Sunday, January 27, 2019
Man becomes priest after illumination from God
Your Life In Review
Have you ever contemplated how your life will be seen in the Light of God?
There can be no more important contemplation -- how He will judge or "review" everything you have ever done, said, or thought. (And how you have reacted to everyone and each situation.)
Ask Rick Wendell, of Wisconsin, who was once in the fast-lane of quick money from building custom homes, dealmaking, and selling drugs. There was drinking. There were women. And a lot of all of the above.
Then, at age thirty, after receiving stitches for a construction injury, he lapsed into a reaction to the anesthesia and was out of it to the extent that he was clinically "dead" for two-and-a-half hours -- cold to his mother's touch, turning blue-gray. In fact, doctors were preparing his body so it could be shipped to Minnesota for organ harvesting (he was a donor).
But during his "death," in the ambulance on the way to the hospital, Wendell had the mystical experience of passing to the other side and encountering the Light of God. It's not something that can really be described. "I don't know whether I went toward it, or it came toward me, because distance, space, and time cannot describe what I was experiencing," he recounts in the new book, Of Men and Mary.
"The Light was just there. It had no visible source, and its brightness was beyond blinding and yet soft on my eyes. It cannot be described by color or wavelength or anything that we use to describe light here on earth because it was infinitely more."
He suddenly knew Who God is -- "the most obvious thing there could possibly be," as he phrases it: that is, all around us but usually unrecognized. He also realized, did Wendell, that a human life is but a "blink within that reality" but also that each and every life is "profoundly important" to the Creator.
What we do with it is critical, says Wendell now; as if "life were a test, but not one that we pass or fail, a test of who we are."
The experience, which occurred after his expiration at three p.m. on a Friday, kicked off a metanoia -- deep spiritual awakenings that reached a crescendo when he visited the apparition site of Medjugorje in former Yugoslavia and, during a "miracle of the sun," standing directly outside of where the Tabernacle resided within the church there, "saw all the sinful events of my life up through to the present moment," he writes -- one account in this book of six amazing testimonies. "It was an illumination of conscience, an experience more intimate and vivid than a movie, more realistic than a 3-D image; and I had the sense that God was there, somewhere behind me, watching everything."
During it, the young Wisconsin man was "aghast," he now says, to see the implications of his sins -- "how my actions or inactions were so much bigger than one single event and had a ripple effect on others across time and eternity." Incredibly, at one point he saw that even an event when he was just five years old was "replayed": his seemingly trivial theft of a Matchbox car from the rack of a local store!
The Lord communicated to Rick how even at that tender age he'd had a choice -- an inherent sense of what was wrong or right -- and had ignored it. To his shock, Wendell also saw that such a seemingly forgettable act of mischief had a "ripple effect," how besides having to pay for it, the store owner and others who were touched by what happened lost a bit of trust in fellow humans, which in ways small but large changed their behavior toward others. So it went, this "review," up through adulthood. In "mind-boggling" detail, the homebuilder saw scenes from his moral descent -- how "materialism, power, and pleasures became my gods. I saw an attachment to the forty-foot motor yacht, the big house on the river, the cool cars, the clothes, the sex, the drugs."
Right before his eyes was the hurt his lifestyle had inflicted on a shocking number of people, including one to whom he had sold drugs and who had later committed suicide. He saw how the man's death had torn his family apart -- initiated a spiral of pain. The drugs were part of the man's decision to end his life -- and Wendell was implicated in that!
All guilt was exposed. Immediately after, Rick found himself with an uncontrollable desire for Confession.
This, again, was at Medjugorje, where so many have the same compulsion for the sacrament that the papal envoy is in the midst of adding to the already dozens of confessionals there.
It was also there that Wendell heard a Voice out of the blue say, "I want you to be a priest."
What? Wendell was engaged at the time! The dress was bought! They had the country club rented! He had never once in his life contemplated the priesthood!
Yet he now knew, and now knows, who he was really is.
