Tuesday, February 7, 2012

A MOTHER WHO LOVES US CRIES TEARS OF BLOOD AT THE SANCTUARY OF OUR LADY OF TEARS CIVITAVECCHIA

Italian Pro lifers meet at St.Peter's Square

On Sunday I walked passed St. Peter’s Square and saw a large number of people for the Angelus with the Holy Father Pope Benedict XVI. Later I learnt that they were members of an Italian pro-life group which had come there from the Sanctuary of Our Lady of Tears, Civitavecchia. The previous day their meeting was addressed by Olympia Tarzia President World Women’s Alliance for Life & Family. Its ten years for the weeping statue of Our Lady of Tears in St. Augustine’s parish, Civitavecchia, Italy.The statue wept  blood also in the presence of the bishop.


A mother who loves us and tells us that God is love and wants us all to be in Paradise, wept tears of blood ?When a mother cries for her children something is dead wrong.Is she weeping along with Jesus for the many who chose not to be saved in the Catholic Church outside of which there is no salvation?
She loves us we would agree, yet at Fatima she spoke about Hell. She showed Hell to Sister Lucia.
Our Lady weeps at so many places. It is because of her love for us. She knows many of us could be lost forever.
For the pro lifers Our Lady could be crying for the millions of babies killed through legal abortion.
-Lionel Andrades

BAPTIST CONVERTS INTO THE CATHOLIC CHURCH AFTER READING A BOOK ON HELL

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2012/02/baptist-converts-into-catholic-church.html

SOCIETY OF ST.PIUS X (SSPX) USES A DEFACTO-DEFACTO ANALYSIS OF MAGISTERIAL DOCUMENTS WHICH LEADS TO HERESY

The Society of St.Pius X (SSPX) is using a defacto-defacto analysis of Catholic magisterial documents including the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 . There is no traditional teaching which recommends this interpretation of Church texts.No magisterial texts claim that the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. No traditional texts claim that these are exceptions to the magisterial texts which indicate every one with no exception needs to enter the Church for salvation.

It is contrary to the Principle of Non Contradiction. It is irrational. It is heresy for example to reject the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus by saying everyone needs to defacto enter the Church for salvation however some non Catholics with the baptism of desire or in invincible ignorance do not have to explicitly,defacto enter the Catholic Church.

The SSPX teaches that the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance are exceptions to the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation.We do not know any case of a non Catholic saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire so how can they be exceptions to the dogma as the SSPX teaches .

This is heresy.A defined dogma has defacto,known to us  exceptions or are the possible exceptions known only to God?
-Lionel Andrades

See the difference!

MSGR.JOSEPH FENTON AND FR. WILLIAM MOST DID NOT NOTICE THE RICHARD CUSHING ERROR

CARDINAL RATZINGER DID NOT VIOLATE THE PRINCIPLE OF NON CONTRADICTION AS CATHOLICS UNITED FOR THE FAITH IMPLY

FR.TULLIO ROTONDO AFFIRMS CANTATE DOMINO, COUNCIL OF FLORENCE ON EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS

VATICAN COUNCIL II SAYS OUTSIDE THE CATHOLIC CHURCH THERE IS NO SALVATION