Tuesday, August 29, 2017

Cardinal Burke,Chris Ferrara need to make a formal correction of their error and heresy which they share with Pope Francis

Cardinal Burke on the Pope: Part III (Conclusion)
Formal Correction Coming Soon?

by Christopher A. Ferrara
August 25, 2017

Removing the papal stole before speaking.
Is Francis trying to tell us something?

In my previous two columns, I discussed the distinction drawn by Cardinal Raymond Burke, rooted in the thinking of medieval canonists, between the person of the Pope and the papal office of Vicar of Christ, exercised as such. While the Pope as a human person may have erring opinions, and may even be so bold as to express those opinions to the world, as did Pope John XXII regarding the Beatific Vision in the 14th century and as Francis does today, an erring opinion cannot belong to the authentic Magisterium, which is the teaching office of the Holy Catholic Church, not the magisterium of a particular Pope who is free to depart from the personal magisterium of other Popes in ordinary pronouncements and documents short of infallible definitions of dogma.
Lionel: Since Pope Pius XII to Pope Francis an erring opinion is that invisible for us baptism of desire(BOD),baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance (I.I) are visible exceptions to the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).This is a view shared by Cardinal Burke and Chris Ferrara.
Since Pope Paul VI to Pope Francis an erring opinion is that invisible for us cases mentioned in Vatican Council II (LG 16, LG 8, LG 14, UR 3; NA 2, GS 22, AG 11, AG 7 etc) are visible exceptions to Feeneyite EENS and the old ecclesiology of the Catholic Church, supported by the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.This is supported by Cardinal Burke and Chris Ferrara.
In other words, there is no such thing as a “fallible ordinary Magisterium.” What the Church has always taught by way of her “ordinary Magisterium” is no less infallible than dogmatic definitions of the “extraordinary Magisterium,” which, after all, are only the culmination of the constant, infallible teaching of the ordinary Magisterium down through the centuries (e.g., the dogma of the Assumption merely proclaims what the Church had always believed since the time of the Apostles).
Lionel: The dogma EENS reflects the Church's teaching expressed in the extra ordinary Magisterium of three Church Councils, which do not mention BOD, BOB and I.I as relevant or exceptions to EENS. It is reflected in the ordinary magisterium of popes who have affirmed the dogma EENS along with BOD, BOB and I.I and have not stated that they refer to visible or known cases of BOD,BOB and I.I  in the present times.Yet Mystici Corporis, the Catechisms of Trent, Baltimore and Pius X are interpreted by the present magisterium, as referring to known and visible examples of salvation outside the Church.This is also the common view of traditionalists.So reports on the Internet,from pontifical and secular sources,contradict Feeneyite EENS.This was confirmed by Pope Benedict.He said that EENS was no more like as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century(Avvenire,March 2016).This was  not contested by Cardinal Burke, Chris Ferrara and the SSPX bishops.
_______________________
Thus, when paragraph 25 of the Vatican II document Lumen Gentium (LG) speaks of the “religious submission of mind and will … to the authentic magisterium of the Roman Pontiff, even when he is not speaking ex cathedra,” it is not referring to every utterance by a Pope but rather to exercises of the teaching office of the Vicar of Christ by which he clearly intends to bind the entire Church. Nor is it self-evident that any particular papal document in ordinary course belongs to the “authenticMagisterium” for the sole reason that a Pope has issued it. As even LG makes clear, whether a given document belongs to the binding and authentic ordinary Magisterium depends upon an examination of “the character of the documents” as well as the Pope’s “manner of speaking.”
Lionel: So according to the authentic magisterium of the Church,Catholics cannot affirm Feeneyite EENS, since invisible for us BOD, BOB and I.I are exceptions, as the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 concluded.
Therefore, that one may obtain eternal salvation, it is not always required that he be incorporated into the Church actually as a member-Letter of the Holy Office 1949
According to the authentic magisterium of the Church a Catholic cannot affirm Feeneyite Vatican Council II, in which invisible for us LG 16, LG 8, LG 14, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22, AG 11, AG 7 etc are simply invisible and hypothetical and so do not contradict Feeneyite EENS or EENs according to the magisterium in the 16th century.This is acceptable for Cardinal Burke, Bishop Schneider and Chris Ferrara.
__________________________________
Both Francis’ manner of speaking and the rambling, ambiguous, discursive and distinctly opinion-laden character of even his major documents (Evangelii GaudiumLaudato Si’ and Amoris Laetitia) do not evidence any clear intention to compel belief in some particular “new” doctrine of the Church. Moreover, even if such an intention were expressed, it would be void and of no effect, for as Vatican I (infallibly) declared in rejecting the notion that a Pope can announce new doctrines:
“For the Holy Spirit was promised to the successors of Peter not so that they might, by His revelation, make known some new doctrine, but that, by His assistance, they might religiously guard and faithfully expound the revelation or deposit of faith transmitted by the apostles.”
Lionel: That invisible for us BOD, BOB and I.I are visible exceptions to the dogma EENS is a new doctrine which says there is salvation outside the Church.
That invisible for us BOD, BOB and I.I is visible for us is a new philosophical reasoning.
That in principle hypothethical cases can be interpreted as being non hypothetical in the interpretation of Vatican Council II, Mystici Corporis, Catechisms of Trent, Baltimore and Pius X is a new interpretative theology in the Church.
To suggest invisible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I are visible in 2017 cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit.
___________________________________

