Wednesday, September 11, 2013

When Pope Francis said “If someone is gay and he searches for the Lord and has good will, who am I to judge?” he was drawing upon Cushingism

Cushingism assumes in principle  possibilities are known realities in the present times and so contradicts  the Catholic Church's traditional teaching on faith or morals.
 
Pope Francis has had the liberal seminary formation of the Jesuits in which Cushingism is the norm.
 
The error originated in the Fr.Leonard Feeney case in Boston, when  the Archbishop of Boston, Richard Cushing assumed  there were known exceptions to the dogma on salvation. For him the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance were exceptions and relevant to the literal interpretation of Fr. Leonard Feeney.In other words , he could physically see the dead on earth, saved with the baptism of desire etc, who were personally known exceptions to the Catholic teaching on the need for the baptism of water for salvation in the Catholic Church, every one needed to be a viisble member of the Church, with 'faith and baptism'.
 
Fr.Leonard Feeney was a Jesuit,like Pope Francis,  and was expelled from the Jesuit community.The Jesuit  Superior General like the secular media in Boston supported Cushing.The media referred to the Boston Heresy, of Fr.Leonard Feeney, when it was really Cardinal Richard Cushing who was denying a defined dogma, with claims of being able to see the dead who were known exceptions.
 
Since then in the Catholic Church Cushingism is being used to interpret magisterial documents from the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church. Wherever there is a reference to the baptism of desire etc it is assumed that these cases are visible to us (Cushingism ) instead of accepting that these cases are known only to God and not visible. (Feeneyism).Since they are not visible they are not exceptions.
 
 
Pope Francis and Pope Benedict XVI interpret Vatican Council II according to Cushingism. Lumen Gentium 16 (invincible ignorance) etc refers to a known exception to Ad Gentes 7 ( all need faith and baptism for salvation) - and to  the dogma on exclusive salvation. If they considered LG 16 as being known only to God and invisible to us, LG 16 would just be a possibility accepted in principle  and not an exception.This would be an interpretation of Vatican Council II according to Feeneyism (no visible exception). It would also mean there are no exceptions in Vatican Council II to the traditional teaching on other religions and ecumenism.Vatican Council II would be in agreement with the understanding of extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to the Slaves of the Immaculate  Heart of Mary, the communities of Fr.Leonard Feeney and to the sedevacantists  Peter and Michael Dimond of the Most Holy Family Monastery,NY,USA.
 
Atheists
So when Pope Francis said that an atheist could be saved he was referrring to an in principle case, a possibility known only to God and not known to us. The Catholic Church  considers atheism a mortal sin.Atheists are heading for Hell and no Church document says that there can be  or are, known  exceptions.Pope Francis was using Cushingism. He was assuming that there are known cases of atheists in the present times, persons with positive values otherwise, who are saved, or who, he is sure will be saved. But there are no such known cases ! Not a single one in 2013 or during the popes entire lifetime.
Similarly when Pope Francis said recently “If someone is gay and he searches for the Lord and has good will, who am I to judge?” this is Cushingism. Who am I to judge ? How can he judge when he does not know a single such person. How can he judge anyone on earth?.How can he tell if a particular person is going to Heaven or Hell ?
 
The pope affirmed that homosexual acts were sinful.So if he did meet a practising homosexual he would have to judge based on the teachings of the Catholic Church. A practising homosexual is in mortal sin and is on the way to Hell. Even in today's reading from Colossians during Mass, we are told that some persons are on the way to Hell, fornicators etc. This is a judgement.So personally the pope could judge! He could say that homosexuals according to the general teaching of the Catholic Church are on the way to Hell and he does not know any exception to this teaching, he cannot know any exception. This would be Feeneyism.
 
So it is irrational when the pope says who am I to judge , since we humans are in no position to judge any way.Similarly it was irrational for the Archbishop of Boston to judge and say there are known exceptions to the dogma. 
 
It is irrational, since he could also saying like Fr.Charles Curran that the exception is the rule i.e if we could really know any exception.
 
In Veritatis Splendor Pope John Paul II says a mortal sin is a mortal sin and the outer actions indicates the inner intention. So traditional mortal sin, which include homosexuality, is always a mortal sin.It is intrinsically evil according to the Catechism of the Catholic Church.There are no known exceptions and if there is an exception it would be known only to God, the pope would not be able to detect this exception.
 
"If a person is gay and seeks God and has good will,...but remains in a homosexual relationaship and commits the homosexual act and admits this in public, then the pope and any Catholic can judge!.
 