Today, that "who" is Father Rick Wendell, and as he will tell you, "The most profound part of my experience, by far, was knowing God is love. Never had I realized that I could be loved like that -- with a love so perfect, so pure, so intense, so marvelous that nothing else mattered!" Amen.
[resources: Of Men and Mary]
https://www.spiritdaily.com/wendelllifereview.htm
Pope Benedict does not tell Michel Bohnke that Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church support the strict interpretation of the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation and so this is the basis of Catholic mission
Pope Benedict did not tell Michel Bohnke, the theologian, that Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church support the strict interpretation of the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation and so is the basis for mission to the Jews.Bohnke criticized the pope and accused him of advocating proselytism (trying to convert Jews)1
Vatican Council II ( Ad Gentes 7) says all need faith and baptism for salvation. Ad Gentes 7 is placed in the Catechism of the Catholic Church under the title Outside the Church No Salvation (CCC 846).So we have Vatican Council II(AG 7) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church(846) in agreement with the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).There is nothing in CCC 846-848 to contradict EENS, the past exclusivist ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.
The following passage in red is hypothetical and not a reference to a concrete and known non Catholic saved outside the Church.
While the passage in blue affirms extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).
- Basing itself on Scripture and Tradition, the Council teaches that the Church, a pilgrim now on earth, is necessary for salvation: the one Christ is the mediator and the way of salvation; he is present to us in his body which is the Church. He himself explicitly asserted the necessity of faith and Baptism, and thereby affirmed at the same time the necessity of the Church which men enter through Baptism as through a door. Hence they could not be saved who, knowing that the Catholic Church was founded as necessary by God through Christ, would refuse either to enter it or to remain in it.-Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II
The red is not an exception to the blue, the red does not contradict the blue : Catechism of the Catholic Church 846-848
"Outside the Church there is no salvation"
846 How are we to understand this affirmation, often repeated by the Church Fathers? Re-formulated positively, it means that all salvation comes from Christ the Head through the Church which is his Body:
846 How are we to understand this affirmation, often repeated by the Church Fathers? Re-formulated positively, it means that all salvation comes from Christ the Head through the Church which is his Body:
- Basing itself on Scripture and Tradition, the Council teaches that the Church, a pilgrim now on earth, is necessary for salvation: the one Christ is the mediator and the way of salvation; he is present to us in his body which is the Church. He himself explicitly asserted the necessity of faith and Baptism, and thereby affirmed at the same time the necessity of the Church which men enter through Baptism as through a door. Hence they could not be saved who, knowing that the Catholic Church was founded as necessary by God through Christ, would refuse either to enter it or to remain in it.
847 This affirmation is not aimed at those who, through no fault of their own, do not know Christ and his Church:
- Those who, through no fault of their own, do not know the Gospel of Christ or his Church, but who nevertheless seek God with a sincere heart, and, moved by grace, try in their actions to do his will as they know it through the dictates of their conscience - those too may achieve eternal salvation.
848 "Although in ways known to himself God can lead those who, through no fault of their own, are ignorant of the Gospel, to that faith without which it is impossible to please him, the Church still has the obligation and also the sacred right to evangelize all men."
-Catechism of the Catholic Church 846-848
The passages in red refer to hypothetical cases, theoretical possibilities and not personally known non Catholics saved outside the Church in the present times(2019).
The passage in blue agrees with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) which says all need to be members of the Catholic Church, for salvation, all need faith and baptism to avoid the fires of Hell.
The passage in blue is the norm for salvation in the Catholic Church, it is the rule on how to go to Heaven, for all people, as taught to the Church over the centuries, by the Holy Spirit.
For there to be an exception there would have to be a person saved outside the Church who is known and physically visible. An invisible person who does not exist in our reality cannot be an objective excepton to all needing to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation.
So the passages in red are hypothetical only,always. They can only be hypothetical.
So Catholics still have traditional mission to all non Catholics, based on the traditional interpretation of exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. This is supported by the Church Fathers and Vatican Council II and the Catechisms.
