The Giorgio Pira Islamic library in Palermo, Italy is ‘hate’ against the Catholic Church.
Vatican Council II says all need faith and baptism for salvation (Ad Gentes
7).Catholics are tacitly invited at Palermo to convert to Islam and lose their
soul to Hell.
There are
good things in other religions but the religions are not paths to salvation (CDF,
Notification, Fr. Jacques Dupuis sj, 2001, Dominus Iesus etc).
The religion
of Mohammad is not a path to salvation according to Vatican Council II (AG 7,
LG 14) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church (845, 846, 1257 etc).
Catholics
who are living with Muslims in a civil marriage are living in adultery, which
is a mortal sin which leads to Hell. They are outside the Church and should not
come forward for the Eucharist during Holy Mass. Those Catholics who convert
into other religions are lost to Hell forever (Lumen Gentium 14, Ad Gentes 7).
ARCHBISHOP CORRADO LOREFICE
At Palermo,
it is obligatory for Corado Lorefice, the Archbishop of Palermo, to accept
Vatican Council II and interpret it only rationally and so traditionally. The
Council then supports Feeneyite EENS and the Council of Florence (1442).This is
obligatory for all cardinals and bishops.
SYNODS
CANNOT ACCEPT POLYGAMY OF ISLAM
The Synods which accept the polygamy of Islam
are political and are not based upon Vatican Council II interpreted rationally,
which does not permit any innovation in faith and morals.
How can they
knowingly hold Synods based upon Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally?
How can they appoint new cardinals who only interpret the Council,
irrationally?
At the Biblicum, the pontifical university in
Rome, students have to study the Quran, the same could be expected of all of
us, at future Synods, in the name of
Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally.
The Islamic
library of the FSCIRE in Palermo will be disseminating material which says Jews
and Christians must be forced to convert. Even violence and death are recommended
by the Islamic Tradition.
The Bible
says that anyone who does not accept Jesus as the Son of God is the Anti
Christ.For the Islamists in Palermo Jesus is not the Son of God.
The Catholic
Church, the post Vatican Council II Church, supports the past exclusivist
ecclesiology, when the Council is interpreted rationally and so ethically. This
is Magisterial. Vatican Council II is a Magisterial Document only when it is
interpreted rationally, I was telling my Parish Priest today morning.
PAUL VI TO
FRANCIS CHOSE THE IRRATIONAL MODEL
The interpretation
of Vatican Council II by the popes from Paul VI to Francis was political and
irrational.
Also being
saved with the baptism of desire (BOD) and in invincible ignorance(I.I), since
the time of Pope Pius XII and the creation of the state of Israel, was also
irrational and political ( See Letter of the Holy Office 1949).The BOD and I.I
refer to hypothetical and not objective cases in the present times.This was understood
over the centuries before 1949.
We can now
re-interpret Lumen Gentium 14 (baptism of desire) and Lumen Gentium 16 (being
saved in invincible ignorance) rationally i.e. they are hypothetical and physically
invisible cases only, always.
There is
nothing in Vatican Council II to contradict the dogma EENS of the Fourth
Lateran Council (1215).
So the
Church returns to ‘an ecumenism of return’. There cannot be a new ecumenism
based upon there being exceptions for EENS, in Vatican Council II. Unitatis
Redintigratio 3, the Decree on Ecumenism, Vatican Council II, does not
contradict Feeneyite EENS.Nothing in the Decree on Ecumenism contradicts
Feeneyite EENS.
So we are no
more obliged to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally like Rahner,
Ratzinger, Congar, Murray, Balthazar, Bea, Lefebvre and Kung. Theology and
philosophy have returned to the Scholastic period, the Middle Ages, that golden
time in the history of the Catholic Church.
Muslims
in general are oriented to Hell without Catholic faith and the baptism of water(AG
7).This is a Conciliar teaching and not just a personal view. It is Magisterial according to Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church and Church teachings over the centuries.
Mohammad knew about the Catholic Church and yet
formed another religion. According to Lumen Gentium 14 those who know about
Jesus and the Church and yet do not enter are on the way to Hell.
LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to hypothetical and invisible cases in 1965-2023. We cannot see a baptism of desire case. If anyone was saved outside the Church in invincible ignorance, seeds of the Word, good and holy things in other religions or elements of sanctification and truth in other religions, it would only be known to God. These are not objective exceptions for EENS in our human reality. As Ann Barnhardt says, 'technically they exist only on paper'. So there is nothing in Vatican Council II to contradict Ad Gentes 7 or the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus,according to the Fourth Lateran Council (1215).
POPE HONORIOUS AND THE ORDER OF PREACHERS
This Church Council during the time of Pope Honorius, approved the Order of Preachers of St. Dominic Guzman. It did not mention any exceptions. The Council has a hermeneutic of continuity with the Syllabus of Errors, the Athanasius Creed and on EENS according to the Council of Florence (1442). The Council of Florence was Feeneyite.
But Alberto Melloni's FSCIRE (Bologna School) which is financed by the Italian Government, with a million euros annually, and which is supported by Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II irrationally.
For them, LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to physically visible cases of non Catholics saved outside the Church without faith and the baptism of desire. So Vatican Council II is a break with Tradition. But for me there is no rupture with the traditional concept of EENS and the rejection of Mohammadism.
It is known that Mohammad’s concept of the cosmos, the human body and the Trinity was wrong. Also translations of the Quran in different languages have different meanings, example, in Urdu, English, Arabic etc. So in the name of Vatican Council II ( irrational), Catholics must not be expected to accept the Quran as a religious book equal to the Bible..- Lionel Andrades
https://bussola-pro.com/835535/biblioteca-la-pira-www-fscire-it
Posts
