Friday, April 13, 2018

Commento al Catechismo di San Pio X - n.5 (Corrado Gnerre)


Commento al Catechismo di San Pio X - n.5 (Corrado Gnerre)


01:01:01

Catechismo San Pio X - Apologetica
https://gloria.tv/video/6Jun3G1wfxDW6kj3GuvqJyu72

Catholic political parties and lay Catholics can first affirm the dogma EENS and then the Social Reign of Christ the King.In this way Catholics can enter in an organised way into the politics of France without any confusion in doctrine and theology :Macron's appeal to Catholics

French President Emmanuel Macron
The French President has called on Catholics to engage politically in the country and this could be an opportunity for lay Catholics and political parties to  affirm Vatican Council II in harmony with the traditional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus which was known historically in France.When they affirm Vatican Council II like me, L.A, then they do not mistake LG 8, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22, AG 11(seeds of the Word) etc as being explicit and objectively visible. They are not.So they are not exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was known historically to the saints in France.
Image result for Bishop Fellay social reign of christ the king PhotoImage result for Bishop Fellay social reign of christ the king Photo


So with Vatican Council II (AG 7) affirming the dogma EENS, as it was known to the missionaries and Magisterium in France in the 16th century, - and LG 8 etc not being exceptions to EENS- then the Council supports the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church.There can only be an ecumenism of return.
Image result for Bishop Fellay social reign of christ the king PhotoImage result for Photo Forza Nuova
Image result for Bishop Fellay social reign of christ the king Photo
Upon this exclusivist understanding of salvation, which is traditional Catholic doctrine, was based the doctrine on the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation.
So Catholic political parties and lay Catholics can first affirm the dogma EENS and then the Social Reign of Christ the King.In this way Catholics can enter in an organised way into the politics of France, without any confusion on Catholic doctrine and theology.-Lionel Andrades


http://www.ncregister.com/daily-news/president-of-france-calls-on-catholics-to-engage-politically


___________________________________





APRIL 9, 2018


What if the pope or Bishop Fellay called for a day to celebrate and discuss the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation ?

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/what-if-pope-or-bishop-fellay-called.html
APRIL 8, 2018

So for Fr. Paul McGregor the Social Reign of Christ the King must be taught in the Catholic family and its implementation will happen in future in Russia and the rest of the world when Our Lady's Immaculate Heart will Triumph http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/so-for-fr-paul-mcgregor-social-reign-of.html
APRIL 8, 2018

Fr.Paul McDonald is really saying he supports an exclusivist ecclesiology with no dual conclusions, heterodox passages, no passages against EENS http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/frpaul-mcdonald-is-really-saying.html
APRIL 7, 2018



There is no known exception to the exclusive ecclesiology of the Church on salvation so we have the old evangelisation today http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/there-is-no-known-exception-to.html
 APRIL 7, 2018

Even Vatican II says every one on the face of the earth is called to become a member of the Mystical Body ( the Catholic Church)- Fr.Paul McDonald , Fatima Center http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/even-vatican-ii-says-every-one-on-face.html
APRIL 8, 2018


Even members of the Lay Movements in the Catholic Church can proclaim the necessity of the Social Reign of Christ the King     http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/even-members-of-lay-movements-in.html
NOVEMBER 26, 2017


The Social Reign of Christ the King can be seen based on Cushingite or Feeneyite theology, Vatican Council II with the false premise or without it. http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/11/the-social-reign-of-christ-king-can-be.html

Image result for Bishop Fellay social reign of christ the king PhotoImage result for Bishop Fellay social reign of christ the king Photo
AUGUST 17, 2017
Bishops Fellay, Schneider are not proclaiming the Social Reign of Christ the King supported by Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite)
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/08/bishops-fellay-schneider-are-not.html
AUGUST 16, 2017
Bishop Athanasius Schneider does not proclaim the Catholic Faith honestly in Kazhkistan http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/08/bishop-athanasius-schneider-does-not.html

