Luciano Pavarotti - Montreal - 1978 - Adeste Fideles

Episode 1 - Christmas Miracles - Miracles of the Holidays

Stille Nacht, Heilige Nacht

Joy to the World

Archbishop Roche is choosing the hermenetic of rupture with tradition and apostolic times.He has altered the faith.

 However, let me clarify one important matter. The liturgy is never simply a matter of personal tastes or preferences. It is the lex orandi of the Church, which in faithfulness to the tradition received from Apostolic times, is determined by the Church and not by individual members. The Roman Missal of the saintly Popes, Paul VI and John Paul II, is witness to an unaltered faith and uninterrupted and living tradition. - Archbishop Roche on ‘Traditionis Custodes’ and Its Guidelines: ‘The Liturgical Possibilities Are in Place’

https://www.ncregister.com/interview/archbishop-roche-on-traditionis-custodes-and-its-guidelines-the-liturgical-possibilities-are-in-place

,

Like a switch - we can turn the hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition on or off.

Bishop Athanasius Schneider has pressed the button. He says there are no literal cases of the baptism of desire (LG 14). He has kept the switch on. Vatican Council II has a continuity with Tradition.

Pope Francis' New Theology keeps the switch off. Lumen Gentium 14 (baptism of desire) refers to known and visible non Catholics. He infers that invisible people are visible for him and are examples of salvation outside the Church. So he concludes that EENS and the Syllabus of Errors are obsolete. There is a cut off with the past.

For me Unitatis Redintigratio (imperfect communion with the Church) refers to only a hypothetical case. So UR (Decree on Ecumenism) nowhere contradicts the Syllabus of Errors and the dogma EENS. I have kept the line open with Tradition. Cardinal Walter Kasper's New Ecumenism is based upon UR 3 being an exception for the Syllabus and EENS. He has turned the switch off, breaking the connection with Sacred Tradition and the past exclusivist ecumenism. The premise was his handle Archbishop Roche has used the false premise and has broken faithfulness to tradition received from apostolic times. He has chosen to keep 'the switch' off and has altered the faith and interrupted the living tradition.-Lionel Andrades

Little Drummer Boy - Snare Drumline Encore Performance

Susan Boyle-Silent Night

O Holy Night - David James Fritch

Susan Boyle - O Holy Night

The interpretation of Vatican Council II according to Cardinal Godfried Daneels and Roberto dei Mattei is finished. This interpretation of Vatican Council II is as false as Pope Benedict’s, who does not use the Rational Premise.

 

The interpretation of Vatican Council II according to Cardinal Godfried Daneels and Roberto dei Mattei is finished. This interpretation of Vatican Council II is as false as Pope Benedict’s, who does not use the Rational Premise.

Pope Benedict permitted the Latin Mass since he wanted Bishop Bernard Fellay and the SSPX to come into the Church and accept Vatican Council II interpreted with the False Premise. He has always defended the interpretation of the Council with the False Premise creating a hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition.

The liberals are also afraid of interpreting Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise. They know that pretending that they are on the moral high ground because of Vatican Council II, is over. They can no more claim that the traditionalists are in schism for not accepting Vatican Council II. Instead it is now the conservatives who can say that the liberals are in schism for not affirming Vatican Council II ( rational).If they affirm Vatican Council II with the rational premise they could be accused of being extremists and if they do not schismatics.

The bottom line is that LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II always refer to hypothetical cases. How can invisible people be visible examples of salvation outside the Church in 1965-2021? How can LG 8 etc be exceptions for the Athanasius Creed which says all need to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation?

So we have two interpretations of Vatican Council II1) with LG 8 invisible and 2) with LG 8 etc being visible.

Pope Francis and Traditionis Custode choose the irrational option. So does Cardinal Daneels and Roberto dei Mattei.

So the division – the break with Tradition, does not come with the liturgy but with the use of the False or Rational Premise. This is irrespective if you go for Holy Mass in Latin or Greek or if it is the Ambrosian, Syro Malabar or Melkite rite. It is the premise which decides if you are liberal or orthodox.

If Cardinal Daneels chooses to interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise then he could be considered conservative. While Roberto dei Mattei with the False Premise would still be rejecting extra ecclesiam nulla salus with no exceptions, the Syllabus of Errors with no exceptions and the Athanasius Creed with no exceptions. There would be exceptions for him since he would be using the divisive New Theology which is created with the False Premise.

So there are two important points here.1) We have to de-condition ourselves from the mistake of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which used the Fake Premise and projected invisible cases of the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance as being visible exceptions for traditional EENS( with no exceptions) and 2) we have to stop thinking that the division in the Church comes with the liturgy.

If there is a rational interpretation of Vatican Council II at the Novus Ordo or Latin Mass, then the catechesis and homilies can be exclusivist and traditional.

