Saturday, June 20, 2020

St.Paul Center interprets Vatican Council II with the false premise and so rejects the interpretation of outside the Church no salvation according to the Church Fathers.





The St.Paul Center interprets Vatican Council II with the false premise and so rejects the interpretation of outside the Church no salvation according to the Church Fathers.1
The Church Fathers held the strict interpretation of outside the Church no salvation.It was the same with the Medieval popes. When they mentioned invincible ignorance(I.I) , the baptism of desire(BOD) and the baptism of blood(BOB) they were obviously referring to hypothetical and theoretical cases.They could not be anything else.
However the liberal theologians after the 1930's interpreted BOD,BOB and I.I as being exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). So in other words they were objective examples of salvation outside the Church,for them to be exceptions.They projected BOD and I.I as exceptions to Feeneyite EENS for ideological reasons. They also re-interpreted the Church Fathers and Medieval popes, when they mentioned I.I etc, as referring to objective exceptions to the strict interpretation of EENS. 
They projected the Church Fathers and the popes as saying there were exceptions to all needing to enter the Church for salvation. Among those who promoted this confusion were the Americanists but also Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger and then those who would be employed at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and be associated with the International Theological Commission, Vatican.
Even Archbishop Lefebvre would make the same error. The traditionalists then over the next 50 years would misinterpret BOD, BOB and I.I in Mystici Corporis, Quanta Cura etc as exceptions being mentioned by the popes to the 'rigid' interpretation of EENS.
The same mistake is made by Scott Hahn and the apologists at the St. Paul Center. 
The Church Fathers are cited on many subjects but not outside the Church there is no salvation. Instead on Wikipedia there is a long list of Church Fathers, popes and saints, who affirmed the strict interpretation of outside the Church there is no salvation.
However Wikipedia, like the St. Paul Center, interprets Vatican Council II, with the false premise.So there are exceptions to the Church Fathers on outside the Church no salvation. 
Also Wikipedia interprets the BOD, BOB and I.I as exceptions to Feeneyite EENS. They imply, like the St. Paul Center, that these are visible and non hypothetical examples of salvation outside the Church.
So they contradict the Church Fathers, popes and saints but also Jesus, in the Bible ( John 3:5. Mark 16:16 etc).
With the false premise even the Creed has been changed. The Profesion of Faith which we make in the Church is meaningless since there are two interpretations of the Nicene Creed.There is the version of the St. Paul Center and mine. 
-Lionel Andrades



1

The Body of Christ is a Literal Reality in the Church




Understanding Vatican II and the One Church of Christ


________________________



2

This set of passages from the Church Fathers shows that they equated baptism with being “born again,” as Jesus put it in John 3. By Joseph Gallegos.
Church Fathers on Christ’s Real Presence in the Eucharist
A collection of texts illustrating the Church Fathers’ “realist” view of the Eucharist. By Joseph Gallegos.
Church Fathers on Infant Baptism
A collection of documents illustrating the practice of infant baptism in the early Church. By Joseph Gallegos.
Church Fathers on Purgatory
Texts from the early Church that show belief in the existence of Purgatory.
Church Fathers on the ‘Catholic Bible’
A good collection of quotes showing how the Church Fathers, to varying degrees, came to embrace the larger Old Testament that now makes up the Catholic version of sacred Scripture. By Joseph Gallegos.
Church Fathers on the Assumption of Mary
Documents illustrating early belief in the bodily assumption of Mary. By Joseph Gallegos.
Church Fathers on the Canon of Scripture
These documents from the early Church illustrate the belief that only the appointed authorities of the Church can determine which books belong in the “canon.” By Joseph Gallegos.
Church Fathers on the Immaculate Conception
Documents illustrating that Mary was conceived without the stain of original sin. By Joseph Gallegos.
Church Fathers on the Intercession of the Blessed Virgin Mary
Devotion and intercession of the Blessed Virgin Mary is shown to be a common expression in the writings of the Church Fathers. By Joseph Gallegos.
Church Fathers on the Meaning of Apostolic Succession
This collection of texts shows that the Church Fathers believed that the teachers of the Catholic Church – the Pope and the Bishops – are connected to the Apostles by succession of office. By Joseph Gallegos.
Church Fathers on the Mother of God (Theotokos)
Documents illustrating that the Church Fathers believed Mary was truly the Mother of God. By Joseph Gallegos.
Church Fathers on the Sacrament of Confirmation
A collection of passages by Joseph Gallegos.
Church Fathers on the Sacrament of Extreme Unction (Anointing of the Sick)
Texts that show that the early Church believed in the sacramental nature of the anointing of the sick. By Joseph Gallegos.
Church Fathers on the Sacrament of Holy Matrimony
A collection of texts that shows the early belief that Christ elevated marriage to a sacrament. By Joseph Gallegos.
Church Fathers on the Sacrament of Holy Orders
These texts show the Church Fathers’ assumption that Christ wanted a ministerial priesthood. By Joseph Gallegos.
Church Fathers on the Sacrament of Penance
This collection of texts illustrates the practice of priests hearing confessions in the early Church. By Joseph Gallegos.
Church Fathers on Transubstantiation
These documents illustrate the ancient roots of Catholic belief in the way the bread and wine are changed into Christ’s body and blood.
Church Fathers on Veneration and Invocation of the Saints
A selection of texts that shows the Church Fathers invoking the saints’ intercession in prayer, naming children after them, creating statues and images of them, and preserving their relics. By Joseph Gallegos.
Church Fathers on Veneration of the Blessed Virgin Mary
A collection of texts that shows how veneration of the Blessed Virgin Mary is a recurring theme in the writings of the Church Fathers. By Joseph Gallegos.

