Wednesday, August 16, 2017
What this Atheist Saw in Hell is FRIGHTENING !!! (Bryan Melvin NDE Testimony)
https://youtu.be/pmp3UNjeu0k
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pmp3UNjeu0k
Bishop Athanasius Schneider does not proclaim the Catholic Faith honestly in Kazhkistan
DOES NOT PROCLAIM SYLLABUS OF ERRORS
He could affirm the Syllabus of Errors in harmony with Vatican Council II ( without the Cushingite error) on ecumenism, Social Reign of Christ the King, exclusive salvation in the Church etc.
He could initiate Mission in Kazhakistan and the rest of the world by announcing that all Muslims there are on the way to Hell according to Vatican Council II(AG 7, LG 14) since they die without ' faith and baptism' needed for salvation.
With reference to Vatican Council II he could announce that there are no visible and known exceptions to Ad Gentes 7( all need faith and baptism for salvation) in 2017 Khazakistan where he is a bishop.
NO PRACTICAL EXCEPTIONS TO THE DOGMA EENS IN VATICAN COUNCIL II
NO PRACTICAL EXCEPTIONS TO THE DOGMA EENS IN VATICAN COUNCIL II
Neither are there any practical exceptions to the dogma EENS mentioned in Vatican Council II since LG 16,LG 8, LG 14, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22, AG 11, AG 7 etc refer to hypothetical and theoretical cases.They are not visible and known people in the present or past. They are not living examples of salvation outside the Church.They do not contradict Ad Gentes 7. Neither do they contradict EENS as it was known to the magisterium, for example, in the 16th century.LG 16 does not contradict AG 7.Why does he not announce this in his interviews on Vatican Council II?
VATICAN COUNCIL II IS FEENEYITE
VATICAN COUNCIL II IS FEENEYITE
So outside the Church there is no salvation is the teaching of Vatican Council II(AG 7) and LG 16 etc is not an exception to Feeneyite EENS. The Letter of the Holy Office 1949 made an objective mistake when it wrongly assumed invisible cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) were visible exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.The error was repeated in Vatican Council II however the Council can still be interpreted in harmony with Tradition when the explicit-implicit, visible-invisible mistake is not made.
Since there is no salvation outside the Church according to Vatican Council II there is no change in the ecclesiology of the Church, the pre and post Vatican Council II ecclesiology is the same.
PAST ECCLESIOLOGY INTACT WITH VATICAN COUNCIL II
PAST ECCLESIOLOGY INTACT WITH VATICAN COUNCIL II
With the past ecclesiology intact there can only be an ecumenism of return and the need for Orthodox Catholics, Lutherans, Pentecostals and Evangelicals and other Christians to formally enter the Catholic Church to avoid the fires of Hell.This is not the Vatican Council II affirmed by Bishop Schneider in his writings and statements.
Since there is the priority for all people to enter the Catholic Church he could proclaim the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation and the non separation of Church and State.This is a priority for a Catholic.
SCHNEIDER DOES NOT AFFIRM SOCIAL REIGN OF CHRIST THE KING
SCHNEIDER DOES NOT AFFIRM SOCIAL REIGN OF CHRIST THE KING
But he is not affirming the Social Reign of Christ the King based on Vatican Council II( without the irrational premise).
He is not rejecting the new ecumenism which is founded on LG 16, UR 3 etc being mistaken as visible exceptions to the dogma EENS and AG 7.
He is not affirming the old ecumenism of the Church based on the old ecclesiology which is intact with AG 7 and UR 3, LG 16 etc not being an exception.
He is not affirming exclusivist salvation in the Catholic Church based on the dogma EENS and AG 7.
I hope Bishop Athanasius Schneider will not issue one of his usual statements on Vatican Council II since they are heretical, non traditional,irrational and appreciated by the magisterium and the political Left.He has not responded to reports and comments I made on his May interview to a Polish publication.-Lionel Andrades
AUGUST 15, 2017
Vatican Council II is a legitimate,dogmatic,pastoral,exclusivist and traditional Council : it is a rupture with Schneider, Burke, Kohl and Kasper
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/08/vatican-council-ii-is.html
AUGUST 15, 2017
For the Sacred Heart Major Seminary Detroit Vatican Council II is not exclusivist or traditional as it is for me
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/08/for-sacred-heart-major-seminary-detroit.html
__________________________________________
JULY 25, 2017
Bishop Athanasius Schneider does not respond to e-mails or reports on the Internet : Pope Francis has made an objective mistake and violates the Principle of No Contradiction in the interpretation of Vatican Council II
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/bishop-athansius-schneider-does-not.html
JULY 22, 2017
Bishop Schneider will not say that Pope Francis has made an objective mistake and violates the Principle of Non Contradiction
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/bishop-schneider-will-not-say-that-pope.html
JULY 22, 2017
Rorate Caeili and Bishop Schneider do not write that Pope Francis made a factual mistake, an objective error in his interpretation of Vatican Council II
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/rorate-caeili-and-bishop-schneider-do.html
JULY 21, 2017
Bishop Athanasius Schneider still incoherent and confused : has repeated last report without addressing previous critical points
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/bishop-athanasius-schneider-still.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)