Thursday, July 31, 2014

Feast of St.Ignatius of Loyola today : USCCB disconnects the Kingdom of Heaven from the Catholic Church

Today is the feast day of St.Ignatius of Loyola who affirmed the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and believed every one needed to enter the Catholic Church to avoid Hell , there were no known exceptions. Centuries later this would be the same message in Vatican Council II (Ad Gentes 7).



St.Ignatius of Loyola was a missionary  since he knew that Jesus in the Catholic Church was the ' Kingdom of heaven' present in our time. Today's Gospel Reading says that the Kingdom of Heaven  ' is like a net thrown into the sea,which collects fish of every kind.
When it is full they haul it ashore and sit down to put what is good into buckets.
What is bad they throw away.
Thus it will be at the end of the age.
The angels will go out and separate the wicked from the righteous and throw them into the fiery furnace,where there will be wailing and grinding of teeth.”

“Do you understand all these things?” Jesus asked .They answered, “Yes.”
May be the Benedictine speaker today Rev.Guerric De Bona in the USCCB video of the Daily Readings did not know that the Kingdom of God must not be separated from the Church (Dominus Iesus). He  did not mentiond the Church and its necessity for salvation for all people.The scribes and Pharisees of today will not permit the USCCB to do so. There is a prohibition placed on the Catholic Church by leftist rabbis associated with the Chief Rabbinate of Israel and backed by the political and military strength of that country.So in the USCCB Reflections there is a disconnect between 1) the Kingdom of Heaven and the Catholic Church and 2) Jesus and the necessity of the Catholic Church for salvation.The foundation for Catholic mission to the Jews is removed.
 
A Benedictine priest in Rome however like St.Ignatius of Loyola affirms the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.Fr.S.Visintin, the Dean of Theology at the University of San Anselm, Rome says that there are no exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and all need faith and baptism in the present times to go to Heaven and avoid Hell; for salvation.
 
The Rev.Guerric De Bona,OSB of St.Meinrad Archabbey possibily assumes that in Vatican Council II LG 16,LG 8,NA 2 etc are explicit exceptions to St.Ignatius of Loyola's understanding of extra ecclesiam nulla salus.The Jesuits in general promote this  irrationality.They have abandoned the teachings on salvation,according to the founder of their community.
When the Jesuit Fr.Leonard Feeney in Boston taught  that we cannot seperate Jesus from the Church and there was exclusive salvation in only the Catholic Church with no known exceptions, the Jesuits expelled him. Until today they deny the teachings of St.Ignatius of Loyola with their visible in the flesh baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance..Perhaps this was part of the formation of  Rev.Guerric DeBona OSB.
So there is no USSCB Mission with Catholic doctrine.To protect their careers, property and lifestyle they will not affirm the dogma like St.Ignatius of Loyola and they interpret magisterial documents with an irratiional inference,to reject the traditional ecclesiology.
-Lionel Andrades
 

July 31, 2014



Memorial of Saint Ignatius of Loyola, Priest
Lectionary: 404


Reading 1 jer 18:1-6

This word came to Jeremiah from the LORD:
Rise up, be off to the potter’s house;
there I will give you my message.
I went down to the potter’s house and there he was,
working at the wheel.
Whenever the object of clay which he was making
turned out badly in his hand,
he tried again,
making of the clay another object of whatever sort he pleased.
Then the word of the LORD came to me:
Can I not do to you, house of Israel,
as this potter has done? says the LORD.
Indeed, like clay in the hand of the potter,
so are you in my hand, house of Israel.

Responsorial Psalm ps 146:1b-2, 3-4, 5-6ab

R. (5a) Blessed is he whose help is the God of Jacob.
or:
R. Alleluia.
Praise the LORD, O my soul;
I will praise the LORD all my life;
I will sing praise to my God while I live.
R. Blessed is he whose help is the God of Jacob.
or:
R. Alleluia.
Put not your trust in princes,
in the sons of men, in whom there is no salvation.
When his spirit departs he returns to his earth;
on that day his plans perish.
R. Blessed is he whose help is the God of Jacob.
or:
R. Alleluia.
Blessed he whose help is the God of Jacob,
whose hope is in the LORD, his God.
Who made heaven and earth,
the sea and all that is in them.
R. Blessed is he whose help is the God of Jacob.
or:
R. Alleluia.

Gospel mt 13:47-53

Jesus said to the disciples:
“The Kingdom of heaven is like a net thrown into the sea,
which collects fish of every kind.
When it is full they haul it ashore
and sit down to put what is good into buckets.
What is bad they throw away.
Thus it will be at the end of the age.
The angels will go out and separate the wicked from the righteous
and throw them into the fiery furnace,
where there will be wailing and grinding of teeth.”

