaningless for him.
Image result for Photos of Athanasian Creed
So with this innovation brought into the Church (hypothethical cases are objective exceptions to EENS)  he rejected the defined dogma EENS, changed the Nicene Creed,  made the Athanasian Creed obsolete since it  stated outside the Church there is no salvation, he interpreted Vatican Council II with an irrationality when a rational option was available and he then excommunicated Archbishop Lefebvre and the SSPX bishops for not accepting this heretical version of the faith.It was because of this heretical interpretation of Vatican Council II Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre had consecrated the four bishops.
Related image
It was Cardinal Ratzinger who was in first class heresy and he should have been checked by Pope John Paul II.
Archbishop Lefebvre was correct in rejecting Vatican Council II in which LG 16, LG 8, NA 2, UR 3 etc refer not to invisible cases but visible cases. This is irrational. Yet this was the Vatican Council II which was politically correct and which was approved by Cardinal Ratzinger.Archbishop Lefebvre was also using the Rahner-Ratzinger new theology and could not see an option.He also overlooked the irrationality in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.
Pope Benedict has now confirmed in the recent interview to Avvenire that he considers the dogma EENS developed and no more the same. This is an indication that he still is using the Rahner-Ratzinger new theology,which is based on an empirical error, an objective error, that of being able to see people in Heaven saved without the baptism of water.
He also approved Summorum Pontificum and wanted the SSPX to canonically enter the Church accepting Vatican Council II with the Rahner-Ratzinger New Theology.  Vatican Council II would be a break with EENS and the old ecclesiology, the Nicene Creed would continue to be changed and the Athanasian Creed remain redundant.This would  be green lighting a Vatican Council II with a hermeneutic of rupture.He rejected the theology of Feeneyism, which would maintain the hermeneutic of continuity.
Related image
This was all permitted by a Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF).
So for the Prefect of the CDF,  Cardinal Richard Cushing, the Archbishop of Boston and the Holy Office in 1949 did not make an objective mistake, with their known cases of the baptism of desire . Instead, for Cardinal Ratzinger, it was Fr.Leonard Feeney who was in heresy.Since he affirmed EENS .There were no persons  known to him saved with the baptism of desire or in invincible ignorance. He considered this heresy.

For the priest from Boston there was no known salvation outside the Church,there  were no exceptions to the dogma EENS and this was not supported by the magisterium of Cardinal Ratzinger. 
It was Rome which was  in heresy, the magisterium was in heresy and even during Vatican Council II (1965) the popes, since Pius XII, had not lifted the excommunication of Fr.Leonard Feeney.
Cardinal Ratzinger did not check the heresy. Instead he supported it and tried to make Archbishop Lefebvre and then the SSPX bishops,to  also accept it.He allowed all this confusion and heresy to persist in the Catholic Church, even after he was a pope.
His pontificate supported magisterial heresy as he did as a cardinal in 1988 when Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre was excommunicated.He produced magisterial documents like Redemptoris Missio and Dominus Iesus which were theologically  based on irrational Cushingism.
Related image
The International Theological Commission under Fr. Luiz Ladaria S.J ( now cardinal-secretary of the CDF),which was over seen by Cardinal Ratzinger as the CDF Prefect and then as pope, promoted 'a theology of religions', religious pluralism,  based on the irrationality in the Rahner-Ratzinger new theology, which he protected. 
The excommunication of Archbishop Lefebvre by the CDF Prefect, was an injustice.-Lionel Andrades

Archbishop Lefebvre was correct in rejecting Vatican Council II interpreted with the irrationality. May God bless him for that

Pope Benedict must be asked to come back to the faith

Christopher A. Ferrara

There being known salvation is central to the Rahner-Ratzinger new theology

The new theology is based upon there being salvation outside the Church. This is irrational

Related image

The hermeneutic method depends upon how you interpret the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance

Pope Benedict, Cardinal Kasper's false arguments for Synod Report : Vatican Council II agrees with the dogma extra ecclesiam nullas salus as it was interpreted by the 16th century missionaries

Bishop Fellay 3-2016

Archbishop Lefebvre interpreted Vatican Council II with the new theology of Rahner-Ratzinger

Image result for Photo of Catholic  Pope FrancisSynodImage result for Photo of Cardinal Kasper

Pope Benedict's heretical interview to Avvenire prepares Catholics to receive a sacrilegeous Synod report after Easter

Related image

You can interpret Vatican Council II without the new theology. Try it and see

Related image

Rahner's Anonymous Christian is main line Catholic theology : coming back full circle

The central point of what I want to say