Saturday, July 15, 2017

Boniface's premises are different from mine



Unam Sanctam Catholicam
Boniface celebrates 10 years for his blog Unam Sanctam Catholicam and he still cannot understand what I say. This is common among traditionalists who have their religious formation with the SSPX in some way.The error comes from Archbishop Lefebvre who accepted the irrationality in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.Their premises are different from mine.
Boniface calls what I write ridiculous and pathetic without explaining  to me with theology or Catholic doctrine where I am wrong.Ten years have past.He means well but he probably does not have a clue as to where to begin from.
He would find me confusing since for him, for example, the baptism of desire etc refers to an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).This is a given in the Catholic Church today.
But not for me.
For me the baptism of desire etc are not exceptions since I clarify that these cases are invisible in the present times and so they cannot be exceptions.An exception would have have to be a person known.An invisible person cannot be an exception.This has not registered with Boniface and he is sincere.
For Boniface the baptism of desire really refers to a visible person.Since only because it is visible can it be an exception or relevant to the dogma EENS. This is his inference whether he knows it or not.
This is a point he still has not been able to discuss over the last ten years.
And why should he ? Since the SSPX , the sedevacantists, the liberals, the present magisterium and the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary at the traditionalist St. Benedict Centers, all,  assume the baptism of desire etc are physically visible cases and so Vatican Council II (LG 16 etc) would be a rupture with the dogma EENS and the Syllabus of Errors. So they have rejected Vatican Council II(Cushingite) and it is the only Vatican Council II they know of.
I do not have to reject Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite-invisible BOD is invisible) and this confuses many traditionalists.
I hope I do not have to wait another 10 years before they break their conditioning.
This might help.Definitions of Feeneyism and Cushingism.
Definitions

Feeneyism: It is the old theology and philosophical reasoning which says there are no known exceptions past or present, to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).There are no explicit cases to contradict the traditional interpretation of EENS.It is practical. There obviously are no known cases of the baptism of desire (BOD),baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) in 2017.So there are no practical exceptions to EENS.Neither was BOD,BOB and I.I an exception to Feeneyite EENS in 1949 when the Letter of the Holy Office was issued to the Archbishop of Boston. The cardinals made an objective mistake.Similarly mentioning BOD and I.I in Vatican Council II (AG 7,LG 14) relative to the traditional teaching on salvation was superflous.

Cushingism: It is the new theology and philosophical reasoning.It assumes there are known exceptions, past and present, to the dogma EENS, on the need for all to formally enter the Church.It assumes that the baptism of desire etc are not hypothetical but objectively known.In principle hypothetical cases are objective in the present times.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/rational-and-traditional-catholic.html
-Lionel Andrades

Satan Turned Me GAY; Jesus Made Me STRAIGHT! - T.B Joshua Healing



EXPOSED: The Spirit Behind Homosexuality!





LESBIAN DEMON Speaks Out!!!




INCREDIBLE Demonstration Of God's Power | T.B. Joshua



CAST OFF: Broken Bone Healed In South Korea!!!






Experts agree.No denial from Vatican.Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise.Violates Principle of Non Contradiction


Featured Image

Experts agree and there is no denial from the Vatican Press Office.Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise and violates the Principle of  Non Contradiction. No one disputes this. The basic error is not theology but an empirical observation.It is seeing what is before our eyes,or, rather not seeing.
The pope interprets Vatican Council II with an irrational premise which comes from the Cushing-Feeney dispute.There is an alternative interpretation.The popes does not choose it. It is a Vatican Council II without an irrational premise.I call it Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite).It is not a break with Tradition.
Image result for Photos Letter of the Holy Office 1949Image result for Photos Letter of the Holy Office 1949
Without the irrational premise 'Rome comes back to the Faith'. The popes and Vatican Council II would be saying all non Catholics are on the path to Hell unless they become members of the Catholic Church.This is what the document says. It is not someones personal view or interpretation.
Magisterial documents interpreted without the irrational premise and inspired by the Holy Spirit indicate all Buddhists, Hindus, Jews, Muslims, atheists and Communists, Pentecostals, evangelicals, Protestants and Orthodox Christians are outside the Church.They are not Catholic.So they are on the way to the fires of Hell.This is the dogmatic teaching in the Catholic Church.It was based on John 3:5, Mark 16:16 etc.
Ralph Martin, Robert Fastiggi, John Martignoni, Fr.Stefano Visintin osb, Fr.George Puthoor, Fr.Nevus Marcello o.p and priests in Rome whom I have contacted, indicate Pope Francis has violated the Principle of Non Contradiction in his interpretation of Vatican Council II.
Image result for Ralph Martin photoImage result for Robert fastiggi photos
They all agree that somebody invisible cannot be visible at the same time. They would be supported by all priests most of them ironically would also be violating the Principle of  Non Contradiction in their  interpretation of the Council.