JULY 17, 2017
Catholic political parties must teach Catholics the faith which is not being taught by religious due to political pressure
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/catholic-political-parties-must-teach.html
 MAY 3, 2017
Image result for Name of the President of PolandAndrzej Duda President of Poland does not note the split between Church doctrine and State in Poland because of Cushingism   http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/05/andrzej-dudathe-president-of-poland.html
DECEMBER 19, 2016
Catholics will not vote for the Catholic political parties :The four cardinals are using an irrational philosophy to reject the traditional ecclesiology and interpret Vatican Council II with the same irrationality
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/12/catholics-will-not-vote-for-catholic.html
 OCTOBER 30, 2016
Image result for Photo of the Social Reign of Christ the King
With Feeneyite Vatican Council II the Catholic Church affirms the Social Reign of Christ the King.  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/10/with-feeneyite-vatican-council-ii.html
NOVEMBER 25, 2014
The Council’s words are strong and forthright here, implicitly asserting the sovereignty of Christ over all nations, but we now seldom hear them quoted http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/11/the-councils-words-are-strong-and.html 


VATICAN COUNCIL II AFFIRMS THE SOCIAL KINGSHIP OF CHRIST THE KING AND THE NON SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/09/vatican-council-ii-affirms-social.html





Repost : Vatican Council II is based on a lie, it is a kind of a theme.

 DECEMBER 27, 2016

Vatican Council II is based on a lie, it is a kind of a theme.

In principle the Vatican Council II Fathers assumed hypothetical cases were not hypothetical but objectively visible.
In principle they assumed people in Heaven are objectively visible on earth.
In principle they assumed that we can know of non Catholics on earth saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.
In general, as a norm, the Principle of Non Contradiction was violated what is invisible was inferred to be visible and then non traditional conclusions were made.
There are philosophical mistakes in Vatican Council II, objective mistakes.Errors in empirical observation.
From professors of  philosophy to the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith and the two popes they are teaching a lie.
The cardinals and priest-professors will continue to assume that the baptism of desire refers to a visible case in the present times. Then they will infer that there are known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. So every one does not need to be incorporated into the Church as a member for salvation.
For Catholic professors, of philosophy and theology, it is not un-ethical to lie by inferring that the baptism of desire cases refers to visible  and known people. Yet this is the magisterial heresy, the lie imposed upon on them by the Vatican  and they have to teach it. There is no choice.
1.In this way Vatican Council II (LG 16, LG 14 etc) becomes a rupture with the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.This is a LIE they maintain.
2.By confusing what is invisible as being visible, it is wrongly assumed that the Holy Office 1949 and the Archbishop of Boston did not make a mistake.They were not in heresy for rejecting or re-interpreting the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus  in the Fr.Leonard Feeney case.This  is a LIE.They were in heresy. They criticize Fr. Leonard Feeney and suggest tht the magisterium has not made a mistake.They  LIE .
Lumen Gentium 14 ( those who know) was based on a wrong inference.It was based on the LIE.We do not know of any one saved in invincible ignorance and without the baptism of water.So it cannot be said that only those who 'know' need to enter the Church and not all people in general.
Based on the LIE they have Unitatis Redintigratio suggest that there is known salvation for someone saved in imperfect communion with the Church.Why did they have to mention it? There is no such person known.Also now UR 3 can be interpreted as being hypothetical.Then their LIEis exposed.
Based on the LIE of there being known cases saved in other religions with elements of sanctification and truth we have Lumen Gentium 8.Why did they mention it? Since they assumed there was known salvation as such without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church. This is aLIE.
There is no known salvation outside the Catholic Church and so we do not know of any non Catholic saved due to 'good and holy' things in his religion.For Nostra Aetate 2 to suggest this or be interpreted as such, was a LIE.
Who among us knows of some category of people saved because the Catholic Church subsists outside its visible boundaries (Lumen Gentium 8-subsists it). This is all speculation based on theLIE of known salvation outside the Church.
These are all hypothetical cases and they have nothing to do with the traditional Catholic teaching on salvation.To pretend that they refer to known cases saved outside the visible limits of the Catholic Church, without faith and baptism, is a LIE.

A major Church Council makes a wrong inference based on a lie and this is a theme, something accepted in principle. This was Vatican Council II.

Here are the questions 1 that Catholic professors in Rome, and many priests too, would not like to answer.They do not want to be quoted.It exposes THE LIE.
How can they say that it was Vatican Council II itself, which was based on a new theology whose foundation was a lie?
-Lionel Andrades


1
1.From the philosophical point of view a catechumen desires to receive the baptism of water but he dies before he can receive it and is allegedly saved.Is this a hypothetical case for you?