Apologetics

Essential Resources Catholic Encyclopedia Invaluable resource for understanding basic questions of the faith. EWTN Online The global Catholic television network’s website is a goldmine – from daily news to prayer and devotion resources. Just visit and browse. We find especially useful: – Document Library – Audio Library – News – Catholic Q&A – Prayers – Novenas – Litanies – Daily Mass Readings Pocket Catholic Dictionary An excellent resource. Definitions written by Father

__________________________________


JUNE 20, 2020

St.Paul Center of Scott Hahn contradicts Biblical texts with the use of a false premise




St.Paul Center of Scott Hahn contradicts Biblical texts with the use of a false premise

The St.Paul Center of Scott Hahn has posted an article which interprets Vatican Council II with the false premise to create a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) . The wrtier Matthew Ramage admits that EENS today is no more like it was over history .He puts the blame on Vatican Council II and the 'Magisterium'. He is not aware of his irrational interpretation of the Council by confusing what is invisible as being visible.
He admits that there is a development of doctrine and quotes Pope Benedict on this subject. He does not know that there could only be a development of doctrine because the false premise is used in the interpretation of Vatican Council II, the Catechisms and the Creeds.
He does not refer to Pope Benedict's 'hermeneutic of continuity' with Tradition, since there is no continuity.He acknowledges this.
He does not refer to Pope Benedict's 'hermeneutic of rupture' created by the false premise used by Pope Benedict to interpret Vatican Council II.
Instead he refers to a 'hermeneutic of reform'. With the use of the false premise doctrine on salvation has been changed and he interprets it as a reform.
He begins with a false premise and then there are liberal and broad conclusions.
Of course he would be contradicting Jesus in John 3:5, Mark 16:16, Matthew 7:13. He would be projecting exceptions to these Biblical texts based upon the false premise and inference.Lionel Andrades


St. Paul Center

Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus and the Substance of Catholic Doctrine: Towards a Realization of Benedict XVI’s “Hermeneutic of Reform”

Nova et Vetera, Winter 2016 (Vol. 14, No. 1)
https://stpaulcenter.com/11-nv-14-1-ramage/


Un Miracolo comprovato dalla scienza: le lacrime del quadro del Cuore Im...

Preghiera di Guarigione - Medjugorje 17 giugno 2020

Patricia Chadwick's book Little Sister calls the St.Benedict Center, New Hamphire schismatics

The Jesuit publication America, has re-princted an article by Patricia Chadwick   
Old Greenwich woman details brutal childhood in Catholic cult ...




Father Feeney was dismissed by the Jesuits and excommunicated in 1953 after refusing to reply to a summons to the Vatican. Nor did I know that my father, a teacher at the Jesuit-run Boston College, had, along with two other professors, been fired in early 1949, when I was just 7 months old, because of their rigid theological views.