So in inter religious dialogue Pope Francis can judge that all the non Catholics whom he meets are on the way to Hell, not because he can personally know or see their soul, but because Vatican Council II, interpreted with Feeneyism says so. So does the Catechism of the Catholic Church 846 etc.However if he is using Cushingism, which says there are known exceptions, he will not know if the non Catholic whom he meets is one of the known exceptions, someone who is saved or going to be saved, who is outside the visible limits of the Catholic Church.Then he could say "Who am I to judge ?".
 
Pope Francis has been using Cushingism in his understanding of Jews,Mulsims and Protestants in relation in salvation.
-Lionel Andrades
 
 1.
Pope Francis has said gay people should not be marginalised but integrated into society.
Speaking to reporters on a flight back from Brazil, he reaffirmed the Roman Catholic Church's position that homosexual acts were sinful, but homosexual orientation was not.
He was responding to questions about whether there was a "gay lobby" in the Vatican.
"If a person is gay and seeks God and has good will, who am I to judge?"
 

From the Parish Priest to the Pope the Catholic Faith is being denied for political reasons and necessity

There is a total disregard for the doctrines and teachings of the Church and this is being imposed with power, on Catholic religious (Franciscans of the Immaculate for example) (1) and on lay people .Cushingism seems one of the biggest problems in the Church, doctrinally, which is not being identified.
 
Ecumenism: It is not being said that Vatican Council II is contrary to the ecumenism of 'non return' to the Catholic Church.This is contrary to Vatican Council II.Vatican Council II says all need faith and baptism for salvation.Protestants and Orthodox Christians do not have Catholic Faith.So there can only an ecumenism of return to the Catholic Church,according to magisterial documents.
 
Inter religious Dialogue :
Vatican Council II (AG 7) says all Jews, Muslims and other non Catholics need to enter the Church for salvation. This is not being said in public.The Council is in perfect  agreement with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. This is  not being affirmed for political reasons.Vatican Council II says Catholics are the new people. Catholics are the new Chosen People(Nostra Aetate 4). Catholics have the promised Messiah, they have the Sacrifice in the Mass, they have the Ark of the Covenant in the tabernacle in Christ himself, they have the Jewish prophets.(2)
Traditional Latin Mass, the Tridentine Rite Mass still upholds Vatican Council II interpreted rationally (3) Yet it is being projected as a break with the Council (interpreted with Cushingism). 
Atheism is a mortal sin. Since the atheist does not have Catholic Faith which is needed for salvation.
 
Similarly homosexuality is a mortal sin. The orientation can be changed , the act is sinful and evil and so is the relationship. The orientation is not a sin, but it is not normal or natural and can be changed as is the experience of so many at prayer meetings.Jesus dispels the impure spirits which is the cause of the sin.
This is not being affirmed clearly from the Parish Priest to the pope.This is a form of denial.Denial with silence.

Similarly being saved in invincible ignorance and with the baptism of desire are not exceptions to Vatican Council II (AG 7 all need faith and baptism for salvation), the defined dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors and other magisterial documents (Redemptoris Missio, Dominus Iesus etc).Also no magisterial document claims that we know these cases in practical life , for them to be exceptions to the traditional teaching on salvation.

Yet this error is being maintained and there is no clarification from the Vatican.It is politically expedient to say that one can see the dead on earth who are saved and are visible exceptions to all needing to convert into the Church for salvation.Due to these allegedly visible ghosts every one does not need to convert into the Church!
 
The Catholic Church is following the Masonic agenda set for all, in which the motto is 'peace at any price'.
 
In general magisterial documents are being interpreted with Cushingism (visible to us exceptions) instead of Feeneyism ( no visible to us exceptions to the dogma on salvation). Since they assume that there are visible exceptions to the dogma on salvation(Cushingism) Pope Francis can say that an atheist in 2013 can be saved or that he cannot judge a homosexual. Since if there is a known exception in 2013  then there is an exception  to the rule, an exception to the traditional teaching.
If there is only a hypothetical case of an atheist being saved, something we accept as a possibility, known only to God, then there is no known, defacto case in 2013 to the traditional teaching on atheism being a mortal sin.
Similarly only if we use Cushingism can we deny the traditional teaching on suicide.Suicide is a mortal sin. However it is being said that there could be a case(known) who is an exception. So we can give the suicide victim the benefit of the doubt and a Catholic funeral.
The political left is filtering Church doctrines with Cushingism and  religious are in ignorance or political-silence.
-Lionel Andrades

1

Leader of the Dissidents Appointed General Secretary of the Franciscans of the Immaculate

http/eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/09/leader-of-dissidents-appointed-general.html#links 2

Peter and Michael Dimond exposè on Pope Francis

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/09/peter-and-michael-dimond-expose-on-pope.html
 
3
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/08/traditional-latin-mass-tridentine-rite.html#links


Latin Mass at St. Mark TERMINATED

http://veneremurcernui.wordpress.com/2013/09/10/latin-mass-at-st-mark-terminated/