“Do you understand all these things?”
They answered, “Yes.”
And he replied,
“Then every scribe who has been instructed in the Kingdom of heaven
is like the head of a household who brings from his storeroom
both the new and the old.”
When Jesus finished these parables, he went away from there.

Comitato dell'Immacolata ask for a clarification

The "Committee of the Immaculate" ("Comitato dell'Immacolata")established and supported by the lay members of the Mission of the Immaculate Mediatrix (Missione dell'Immacolata Mediatrice) , Franciscan Third Order of the Immaculate Conception (Ordine Terziario Francescano dell'Immacolata) and family members of Franciscans of the Immaculate religious, is a spontaneous group according to the website of the Franciscans of the Immaculate spokesman Fr.Alfonso Bruno.
It is further said that the Comitato dell'Immacolata does not represent the Franciscans of the Immaculate.
 
ASK FR.VOLPI TO CLARIFY
The Comitato dell'Immacolata which does not claim to represent the Franciscans of the Immaculate must claim that Fr.Fidenzio Volpi the Commissioner for the Franciscans of the Immaculate ,Fr.Alfonso Bruno and Fr.Angelo Geiger want all Catholics to accept Vatican Council II using a falsehood and irrationality in the interpretation.This has not been denied by Fr.Alfonso Bruno,Fr.Geiger or the Vatican spokesman Fr. Frederico Lombardi.
For full canonical privileges, the right to offer the Traditional Latin Mass and to teach Catholic doctrine freely at their seminaries, the Franciscans of the Immaculate must claim that all salvation mentioned in Vatican Council II is visible in the flesh.It must be alleged that dead persons now in Heaven are physically visible on earth. Then it must be claimed that these ' ghosts' are real   exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.These visible-dead persons it must be alleged according to the Vatican Curia, are examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church.It is based on this falsehood and irrationality the Franciscan Friars and Sisters will have to conduct ecumenism and inter religious dialogue as do Fr. Alfonso Bruno.
ASK THE VICARIATE IN ROME TWO QUESTIONS
The Comitato dell'Immacolata  could ask for TWO QUESTIONS to be clarified by the Auxiliary Bishops of Rome:               
  S.E. Mons. Guerino DI TORA
Pastorale Sanitaria
S.E. Mons. Lorenzo LEUZZI
Settore Est
S.E. Mons. Giuseppe MARCIANTE
Settore Sud
S.E. Mons. Paolino SCHIAVON
Settore Ovest
S.E. Mons. Paolo SELVADAGI
Settore Centro
S.E. Mons. Matteo Maria ZUPPI
Ausiliare Emerito
S.E. Mons. Enzo DIECI
 
Ask them their answer to the TWO QUESTIONS. Ask them what must be the answer to these TWO QUESTIONS by the persecuted members of the Franciscans of the Immaculate.This issue is related to other religious communities in Rome and also to diocesan religious.Here are the TWO QUESTIONS  related to Vatican Council II.
 
TWO QUESTIONS

1) Do we personally know the dead now saved in invincible ignorance, a good conscience (LG 16) etc,can we see them, are they physically visible to us in 2014 ?
2) Since we do not know any of these cases, in real life, they are not visible to us, there are no known exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, or Ad Gentes 7 which says 'all' need 'faith and baptism' for salvation ?
 
 IS THIS INTERPRETATION ACCEPTABLE?
 
The Comitato dell'Immacolata should also bring it to the attention of Fr.Alfonso Bruno, that I, Lionel Andrades, affirm Vatican Council II in agreement with the traditional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, as interpreted by the Church Councils, the popes, saints and Fr.Leonard Feeney of Boston.
 
For me LG 16( invincible ignorance), LG 8 (elements of sanctification and truth), UR 3( imperfect communion with the Church),NA 2( a ray of the Truth),AG 11(seeds of the Word) refer to cases invisible for us and visible only for God. I accept an implicit for us baptism of desire and reject an explicit for us baptism of desire.I accept these cases in principle. I reject them as being de facto known to us in the present times and in personal cases.So there is nothing in Vatican Council II which contradicts the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Tradition.Since hypothetical cases cannot be defacto exceptions to all needing the baptism of water for salvation in 2014.
 