Pope Benedict calls for a witness and dialogue but does not say that all non Catholics are oriented to Hell according to Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church, in the blue passages. While there are no exceptions to the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) in these Magisterial documents( the blue passages). He did not say that the red passages refer to only hypothetical and theoretical cases and so cannot be practical exceptions in the present times, for example 2019, to the blue passages; to all needing faith and baptism for salvation( to avoid Hell).-Lionel Andrades
1
https://youtu.be/aA1GxxUmV3k
JANUARY 26, 2019
The Catechism of the Catholic Church affirms the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus : CDF makes a mistake
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/the-catechism-of-catholic-church.html
JANUARY 27, 2019
Pope Benedict never said that Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church tell us all need faith and baptism for salvation and so they support the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/pope-benedict-never-said-that-vatican.html
JANUARY 26, 2019
The red is not an exception to the blue, the red does not contradict the blue : Catechism of the Catholic Church 846-848
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/the-red-is-not-exception-to-blue-red.html
JANUARY 25, 2019
For me the red does not contradict the blue so there is a hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition ( Graphics)
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/for-me-red-does-not-contrradict-blue-so.html
JANUARY 25, 2019
The Social Reign of Christ the King can be proclaimed based on Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church which affirm the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS)
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/the-social-reign-of-christ-king-can-be.html
JANUARY 24, 2019
Vatican Council II's Decree on Ecumenism ( Unitatis Redintigratio) supports the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/vatican-council-iis-decree-on-ecumenism.html
JANUARY 23, 2019
Catholic religious could join the SBC in the Diocese of Manchester : it is heresy and sacrilege-free : no obligation to use an irrationality to create a hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/catholic-religious-could-join-sbc-in.html
JANUARY 23, 2019
The rational approach, the only approach, is that CCC 846 affirms the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS and there are no practical exceptions mentioned in CCC 846 or the rest of the Catechism
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/the-rational-approach-only-approach-is.html
Repost : The red is not an exception to the blue, the red does not contradict the blue : Catechism of the Catholic Church 846-848
JANUARY 26, 2019
The red is not an exception to the blue, the red does not contradict the blue : Catechism of the Catholic Church 846-848
"Outside the Church there is no salvation"
846 How are we to understand this affirmation, often repeated by the Church Fathers? Re-formulated positively, it means that all salvation comes from Christ the Head through the Church which is his Body:
-Catechism of the Catholic Church 846-848
846 How are we to understand this affirmation, often repeated by the Church Fathers? Re-formulated positively, it means that all salvation comes from Christ the Head through the Church which is his Body:
- Basing itself on Scripture and Tradition, the Council teaches that the Church, a pilgrim now on earth, is necessary for salvation: the one Christ is the mediator and the way of salvation; he is present to us in his body which is the Church. He himself explicitly asserted the necessity of faith and Baptism, and thereby affirmed at the same time the necessity of the Church which men enter through Baptism as through a door.Hence they could not be saved who, knowing that the Catholic Church was founded as necessary by God through Christ, would refuse either to enter it or to remain in it.
- Those who, through no fault of their own, do not know the Gospel of Christ or his Church, but who nevertheless seek God with a sincere heart, and, moved by grace, try in their actions to do his will as they know it through the dictates of their conscience - those too may achieve eternal salvation.
-Catechism of the Catholic Church 846-848
The passages in red refer to hypothetical cases, theoretical possibilities and not personally known non Catholics saved outside the Church in the present times(2019).
The passage in blue agrees with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) which says all need to be members of the Catholic Church, for salvation, all need faith and baptism to avoid the fires of Hell.
The passage in blue is the norm for salvation in the Catholic Church, it is the rule on how to go to Heaven, for all people, as taught to the Church over the centuries, by the Holy Spirit.
For there to be an exception there would have to be a person saved outside the Church who is known and physically visible. An invisible person who does not exist in our reality cannot be an objective excepton to all needing to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation.