Here is where they go wrong.Invisible baptism of desire cannot be visible in 2017.There cannot be people whom we personally know who are saved in invincible ignorance of the Gospel through no fault of their own.They would be known only to God if they existed.
Zero cases of something are not exceptions to the dogma EENS says John Martignoni.
Image result for Photos of  John Martignoni EWTNImage result for Photos of  John Martignoni EWTNRelated image
He is the  Director of the Office of Evangelisation, Archdiocese of Birmingham, Alabama.But for Pope Francis LG 16, LG 14, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2,GS 22 etc are exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.They are not zero cases for the pope.Instead for the pope they are a rupture with Tradition ( EENS, Syllabus of Errors etc).So LG 16, LG 14, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are references to real people , allegedly known people, for them to be exceptions to the 'past ecclesiology'.
Who/what  is invisible is assumed by the pope to be visible.People who are saved in Heaven he assumes are also on earth.Then he makes them relevant to the dogma EENS. People who are not objectively seen he infers are like ghosts.This is a violation of Aristotle's Principle of  Non Contradiction.
How can someone who is not there before you be presumed to be standing in front of you ? And then based upon this wrong observation a new theology is created ? It says there is known salvation outside the Church?!
The pope has made a factual mistake and his whole interpretation of Vatican Council II is skewered.
It is a fact of life that people in Heaven are generally not observed on earth.It is a fact of life that if someone was saved with the baptism of desire and without the baptism of water, it would not be known to any one on earth.It is a fact of life that someone who died centuries back, may be even a saint,would not be visible and personally known  to any one on earth in the present times , to be an exception to Feeneyite EENS.
Juan Javier Flores Arcas e Stefano Visintin
This is the view of the scientist-Benedictine priest who was a former Dean of Theology at Rome's Benedictine university.Fr.Stefano Visintin osb, the new Rector of the Pontifical University of St. Anselm in Rome, has said that there are no exceptions to the dogma EENS. This is something obvious.No quantum physics here.
Archbishop Thomas E.Gullickson also observes that there are no exceptions to EENS in the present times.There are no objective cases of people saved with the baptism of desire etc.Perhaps the popes will agree with him when this issue is brought to their attention. Presently it could all be only an oversight.
So many Catholics, responsible people, are saying that there are no practical exceptions  to Feeneyite EENS.So what I am writing here is not something original and known only to me.It is not a new theology or a new theory. I am not adding any thing new.
Many Catholics know it. Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) is not ' a development' to EENS( Feeneyite).It means Pope Francis has made an objective error which he needs to correct.-Lionel Andrades

JULY 14, 2017


Ralph Martin, Robert Fastiggi, John Martignoni and Fr. Stefano Visintin osb indicate Pope Francis has violated the Principle of Non Contradiction in his interpretation of Vatican Council II http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/ralph-martin-robert-fastiggi-john_27.html



Ralph Martin, Robert Fastiggi, John Martignoni and Fr.Stefano Visintin osb agree that somebody invisible cannot be visible at the same time

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/ralph-martin-robert-fastiggi-john.html



July 13, 2017

Pope Francis violates the Principle of Non Contradiction: chooses irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II which is not the work of the Holy Spirit
eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/pope-francis-vi…



July 12, 2017
Pope's moto proprio suggests there is known salvation and sainthood outside the Catholic Church
eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/popes-moto-prop…


July 13, 2017

Prof. Robert Fastiggi, Ralph Martin agree that invisible people cannot be visible at the same time : in agreement with Fr. Stefano Visintin's statement

eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/prof-robert-fas…




Rational and traditional Catholic apologetics based on Feeneyism and not Cushingism  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/rational-and-traditional-catholic.html





Sit-in dei fedeli di Minutella davanti alla Curia: “Arcivescovo, lasci don Alessandro in parrocchia”