So ask Fr.Alfonso Bruno if he accepts this interpretation of Vatican Council II and if the Franciscans of the Immaculate can also accept this interpretation. Also ask him if all Catholic religious communities can accept this interpretation of Vatican Council II.
Please note that Fr.Angelo Geiger will not affirm Vatican Council II as I ( Lionel) do since he does not want to affirm, in public,extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
I repeat: The Comitato dell'Immacolata must ask the Auxiliary Bishops of Rome, the Vatican Curia and their spokespersons, and Fr.Fidenzio Volpi if the Franciscans of the Immaculate can accept Vatican Council II as interpreted by Lionel Andrades.
-Lionel Andrades

Wednesday, July 30, 2014

Rector of Pontfical Capranica College,Rome sues director of traditional Correspondenza Romano

diritto
Last May the Rector of the Pontfical Capranica College, Rome sued for libel the director of the traditional news agency "Correspondenza Romana", the issue is still in court according to Correspondenza Romana.So now Fr. Alfonso Bruno's lawsuit against Francesco Colafemmina was predictable.
 
According to Roberto de Mattei writing in Correspondenza Romana, democracy is also this: the freedom to express opinions in a clear way, and sometimes unwelcome to those who do not like the discussion. Characteristic of totalitarian regimes is instead to plug the mouth of the dissenters and entrust them to the re-education of the State.
.

The Kingdom of God is a mystery for the Aquinas Institute of Theology :USCCB policy of dissent continues

The Kingdom of God and the Kingdom of Heaven is a mystery for the Aquinas Institute of Theology.The USCCB video Reflection for today does not associate it with Jesus and the Catholic Church.
Ann Garrido,DMin., goes off into an abstratc tangent but a politically safe one.
She is careful to contradict Dominus Iesus which says that the Kingdom of God must not be separated from Jesus and neither from the Catholic Church. She does just this.She separates the Kingdom from the Catholic Church. She is following the USCCB's public policy of dissent.
The USCCB does not affirm the Social Reign of Jesus over all political laws since this is part of a public agreement with Jewish Left rabbis. They also do not affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as part of that same understanding. So they feel obliged to state that there is known salvation outside the Church i.e LG 16,NA 2 etc refer to the deceased saved, who are now visible exceptions on earth, to all needing saving-faith and baptism.Visible in the flesh deceased!
 
This expedience is manifested today in Ann Garrido 's spirited talk sans Catholic doctrine.
For months together no one has said in these reflections on the USCCB video that the Catholic Church is necessary for salvation.This is having good relations with the American rabbis and living comfortably.-Lionel Andrades
 

July 30, 2014


Wednesday of the Seventeenth Week in Ordinary Time
Lectionary: 403


Reading 1 jer 15:10, 16-21

Woe to me, mother, that you gave me birth!
a man of strife and contention to all the land!
I neither borrow nor lend,
yet all curse me.
When I found your words, I devoured them;
they became my joy and the happiness of my heart,
Because I bore your name,
O LORD, God of hosts.
I did not sit celebrating
in the circle of merrymakers;
Under the weight of your hand I sat alone
because you filled me with indignation.
Why is my pain continuous,
my wound incurable, refusing to be healed?
You have indeed become for me a treacherous brook,
whose waters do not abide!
Thus the LORD answered me:
If you repent, so that I restore you,
in my presence you shall stand;
If you bring forth the precious without the vile,
you shall be my mouthpiece.
Then it shall be they who turn to you,
and you shall not turn to them;
And I will make you toward this people
a solid wall of brass.
Though they fight against you,
they shall not prevail,
For I am with you,
to deliver and rescue you, says the LORD.
I will free you from the hand of the wicked,
and rescue you from the grasp of the violent.

Responsorial Psalm ps 59:2-3, 4, 10-11, 17, 18

R. (17d) God is my refuge on the day of distress.
Rescue me from my enemies, O my God;
from my adversaries defend me.
Rescue me from evildoers;
from bloodthirsty men save me.
R. God is my refuge on the day of distress.
For behold, they lie in wait for my life;
mighty men come together against me,
Not for any offense or sin of mine, O LORD.
R. God is my refuge on the day of distress.
O my strength! for you I watch;
for you, O God, are my stronghold,
As for my God, may his mercy go before me;
may he show me the fall of my foes.
R. God is my refuge on the day of distress.
But I will sing of your strength
and revel at dawn in your mercy;
You have been my stronghold,
my refuge in the day of distress.
R. God is my refuge on the day of distress.
O my strength! your praise will I sing;
for you, O God, are my stronghold,
my merciful God!
R. God is my refuge on the day of distress.

Gospel mt 13:44-46

Jesus said to his disciples:
“The Kingdom of heaven is like a treasure buried in a field,
which a person finds and hides again,
and out of joy goes and sells all that he has and buys that field.
Again, the Kingdom of heaven is like a merchant
searching for fine pearls.
When he finds a pearl of great price,
he goes and sells all that he has and buys it.”
 
