All Catholics simply have to use the
rational premise to go back to Tradition. It is for the liberals for whom
Vatican Council II will become an issue.This is when LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3,
NA2, GS 22 etc, are seen as hypothetical cases always.So they cannot be
practical exceptions for the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius X ( ecumenism of
return ), the Catechism of Pope Pius X, 24Q,27Q (other religions and exclusive
salvation in the Catholic Church), the Athanasius Creed ( all need the Catholic
faith for salvation).
GERMAN SYNODAL PATH
Since the popes from Paul VI have
interpreted Vatican Council II with the false premise there exists the German
Synodal Way.It would fall flat if the Germans would choose to use the rational
premise.
The Lefebvrist and Ecclesia Dei
communities are also using the same fake premise and are unaware of it.So they
do not correct the mistake of Pope Francis and Pope Benedict.Vatican Council II
with the rational premise would not be an issue for the traditionalists.
PROOF OF THE FALSE PREMISE
1.Pope Francis wants the Ecclesia Dei
communities to interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise and only
then they will be allowed to offer the Latin Mass.
3.In two theological papers of the International Theological Commission,Pope Benedict and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj, have criticized Fr. Leonard Feeney and his exclusivist ecclesiocentrism.They also mention that Vatican Council II(LG 16 etc) contradicted the priest’s exclusivist understanding of salvation.In other words, LG 16 referred to visible and known non Catholics saved outside the Church, without faith and the baptism of water.This is irrational. In this way, with the false premise i.e by confusing invisible cases of being saved in invincible ignorance, as being visible, practical exceptions were created for the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.Exceptions were created for the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, the Catechism of Pope Pius X and Trent, EENS etc.
4.Archbishops Giacomo Morendi and
Augustine di Noia of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, demanded
that Brother Andre Marie MICM, and the religious community Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary interpret the
Catechism of the Catholic Church( 847-848) on invincible ignorance with the false premise. This is irrational.The
CDF and the Diocese of Manchester, USA are using the false premise. Since the
St. Benedict Center refuses to do likewise, a severe Decree of Prohibitions has
been placed upon them since 2019.
5.The Abu Dhabi Statement of Pope Francis was attributed to a change in ecclesiology and theology created by Vatican Council II when the false premise is used to interpret the text.Without the fake premise the pope would have to say outside the Church there is no salvation.
7.All Pope Benedict’s books on Vatican
Council II and Ecclesiology are written with a false premise. So his conclusion
is non traditional and not the Deposit of the Faith.It is the same with the
books of Cardinal Walter Kasper, Cardinal Marcello Semeraro and Archbishop
Bruno Forte.
8.The dialogue with the Lutherans was based upon Vatican Council II interpreted with the false premise. Otherwise with the rational premise, the Lutherans are outside the Church without Catholic faith (AG 7).While Unitatis Redintigratio 3 etc in Vatican Council II are not practical exceptions to 16th century EENS.
12.The liberalism in the Church comes with the use of the false premise which makes the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King in politics and Traditional Mission obsolete. With this liberalism in the Catholic Church today does not oppose Satanic political parties in Rome( Partito Democratico, Movimento Cinque Stelle etc).They promote homosexual unions, abortion, contraception,public immodesty, pornography on the offical media and pontifical heresy and schism in the Catholic Church.
14.Matteo Salvini and the Lega political party in Italy do not know that Vatican Council II can be interpreted with the rational premise, like I interpret it.This will mean that the local bishops and the parish priests would be able to affirm the Social Reign of Christ the King in all politics(Quas Primas) and the necessity to vote for a Catholic political party, to save souls from going to Hell - without any one citing Vatican Council II (irrational) in opposition.The Council interpreted with the rational premise is in the interest of the centre right political parties in Italy.So the Church's theological attitude to migrants and non Catholics would be Conciliar and also traditional on salvation.
15.Bishop Robert Barron is now as obsolete on Vatican Council II as is Massimo Faggioli.
16. Pope Francis thinks it is the Mass which makes a Catholic or seminarian 'rigid' when it really is the use of the false premise.It is no more 'only they need to enter the Church who know about it'(LG 14).Instead, it is all need to enter the Catholic Church with no known exception.Invincible ignorance is not an exception to all needing to enter the Church with faith and the baptism of water(LG 14,AG 7 etc). So we evangelize since all non Catholics are oriented to Hell without faith and the baptism of water( AG 7, LG 14 etc).The norm for salvationis faith and baptism and not invincible ignorance. When I meet a non Catholic, I cannot know if he or she is an exception to the norm.If there is an exception it could only be known to God.I know that ther non Catholic before me is oriented to Hell.(Athanasius Creed, Vatican Council II(AG 7, LG 14),Catechism of the Catholic Church( 845,846,1257), Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX etc.The non Catholic is not condemned as long as he or she is alive. There is hope.
Photos
https://gaudiumpress.ca/dear-cardinal-braz-de-aviz-the-grass-is-green/
https://bedacollege.org/beda-people
Posts
