Wednesday, October 23, 2013

Priebke Funeral- Interview with Fr.Pierpaolo Petrucci, District Superior,SSPX, Albano-2

D. 4 - In the light of the above, do you think Commander Priebke is a " public sinner " who should be denied a public funeral ?
According to the current Code of Canon Law an ecclesiastical funeral can be denied only to him who " before his death gave no sign of repentance."  I do not see how Erich Priebke could be considered unworthy of the funeral .
Never before in the Church as today, especially under this pontificate do we speak of charity and, love of neighbor.
And when it comes to putting these virtues into practice, consistent with the Gospel, even when it is not politically correct and challenges the common opinions and the media , then things change ...
The Church cannot bend to the world if you do not want to deserve the reproach of being a hypocrisy as Jesus called the Pharisees in the Gospel.
The mercy of God goes beyond political affiliations , even the most reprehensible and the most serious of sins , provided there is repentance ,which is the only prerequisite. The Church is based on external acts . A Catholic who expressed repentance for his sins, is entitled to a funeral. The inner consciousness of man , none of us can judge , but only God who has the final judgment .
The Catholic religion is one of mercy and forgiveness and not of hatred and revenge .

D. 5 We have seen , however, some prominent ecclesiastical personalities recognize the right of an ecclesiastical funeral for Priebke.
R. Yes, we have heard some voices in the wilderness and this is to their honor. I was very pleased to read the statements of Cardinal Cottier as well as an interview of Cardinal Montezemolo , grandson of the Colonel killed at the Fosse Ardeatine. I was moved by the testimony of some relatives of the victims who showed solidarity, after the pardon was granted and joined in the prayers for the deceased.
This alone is the Christian attitude .
6 - Priebke was a faithful of the SSPX or at least occasionally frequented the chapels ?
R. No, I never met him nor has he ever attended the Society of St. Pius X . I had read that he had been baptized , and that he had received permission to leave the house while under house arrest to go for Mass.
I knew then that he was regularly following instructions of a priest.
D. 7 - Many newspapers have also reported that the funeral would not have been actually held  or at least that it would have been suspended.
How did things go into convulsions in those hours ?
R. The body came in at 17.30 but the family and friends invited to the ceremony were not able to enter because of the protesters . After several attempts , the lawyer decided to suspend the funeral .Since in those conditions he was not able to fulfill the mandate given to him by the family.
At about 19:20 ,in the presence of about twenty people, I offered Mass for the deceased with the absence of the body.
Meanwhile, the coffin was placed in a room on the ground floor where a mortuary had been set up. In the late evening , to fulfill my priestly duties , I suggested to the lawyer that the body be blessed with the funeral ceremony that the Church grants, at the end of the Mass . In his presence , and with a few other people this ceremony was held . Of this I have had occasion to speak to the Press in a recent interview with Andrea Tornelli.
Message incomplete

CDF would be telling a falsehood,if it continued to promote Cushingism

The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF), Vatican would be promoting a falsehood , a lie, if it continued to promote Cushingism.Since Cushingism is not rational and the CDF cannot pretend to know the dead who are saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire.
The CDF needs to clarify that we cannot know the dead- saved and Cushingism cannot be used as an interpretation of Vatican Council II as it is beng done today on a grand scale.
 lies photo: no lies _.jpg
Cushingism is an objective, factual error and corrections need to be made in two theological papers of the International Theological Commission, Vatican.The error can be read on line.
CDF, please do not suggest that the lie of Cushingism is a doctrine of the Catholic Church.No magisterial document claims that we can see the dead or that there are known exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Also when the secular media fault the SSPX for not accepting Vatican Council II , the CDF must  clarify that Vatican Council II can be interpreted according to Feeneyism too, which is rational, while Cushingism is not.
Also the errors in the Catholic encyclopedias need to be brought to the attention of Catholics and people in general.LG 16 (invincible ignorance) is generally considered by the encylopedias and the media to be a known exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.So Vatican Council II is projected as a break with the past.
When the CDF is silent on this is issue it is allowing Catholics to believe in a falsehood. This is contrary to the Ten Commandments and Catholic moral teaching.
-Lionel Andrades

SSPX priests could ask Archbishop Muller to accept Vatican Council II according to Feeneyism

There are four priests of the Society of St.Pius X(SSPX) who have commented on LG 16,LG 8 and UR 3, the controversial passages in Vatican Council II. They have interpreted these passages according to Feeneyism and Tradition.They could ask Archbishop Muller, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican to do the same.Affirm the Council according to Feeneyism!
Seminario di Econe - ordinazioni 29 giugno 2009
Why do they have to accept Vatican Council II according to Cushingism and assume that LG 16,LG 8 and UR 3 refer to known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and to AG 7?
Since the criteria for canonical status is accepting Vatican Council II, they could accept the entire Vatican Council II interpreted according to Feeneyism.Would this be acceptable to Archbishop Muller?
According to Vatican Council II (Feeneyism) Ad Gentes 7 says all non Catholics and all non Christians , all people, need 'faith and baptism' for salvation, while, LG 16, LG 8 and UR 3 are not known exceptions to AG 7. Would this traditional Council be acceptable to Archbishop Muller ?
Aside from the SSPX , why do we Catholics who regularly attend the Novus Ordo Mass, have to accept Vatican Council II according to Cushingism instead of Feeneyism?We can affirm the 'rigorist interpretation' of Fr.Leonard Feeney of Boston, along with Vatican Council II, they are compatible.
Even the Franciscans, Dominicans and Jesuits, all Catholic religious communities who now have canonical status, can affirm the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to Fr.Leonard Feeney which is compatible with Vatican Counci II and other magisterial documents.
Since Vatican Council II is compatible with the defined dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus why is the Traditional Latin Mass only associated with the dogma on salvation and not the Novus Ordo Mass? Since for the priest who offers the Novus Ordo Mass, too, LG 16, LG 8 and UR 3 etc are not exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
The four SSPX priests with whom I have spoken to, could appeal to all Catholic religious communities, to accept Vatican Council II , according to Feeneyism. There is no other rational alternative.
A Dean of Theology and a Dean of Philosophy at Pontifical Universities in Rome, have said that there are no known exceptions to the dogma on salvation.They affirm the literal interpretation of the dogma. They also offer the Novus Ordo Mass.
Since there are no known exceptions to the dogma on exclusive salvation mentioned in Vatican Council II , why cannot the SSPX be granted canonical status ? Since the Council is traditional anyway,when interpreted with Feeneyism.Archbishop Muller has only to affirm Vatican Council II in public  according to Feeneyism and this would be a welcome path for the SSPX and sedevacantists.
Since Archbishop Gerhard Muller cannot name any 'exception' in 2013, why does he want the SSPX to say the Council is a break with Tradition ?
-Lionel Andrades