Tuesday, March 5, 2019
Big gaps in the SSPX theology
There was no mention of Hell, exclusive salvation and unknown cases of being saved in invincible ignorance outside the Church, in the SSPX Superior's statement on the Abu Dhabi meeting.
Since there are big gaps in the SSPX theology.
1.They cannot say that all Muslims and other non Christians are on the way to Hell, unless they convert into the Catholic Church,since they believe there are known exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II etc.
2. Also for the SSPX there are known exceptions of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) and so there is a new version of extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) for them.
2. Also for the SSPX there are known exceptions of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) and so there is a new version of extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) for them.
This is Cushingism.
Cushingites assume hypothetical cases are practical exceptions to EENS.
3.The SSPX could not say that there is salvation in only one religion since they assume that there is salvation in other religions. For them non Catholics are saved with the baptism of desire, invincible ignorance and the baptism of blood all without the baptism of water.So they contradict the Nicene Creed and traditional EENS.
4.The SSPX cannot even say that all Christians need to enter the Catholic Church for salvation since invisible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I are visible exceptions to EENS as it was interpreted by the missionaries in the 16th century.
They use the same false reasoning as the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith to interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
-Lionel Andrades
SSPX does not proclaim the Faith any more
The Society of St.Pius X(SSPX) does not proclaim the Catholic Faith on salvation in public and is critical of others for not doing the same.The Great Commission, is ther for others to proclaim.1
They do not affirm the Catechism of the Catholic Church( Feeneyite) but instead interpret all the Catechisms with Cushingism. So there is a rupture with the trasditional teaching on exclusive salvation in the Church.
The do not affirm the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation and the non separation of Church and State since they do not affirm extra ecclesiam nulla salus(Feeneyite).
They cannot affirm an ecumenism of return since they they reject extra ecclesiam nulla salus( Feeneyite), Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite), Catechisms(Feeneyite).It is the same with the liberals, including the Catholic journalists.
They do not affirm the past ecclesiology and instead accept the new ecclesiology.Since for them the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance,is always interpreted with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism.
They are looking towards the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) to resolve their doctrinal problems but the CDF makes the same mistake.
They use the same irrationality( invisible people are visible) to interpret Magisterial documents to create a rupture wit Tradition.
The CDF accepts the Magisterial documents ( Vatican Council II etc) with the irrational inference and the SSPX rejects it.
This is the difference between the two.Their philosophy and theology is the same and so are the conclusions, but one accepts it and the other rejects it.
Such talk is opposed to the dogma that declares that the Catholic religion is the one true religion (cf.Syllabus of Errors, proposition 21). When something is a dogma, anything opposed to it is called heresy. God cannot contradict Himself. 2
The Catholic religion is the one true religion for the SSPX but there is known salvation outside the Church for them. So they reject the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(Feeneyite).Outside the Church there is salvation even though the Catholic religion is the one true religion. Every one does not need to be Catholic for salvation for them.
-Lionel AndradesThey use the same irrationality( invisible people are visible) to interpret Magisterial documents to create a rupture wit Tradition.
The CDF accepts the Magisterial documents ( Vatican Council II etc) with the irrational inference and the SSPX rejects it.
This is the difference between the two.Their philosophy and theology is the same and so are the conclusions, but one accepts it and the other rejects it.
Such talk is opposed to the dogma that declares that the Catholic religion is the one true religion (cf.Syllabus of Errors, proposition 21). When something is a dogma, anything opposed to it is called heresy. God cannot contradict Himself. 2
The Catholic religion is the one true religion for the SSPX but there is known salvation outside the Church for them. So they reject the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(Feeneyite).Outside the Church there is salvation even though the Catholic religion is the one true religion. Every one does not need to be Catholic for salvation for them.
1
“Going therefore, teach ye all nations: baptizing them in the name of
the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost” (Mt 28:19-20). “He that
believeth and is baptized shall be saved: but he that believeth not
shall be condemned” (Mk 16:16).- CommuniquĆ© of the Superior General of the Society of Saint Pius X : True Fraternity
2.
https://sspx.org/en/news-events/news/communiqu%C3%A9-superior-general-society-saint-pius-x-true-fraternity-45364
2.
https://sspx.org/en/news-events/news/communiqu%C3%A9-superior-general-society-saint-pius-x-true-fraternity-45364
March 4, 2019
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