Lionel: Those 'rigid theological views' are expressed in Vatican Council II.They are those of the Council in Ad Gentes 7 (CCC 846 Outside the Church No Salvation). There are no exceptions mentioned in the Council-text  to extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) when Vatican Council II is interpreted rationally.
Patricia Chadwick like the Jesuit magazine America interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise to create a false rupture with the 'rigid theological view' of the professors who were dismissed by Boston College, including her father.
When she was young the Holy Office(CDF) and Pope Pius XII had wrongly assumed that  unknown cases of being saved in invincible ignorance or the baptism of desire were known and objective exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). However this was the birth of the irrational New Theology which was accepted at Vatican Council II along with the mistake. Pope Benedict helped maintained the false narrative in the Church.
______________________

In the early 1970s, Father Feeney became reconciled with the Catholic Church, though he never recanted his views on extra ecclesiam nulla salus. The community of men became a Benedictine Abbey, while the women came under the auspices of the Diocese of Worcester. While some members formed a new schismatic community in New Hampshire, the Still River community is in full communion with the Catholic Church.

Lionel: How can she say that the community in New Hampshire is schismatic ?
Vatican Council II interpreted without the false premise does not contradict the popes over the centuries, on their 'rigid theological interpretation' of EENS. So the community at New Hampshire is not in schism with them. However Boston College and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) which use the same false premise to interpret Vatican Council II, as the author, are in schism with the popes before the 1930's on EENS.
Secondly the community at New Hampshire can affirm Vatican Council II without the false premise which would be in harmony with the rigid theological interpretation of EENS.So they do not have to deny Vatican Council II. 
They cannot be  in schism for rejecting Vatican Council II a charge levelled at other traditionalists.
So it is wrong to label the New Hampshire community as schismatics.They are not traditionalists who reject Vatican Council II (Feeneyite).
Thirdly the community at Worcester are in full communion with the Bishop of Worcester and the CDF since they interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise to create a rupture with 'the rigid traditional theological' interpretation of EENS, including that of Fr. Leonard Feeney.Brother Thomas Augustine MICM, Superior at the St.Benedict Center, Still River, has still not announced that the community affirms Vatican Council II (Feeneyite).The Council interpreted without the false premise.
Fourthly when they affirm Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and EENS ( Feeneyite) they would not be liberals like the Jesuits who reject EENS ( Feeneyite) with Vatican Council II( Cushingite).
The St.Benedict Center N.H, USA affirm the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance as referring to invisible and hypothetical cases only.This is something obvious. It does not have to be explained.
All the popes over the centuries affirmed the strict interpretation of EENS along with hypothetical cases,unable to be objective exceptions to EENS.-Lionel Andrades


Međugorje,19 Giugno 2020 -Venerazione alla Santa Croce, Sacratissimo Cuo...

Un saluto dalla veggente Marija dalla collina delle apparizioni a Medju...

SBC tell the CDF that you will not use the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II like the Oblate Dean of Theology in Texas





Dr. Scott Woodward, the Academic Dean of Theology of the Oblate School of Theology,San Antonio, Texas,USA was interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise to create a 'the hermeutic of rupture' with extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).1 He was publically denying EENS with a false premise, in his ignorance. But  the St. Benedict Centers in the USA, the communities of Fr. Leonard Feeney, cannot interpret Vatican Council II in the same way,since  they have been informed  about this mistake.

Ralph Martin Edward Feser: A further reply to Fastiggi, etc.
It unethical, for example, for Prof. Robert Fastiggi and Prof. Ralph Martin, at the Sacred Heart Major Seminary,Detroit,USA, to continue to interpret Vatican Council II  with the false premise since they understand the mistake.
Fr. Michal Paluch OP (Rector... - Pontifical University of St ...
Similarly, it is unethical for Sister Catherine Droste OP,Dean of Theology, at the University of St.Thomas Aquinas( Angelicum) Rome,and Prof. Francesco Giordano, at the Angelicum,  to continue to interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise,  to create an artificial rupture with Tradition, especially EENS.They know the mistake being forced upon them by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) and the present two popes.
The CDF is interpreting Vatican Council II with the false premise and Archbishop Carlo Vigano and Bishop Athanasius Schneider will not correct the mistake.
There is nothing in Lumen Gentium to contradict the past ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.
There is nothing in Unitatitis Redintigratio to contradict EENS and the past understanding of ecumenism.
Nostra Aetate can no where state that there is personally known salvation outside the Church which contradists EENS. If someone was saved outside the Church without faith and baptism it would only be known to God.


So the St. Benedict Centers must be aware of this common mistake.If they do not interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise, they will negate Feeneyite EENS. The CDF is using the false premise, to interpret Vatican Council II, to create a rupture with EENS, as did the Holy Office (CDF) in the 1949 Letter.This is a new tradition in the Catholic Church.It was not  part of the Deposit of the Faith over the centuries before the 1930's.

