I LOVE THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE ( Graphics)

-Lionel Andrades

AUGUST 20, 2018

The Rome Vicariate is forcing Catholic priests to teach false doctrine or be suspended

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/08/the-rome-vicariate-is-forcing-catholic.html

Society of St. Pius X misinterprets the Catechism of Pope Pius X : feast day today

Today is the feast day of Pope Pius X and at Holy Mass today morning in Italian, the thought arose about how the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) misinterprets the Catechism of Pope Pius X.

Numbers 24 Q  and 27Q in the Catechism are Feeneyite.They affirm the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) as it was interpreted by the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century.Confusion arises with 29Q which  can be interpreted as being visible or invisible.The SSPX interprets 29 Q as referring to  visible and known non Catholics saved outside the Church. From here the problem in doctrine and theology begins for them with this Catechism which they often quote.

For me 29Q refers to an invisible case.So it is not an exception to 24Q and 27Q.So the Catechism of Pope Pius X is Feeneyite and not Cushingite for me.

 24 Q. To be saved, is it enough to be any sort of member of the Catholic Church?
A. No, to be saved it is not enough to be any sort of member of the Catholic Church; it is necessary to be a living member. 

27 Q. Can one be saved outside the Catholic, Apostolic and Roman Church?
A. No, no one can be saved outside the Catholic, Apostolic Roman Church, just as no one could be saved from the flood outside the Ark of Noah, which was a figure of the Church

 29 Q. But if a man through no fault of his own is outside the Church, can he be saved?
 A. If he is outside the Church through no fault of his, that is, if he is in good faith, and if he has received Baptism, or at least has the implicit desire of Baptism; and if, moreover, he sincerely seeks the truth and does God's will as best he can such a man is indeed separated from the body of the Church, but is united to the soul of the Church and consequently is on the way of salvation. - Catechism of Pope Pius X

The SSPX  today can choose to re-interpret 29Q. It  can be re-interpreted as referring to an invisible person.

If 29Q  refers to visible cases in 2018, people personally known, who are saved in invincible ignorance and without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church, then 29Q contradicts 24Q and 27Q. Then 29 Q contradicts the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma EENS.I call this Cushingism or the Cushingite interpretation of EENS.
It is also the Cushingite interpretation of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I).

With Cushingism hypothetical cases like 29Q are not hypothetical but objective and personally known examples of salvation outside the Church.

With Feeneyism hypothetical cases like 29Q are hypothetical only. They are not objective and known people saved outside the Catholic Church.

So there can be a Cushingite and Feeneyite interpretation of the Catechism of Pope Pius X and the SSPX chooses the irrational Cushingite version.
So the Catechism of Pope Pius X would be a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors ( ecumenism of return) for them.There would be exceptions to an ecumenism of return.
The Catechism of Pope Pius would also be a rupture with the past exclusivist ecclesiology. Since BOD, BOB and I.I would be Cushingite.

They use the same Cushingite reasoning to interpret LG 8, LG 16 etc as a rupture with the past exclusivist ecclesiology and the Syllabus of Errors.So the fault does not lie with Vatican Council II but instead with their Cushingite reasoning. Cushingism causes the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition and not Vatican Council II per se, which is Feeneyite for me.

-Lionel Andrades

JANUARY 14, 2017

For Cardinal Ratzinger there was no ecclesiocentrism in the past too, since he has used the irrational premise to re-interpret the Catechism of Pope Pius X etc.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2017/01/for-cardinal-ratzinger-there-was-no.html  

MARCH 18, 2018

The Catechism of Pope Pius X does not say that invincible ignorance is an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiaam nulla salus(EENS). This has to be wrongly inferred by sedevacantists (Graphics)

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/03/the-catechism-of-pope-pius-x-does-not.html

OCTOBER 10, 2016

I even interpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1995) as being Feeneyite. I use the same reasoning : hypothetical cases are not explicit in the present times.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2016/10/i-even-interpret-catechism-of-catholic.html

OCTOBER 10, 2016

The Letter of the Holy Office says that it is not required that a person be incorporated into the Church as a member for salvation while the Catechism of Pius X says it is necessary

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2016/10/the-letter-of-holy-office-says-that-it.html

OCTOBER 10, 2016

Vatican Council II and the Catechism of Pope Pius X are Feeneyite.They contradict Pope Pius XII,the Archbishop of Boston and the U.S Jesuits.Confusion arises with 29Q which can be interpreted as being visible or invisible

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2016/10/vatican-council-ii-and-catechism-of.html

 OCTOBER 9, 2016

The Catechism of Pope Pius X is Feeneyite.It supports Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston and contradicts Pope Pius XII and the Archbishop of Boston. See numbers 24Q and 27Q.Confusion today comes with 29Q. It can be interpreted as being visible or invisible

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2016/10/the-catechism-of-pope-pius-x-is.html

OBER 8, 2016

The sedevacantists must observe that the Catechism of Pope Pius X is Feeneyite.So now they know the error. They can correct it.Vatican Council II supports the old ecclesiology

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2016/10/the-sedevacantists-must-observe-that.html

Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston contradicts the Catechism of Pope Pius X

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/10/letter-of-holy-office-1949-to.html

Catechism of Pope Pius X : Difference between John Vennari and me

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/10/catechism-of-pope-pius-x-difference.html

I affirm Vatican Council II with the old ecclesiology of the Catechism of St. Pius X

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/10/i-affirm-vatican-council-ii-with-old.html

_____________________________________