The hermeneutic of rupture or continuity with Tradition comes with the Irrational or Rational Premise in the interpretation of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc.-Lionel Andrades

Random Acts of Kindness

Random Acts of Kindness 2021 #1

O EMMANUEL: Antífonas "O" y Magnificat (7/7)

If Pope Francis permits the Franciscans of the Immaculate to offer the Latin Mass once again at Boccea, Rome , it should be without the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II, without the False Premise.They should be free to interpret the Council with the Rational Premise

 

DECEMBER 24, 2021

If Pope Francis permits the Franciscans of the Immaculate to offer the Latin Mass once again at Boccea, Rome, it should be without the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II, without the False Premise. They should be free to interpret the Council with the Rational Premise

 

The old seminary and old church of the Franciscans of the Immaculate is still vacant and un-used at Casalotti, Boccea, Rome and if Pope Francis permits them to offer the Latin Mass there, once again, it should be without the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II, without the False Premise. They should be free to interpret the Council with the Rational Premise.

In the seminary-parish, Santa Maria di Nazareth, the irrational and immoral interpretation of Vatican Council II, is still being promoted. At First Communion classes, at religion classes for children and adults, and in the homilies of the priests. With the rational interpretation of Vatican Council; with the Rational Premise their theology will be the same as that of the Catholic Church over the centuries.-Lionel Andrades

Gloria Polo - Appello per la conversione in questo tempo di pandemia.

Testimonio de Gloria Polo

REAL TO REEL - Gloria Polo Struck by Lightning

DECEMBER 24, 2021

What Happened to Gloria Polo?

Novena di Natale da Medjugorje : 9° GIORNO: Santo Rosario - 24 Dicembre ...

It's immoral for Michael Sean Winters at the National Catholic Reporter to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally when he knows that there is a rational interpretation of the Council in harmony with Tradition and the ecclesiology of the Roman Missal of 1580

It's immoral for Michael Sean Winters at the National Catholic Reporter to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally when he knows that there is a rational interpretation of the Council in harmony with Tradition and the ecclesiology of the Roman Missal of 1580..

It is dishonest on is part and that of the editor of NCR Heidei Schlumpf.

It is dishonest on is part and that of the editor of NCR Heidei Schlumpf.

They choose to confuse what is invisible( LG 16 etc in 2021) as being visible ( practical exceptions for the Athanasius Creed and the extra ecclesiam nulla salus).Then with Vatican Council II allegedly contradicting EENS etc they mention the ‘reforms of Vatican Council II( interpreted irrationally)’

MSW also has reviewed the book of Fr. Jared Wick’s sj on Vatican Council II in which the author chose to interpret the Council with the common false premise instead of the rational premise. With the Rational Premise Fr. Wicks would have to write about a Vatican Council II which supports the concept of mission of St. Ignatius of Loyola and St. Francis Xavier.-Lionel Andrades

 DECEMBER 23, 2021

If Vatican Council II was interpreted with the Rational Premise, it would be honest and it would be in harmony with the past Magisterium of the Catholic Church, inspired by the Holy Spirit

 US bishops should help Latin Massgoers understand purpose of Francis' new restrictions

by Michael Sean Winters

 National Catholic Reporter, Dec 22, 2021

...The problem was always a problem with bishops and clergy for whom the old rite became an expression of an ideological rejection of the Second Vatican Council...

Lionel : Note. The writer(MSW) knows that there can be two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one with a rational premise and the other without it , one with a traditional conclusion and the other without. But for ideological reasons he does not mention it. He continues to interpret Vatican Council II with the Fake Premise.

____________

...Other bishops, though not hostile to reform themselves, simply refused to sound the alarm or discipline those under their pastoral care who were demonstrating an increasing hostility to Vatican II.

Lionel: MSW knows that Vatican Council II interpreted with the Fake Premise, by the National Catholic Reporter staff, creates schism and heresy and that  a rational alternative is available. If Vatican Council II is interpreted with the Rational Premise then the pastoral approach would also be different.There could no more be a New Ecumenism, New Ecclesiology etc since the Council would support the past ecclesiocentrism. It would be an exposure of the so called 'reforms'.

_________________

What is undeniable is that no one can think Francis is trying to dial back the reforming impetus of Vatican II.

Lionel : He is not going back, instead he is pushing ahead Vatican Council II interpreted with a Fake Premise and people now are aware of it.The writing is there on the wall.The foundations for the New Theology are no more there. They have been corrected and made known.

_________________

 In fact, he has brought all the energy and creativity that have marked the reception of Vatican II in the church of Latin America to the chair of Peter and thence to the universal church. This pontificate has turned those who held their nose at Vatican II from skeptics into schismatics...

Lionel : His interpretation of Vatican Council II with the False Premise produces a conclusion which is schismatic and heretic. This cannot be Magisterial.If he interpreted Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise, it would be honest and it would be in harmony with the past Magisterium of the Catholic Church, inspired by the Holy Spirit.-Lionel Andrades

https://www.ncronline.org/news/opinion/us-bishops-should-help-latin-massgoers-understand-purpose-francis-new-restrictions?utm_source=NCR+List&utm_campaign=6ab1285383-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2021_12_21_07_16&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_6981ecb02e-6ab1285383-230712586