 
 

Fr.Angelo Geiger and Fr. Alfonso Bruno want the Franciscans of the Immaculate and the whole Church to accept Vatican Council II with an irrationality

 

I have sent these blog posts to Father Alfonso Bruno spokesman of Fr.Fidenzio Volpi Ofm.cap, the Apostolic Commissioner of the Franciscans of the Immaculate. I am still waiting for a reply. There is a report in Italian by Fr.Angelo Geiger on their official website.It  states 'No one in this discussion casts serious doubt that Tradition and the Magisterium should be the criteria for the interpretation of Vatican II. ' 1 Where does Tradition and the Magisterium say that the deceased now in Heaven are physically visible to us on earth? And so since they are known and visible in real life they become exceptions to Tradition?

Why does the whole Church have to accept all this nonsense?

How can being saved with ' a ray of the Truth' (Nostra Aetate 2) be an explicit exception to the traditional teaching which says all Jews,Muslims and other need to convert with the baptism of water and Catholic Faith for salvation.? How can Fr.Angelo Geiger imply that we know exceptions in 2014, to this traditional teaching of the Church.

They want the Friars and Sisters of the Franciscans of the Immaculate to proclaim this lie in the interpretation of Vatican Council II before they are allowed to offer the Traditional Latin Mass and teach at their seminary? 
They have to say that they can see the dead.-saved, who are visible exceptions to all needing to convert into the Church.So there is known salvation outside the Church ?

For me Vatican Council II (Ad Gentes 7) is saying all Hindus, Buddhists, Jews, Muslims etc are on the way to Hell since they do not have Catholic Faith and the baptism of water.They do not have 'faith and baptism'.  For me there is no text in Vatican Council II which refers to visible for us cases, of non Catholics being saved in 'invincible ignorance'(LG 16), imperfect  communion with the Church (UR 3) etc.So there are no exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. LG 16,NA 2,UR 3 etc are not exceptions. I accept them as possibilities known only to God. I reject the theory which says that they are explicit exceptions.
So this is the hermeneutic of continuity for me.It  is in agreement with Tradition and the Magisterium .Most important of all it is a rational interpretation of Vatican Council II.
 
Why cannot Fr.Angelo Geiger and Father Alfonso Bruno   affirm this rational interpretation of Vatican Council II? Set an
example for the other Franciscans.
 
Why must the main group of Franciscans interpret Vatican Council II as a break with the past using  the dead man walking and visible theory ? Why must they allege, as Catholics, that they can see the dead-saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16) etc. No text in Vatican Council II makes this claim unless one infers wrongly.
Vatican Council II being a break with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus is false.To have a 'career' in the Church religious are expected to accept this falsehood. This irrational interpretation of the Council is being forced upon the Franciscans of the Immaculate by Fr.Fidenzio Volpi. This is a Vatican Council II which is a break with Tradition and which is heretical.It contradicts the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (which Fr.Angelo Geiger will not affirm) and changes the Nicene Creed.
 
This dead man walking  interpretation of Vatican Council II approved by the Left, is being foisted on the Franciscans of the Immaculate.It is being forced upon them by the Vatican Curia and the Apostolic Commissioner.Then when they do not accept this irrationality ( as they should not as good Catholics)  they are  told that they are being disobedient to the pope.
If Pope Francis says Jesus is not God or the Holy Mass is not the Sacrifice of Jesus re enacted, we just reject it.If the pope rejects a defined dogma and interprets Vatican Council II with an irrationality it has to be rejected.
 
When the irrationality is repeated even after the concerned persons are informed , it becomes a falsehood. The irrationality is a falsehood.
-Lionel Andrades


 1.

L’inganno Cripto-Lefebvriano: un Francescano dell’Immacolata risponde a De Mattei 

 http://www.immacolata.com/index.php/en/35-apostolato/ffi-news/288-rassegna-web

Fr.Angelo Geiger and his Franciscans of the Immaculate group cannot accept Vatican Council II ( inference-free) because of extra ecclesiam nulla salus 

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/07/frangelo-geiger-and-his-franciscans-of.html#links

 
 