So the passages in red are hypothetical only,always. They can only be hypothetical.
-Lionel Andrades
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/the-red-is-not-exception-to-blue-red.html
Canada: Social worker from Catholic church that brought accused jihadi into country says arrest a “total shock”
Canada: Social worker from Catholic church that brought accused jihadi into country says arrest a “total shock”
BY
Of course the news of this young Muslim being arrested for a jihad mass murder plot came as a “total shock” to Bronek Korcynski. The church groups that bring Muslim migrants into Canada and the U.S. do so without the slightest concern for the possibility that any of them are or might become jihad terrorists. Even to consider that possibility would be “Islamophobic.” They know nothing of Qur’anic teaching or Islam’s doctrine of jihad. Their Pope tells them it’s a religion of peace. And so of course they’re shocked when reality breaks through.
“Youth charged with terrorism in connection to Kingston raids; 2nd person arrested, not charged,” by Rebecca Joseph and Stewart Bell, Global News, January 25, 2019:
RCMP have charged one youth with terrorism-related offences Friday morning in relation to raids at two Kingston, Ont., residences. A second adult male was arrested, but charges have not yet been laid.The raids happened at two homes Thursday night.RCMP said the “Youth Criminal Justice Act prevents any further release of information regarding this individual.” The charges include “knowingly facilitating a terrorist activity,” and “Counselling a person to deliver, place, discharge or detonate an explosive or other lethal device” in a public place.One of the houses belonged to a refugee family that fled to Canada from Syria. The family, whose adult son was arrested but not charged, was sponsored by four churches, including Our Lady of Lourdes church.According to documents from the church, the family was sponsored by the congregation to come to Canada in 2016. The church helped the family, which was originally from Damascus, Syria, travel to Kingston from Kuwait.Bronek Korcynski oversaw the church’s sponsorship of the family, which lasted a year. He said the son of the family was arrested in the raid.“I was intimately involved with the sponsorship as co-chair of the group so I know the family very well,” Korcynski said. “This has come as a total shock.”“It’s just so completely beyond anything we’ve experienced with the family. This is a group of people who have expressed nothing but gratitude for our assistance and to Canada for being able to welcome them.“Their priority has been to build a new life here.”Korcynski said the family’s son was working to get his high school marks up so he could get into university.“I have been in contact with the father and I know right now their heads are spinning.”Documents from St Thomas Church, which was part of the group sponsoring the family, said the father had once been imprisoned for not joining Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s political party. It also said their home in Damascus was destroyed, and the family would be “vulnerable to arrest and ‘extreme measures’” if they returned to Syria.The people who reside at the second house involved in the investigation were kind, a neighbour told Global News.“They’re very nice, they brought food over at Christmas, and dropped off some canned good and welcomed me to the neighbourhood, they helped me move a couch in,” https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/01/canada-social-worker-from-catholic-church-that-brought-accused-jihadi-into-country-says-arrest-a-total-shock neighbour said…
UK acid attack victim’s mom: Attacker said he’d “take them to an Islamic country where he could do anything to them”
UK acid attack victim’s mom: Attacker said he’d “take them to an Islamic country where he could do anything to them”
BY
In another report on the same incident, it is revealed that the Muslim migrant father threatened to kill his wife and children. The mother of the three-year-old acid attack victim said that “her estranged husband ‘threatened to kill her and their three children – or take them to an Islamic country where he could do anything to them.'” Those words are very telling. Women are worth less than men in Islamic countries and suffer the worst abuses — from acid attacks, honor violence to female genital mutilation and the triple talaq easy divorce. The arrogance of Leftists is revealed in the fact that they will refuse to consider the implications of this statement from a man who knows, and who was prepared to take advantage of these cultural and religious norms.
