Sunday, January 10, 2021

If the present two popes continue to interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise it would be unethical. It would be a public lie. Since now we know how the false premise is used to create a false rupture with Tradition.This is a scandal

 If the present two popes continue to interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise it would be unethical. It would be a public lie. Since now we know how the false premise works , how it is used to create a false rupture with Tradition.This is a scandal. -Lionel Andrades

A Feeneyite for me is a Catholic who interprets and accepts all Magisterial documents without a false premise and so there is no rupture with Tradition in general

 For me a Feeneyite is not a Catholic, who goes only for the Latin Mass, and allegedly rejects the baptism of desire and affirms the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). A Feeneyite for me is a Catholic who interprets and accepts all Magisterial documents without a false premise and so there is no rupture with Tradition in general.

A Cushingite interprets Magisterial documents with a false premise, creating a rupture with the historical, strict interpretation of EENS.

Cardinal Kasper and Koch, Pope Benedict and Popes Francis, the FSSP, SSPX, Paulish Fathers and the St. Benedict Center Still River, USA in the diocese of Worcester, are Cushingites on Vatican Council II. -Lionel Andrades

There are no practical exceptions to the traditional ecumenism of return, in any of the text of Unitatitis Redintigratio ( Decree on Ecumenism), Vatican Council II. There are no practical exceptions mentioned in any of the text of Lumen Gentium which would contradict the past exclusivist ecclesiology. There are no practical exceptions mentioned in any of the text of Ad Gentes to traditional Mission and exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church, with no known exceptions

 I am not against non Catholics but I believe that the Catholic Church teaches, when Vatican Council II is interpreted rationally i.e without the false premise, outside the Church there is no salvation. There are no practical exceptions to the traditional ecumenism of return, in any of the text of Unitatitis Redintigratio( Decree on Ecumenism), Vatican Council II.

There are no practical exceptions mentioned in any of the text of Lumen Gentium  which would contradict the past exclusivist ecclesiology.

There are no practical exceptions mentioned in any of the text of Ad Gentes  to traditional Mission and exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church, with no known exceptions.

There are no practical exceptions mentioned in Ad Gentes ( or the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 ) to traditional Mission theology, based upon there being exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.

So when I say outside the Church there is no salvation I am citing Vatican Council II interpreted rationally i.e with the common false premise of the Cushingites. - Lionel Andrades

For me outside the Church there is no salvation is based on the teaching of Vatican Council II (AG 7) interpreted rationally (LG 8,LG 16 etc are invisible cases). For others outside the Church there is salvation based on Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally( LG 8, LG 16 etc are visible examples of salvation outside the Church and so practical exceptions to EENS, Athanasius Creed etc

 For me outside the Church there is no salvation is based on the teaching of Vatican Council II (AG 7) interpreted rationally (LG 8,LG 16 etc are invisible cases). For others outside the Church there is salvation based on Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally( LG 8, LG 16 etc are visible examples of salvation outside the Church and so practical exceptions to EENS, Athanasius Creed etc. -Lionel Andrades

La Madonna aveva profettizzato il periodo che abbiamo iniziato a vivere....

The feast of the Baptism of Jesus on the Jordan River

According to the Gospel of John we are not all children of God. There are conditions to being a child of God. There are also children of the devil. The priest who offered Holy Mass today in Italian mentioned the two conditions : the baptism of water and faith

 According to the Gospel of John we are not all children of God. There are conditions to being a child of God. There are also children of the devil.

The priest who offered Holy Mass today in Italian mentioned the two conditions : the baptism of water and faith.  -Lionel Andrades

Scientific Evidence of Eucharistic Miracles | The Catholic Talk Show

 
https://www.churchpop.com/2021/01/09/scientific-revelations-about-eucharistic-miracles-including-physical-evidence/

“It would, however, be desirable that he, above all in consideration of the Divine Judgment that awaits him (Pope Benedict), would definitively distance himself from those theologically erroneous positions - Vigano

 Abp. Viganò: Abolition of anti-Modernist Oath is ‘a desertion, a betrayal of unheard-of gravity’

https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/abp-vigano-abolition-of-anti-modernist-oath-is-a-desertion-a-betrayal-of-unheard-gravity

JANUARY 10, 2021

Pope Benedict must be asked to affirm the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). He now uses a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I). Then he claims there is ' a development of doctrine'.