Tuesday, July 29, 2014

MESSAGE TO PAGAN AFRICAN BOY SAID THAT SIGN OF LOOMING EVENTS WOULD BE IN 'WARS OF RELIGION'

http://www.spiritdaily.com/persecutionkibeho.htm

At Kibeho in Rwanda an alleged seer once asserted that major events would come upon the world when it encounters unending "wars of religion." To wit:
"Today this world is full of hatred, and you will know that the time of My return is near, that I am on My way, when you hear of and see the wars of religion," this alleged visionary claimed he was told during an apparition of Jesus. "Know then that I come, for nothing will be able to stop these wars."
It is noteworthy because the seer, Emmanuel Segatashya, was a pagan boy who'd never heard of Jesus but became attached to a famous place of apparitions that achieved full Church approval back on June 29, 2001 (when Bishop Augustin Misago of Gikongoro published a declaration concerning the "definitive judgment," announcing it from the Vatican).
It is also noteworthy at a time when we see the unending conflict in the Holy Land -- really a holy war -- as well as the persecution of Christians globally.
For our discernment: are all these religious conflicts cropping up the "start" of something bigger?
Segastashya -- who died in the 1994 Rwandan genocide (which was predicted, in 1982, at Kibeho) -- was one of seven main visionaries though not among the three officially deemed by the bishop as authentic (judgment has been withheld, for the time being, on the other four). His claims, to be sure, were radical -- and apocalyptic (in the true sense of that word).
But priests, theologians, and bishops alike found this young Rwandan -- in his sudden and deep understanding of the Catholic faith -- to be humble, sincere, and unexplainable. His experience allegedly began on July 2, 1982, when Emmanuel was checking on his father's bean fields and during a respite heard a Voice he said came from Jesus, Who appeared to him as a man in His thirties with a dark-skinned complexion but not nearly as dark as a Rwandan's. He was dressed in a traditional African tunic and the material, recounted his sister, "was glowing as though it had been sewn with thread of silver and gold" [see a previous article].
"Those forthcoming times, those times that are leading up to God, will be times of trials, times when each person will have to bear his own cross. Do not be afraid, but have faith!" Segatashya claimed Jesus said. "For the one who does good will come with Me to Heaven. It is the one who does evil who will be met by fire. Therefore, hurry to do good, for Satan will one day disappear from this world and then you will never be tempted again. But hurry, for there is little time left."
Indeed: dramatic. Quite a claim. Yet in our current time (whatever our belief in a particular message), we must acknowledge that we are indeed at a unique intersection of history -- particularly when it comes to violence in the name of religion.
There are spiritual battles that are precipitating into actual military ones -- the actual glare of rockets. This occurs currently in Gaza. (No one knows how it will end.)
There are battles between Hindus and Muslims in Pakistan; and Hindus and Christians in India; and especially Muslims and Christians -- the latter slain by Muslims on a regular basis from the Middle East and Africa to the Philippines. Between 2,000 and 8,000 Christians are martyred each year, depending on the source you use. These deaths have occurred in thirty-six countries. As Pope Francis recently pointed out, that's a higher number than during the time of Roman emperors.
Just last week a missile hit a monastery in Syria at the same time that Iraq militants -- who have all but erased Christianity from that country -- seized another monastery.
Is this what Jesus, if He appeared as reported, was alluding to?
Christians -- including priests and nuns -- are kidnapped or murdered and churches destroyed or damaged on a regular basis in Nigeria, Indonesia, India, the Philippines, and Pakistan while in the West there is the "white martyrdom" of oppression by modern governments that challenge Christian values on everything from birth-control mandates to gay marriage.
The Iraqi city of Mosul, under the domain of the Islamic State, "has uprooted the centuries-old Christian presence," said the Latin Rite Archbishop of Baghdad, Jean Benjamin Sleiman, recently. "The invasion of the Islamic State [Isis] cut the country into pieces and spread general panic, with killings, destruction, ethnic-confessional cleansing, and the imposition of the Sharia. However, this at times apocalyptic picture of the events in Iraq does not obscure the real actors, namely, the governments with influence in the Middle East area and big oil and gas companies.
There is the word: "apocalyptic."
"When a fire flares up, it is circumscribed immediately to control it, otherwise it can spread," he said. "For years I have felt that the powers often start the fire in the Middle East. It’s not said that they will always be able to control it. Therefore, the fire that flares up in the region can hit Europe and cause a World War."
It is interesting that there were also apparitions -- and apocalyptic warnings -- to a seer there in Mosul, which is near the ruins of ancient Nineveh. Just last week, the tomb of Jonah was destroyed by Muslims.
There is good in most major religions but there is also contamination. In the case of Islam, there is the belief in "jinni" spirits that sound like demigods. The constant violence, wherever this religion is planted, is not a good fruit. One is correct in asking: what is wrong with this religion? Why is violence associated with it no matter the country that harbors it? In India, the pagan gods seem to frown on those who follow the One God. In England (as elsewhere) Christians are attacked by "humanists" who believe in zero gods.
In Oklahoma City: a civic center says okay to a "black mass."
Are we seeing the glimmerings of yet greater religious conflict?
How can people kill each other in the Name of God?
"It is because they love without loving," Jesus allegedly told the Rwanda peasant boy. "They believe without believing."