That is precisely Cardinal Burke’s point. And it is also the point on which Father Gruner insisted in the many conversations I had with him on the novelties of the post-conciliar epoch: a novel doctrine is not part of the “authentic Magisterium” (LG) because the Church has never taught it, and if the Church has never taught a novel doctrine it cannot be a true doctrine. And if it is not true doctrine, it can only be the mere opinion of the Pope who uttered it, speaking in his personal capacity.
Lionel: That invisible for us BOD, BOB and I.I are visible to us is an inference made my Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and is supported by Cardinal Burke, Bishop Schneider and Chris Ferrara.It is supported by the two popes and the CDF Prefects including Cardinal Luiz Ladaria S.J(Christianity and the World Religions,ITC,1997).
___________________________
Here it seems to me most telling that Pope Francis seems averse to wearing the papal stole, a symbol of the Roman Pontiff’s authority, and that he wears the same pectoral cross he wore as Archbishop of Buenos Aires, rather than the gold cross of the Roman Pontiff. As America magazine observed of Francis’ first appearance on the balcony of Saint Peter’s:
“That Francis chose not to wear the … gold embroidered papal stole… went unnoticed to most, but to those who understood the language of ecclesiastical garments, this was a shout. Moreover, instead of the gold pectoral cross, Francis emerged wearing the silver cross he had worn as bishop of Buenos Aires. He donned the stole for the papal blessing, then promptly removed it.”
Most curious. Why promptly remove the stole after having donned it to give a papal blessing?  If this were merely some sort of prideful aversion to “finery,” why wear it even to administer the blessing? What was Francis trying to tell us with this abrupt doffing gesture? Or was it the Holy Ghost prompting him to remove the symbol of the Vicar of Christ before saying things inappropriate to the office?
Having said all this, however, the fact remains that Pope Francis has provoked disastrous confusion and division by attempting to insert into the life of the Church what amounts to his personal theology, practiced as Archbishop of Buenos Aires, through ambiguous pronouncements and winks and nods to those who are doing what he would like to see. Thus, whether or not Francis has acted in his official capacity as Vicar of Christ, his errant opinions must be corrected because they are causing grave harm to the Church.
In the second part of his interview with the Wanderer, Cardinal Burke does indeed indicate that, notwithstanding a distinction between the person and the office of the Pope, he will issue the promised formal correction of the errors of Amoris Laetitia:
“Q. Setting aside the question of timing, please explain how the process for the execution of a ‘formal correction’ would proceed should a response to the five dubia not be forthcoming? How is a formal correction officially submitted, how is it addressed within the Church’s hierarchal structure, etc.?