“Mother of three-year-old acid attack victim says her estranged husband ‘threatened to kill her and their three children – or take them to an Islamic country where he could do anything to them,'” by Joel Adams and Rory Tingle, Mailonline, January 23, 2019:
The mother of a three-year-old acid attack victim has told a court how her ex-husband threatened to kill her and their children.Her evidence came after jurors at Worcester Crown Court heard the child screamed ‘I hurt’ over and over again after the corrosive substance hit his face and arm last July.She said her ex told her he knew somebody who would murder them – and even warned police would never be able to find their bodies.Giving evidence via video link she told jurors the pair married in 2006 and that she broke up with him in 2012.But they got back together after her ex phoned her up ‘crying down the phone’ and ‘begged’ her to take him back.She then left him a second time four years later, after he threatened to murder them in an Islamic country.The Afghan mother, who cannot be named for legal reasons, said: ‘Me and my husband separated in October 2012 – I left the family home and the children came with me.‘We went to a refuge and I took some clothes for me and the children. We stayed there for three days. My husband kept calling my family, and me as well.‘He kept crying and begging me to come back to him and said he wouldn’t hurt me again and couldn’t live without me or the children.‘When I came back he said that I embarrassed him in front of their family and wasn’t crying for me but for the children.‘I felt very disappoint and gutted, I felt stupid as he told me he loved me.‘He also said he asked an imam whether, in our religion, he was allowed to kill me and the children because we left him for three days.‘The imam told him he wasn’t allowed to do that and instead to say a prayer.‘He said to me he has two options, to either kill me and children in this country or take us to an Islamic country where he would be able to do anything to us.‘He said he knew somebody that could do something to us and the police would not find our bodies.’….https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/01/uk-acid-attack-victims-mom-attacker-said-hed-take-them-to-an-islamic-country-where-he-could-do-anything-to-them
20 Killed, 81 Injured After Twin Bomb Blasts in Philippines Cathedral
https://www.news18.com/news/world/at-least-19-dead-48-injured-as-twin-bombs-hit-cathedral-in-southern-philippines-2015457.html
https://spiritdailyblog.com/news/twenty-dead-as-bomb-explodes-in-cathedralPope Benedict never said that Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church tell us all need faith and baptism for salvation and so they support the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Pope Benedict did not recognize that Vatican Council II says all need faith and baptism for salvation and so affirms the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. Also the Catechism of the Catholic Church when interpreted rationally( red passages not exceptions to blue) also support the traditional centuries-old interpretation of the dogma EENS.
Basing itself on Scripture and Tradition, the Council teaches that the Church, a pilgrim now on earth, is necessary for salvation: the one Christ is the mediator and the way of salvation; he is present to us in his body which is the Church. He himself explicitly asserted the necessity of faith and Baptism, and thereby affirmed at the same time the necessity of the Church which men enter through Baptism as through a door. Hence they could not be saved who, knowing that the Catholic Church was founded as necessary by God through Christ, would refuse either to enter it or to remain in it.-Ad Gemtes 7. Vatican Council II
But with this irrationality Pope Benedict has also changed the Nicene and Apostles Creed and outright rejected the Athanasius Creed. This is first class heresy and he has no right to be a pope.It is the same with Pope Francis. They both need to correct the error in public, Confess mortal sins of faith and end the scandal.
We cannot put the blame on Vatican Council II since the Council can be interpreted in harmony with the Council of Florence, Cantate Domino 1441.
In a new video Peter and Michael Dimond criticize Pope Benedict and place the blame on Vatican. 1
I affirm Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church in harmony with Tradition ( EENS, Syllabus of Errors etc).I do not reject the strict interpretation of EENS, the Syllabus of Errors, the past ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return and hypothetical and theoretical possibilities of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I), known only to God if it happens.
So I do not belong to a counter-Church, a false Church or a counter Church, even though the two popes are promoting one to please the Left.