UK jihadist: “We are in Iraq & Sham but…our eyes are upon Rome!”

 
By on Jul 27, 2014 


“Imam Ahmad reported in his Musnad that Abdullah bin ‘Amr bin Al-‘As (may God be pleased with him) reports, Whilst we were around the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) writing down, he was asked, ‘Which of the two cities is to be opened first, Constantinople or Rome?’ He (the Prophet) answered, ‘The city of Heraclius will be opened first!’” (Imam Ahmad, and Al-Albany)
Sheikh Yousef Al-Qaradawi quoted this hadith a few years ago and added: “This means that Islam will return to Europe as a conqueror and victor, after being expelled from it twice – once from the South, from Andalusia, and a second time from the East, when it knocked several times on the door of Athens.”
And the Saudi Sheikh Muhammad bin Abd Al-Rahman Al-’Arifi, imam of the mosque of King Fahd Defense Academy, once boasted: “We will control the land of the Vatican; we will control Rome and introduce Islam in it. Yes, the Christians, who carve crosses on the breasts of the Muslims in Kosovo – and before then in Bosnia, and before then in many places in the world – will yet pay us the Jiziya [poll tax paid by non-Muslims under Muslim rule], in humiliation, or they will convert to Islam.”
There are many more such statements here.

Pakistan: Sunni Muslim mob murders five Ahmadis for “blasphemy”

By on Jul 28, 2014 

BlasphemyIn Pakistan and elsewhere, Sunnis viciously and violently persecute Ahmadis as heretics and apostates. Yet in the West, Ahmadi spokesmen such as the venomous and supercilious Qasim Rashid and the unctuously pious Haris Zafar make a tidy living allying with their persecutors and aiding and abetting their sinister agenda by telling non-Muslim audiences what they want to hear — that Islam doesn’t actually have any of the doctrines that Sunnis invoke to persecute Ahmadis and others. And indeed, Ahmadi Islam doesn’t — but Rashid and Zafar don’t bother to mention to their marks that they represent a form of Islam that is held by an actual tiny minority — and one that is rejected by the mainstream and persecuted by it as heretical.
The only effect of their endless stream of articles and books purporting to prove that Islamic texts and teachings don’t actually contain material justifying violence and supremacism (here is one recent example from Rashid) will be to render Infidels complacent and less likely to resist that violence and supremacism, or at least less likely to do so in any genuinely effective way. Ahmadi Muslims will continue to suffer because of the laws about apostasy, heresy and blasphemy that Rashid, Zafar and other Ahmadis deny exist instead of confronting and calling for genuine reform — but that doesn’t seem to trouble them.
“Five Ahmadis killed over alleged blasphemy in Gujranwala,” Khyber News, July 27, 2014:
GUJRANWALA: Four members of the Ahmadi community were killed late on Sunday and four others were severely injured when an angry mob attacked and burnt five houses belonging to members of the community over alleged blasphemy.
According to BBC Urdu, those who died in the attack include a 55-year-old woman Bashiran, a minor girl Kianat, 7-year-old girl Hira and an unborn child who died due to suffocation.
The injured were rushed to the district headquarters hospital and their condition is said to be critical.
The BBC Urdu report quoted Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP) of the People’s Colony Circle as saying that the trouble started with an allegedly blasphemous post on Facebook by an Ahmadi youth, following which the mob began protesting and eventually attacked and damaged homes belonging to members of the Ahmadi community.
According to police and eyewitnesses, there were seven to eight houses of the Ahmadi community in the vicinity. However, following the violence all Ahmadi families in the area managed to flee.
 http://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/07/pakistan-sunni-muslim-mob-murders-five-ahmadis-for-blasphemy

Jesus said that to believe in Him, one needed to enter the community of that time with faith and baptism-USCCB does not mention it

Jesus told her,
“I am the resurrection and the life;
whoever believes in me, even if he dies, will live,
and anyone who lives and believes in me will never die.
Do you believe this?”
She said to him, “Yes, Lord.
I have come to believe that you are the Christ, the Son of God,
the one who is coming into the world.”
 