 Pope Benedict must be asked to affirm the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). He now uses a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I). Then he claims there is ' a development of doctrine'. Without the false premise BOD, BOB and I.I do not contradict EENS as it wasw interpreted by the missionaries in the 16th century.

This issue is 'dcotrinal' according to his statement on the canonical recognition of the Society of St. Pius X.

He can also avoid, what he called the 'hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition'. - Lionel Andrades


ANUARY 10, 2021

Pope Benedict must be asked to affirm the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24 Q, 27 Q) and Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church interpreted rationally,without the false premise.Since Vatican Council II he has denied the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors and other Magisterial documents which affirm exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/01/pope-benedict-must-be-asked-to-affirm.html

 JANUARY 10, 2021

Pope Benedict used a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and so rejected the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.This is a public scandal. There is no denial from him or the Vatican

 Pope Benedict used a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and so rejected the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.This is a public scandal. There is no denial from him or the Vatican. -Lionel Andrades

However, Viganò still hopes that Ratzinger “above all in consideration of the Divine Judgment that awaits him, would definitively distance himself from those theologically erroneous positions – I am referring in particular to those in Introduction to Christianity – which are still disseminated today in universities and seminaries which boast to call themselves Catholic. Delicta juventutis meae et ignorantias meas ne memineris Domine (Ps 25: 7).”

This new statement by Archbishop Viganò is of great historical and moral worth and hopefully will help many Catholics to understand more deeply the history of Modernism and the Church's abandonment of resisting it, with major Modernist thinkers becoming the leading figures and inspirations of the modern hierarchy.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/abp-vigano-abolition-of-anti-modernist-oath-is-a-desertion-a-betrayal-of-unheard-gravity


Alleged apparition in Nigeria: coming darkness?

 

Apparition In Nigeria

Is it real or not, and if actually supernatural, from God or elsewhere?

One speaks here of serial apparitions in Aokpe in Nigeria which began, it is alleged, by the young female, Christiana Agbo, at the time 12, in October of 1992.

Christiana was collecting herbs in the fields, says a website, Miracle Hunter, when the girl saw flashes of light. “After the first signs of light, she saw a beautiful woman floating in the sky,” we are told. “The Virgin looked and smiled without saying a word, was standing on the clouds, had a dress with a veil of shining a blue color that covered her head and fell down her back and shoulders, hands clasped on her chest and clutching a rosary.”

In a videotaped interview [below], Christiana, speaking of the Blessed Mother, said, “She’s all beautiful, quite tall and so young, eyes so shiny. She had a brownish complexion. She had a white garment and an inner garment under that, and a cape that went to her feet and the back was shining so bright, and two colors running down her back, one white and one red.” What impressed the young girl the most? “Her beauty and smarts,” she says in a bit of halting but understandable English.

At one point, the girl tried to run away but was called back by the asomatous, splendiferous woman, who said. “Behold, I am the Holy Mother.”

In the first message received from Our Lady, Christiana says the Blessed Mother explained that “I am the refuge of sinners. I come from Heaven to gain souls to Christ and to shelter my children in my Immaculate Heart. What I want from you is to pray for the souls of purgatory, for the world. and to console Jesus.”

The local bishop, Fidelis Orgah, obviously believed Christiana, granting an imprimatur for the publication of her accounts and permitting pilgrimages to the site where she purportedly encountered Mary (though as far as we know, not issuing a formal pastoral letter). In the initial days, says Christiana, she fainted when she first saw the “very beautiful lady.” Her father didn’t believe her and feared it might be the devil, and the community reacted in an identical way.

That led Christiana to wish the lady would no longer appear — but next time she saw her, Christiana found herself “happy and consoled.”

christiana H.C.There was a Eucharistic miracle — documented by a representative from the bishop’s office — attached to the apparition on August 4, 1994, a date that became a local feast day, drawing tens of thousands. A strange request: at one point, perhaps in reference to penance, the Virgin supposedly told the girl to crawl on her knees. Mary spoke a dialect called Doma and when there were tears in her eyes, explained Christiana, it was because of so many going to hell.

In a message on March 1, 1995, the Blessed Virgin reportedly called for the recitation of the Rosary, saying: “Those of my children who pray the Rosary frequently with commitment will receive many graces. Satan will not be able to approach them. My children, when you are assailed by great temptations and problems, take your Rosary to me and your problems will be solved. Every time you say ‘Hail Mary full of Grace,’ you will receive many graces from me. Those who recite the Rosary will never be damned.”

