Bishop Athanasius Schneider interpreted Vatican Council II irrationally throughout the interview with Steve Bannon this month.

 

Bishop Athanasius Schneider interpreted Vatican Council II irrationally throughout the interview with Steve Bannon this month. It was a waste of time. He did not interpret the Council rationally, in harmony with Tradition. Bannon does not know that the Council can be interpreted traditionally once the Rational Premise is chosen.

THERE ARE NO LITERAL CASES OF THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE

This was an opportunity for Bishop Schneider to affirm exclusive salvation in Jesus and only in the Catholic Church as he did recently at Khazakistan. It was possible since he believes that there are no literal cases of the baptism of desire (LG 14) in the present times. So with LG 8,14,16, UR 3, GS 22, NA 2 etc. in Vatican Council II being only hypothetical and invisible in 2022 there are no practical exceptions in the Council-text for the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. So at Kazakhstan he could affirm the traditional ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church.Vatican Council II interpreted rationally was in harmony with Tradition for him. He did not have to reject the Council(R).

Pope Benedict would not affirm traditional ecclesiocentrism and would not say that all need to enter only the Catholic Church for salvation. Since he would interpret Vatican Council II with the Irrational Premise. Invisible cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, and UR 3, GS 22 etc. would be seen, by him, as being visible examples of salvation outside the Church. So they would be practical exceptions for Feeneyite EENS. So the dogma EENS and the Athanasius Creed was obsolete for him. He would use the False Premise (invisible people are visible) and then say that there was ‘a development of doctrine’ with Vatican Council II. 

So the Council was always interpreted as a break with Feeneyite EENS, for him.

But now we know that the Council per se is not the cause of division but it was the Irrational Premise which Pope Benedict chose. 

POPE BENEDICT STILL WANTS DIVISION IN THE CHURCH

He wanted the division in the Church. It was political. Even now he will not interpret the Council rationally and say like Bishop Athanasius Schneider that for salvation all need to accept Jesus in only the Catholic Church.

A German bishop the other day called this right wing extremism but this has been the Catholic faith for centuries and it is not contradicted with Vatican Council II interpreted rationally with the Rational Premise ( invisible cases are just invisible).-Lionel Andrades

OCTOBER 25, 2022

Steve Bannon does not ask Bishop Athanasius Schneider the question important for conservatives and the center right

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/10/steve-bannon-does-not-ask-bishop.html