In today's Gospel Reading Jesus was saying that whoever believes in Him will have eternal life.Jesus was saying that to believe in Him, one needed to enter the community of that time with faith and baptism. It was not just believing in Jesus and going and doing what you wanted. Even Satan at that time knew that Jesus existed.
One had to believe in Jesus within a community. Baptism was given within a community.The community was the Early Church, the Early Catholic Church. Believing in Jesus meant  being baptized with water and living the faith and moral teachings of the community.It meant living what Jesus taught.For the Jews it was believing that Jesus was the promised Jewish Messiah.
These teachings of Jesus would be protected by the Holy Spirit .The Tradition would be passed on by the Apostles to the Early Church and then to the  succession of popes.
In this Tradition it was taught that all need this Catholic Faith along with the baptism of water for salvation.It did not mention any exceptions. The baptism of desire etc were theoretical possibilities when they were mentioned by the popes and saints in later centuries. None of them said that these cases were explicit for us and so were exceptions to Jesus' teaching on outside the Church there is no salvation (John 3:5, Mark 16:16).None of them said that the baptism of desire must exlude the baptism of water.There could be saints who died without the baptism of water and God would send them back to earth fro sacramental baptism.St.Francis Xavier among other  saints mention people returning from the dead only to be baptized with water.
 
But for Catholic Bishops today the baptism of desire refers to cases which  are explicit exceptions to the traditional teaching on salvation which comes down to us from the First Christians, the first Catholics.So in their homilies today they will hold the Protestant teaching. They will say that this Gospel passage refers only to belief in Jesus as being sufficient for salvation.Since for them there is salvation outside the Church since the baptism of desire etc refer to visible in the flesh cases in the present times who are objective,visible exceptions to all needing faith and baptism (Vatican Council II,AG 7) for salvation.The USCCB will not mention this subject.-Lionel Andrades
 
 

July 29, 2014


Memorial of Saint Martha
Lectionary: 402/607


Reading 1 jer 14:17-22

Let my eyes stream with tears
day and night, without rest,
Over the great destruction which overwhelms
the virgin daughter of my people,
over her incurable wound.
If I walk out into the field,
look! those slain by the sword;
If I enter the city,
look! those consumed by hunger.
Even the prophet and the priest
forage in a land they know not.

Have you cast Judah off completely?
Is Zion loathsome to you?
Why have you struck us a blow
that cannot be healed?
We wait for peace, to no avail;
for a time of healing, but terror comes instead.
We recognize, O LORD, our wickedness,
the guilt of our fathers;
that we have sinned against you.
For your name’s sake spurn us not,
disgrace not the throne of your glory;
remember your covenant with us, and break it not.
Among the nations’ idols is there any that gives rain?
Or can the mere heavens send showers?
Is it not you alone, O LORD,
our God, to whom we look?
You alone have done all these things.

Responsorial Psalm ps 79:8, 9, 11 and 13

R. (9) For the glory of your name, O Lord, deliver us.
Remember not against us the iniquities of the past;
may your compassion quickly come to us,
for we are brought very low.
R. For the glory of your name, O Lord, deliver us.
Help us, O God our savior,
because of the glory of your name;
Deliver us and pardon our sins
for your name’s sake.
R. For the glory of your name, O Lord, deliver us.
Let the prisoners’ sighing come before you;
with your great power free those doomed to death.
Then we, your people and the sheep of your pasture,
will give thanks to you forever;
through all generations we will declare your praise.
R. For the glory of your name, O Lord, deliver us.

Gospel jn 11:19-27

Many of the Jews had come to Martha and Mary
to comfort them about their brother [Lazarus, who had died].
When Martha heard that Jesus was coming,
she went to meet him;
but Mary sat at home.
Martha said to Jesus,
“Lord, if you had been here,
my brother would not have died.
But even now I know that whatever you ask of God,
God will give you.”
Jesus said to her,
“Your brother will rise.”
Martha said to him,
“I know he will rise,
in the resurrection on the last day.”
Jesus told her,
“I am the resurrection and the life;
whoever believes in me, even if he dies, will live,
and anyone who lives and believes in me will never die.
Do you believe this?”
She said to him, “Yes, Lord.
I have come to believe that you are the Christ, the Son of God,
the one who is coming into the world.”