“The most important message is prayer,” Christiana says, “especially the Rosary, conversion to God, to do penance, and also to fast. The most important prophecy is the punishment from God for the whole world if they do not change. The prophecy is the great darkness, which Our Lady says will last for seventy-two hours. In the end she described it all as a catastrophe.”

Had Christiana heard the notion of three coming days of darkness from elsewhere? Would such a period be exactly seventy-hours? For your discernment. The apparition also spoke of Mary as a mediatrix of all graces.

Controversial is Christiana’s assertion that when, at the behest of another person, she asked Mary about the consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart, as requested at Fatima, the Blessed Mother “became sad when I asked the question, because it wasn’t properly fulfilled.” Some may find this questionable because, asked the same question — on several occasions — the Fatima seer Lucia dos Santos said that the consecration of the world by Pope Saint John Paul II had met Our Lady’s request at Cova de Iria.

SPRINGChristiana, who at least for a while entered a convent, received private “visits” from Mary, it seems, until 2004. The woman’s ability to speak English was instant and miraculous, it is explained. Sun phenomena? In January and February 1996, says a website dedicated to the happenings, “there were over one hundred thousand people present. One thing that attracted the crowds were the solar miracles. The biggest [one] occurred on 21 November 1999. In the past year Aokpe hosted a pilgrimage for about a hundred seminarians who were treated to a miracle of the sun by Our Lady.”

Reported the Catholic news site La Stampa: “On the morning of October 13th , at the re-consecration ceremony, led by the Archbishop of Jos, Ignatius Ayau Kaigama, president of the Nigerian Episcopal Conference, 53 bishops took part together with more than a thousand priests, two thousand religious, and about 55 thousand faithful. In the afternoon, after the celebration, the witnesses tell us, there was a heavy downpour followed by the appearance of the sun changing color and ‘dancing.’ According to Father Chris N. Anyanwu, director of the episcopate’s social communications, this unusual phenomenon caused the hearts of the pilgrims present at the celebration to rejoice and many of them have attested to what they saw, recalling the experience of Fatima in 1917. Certainly, Nigeria will no longer be the same.”

They made news, it seems, across that nation.

Her last public appearance at Aopke was December 26, 1998. Christiana summarizes the main message: “Do penance, much penance. She helped me to love Jesus with all my heart.”

And that’s the message for all:

“Pray, go to Mass, to love Jesus with all your heart, with the heart of Mary.”

[resources: Medjugrje’s Ten Secrets]

 


https://spiritdailyblog.com/apparitions/apparition-in-nigeria


 

 

Pope Benedict must be asked to affirm the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). He now uses a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I). Then he claims there is ' a development of doctrine'.

 Pope Benedict must be asked to affirm the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). He now uses a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I). Then he claims there is ' a development of doctrine'. Without the false premise BOD, BOB and I.I do not contradict EENS as it wasw interpreted by the missionaries in the 16th century.

This issue is 'dcotrinal' according to his statement on the canonical recognition of the Society of St. Pius X.

He can also avoid, what he called the 'hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition'. - Lionel Andrades


ANUARY 10, 2021

Pope Benedict must be asked to affirm the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24 Q, 27 Q) and Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church interpreted rationally,without the false premise.Since Vatican Council II he has denied the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors and other Magisterial documents which affirm exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/01/pope-benedict-must-be-asked-to-affirm.html


Pope Benedict must be asked to affirm the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24 Q, 27 Q) and Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church interpreted rationally,without the false premise.Since Vatican Council II he has denied the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors and other Magisterial documents which affirm exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.

 Pope Benedict must be asked to affirm the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24 Q, 27 Q) and Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church interpreted rationally,without the false premise.Since Vatican Council II he has denied the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors and other Magisterial documents which affirm exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. - Lionel Andrades


JANUARY 10, 2021

A pope is expected to affirm the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX with Vatican Council II interpreted rationally.Pope Benedict and the cardinals and bishops have always denied the teachings of these Church documents and rejected them with ' a devleopment of doctrine' slogan based upon Vatican Council II interpreted with the now common false premise

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/01/a-pope-is-expected-to-affirm-athanasius.html



JANUARY 10, 2021

 Pope Benedict used a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and so rejected the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.This is a public scandal. There is no denial from him or the Vatican. -Lionel Andrades

However, Viganò still hopes that Ratzinger “above all in consideration of the Divine Judgment that awaits him, would definitively distance himself from those theologically erroneous positions – I am referring in particular to those in Introduction to Christianity – which are still disseminated today in universities and seminaries which boast to call themselves Catholic. Delicta juventutis meae et ignorantias meas ne memineris Domine (Ps 25: 7).”