Bishop Robert McManus and his Curia in the Diocese of Worcester, USA are interpreting Vatican Council II with the false premise like Dr.Scott Woodward, the Dean of Theology, at the Oblate School of Theology, Texas.This is condoned by Brother Thomas Augustine MICM, the Superior at the St. Benedict Center, Still River in the diocese of Worcester. Brother  Thomas Augustine does not interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise  to avoid the break with 19th century EENS.
He should be affirming Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and EENS( Feeneyite).
Things have become easier  for him.Why reject the Council ? It is not a rupture with EENS.
Pope Benedict wanted the Society of St.Pius X(SSPX) to accept Vatican Council II( Cushingite) for canonical status. So Vatican Council II is important.
Catholic traditions are not all sacrosanct, says cardinal
Who We Are | Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate
Cardinal Braz de Avez wanted the Franciscans of the Immaculate to affirm Vatican Council II( Cushingite) for canonical recognition. So Vatican Council II is important.
Vatican Council II is important for them. Fine, Brother Thomas Augustine should go ahead and affirm the Council ( Feeneyite) and ask the CDF to do the same.
Tell the CDF that you will not use the false premise like the Oblate Dean of Theology at Texas.


Call upon Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj to correct the mistake at the Placquet Deo Press Conference. Tell him to announce that Lumen Gentium 8( subsistit ) always refers to a theoretical and hypothetical situation. It is not an exception to EENS. 
Tell Archbishop Carlo Vigano to announce that Vatican Council II is not an exception to the 'strict interpretation' of EENS.

Tell Bishop Athanasius Schneider  to announce that Vatican Council II does not contradict the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX( ecumenism, salvation outside the Church).
Ask the FSSP priests who offer Mass in Latin, to clarify that the ecclesiology of the Church, before and after Vatican Council II, is the same and there are no exceptions mentioned in Lumen Gentium.eucharistandmission: Church Militant TV slanders Brother Andre ...


Ask Archbishop Morandi to acknowledge the mistake in the 2016 CDF Letter to Brother Andre Marie MICM, Prior, St.Benedict Center Richmond, N.H , USA, with reference to CCC 847-848 being an exception to EENS.
Refuse canonical recognition until the Vatican affirms Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite).-Lionel Andrades




1

 JUNE 19, 2020

Academic Dean of Oblate School of Theology,uses a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II to create a non traditional conclusion and the hermeneutic of rupture
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/06/academic-dean-of-oblate-school-of.html


JUNE 19, 2020


Bishop McManus and Bro. Thomas Augustine do not affirm Vatican Council II without the false premise : canonical recognition is maintained (Graphics)
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/06/bishop-mcmanus-and-bro-thomas-augustine.html



JUNE 19, 2020


Canonical recognition for those who use the false premise : Brother Thomas Augustine MICM and St. Benedict Center , Still River approved
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/06/canonical-recognition-for-those-who-use.html


UNE 18, 2020
St.Benedict Center Richmond N.H need to affirm in public Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) by doing this they do not allow people to label them ultra traditionalist or schismatics
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/06/stbenedict-center-richmond-nh-needs-to.html

JUNE 18, 2020

CDF officially asks SBC to follow an error: victory for Americanists ( Graphics )
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/06/cdf-officially-asks-sbc-to-follow-error.html

JUNE 18, 2020

The CDF error is supported by Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, Bishop Athanasius Schneider, the Lefebvrists and Cardinal Walter Kasper and the liberals
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/06/the-cdf-error-is-supported-by.html



JUNE 18, 2020

Brother Thomas Augustine MICM, Superior, Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary at the St.Benedict Center Still River, MA, USA, is in full communion with Bishop Robert McManus, the Bishop of Worcester, USA and the CDF since he interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise and inference to create a rupture with Tradition

JUNE 17, 2020

Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano must see the error in the CDF Letter to the St. Benedict Center : all religious communities must use the false premise


JUNE 17, 2020


Archbishop Vigano, CDF and Lefebvrists want the St. Benedict Center to use a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II, Creeds and Catechisms to create an artitifical rupture with EENS


JUNE 17, 2020

Vigano, Schneider and Lefebvrists keep silent when the Diocese of Manchester, the liberals and the political Left (ADL, SPLC) place ' strict canonical prohibitions and obligations' upon the St.Benedict Center for not affirming EENS with a false premise and inference.

 JUNE 17, 2020

Even if the Catholic Church is infiltrated Dr.Taylor Marshall can still interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise. He could interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism and not Cushingism.


JUNE 16, 2020

Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano interprets Vatican Council II with Cushingism : rupture with Athanasius Creed created