Michael and Peter Dimond however interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise. For them hypothetical cases of BOD, BOB and I.I are practical exceptions to EENS in the present times. Similarly for them LG 8 etc refer to visible and known non Catholics saved outside the Church and so they wrongly reject Vatican Council II. They do not see how their false premise makes Vatican Council II a rupture with EENS. This is the way that Cardinal Luiz Ladaria, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith interprets Vatican Council II. The Most Holy Family also use the same irrationality( red passages are exceptions to blue passages) to wrongly interpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
They have an option.I have shown it them.
They can affirm Cantate Domino, Council of Florence 1441 on outside the Church there is no salvation and re-interpret BOD, BOB and I.I as being only hypothetical. So BOD, BOB and I.I would not be relevant or exceptions to EENS.
They could also affirm LG 8. LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as referring to only hypothetical cases.They are not visible people in 2019. So they are not exceptions to the past ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return, the Syllabus of Errors, EENS and the Catechism of Pope Pius X.
There is a rational choice but they still avoid it and do not even discuss it.
-Lionel Andrades.
1
https://youtu.be/aA1GxxUmV3k
______________________________
JANUARY 26, 2019
The Catechism of the Catholic Church affirms the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus : CDF makes a mistake
Letter from Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith to Brother Andre Marie, Saint Benedict Center
As the Congregation stated in our April 15 letter to you, which the Congregation also shared with Bishop Libasci, the principle "Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus" must be interpreted according to the official doctrine of the Church, as it is summarized with clarity in the Catechism of the Catholic Church (#846-#848) and, more in detail, in the Declaration Dominus Jesus (#20-#22). The Catechism of the Catholic Church emphasizes that all salvation comes from Christ through the Church, which is the Body of Christ, the Sacrament of Salvation (cf. CCC #846). The paragraph that follows, however, is equally binding, as it considers those who, through no fault of their own, do not know Christ and his Church and states that those too have the possibility of obtaining eternal salvation (cf. CCC #847). This being stated, the Church certainly has a perennial obligation and sacred right to evangelize all men (cf. CCC #848).
https://www.catholicnh.org/assets/Documents/About/FAQ/Ltr-CDF-SBC.pdfThe red is not an exception to the blue, the red does not contradict the blue : Catechism of the Catholic Church 846-848
"Outside the Church there is no salvation"
846 How are we to understand this affirmation, often repeated by the Church Fathers? Re-formulated positively, it means that all salvation comes from Christ the Head through the Church which is his Body:
-Catechism of the Catholic Church 846-848
846 How are we to understand this affirmation, often repeated by the Church Fathers? Re-formulated positively, it means that all salvation comes from Christ the Head through the Church which is his Body:
- Basing itself on Scripture and Tradition, the Council teaches that the Church, a pilgrim now on earth, is necessary for salvation: the one Christ is the mediator and the way of salvation; he is present to us in his body which is the Church. He himself explicitly asserted the necessity of faith and Baptism, and thereby affirmed at the same time the necessity of the Church which men enter through Baptism as through a door. Hence they could not be saved who, knowing that the Catholic Church was founded as necessary by God through Christ, would refuse either to enter it or to remain in it.
- Those who, through no fault of their own, do not know the Gospel of Christ or his Church, but who nevertheless seek God with a sincere heart, and, moved by grace, try in their actions to do his will as they know it through the dictates of their conscience - those too may achieve eternal salvation.
-Catechism of the Catholic Church 846-848
The passages in red refer to hypothetical cases, theoretical possibilities and not personally known non Catholics saved outside the Church in the present times(2019).
The passage in blue agrees with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) which says all need to be members of the Catholic Church, for salvation, all need faith and baptism to avoid the fires of Hell.
The passage in blue is the norm for salvation in the Catholic Church, it is the rule on how to go to Heaven, for all people, as taught to the Church over the centuries, by the Holy Spirit.
For there to be an exception there would have to be a person saved outside the Church who is known and physically visible. An invisible person who does not exist in our reality cannot be an objective excepton to all needing to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation.
So the passages in red are hypothetical only,always. They can only be hypothetical.-Lionel Andrades
JANUARY 11, 2019
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