This new statement by Archbishop Viganò is of great historical and moral worth and hopefully will help many Catholics to understand more deeply the history of Modernism and the Church's abandonment of resisting it, with major Modernist thinkers becoming the leading figures and inspirations of the modern hierarchy.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/abp-vigano-abolition-of-anti-modernist-oath-is-a-desertion-a-betrayal-of-unheard-gravity


The updated Joint Catholic and Lutheran Declaration on Justification, produced by Catholic Cushingites, is a lot of thrash. It is not magisterial since it is full of errors.

 

The updated Joint Catholic and Lutheran Declaration on Justification, produced by Catholic Cushingites, is a lot of thrash. It is not magisterial since it is full of errors. It is a preparation for a fake one world religion with a false image of Jesus. It will be a new religion without reference to Hell and Catholic mortal sins of faith and morals.

Those who put this Declaration together interpreted Vatican Council II, with a fake premise and so rejected the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors . These Catholic Church documents would indicate that Lutherans today are oriented to the fires of Hell. They need to convert into the Catholic Church with Catholic faith and the baptism of water.

With the false premise used by both sides, Catholics and Lutherans, the Syllabus of Errors teachings on ecumenism and no salvation outside the Church are made obsolete. This is deception. It is also unethical and not Christian.

Imagine cardinals and bishops fudging an interpretation of a Council to meet a pro-Satan political goal.-Lionel Andrades


JUNE 12, 2018

The Joint Statement of the Catholics and Lutherans on Justification and the Balamand Declaration were false. Lutherans and Orthodox Christians do not have the faith needed for salvation.Pope Benedict was a Cushingite who rejected EENS

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/the-joint-declaration-of-catolics-and.html


 JUNE 13, 2018

Fake conferences




On June 23 there will be another 'fake conference' held by the Catholic traditionalists in Rome. They will use Cushingism as a general philosophy and theology. Since Feeneyism will get them into trouble.They are not aware that Pope Benedict, who issued issued Summorum Pontificum, has rejected extra ecclesiam nulla salus(Feeneyite) and the Syllabus of Errors, officially. So they were allowed to offer the Latin Mass but only with the New Cushingite Ecclesiology.
At the conference they will talk about the crisis in the Church and modernism but they will not want to end the doctrinal confusion by interpreting Vatican Council II without the false premise and instead with Feeneyite philosophy and theology.
Soon this summer, there will be more 'fake conferences' and they will repeat their errors and fantasy theology in the name of Tradition.They have been doing this over the last few years, every year.


The traditionalists  who sponsor them, who pay the bills, do not know the difference between Feeneyism and Cushingism, as an interpretation tool,and the organizers of these fake conferences are not going to tell them about it .Since they want to be there next year for the next conference, without any persecution from the Left, the enemies of the Church and those who work for Satan.
So instead of the truth Catholics will get entertainment. This reminds me of Church Militant TV.



The present two popes reject the dogma EENS( Feeneyite)  with Vatican Council II (Cushingite). Then they use this same Vatican Council II (Cushingite)  to reject the Syllabus of Errors , on ecumenism etc and no Catholic media or conference points out the error. They do not tell them to use Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) to affirm the Syllabus of Errors and EENS ( Feeneyite).
Why not?  Since the traditionalists at these conferences, themselves, do not want to do this.

Bishop Athanasius Schneider who cannot say that all Kazakh people, non Catholics, in his diocese are on the way to Hell, according to Vatican Council II( Feeneyite-Ad Gentes 7),  will not be there at this conference organised by the Lepanto Foundation.
He wants a Syllabus of Errors of Vatican Council II in which he does not have to say all non Catholics in Kazakhstan who have died, are in Hell.There are no known exceptions for us human beings.They  died without 'faith and baptism'(AG 7, LG 14), which is the ordinary way of salvation. 