“A. … It seems to me that the essence of the correction is quite simple. On the one hand, one sets forth the clear teaching of the Church; on the other hand, what is actually being taught by the Roman Pontiff is stated. If there is a contradiction, the Roman Pontiff is called to conform his own teaching in obedience to Christ and the Magisterium of the Church.
Lionel: 
On the one hand, one sets forth the clear teaching of the Church; (invisible for us BOD,BOB and I.I are not exceptions to the dogma EENS according to Cantate Dominio, Council of Florence 1441) on the other hand, what is actually being taught by the Roman Pontiff is stated.
(invisible for us BOD,BOB and I.I are visible exceptions to the dogma EENS.)
_________________


“The question is asked, ‘How would this be done?’ It is done very simply by a formal declaration to which the Holy Father would be obliged to respond. Cardinals Brandmüller, Caffarra, Meisner, and I used an ancient institution in the Church of proposing dubia to the Pope.



“…. Pope Francis has chosen not to respond to the five dubia, so it is now necessary simply to state what the Church teaches about marriage, the family, acts that are intrinsically evil, and so forth. These are the points that are not clear in the current teachings of the Roman Pontiff; therefore, this situation must be corrected. The correction would then direct itself principally to those doctrinal points….
Lionel :
 so it is now necessary simply to state what the Church teaches about invisible BOD, BOB and I.I being visible exceptions to EENS as it as known in the 16th century and how Vatican Council II becomes a rupture with Tradition because of this irrationality.This is a novelty in theology(invisible people are examples of salvation outside the Church) and philosophy(invisible people are visible at the same time).
_______________________
“…. The Pope is the principle of unity of the bishops and all the faithful. However, the Church is being torn asunder right now by confusion and division. The Holy Father must be called on to exercise his office to put an end to this.
“So then, the next step would be a formal declaration stating the clear teachings of the Church as set forth in the dubia. Furthermore, it would be stated that these truths of the Faith are not being clearly set forth by the Roman Pontiff….”
Lionel: Agreed. Cardinal Burke, Cardinal Schneider,the SSPX bishops and Chris Ferrara  need to take the next step.They need to admit the error made by the two pontiffs which they support on salvation theology, the new ecclesiology, the new theology, the new philsophy etc.
_________________________________________
Clearly, the Cardinal knows he has a duty to the Church and to souls to make the promised public correction.
Lionel:Agreed.Invisible people cannot be visible at the same time.A formal correction has to be made.
_________________________________
 Let us hope and pray that he does his duty to confront a situation he himself has so rightly linked to the failure to consecrate Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary.
-Lionel Andrades

http://www.fatimaperspectives.com/fe/perspective1073.asp

Sacerdote cattolico e professore di filosofia a Roma interpreta la Lettera del Santo Ufficio e il Concilio Vaticano II con un'irrazionalità che è magisteriale


mi dispiace dirlo, ma lei dice il falso. Né io né la facoltà dell...e nemmeno la Lettera del Santo Ufficio del 1949 affermmiamo quanto lei ritiene, cioè, testualmente, che “il battesimo del desiderio (BOD), il battesimo di sangue (BOB) e l'ignoranza invincibile (I.I)” sarebbero “eccezioni al dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus”. Di nuovo la sfido a dimostrare il contrario.
Lionel: Ancora una volta dimostrerò il contrario.
Therefore, that one may obtain eternal salvation, it is not always required that he be incorporated into the Church actually as a member-Letter of the Holy Office 1949

