Edward Hapsburg at the Hungarian Embassy at the Vatican probably interprets Vatican Council II with the Fake Premise like Cardinal Peter Erdo in Hungary, but his illustrious Habsburg ancestors and the Austro Hungarian Catholic Empire interpreted Magisterial Documents rationally.For them in Heaven there were only Catholics.

 

Cardinal Braz de Avez continues to interpret Vatican Council II with the Fake Premise and this is approved by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican for all religious communities. Even Fr. Michael Nazir Ali at the Anglican Ordinariate in England does not use the Rational Premise to interpret Magisterial Documents with the Rational Premise in harmony with the past Magisterium.

The religious community Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary in Richmond, New Hampshire, USA say that there are only Catholics in Heaven. Since they interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise unlike Cardinal Braz de Avez and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj. For this religious community in New Hampshire Ad Gentes 7 in  Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church 846 states that all need faith and baptism for salvation. All. While LG 8, LG 16 etc refer to only hypothetical cases for the community at the St. Benedict Center, NH. since they interpret Vatican Council II rationally. So there is a continuity with extra ecclesiam nulla salus (with no known exceptions), the Athanasius Creed (with no known exceptions), the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX on the old exclusivist ecumenism (with no known exceptions).

So for them in Heaven there are only Catholics.

Edward Hapsburg at the Hungarian Embassy at 

the Vatican probably interprets Vatican Council 

II with the Fake Premise like Cardinal Peter Erdo in Hungary.

But his illustrious Habsburg ancestors and the Austro Hungarian Catholic Empire interpreted Magisterial Documents rationally.For them in Heaven there were only Catholics.-Lionel Andrades

PADRE LIVIO AL TELEFONO CON MARIJA PER IL MESSAGGIO DELLA REGINA DELLA P...

Fr.Michael Nazir Ali does not have permission to offer Holy Mass at the SSPX chapel in England

 Fr.Michael Nazir Ali does not have permission to offer Holy Mass in Latin at the SSPX chapel in England  even though Cardinal Ladaria has said that the SSPX is part of the Church and they have been accepted though the dialogue continues.Theologically and doctrinally it is possible for Fr. Michael Nazir Ali to offer Holy Mass since he interprets the Nicene Creed , the Athanasius Creed, the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance and Vatican Council II with the False Premise.Fr. Davide Pagliarani and Fr. Michael Nazir Ali use the same fake premise to create dis-unity with the 16^th century Magisterium. But the SSPX follow the 1580-Missal and their catechesis is traditional, they speak about mortal and venial sins. So in this sense the SSPX could call itself traditionalists of the Latin Mass. Fr.Michael Nazir Ali has to reject the theology and doctrines of the 1580 Holy Mass.Since they are contradicted with Vatican Council II interpreted with a Fake Premise, whose conclusion he accepts, like the cardinals and bishops in England.-Lionel Andrades

Roman Missal of 1580 used for the Traditional Latin Mass this Easter 2021 by the FSSP priests at the church Santissima Trinita dei Pellegrini, Rome is in harmony with Tradition and Vatican Council II interpreted with a Rational Premise

 Roman Missal of 1580 used for the Traditional Latin Mass this Easter 2021 by the FSSP priests at the church Santissima Trinita dei Pellegrini, Rome is in harmony with Tradition and Vatican Council II interpreted with a Rational Premise.

Even the Missal of Pope John Paul II is compatible with Tradition and the Past Magisterium of the 16^th century when Vatican Council II is interpreted with the Rational Premise and so there is no break with Sacred Tradition.-Lionel Andrades

Signore apri i nostri occhi per ciò che è bello e buono che circonda le nostre vite

The fact that the Society of St. Pius X priests elected Dr. Davide Pagliarani and not Bishop Bernard Fellay as the Superior General of the SSPX indicates that they wanted to reject the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which interpreted Vatican Council II with a Fake Premise, while they could still go back to Tradition with the theology of the 16th century and the Roman Missal of 1580

 The fact that the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) priests elected Dr. Davide Pagliarani and not Bishop Bernard Fellay as the Superior General of the SSPX indicates that they wanted to reject the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which interpreted Vatican Council II with a Fake Premise, while they could still go back to Tradition with the theology of the 16^th century and the Roman Missal of 1580. Now Cardinal Ladaria has accepted the SSPX as being within the Church which the traditionalists Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary at Richmond, New Hampshire, USA are not accepted. But Cardinal Ladaria however good his intentions for a rapprochement with the SSPX is, interprets Vatican Council with irrationality, in a break with the theology of the 16^th century and missal of 1580. So the SSPX priests are the cardinals are in two different Churches, there can be doctrinal unity only when both groups use the Rational Premise to interpret Magisterial Documents.-Lionel Andrades