Brian McCall and Christopher Ferrara will soon be there at a conference in Italy interpreting Vatican Council II with Cushingism and so having to reject EENS ( Feeneyite).They will then assume that Vatican Council II (Cushingite) is a rupture with the Syllabus, and it is, and that this is the only interpretation of the Council that is possible.
Then there is John LamontThomas PinkJohn Rao and Joseph Shaw. Catholic professors in England and Australia,who attend the Latin Mass.They will not talk about the difference between Feeneyism and Cushingism.



One silver lining in all these conferences was the talk by Cardinal Raymond Burke on May 18, 2018 at the Voice of the Family Conference.In public he referred to other religions as false religions and affirmed the Catholic Church as being the one and only true Church.He called for the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation.

Cardinal Burke is held in esteem by the Franciscans of the Immaculate (F.I) and the Society of St.Pius X(SSPX) who need to announce their support for his May 18 message.He has rejected the Joint Declaration on Justification with the Lutherans and also the Balamand Declaration.He is supporting ecumenism but with the old ecclesiology which has not changed for him ,with Vatican Council II (F).
He is supporting the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance according to the popes and saints i.e with Feeneyism and not with Cushingism, according to the liberal theologians.
His message to the traditionalists seems, affirm Vatican Council II(Feeneyite) and do not interpret Tradition, with Cushingism.Do not reject Tradition interpreted with Feeneyism.
So Vatican Council II is today a non issue for the F.I and SSPX.There can be a reconciliation with the Church since the doctrinal confusion has been eliminated.There is no rupture with the past.It is on this subject that there needs to be a conference.-Lionel Andrades




JUNE 12, 2018

Image result for Photo John Henry Weston at conference rome photo Lifesites

John Henry Weston will not answer. He is part of the corruption

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/john-henry-weston-will-not-answer-he-is.html

.JUNE 12, 2018

Ecumenical consultation to discuss implications of Joint Declaration on Doctrine of Justification
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/ecumenical-consultation-to-discuss.html



JUNE 12, 2018

The Joint Statement of the Catholics and Lutherans on Justification and the Balamand Declaration were false. Lutherans and Orthodox Christians do not have the faith needed for salvation.Pope Benedict was a Cushingite who rejected EENS
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/the-joint-declaration-of-catolics-and.html



 JUNE 11, 2018


Speakers will re-cycle errors and tell us what we already know about them and their obsolete views, which are also those of the liberals and the ecclesiastics at the Vatican : Lepanto Foundation Conference in Rome

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/speakers-will-re-cycle-errors-and-tell.html







JUNE 10, 2018

Image result for LifeSiteNews  Diane Montagna photo


Like Church Militant TV, LifeSites News would want to protect its financial interests as does the Lepanto Foundation : so it hides the truth about the Catholic Faith  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/like-church-militant-tv-lifesites-news.html



JUNE 10, 2018




John Lamont and Joseph Shaw prepare to talk at the June 23 Lepanto Foundation conference in Rome with their politically correct Cushingite theology, which will preserve their careers and lifestyle and they will get away with it to come back next year

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/john-lamont-and-joseph-shaw-prepare-to.html

JUNE 10, 2018


So is the Lepanto Foundation using irrational Cushingism or traditional Feeneyism at the June 23 conference to interpret magisterial documents? We know the answer. Traditionalists are Cushingites on Vatican Council II

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/so-is-lepanto-foundation-using.html


JUNE 9, 2018



Speakers at the Lepanto Foundation conference in Rome on June 23 do not know that there is a mistake in Lumen Gentium 14,Vatican Council II.They should be discussing it

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/the-speakers-at-lepanto-foundation.html



JUNE 9, 2018










Lepanto Foundation conference this month in Rome is expected to be another non committal, prudent meeting among friends : the real problem and its solution is too sensitive for them to discuss and proclaim

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/lepanto-foundation-conference-his-month.html



MAY 27, 2018

Liberals cannot criticize Cardinal Raymond Burke since he accepts Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite),in harmony with EENS ( Feeneyite),the Syllabus of Errors,an ecumenism and the Social Reign of Christ the King : traditionalists at conf. next month support the New Theology

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/05/liberals-cannot-accuse-cardinal-raymond.html