My answer is YES.It is a hypothetical case.
It would be hypothetical for us and known only to God.
2.
So is this case of a catechumen who is saved with the 'baptism of desire' known or unknown for you ?
He is always unknown for me. He can only be known to God if he existed.
3.
So if someone says that this case of the catechumen is physically visible in 2016 and personally known to us then this would be false reasoning.? My answer is YES.
4.
Would it violate the Principle of Non Contradiction if someone said this case was visible in the present times, and was personally known?
My answer is Yes since it is being assumed that someone invisible is visible.It is being inferred that someone who does not exist is there on earth and is known.Someone who is not concrete and tangible is assumed to be defacto and real in present time and space.
5.
Similarly this case of an un-seen and known catechumen who is saved with the desire for the baptism of water,in the past too, would be hypothetical for the people of that time, since it cannot be physically visible and known in personal cases? Yes.It cannot be known. It is always an invisible case for us human beings.

FINAL  QUESTIONS
A. Do we personally know people saved  in invincible ignorance, a good conscience (LG 16) etc,can we see them, are they physically visible to us in 2016 ?
My answer is that we cannot see them. They are not physically visible .They are not personally known to us in our time and space.

B. Since we do not know any of these cases, in real life, they are not visible to us, there cannot be any known exception to the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, nor to Ad Gentes 7 which states 'all' need 'faith and baptism' for salvation  My answer is that they are not exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. They were never exceptions.The Holy Office 1949 and the Archbishop of Boston made an objective error.

C.So when Vatican Council II mentions this catechumen (LG 14) and being saved in invincible ignorance(LG 16),along with orthodox passages, which support the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, was it a mistake?
It was a mistake for me. Since these are 'zero cases' in our reality, they are not 'practical exceptions' to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the old ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.I can read Vatican Council II while noting that these cases are hypothetical and theoretical only.
-Lionel Andrades

Repost :In the Catechism of Pope Pius X there are no exceptions to the Feeneyite interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus. the priests are not saying it

WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 28, 2016

In the Catechism of Pope Pius X there are no exceptions to the Feeneyite interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus. the priests are not saying it

Image result for photo of loss of faith
Priests are not saying that there are known cases of the baptism of desire.So there are no known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.There were never were and never can be any known exceptions. Instead the priests who are professors have changed the meaning of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. This is heresy and apostasy. It is also in the secular sense un-ethical and a telling of a lie.
They are knowingly not affirming the faith in public for political reasons.They do not want to lose their career.They do not want to be suspended  in the parish or universityby the Vatican, which is officially maintaining the heresy.
So the priests are not saying that there are no exceptions to the 16th century interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. There are no exceptions to the dogma even in the Catechism of Pope Pius X. 1..There are no exceptions in Vatican Council II and they will not admit it.2Similarly in the Catechism of the Catholic Church (1995) without the new theology, without assuming invisible cases are visible, there are no exceptions to the  Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors and the Catechism of Pope Pius X-but the priests are not teaching this.
-Lionel Andrades

1
October 10, 2016
The Letter of the Holy Office says that it is not required that a person be incorporated into the Church as a member for salvation while the Catechism of Pius X says it is necessary. http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/10/the-letter-of-holy-office-says-that-it.html

MONDAY, OCTOBER 10, 2016

I even interpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1995) as being Feeneyite. I use the same reasoning : hypothetical cases are not explicit in the present times. http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/10/i-even-interpret-catechism-of-catholic.html

2.

JUNE 21, 2014

The Grand Secret : Vatican Council II says all Hindus, Buddhists, Jews, Muslims, Protestants etc are lost http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/the-grand-secret-vatican-council-ii.html

__________________________________________________

Image result for divine mercy image

Image result for photos of Archbishop Thomas E Gullickson
Archbishop Thomas E.Gullickson says Vatican Council II does not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/11/archbishop-thomas-egullickson-says.html#links

DEAN OF THEOLOGY AT ST. ANSELM SAYS THERE ARE NO KNOWN EXCEPTIONS TO THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/10/dean-of-theology-at-st-anselm-says.html#links


CANTATE DOMINO, COUNCIL OF FLORENCE ON EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS IS DE FIDE AND NOT CONTRADICTED BY VATICAN COUNCIL II- Fr. Nevus Marcello O.P
BRAZILIAN PRIEST SAYS VATICAN COUNCIL II DOES NOT CONTRADICT DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS