The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) interprets the baptism of desire(BOD) and being invincible ignorance(I.I)
as referring to visible and personally known people in 2019. So the BOD
and I.I are exceptions to EENS as it was known to the Magisterium of
the 16th century.
But
BOD and I.I are not personally known in particular cases. So they
cannot be exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.The Holy Office 1949 made this
same mistake.
So
the CDF is interpreting LG 16( invincible ignorance) with an
irrationality.The CDF is interpreting CCC 847-848( invincible ignorance)
with the same irrationality.They then assume that Vatican Council II
(LG 16 etc) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church(847-848) are
exceptions to the centuries-old interpretation of EENS.
This
is irrational. It is a rupture with the past popes and Church Councils
and it is schismatic. It is also first class heresy since the Creeds are
changed. The Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no
salvation is completely rejected with the CDF's interpretation of LG 16
and CCC 847-848.This is manifest and public heresy. 1
The
CDF persists in assuming invincible ignorance for example, refers to
personally known people saved outside the Church.So they re-interpret
Vatican Council II irrationally.This is heresy. They persist in it even after being informed.
The
CDF assumes that unknown cases of being saved in invincible ignorance(
LG 16, CCC-847-848) are known exceptions to the dogma EENS. So they
reject the Athanasius Creed. This is first class heresy.
The present two popes also interpret magisterial documents like the CDF.
This means the present two popes and the ecclesiastics at the CDF are automatically excommunicated.
They do not recant.
They do not state that there are no personally known cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance.
They do not recant and say that there are no personally known cases of being saved, as referenced in LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc.
When a pope says unknown cases of BOD, BOB and I.I are known exceptions to EENS this is irrational and a rejection of the past Magisterium of the Church. This is schismatic and heretical and so Catholics are not obliged to follow.
When a pope says invisible cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are visible exceptions to
EENS ( 16th century) then they imply that LG 8 etc refer to visible
people saved outside the Church.They would have to be visible to be
exceptions.
This is irrational. It is non traditional and heretical. Catholics are not obliged to accept this heresy.
If
the present ecclesiastics at the Vatican teach heresy and error then
this could not be the teaching of the Holy Spirit and so it is not
Magisterial.
Brother Andre Marie MICM and Michael Voris state that they are faithful to the Magisterium of the Catholic Church.They could indicate, that the heretical position of the two popes and the CDF, as, mentioned above is 'magisterial'.They say that they accept the Magisterium.If they mean the past Magisterium it would be correct, on this issue.
But when the present two popes and the CDF suggest that the doctrine and theology, which they teach, which is interpreted with an irrational premise and inference is the teaching of the Holy Spirit it is false.This cannot be magisterial.
Similarly John Henry Weston( and Bp. Schneider) do not say that the popes and the CDF are in heresy on salvation theology, as mentioned above.So they remain silent and neutral on this issue.They accept the present two popes as magisterial when they reject traditional exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.
When a pope rejects the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors,with the use of an irrationality,it is a mortal sin of faith.He needs to recant and go for Confession.
Brother Andre Marie and Michal Voris would reject the mortal sins of faith but then the Left and the CDF would consider them legally not Catholic. Once they are declared a sect, the SPLC, ADL and others could seek to legally eradicate them.
We have to follow the past Magisterium of the Catholic Church and not the SPLC, ADL etc, whom the two popes follow.-Lionel Andrades
1
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/theologian-ron-conte-misinterprets.html
Theologian Ron Conte misinterprets the St.Benedict Center and Church
Militant TV : there are no literal cases of the baptism of desire to
create a new theology
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/theologian-ron-conte-misinterprets.html
Ron Conte rejects the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), for
example as it was interpreted by the Magisterium in the 16th century,
the Church Fathers and the Medieval Popes
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/ron-conte-rejects-dogma-extra-ecclesiam.html
Posts