____________________________


SUNDAY, FEBRUARY 2, 2020
The books in general published by Ignatius Press interpret Vatican Council II, the Catechism of the Catholic Church and the Church Fathers with an irrational premise, inference and conclusion. New books need to be written avoiding this error . Meanwhile these books should not be promoted by printing new editions.
Church Fathers and Teachers  
CHURCH FATHERS AND TEACHERS
From Leo the Great to Peter Lombard
  Hardback
After meditating on the Apostles and then on the Fathers of the early Church, as seen in his earlier works Jesus, the Apostles and the Early Church and Church Fathers, Pope Benedict XVI devoted his attention to the most influential Christian men from the fifth through the twelfth centuries. In his first book, Church Fathers, Benedict began with Clement of Rome and ended with Saint Augustine. In this volume, the Holy Father reflects on some of the greatest theologians of the Middle Ages: Benedict, Anselm, Bernard, and Gregory the Great, to name just a few. By exploring both the lives and the ideas of the great popes, abbots, scholars and missionaries who lived during the fall of the Roman Empire and the rise of Christendom, Pope Benedict XVI highlights the key elements of Catholic dogma and practice that remain the foundation stones not only of the Roman Catholic Church but of Christian society itself. This book is a wonderful way to get to know these later Church Fathers and Teachers and the tremendous spiritually rich patrimony they have bequeathed to us.  
Clement of Rome, Saint Augustine,theologians of the Middle Ages: Benedict, Anselm, Bernard, and Gregory the Great, all affirmed the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and interpreted the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) as refering to invisible and theoretical cases. This was common sense. They were not practical exceptions to EENS.
 
 
Yet Pope Benedict interpreted BOD, BOB and I.I as being exceptions to EENS. He implied that they were non hypothetical and objective cases for them to be practical exceptions to Feeneyite EENS, the past exclusivist ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.This was not the interpretation of Pope Leo the Great and Peter Lombard.
This is one the many books of Ignatius which need to be pulled down. New books can be written on this subject with BOD, BOB and I.I interpreted rationally.
 
With this literal and objective error Pope Benedict has written other books. He has interpreted Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic  Church irrationally and Ignatius Press has ignored the error.
Gospel, Catechesis, Catechism
Description
Ratzinger, one of the key persons responsible for the compilation of the Catechism of the Catholic Church, offers new insights on the catechetical character and Biblical foundation of the worldwide bestselling Catechism that has had such a positive response from ordinary Catholics across the globe. But he acknowledges that the response of many theologians and "professional religionists" has been negative toward the Catechism.
He says that if theologians don't want to be "shut out" of this worldwide development of sensus fidei and lose touch with the common Catholic, they will have to engage the Catechism positively. The main purpose of this book is to offer an invitation to this changed approach to the Catechism. He wants people to see, as he shows here, how the Catechism is an excellent teaching tool that responds to man's deepest questions about the meaning of life, how to live a good life, and how to attain happiness in this life and in eternal life. He shows how the Catechism affirms that man's happiness is love, and that the essence of true love has been manifested in the Person of Jesus Christ.
This is another book by Pope Benedict in which he does not use the rational premise, inference and traditional conclusion to interpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church. He has interpreted the Catechism with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism.
 
  
Even Redemptoris Missio and Dominus Iesus were written with Cushingism. The Ratzinger theology was there, with the false premise and inference to create a conclusion which had the hermeneutic of rupture with Catholic Tradition.There cannot be a Catechesis or an interpretation of the Gospel,for him,  according to St. Ignatius of Loyola, St.Francis Xavier or St.Robert Bellarmine.-Lionel Andrades
FEBRUARY 2, 2020
Living the Catechism of the Catholic Church, Vol. 1Living the Catechism of the Catholic Church by Cardinal Schonborn (Ignatius) is inadequate. It has interpreted the Catechism irrationally with the Cushingite premise, inference and conclusion. The Catechism of the Catholic Church and Vatican Council II can be interpreted without the Ratzinger theology.
FEBRUARY 2, 2020
Image result for e Fr.Aidan Nichols o.p photo Image result for e Fr.Aidan Nichols o.p photo" Image result for e Fr.Aidan Nichols o.p photo" 
Fr.Aidan Nicols Dominican Master of Sacred Theology has authored The Theology of Joseph Ratzinger (1988) and like the pope interprets Vatican Council II with the false premise, inference and conclusion. This is a fault line in the books of Cardinal Ratzinger/Pope Benedict pubished by Ignatius Press.Pope Benedict and Fr. Nicols need to stop promoting their books with the misinformation
 FEBRUARY 1, 2020
Conciliar Octet Figuring out the Church
Ignatius Press needs to acknowledge that Pope Benedict, Aidan Nicols and so many of their authors have made an objective mistake
JANUARY 3, 2020
JANUARY 14, 2020
Called to CommunionChurch, Ecumenism and Politics
JANUARY 21, 2020
Ignatius Press needs to stop publishing books on Vatican Council II by authors who interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA, 2, GS 22 etc as being exceptions to traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).Books written by Pope Benedict also carry this error 
JANUARY 14, 2020

