Sunday, May 23, 2021
Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke and the Lefebvrists are in practical schism with the past Magisterium when they use the false premise , inference and conclusion to create a non traditional conclusion. Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise and the cardinal goes along with it.
Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke and the Lefebvrists are in practical schism with the past Magisterium when they use the false premise , inference and conclusion to create a non traditional conclusion.They are also in a rupture with a rational and Magisterial interpretation of Vatican Council II.Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise and the cardinal goes along with it.With the fake premise they change the understanding and meaning of the Nicene and Apostles Creed and reject the Athanasius Creed.
They re-interpret the baptism of desire(BOD) and invincible ignorance(I.I) with the false premise and so they project exceptions for Tradition.They are not Feeneyites.For them there are practical exceptions for the Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation.The same mistake is made by the liberals.
Since BOD and I.I refer to objective examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church in 1949-2021, they re-interpret the Catechisms irrationally.I do not make this mistake.
To re-intepret the Creeds in a different way, as compared to the past centuries,is heresy.It is also schism with the past popes and saints.It is creating a rupture with the past Magisterium with the use of a false premise.It is the same as the liberals. This is the 'development of doctrine' of the liberal popes.
Since they interpret BOD and I.I with the false premise they create a false rupture with Feeneyite EENS or 16th century EENS. EENS is a de fide teaching of three Church Councils.EENS is also rejected by the liberals.
This was the mistake of Rahner, Cushing and Ratzinger at Vatican Council II.
Cardinal Burke and the Lefebvrists do not interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise, inference and conclusion and so remain in harmony with Tradition.It is the same as the liberals.
I have written about this before and there is no comment or denial from them.The liberals and Lefebvrists are in heresy and schism.The Lefebvrists cannot call themselves traditionalists.
Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre like Pope Paul VI was in schism with the past Magisterium. The Vatican Council II which he signed and approved,was based upon a false premise, inference and conclusion.
The rational alternative would be Magisterial and not a rupture with Tradition.
We have now discovered the secret for the cause of the 'hermeneutic of rupture or continuity with Tradition'. We have discovered the missing link. We can avoid the rupture. It is simple.We avoid the false premise, we do not confuse what is invisible as being visible and every thing else will fall in place.-Lionel Andrades
MAY 21, 2021
Cardinal Raymond Burke , Lefebvrists in practical schism
Summorum Pontificum approved Holy Mass in Latin but it was only allowed to be offered by a priest who accepted the New Ecclesiiology created with the irrational interpretation of the baptism of desire, invincible ignorance, extra ecclesiam nulla salus, Vatican Council II, the Creeds and Catechisms.
A Catholic can attend the Latin Mass as a Cushingite or Feeneyite.A Cushingite is someone who interprets Magisterial documents with a false premise and a Feeneyite is someone who avoids this error with a rational interpretation.
A Catholic can also affirm the four marks of the Church as a Cushingite or Feeneyite. We can also recite the Profession of Faith as a Cushingite or Feeneyite and our conclusion will be different.It would be the same for the Oath of a Bishop or the Oath Against Modernism.
One is orthodox and the other modernist.
Lefebvrists are generally Cushingite. The liberals are also Cushingite. The New Theology depends upon Cushingism.
For the traditionalists, EENS, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors can be either Feeneyite or Cushingite.There are the traditionalists at the St. Benedict Centers and those of the SSPX.
Lefebvrists are modernists who make Magisterial documents obsolete.They are in practical schism and heresy.Yet they are called 'traditionalists'. -Lionel Andrades
____________________________
Fake premise
____________________
Pope Benedict could apologize for the theological mess he promoted in the Catholic Church : he did not caution the Polish minor seminary in a recent message
Pope Benedict could apologize for the theological mess he promoted in the Catholic Church.At the Polish Minor Seminary in Czestochowa, like in Bavaria, Germany, they interpret Vatican Council II with his false premise, inference and conclusion.Even the liberals and conservative Catholics in Switzerland do the same.
The Pope interprets the Creeds and Catechisms with a false premise and rejects the 16th century interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). With the false premise he also makes the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius X obsolete. He has written to a minor seminary in Poland, saying that he is delighted to see “how in Poland still blossoms what in Germany has withered.”
The Poles may be conservative on pro life issues but on salvation issue, they interpret Magisterial documents irrationally. So they reject exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church, just like the former Archbishop of Munich and liberal at Vatican Council II.
Pope Benedict was expected to tell the Polish seminary that it was important that they affirm EENS like the Polish saints and interpret Vatican Council II with the rational premise too.-Lionel Andrades
https://www.ncregister.com/news/pope-emeritus-benedict-xvi-praises-polish-vocations-in-letter-to-minor-seminary-in-czestochowa
The Comitato dell Immacolata could ask the diocese of Porta Santa Rufina,Rome why is it necessary to use a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and the Creeds and Catechisms in the parish of Santa Maria di Nazareth, Casalotti, Boccea ? The religious communities Joselitos Christo, Salesians, Franciscans etc could choose to interpret Vatican Council II rationally
The lawyer of the Comitato dell Immacolata could ask the diocese of Porta Santa Rufina,Rome, now under the Administrator of the Diocese of Civitavecchia, why is it necessary to use a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and the Creeds and Catechisms in the parish of Santa Maria di Nazareth, Casalotti, Boccea ? The religious communities in the parish ( Joselitos Christo, Salesians, Franciscans etc) could choose to interpret Vatican Council II rationally. They could chooce to interpret the Council, with only the rational premise, inference and conclusion.I am only calling upon the diocese and parish to affirm the Catholic faith. -Lionel Andrades
MAY 19, 2021
The Comitato dell Immaculata could use the old seminary building, now vacant, at Casalotti, Boccea Rome, as an educational institution which corrects the public errors being taught at the pontifical universities and the religious communities and seminaries in Rome.
The Comitato dell Immaculata could use the old seminary building, now vacant, at Casalotti, Boccea Rome, as an educational institution.It could correct the public errors being taught at the pontifical universities.The same errors are taught to Catholics in the religious communities and seminaries of Rome.
There is no building in Rome, which houses an educational institution, to correct such common errors.
In the parish Santa Maria di Nazareth, Casalotti,and the nearby School of Catechetics of the Salesian Sisters at the Auxilium, Boccea, they emerge as liberals. Since they have religious programs based upon the non traditional interpretation of Vatican Council II.
There is no educational institution, lay or religious, to correct this error.
Catholics need to be taught traditional doctrine based upon the old rational theology and ecclesiology of the Church without rejecting Vatican Council II(L.A).
The Boccea seminary and church premises should not be allowed to be used for another leftist project,amid so much confusion in the Catholic Church.
I remember attending Mass in Italian offered by Fr.Giovani Manelli F.I,at the church Annunziata, Lungotevere, Rome.There was also Mass in Latin there which was attended by lay members; Third Order members, of the Franciscans of the Immaculate.The Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate would form the choir.No one told them that Vatican Council II and all Magisterial documents could be interpreted with a rational premise and then we return to the old ecclesiology of the Traditional Latin Mass.There is no institution in the Church which brings out in public this information in an organised way and the old seminary building in Boccea, could be used for this aim. -Lionel Andrades
_____________________________
MAY 19, 2021
The Comitato dell Immacolata could use the old seminary building for Catechectical instruction which is not available in the parish
Before Pope Francis shut down the Franciscans of the Immaculate seminary Boccea, Rome, Fr. Stefano Manelli F.I wanted to build a new seminary land near the present one.It would be called the Immaculatum, I was told by a Friar.
Now that the Comitato dell Immacolata,have possesion of the Boccea seminary building and adjoining buildings,including the old church, they could use the premises, for Catechetical instruction, which is not possible in the parish.
They could show in the classroom how the Latin Mass can be offered/attended, with the past theology or the new theology.It depends upon the use of a false or rational prmeise, in the interpretation of Vatican Council II, the Catechisms and Creeds.
The present Brazilian Joselitos Christo priests at Casalotti, Boccea, like the former Fransciscan Friars of the Immaculate, who were there last year, are liberals.They follow the Left.They would not like to affirm Magisterial documents in harmony with Tradition, it would be politically incorrect.They are Cushingites, unlike the popes and saints over history, who were Feeneyites.
If Fr. Stefano Manelli had built the Immaculatum it would have to be Feeneyite in its theology, for it to be in harmony with Tradition.
Today there are many new universities and educational institutions being opened in Rome.None of them interpret Vatican Council II, the Creeds, Catechisms and EENS with the rational premise, inference and traditional conclusion.Instead it is the opposite.This is official dissent, heresy and schism approved by the Vicariate and the Vatican.
If there is to be a seminary or an educational institution, with only on line programs called the Immaculatum, its theology should be rational, so that the doctrines it teaches are not new, like those at the pontifical universities in Rome. -Lionel Andrades
MAY 15, 2021
Posts