Fr.Angelo Geiger and his Franciscans of the Immaculate group cannot accept Vatican Council II ( inference-free) because of extra ecclesiam nulla salus

 
 
 
 
Fr.Angelo Geiger and his Franciscans of the Immaculate group cannot accept Vatican Council II ( inference-free) because of extra ecclesiam nulla salus

Fr.Angelo Geiger FFI, cannot accept Vatican Council II (without the visible- dead premise) since he would have to affirm extra ecclesiam nulla salus.He would be deserted by the FFI and his present supporters and would come under attack by the Jewish Left as being anti-Semitic.This would be a threat to his 'career'.
But why would he be anti-Semitic when he is affirming Vatican Council II ?
He and the other 'FFI dissidents', the break away group are affirming Vatican Council II while assuming that all salvation mentioned in the Council is physically visible in the flesh to us on earth.They can 'actually see the dead' saved with ' a ray of the Truth'(NA 2), invincible ignorance(LG 16), seeds of the Word(AG 11) etc. So for them these cases of the deceased now in Heaven are actual examples on earth of salvation outside the Church.They are examples of people who are saved in the present times without the baptism of water.So for them Vatican Council II rejects the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus with this visible-dead theory.
Fr.Angelo instead wants the traditionalists to accept Vatican Council II with this irrational reasoning.
So he is critical of the SSPX and his former colleagues and superiors.
He has not criticized me when I say that I accept Vatican Council II.I accept the Council in which all salvation mentioned or alluded to is implicit for me.It is invisible for me and visible only to God.
I affirm the literal and traditional interpretation of the thrice defined dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. I affirm implicit for us baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance.I reject explicit for us, visible in the flesh baptism of desire.So these cases refer to possibilities but not exceptions to the dogma.
If any one says that the baptism of desire etc refers to explicit cases in 2014 I reject it .It is irrational. When Cardinal Francesco Marchetti Selvaggiani suggests  this irrationality in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949, it must be accepted as an objective error.It is a fact of life that we cannot see the dead as we see the living.
So when Pope Francis presents a kerygma without the necessity of the Church for salvation, in which all do not need to enter with 'faith and baptism' (Ad Gentes 7) I reject it.It is a Protestant kergyma.I accept the kerygma with the necessity of the Catholic Church for salvation. To be saved one needs to believe in Jesus and respond to his Great Sacrifice by formally entering the Catholic Church.
When the Bishop's Conferences in the USA and Britain assume that being saved with ' a ray of the Truth'(NA 2) is an exception to Tradition it is irrational and should be rejected. This was not part of the Deposit of the Faith before 1949.
 
The Jewish Left has not given permission to the Catholic Church in the present times to affirm Vatican Council II without the strange inference. There is always the threat of anti Semitism laws, which they have placed in many countries, and which they use as weapon.
 
So Fr.Angelo Geiger, the apologists like Mark Shea, Jimmy Akins, and so many other Catholics,like those in the EWTN Administration, imply that they can see the dead, when they interpret Vatican Council II.
-Lionel Andrades
 
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/07/frangelo-geiger-has-deleted-questions-i.html#links
 

 

Monday, July 28, 2014

The USCCB Daily Mass Reflections meet leftist standards

The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) in its video reflections on the Daily Mass Readings are separating the Catholic Church from the Kingdom of Heaven,they are also separating Jesus from necessity of being a member of the Catholic Church, for salvation.They are meeting the anti-Semitism and racist criteria set by the Jewish Left organisations.They (SPLC etc) have labelled traditionalist Catholics as anti-Semitic who affirm 1) the Social Reign of Jesus Christ over all political laws and 2) the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation even when affirmed by Vatican Council II (Ad Gentes 7).So the USCCB has changed the Gospel's proclamation and adapted it to the new leftist laws.

 
The U.S cardinals and bishops also assume that all salvation mentioned in Vatican Council II (LG 16,NA 2 etc) are physically visible to us on earth. So those saved with' a seed of the Word'(AG 11), 'elements of sanctification and truth'(LG 8) etc are physically visible exceptions to all needing to enter the Church with the baptism of water. The USCCB does not have to affirm extra ecclesiam nulla salus or Ad Gentes 7 ( all need faith and baptism for salvation). The irrationality is useful.It helps them remain politically safe.There is no tension.The liberal Rabbis do not protest.


The USCCB has adapted Jesus' Great Commission.No more is there an ecumenism of return and the need for all to convert into the Catholic Church for salvation.Their irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II, with a false premise, is also being used by the traditionalists and sedevacantists- unaware of the error.
-Lionel Andrades





Sunday, July 27, 2014

The pearl of great price is Jesus in the Catholic Church outside of which there is no salvation :USCCB in today's Daily Mass Reading ignores this point http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/07/the-pearl-of-great-price-is-jesus-in.html#links




Saturday, July 26, 2014

Two months of USCCB Daily Mass Reading Catechesis and no video says formal entry into the Catholic Church is necessary for salvation http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/07/two-months-of-usccb-daily-mass-reading.html#links