Attention Jesuits : Before you write new books on Vatican Council II please do not make this mistake ( Graphics ) 
Image result for Photo of Paul Lakeland Ohio
NOVEMBER 11, 2019
Cover for 9780199593255Cover for 9780198709763Cover for 9780198717522Cover for 9780195332674The Oxford University Press has produced many books on Vatican Council II based upon a false premise. A deceptive rupture is created with Catholic Tradition
OCTOBER 31, 2019
EWTN's Tragic Errors of Leonard Feeney by Fr. William Most present arguments which cannot be practical exceptions to EENS, they cannot violate Newton's Laws of Physics https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/ewtns-tragic-errors-of-leonard-feeney.html 
 OCTOBER 30, 2019
Image result for Photo POpe Benedict and Vatican Council IIThere is a fundamental mistake in the theology of Vatican Council II. We have to reconcile ourselves with this.The Council Fathers blew it.They made an elementary mistake violating the laws of physics.Upon a false premise and inference they created a new theology. Then the periti, after 1965, upheld the false narrative.Until today, it's all a secret for them, especially for Pope Benedict. Pope Benedict is still hiding the truth.https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/there-is-fundamental-mistake-in.html
OCTOBER 29, 2019
Theological Highlights of Vatican II by Joseph Ratzinger (2009-09-01)Such a staggering thought.All those thousands of books, numerous, written on Vatican Council II have a major theological error. They should be thrown into the dustbin- O'Malley, Kasper, Faggioli,Gherardini,Mattei, Ferrara.They violate Newton's laws of physics and Aristotle's Principle of Non Contradiction https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/such-staggering-thoughtall-those.html 
OCTOBER 29, 2019
Image result for Vatican Council II books photoThe 16 books of Vatican Council II have an error. They violate the Principle of Non Contradiction. The Council Fathers misunderstood the laws of physics. They wrongly assumed the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) referred to physical bodies in time and space. They they created a new false theology based upon this irrationality. This cannot be magisterial but is human error. Since the Holy Spirit cannot make a factual and objective error.https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/the-16-books-of-vatican-council-ii-have.html
OCTOBER 28, 2019
 Image result for Photo physicists
When I say that the baptism of desire (BOD), Baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance (I.I) are not objective people in 2019, I refer to physics. Physics refers to stationary and moving bodies, acceleration,gravity, force etc.According to Newton's Laws of Physics we humans cannot see someone saved outside the Church with BOD, BOB and I.I ? 
 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/when-i-say-that-baptism-of-desire-bod.html
OCTOBER 28, 2019
BOD, BOB and I.I and EENS and LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to invisible cases in 2019. They are not objective people in the present times.This is a reality every rational adult and professional has to accept. This is the objective understanding of a reality shared by people in general. So if a professional denies it, something is wrong. 
 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/bod-bob-and-ii-and-eens-bod-bob-and-ii.html
OCTOBER 28, 2019
Image result for Photo Fr.Thomas Hardon  booksImage result for Photo joseph clifford fenton's books
Repost : Books to avoid - Fenton and Hardon's theology is off the rails 
 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/repost-books-to-avoid-fenton-and.html
OCTOBER 29, 2019
According to the laws of physics there are no exceptions to the traditional strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) of the popes and saints over the centuries.So the New Theology, New Ecclesiology, New Ecumenism and New Evangelisation is a lot of nonsense
 
 JUNE 12, 2018
The Joint Statement of the Catholics and Lutherans on Justification and the Balamand Declaration were false. Lutherans and Orthodox Christians do not have the faith needed for salvation.Pope Benedict was a Cushingite who rejected EENS  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/the-joint-declaration-of-catolics-and.html
Image result for Photos of outside the Church there is no salvation

___________________________________________