Pertanto, che si può ottenere la salvezza eterna, non è sempre necessario che sia incorporato nella Chiesa in realtà come membro-Lettera di Santo Ufficio 1949 a l'Arcivescovo di Boston 
Questo è accettato da voi e da tutti i membri della....
Perché, per ottenere la salvezza eterna, non è sempre necessario che sia incorporato nella Chiesa in realtà come membro?
Non è necessario perchè il battesimo del desiderio (BOD), il battesimo di sangue (BOB) e il salvataggio in ignoranza invincibile (I.I) sono eccezioni.
E perché sono eccezioni e come sono le eccezioni?
Poiché ci sono persone conosciute salvate al di fuori della Chiesa.
Ci sono persone salvate con visibili per noi BOD, BOB e I.I quindi sono eccezioni.
Quindi non tutti hanno bisogno di entrare nella Chiesa come membro come dice la Lettera del Santo Ufficio.
Therefore, that one may obtain eternal salvation, it is not always required that he be incorporated into the Church actually as a member-Letter of the Holy Office 1949
Questo è ciò che tutti i sacerdoti della ...credono
Non dicono che tutti in Italia ad esempio devono diventare membri della Chiesa cattolica per evitare l'Inferno e non ci sono eccezioni.
Esistono eccezioni per tutti.
Quindi qui vi ho dato un esempio per mostrarvi come la Lettera del Santo Ufficio 1949 ha commesso un errore oggettivo, un errore filosofico e lo accetti. Non lo neghi.
Per me BOD, BOB e I.I riferisco a casi invisibili, persone sconosciute nei tempi presenti (2017) e quindi non sono eccezioni all'EENS
Anzi, dichiaro che lei è contrario al Magistero autentico della Chiesa, e per questo la ritengo, paradossalmente, di fatto “extra Ecclesia”, e quindi in pericolo di non poter accedere alla salvezza eterna.
Lionel:  Il 'magistero autentico' è in una rottura con i missionari del XVI secolo. Questo è stato confermato da Papa Benedetto XVI in Avvenire, marzo 2016.Dunque il presente magistero di due papi e tutti i sacerdoti della...contraddice il passato magistero.
Quando il magistero oggi dedurre che invisibile per noi BOD, BOB e I.I è un'eccezione visibile al dogma EENS, non può essere l'opera dello Spirito Santo. È errore umano.
Poi quando Papa Benedetto XVI dice che l'EENS non è più come nel 16 ° secolo è una errore umano. Dallo Spirito Santo ha guidato la Chiesa prima del 1949.Il magistero oggi  non può dire che il magistero in passato era fuori dalla Chiesa.

Ecco quello che dice la traducione inglese della Lettera del 1949:

Now, among those things which the Church has always preached and will never cease to preach is contained also that infallible statement by which we are taught that there is no salvation outside the Church.
Lionel:Sono d'accordo con questo. Per me BOD, BOB e I.I non mi riferisco a persone visibili e conosciute e non sono eccezioni all'EENS.Non respingo il BOB, il BOD e I.I.Li accetto come casi ipotetici. Possono solo casi ipotetici per noi umani. Quindi non sto rifiutando BOD, BOB e I.I né io rifiuto EENS secondo il magistero del XVI secolo.
However, this dogma must be understood in that sense in which the Church herself understands it. For, it was not to private judgments that Our Savior gave for explanation those things that are contained in the deposit of faith, but to the teaching authority of the Church.

 'La Chiesa oggi' capisce BOD, BOB e I.I come riferendosi a persone note e visibili nei tempi presenti (2017). Quindi ci sono eccezioni per Feneeyite EENS. Questo è filosoficamente irrazionale. La conclusione è una rottura con la Tradizione ed è eretica. Dal momento che assume che le persone invisibili sono visibili oggi  viola il Principio della Non Contraddizione di Aristotele. Ci troviamo di fronte una eresia magistrale che è una rottura con i papi del passato, che non consideravano BOD, BOB e I.I come visibili e sconosciuti a noi.
E nella conclusione della lettera, che fa appello esplicito a Papa Pio XII in diversi momenti del testo (sia alla sua dottrina sia all’approvazione della lettera), si afferma chiara e categoricamente:

Therefore, let them who in grave peril are ranged against the Church seriously bear in mind that after "Rome has spoken" they cannot be excused even by reasons of good faith. Certainly, their bond and duty of obedience toward the Church is much graver than that of those who as yet are related to the Church "only by an unconscious desire." Let them realize that they are children of the Church, lovingly nourished by her with the milk of doctrine and the sacraments, and hence, having heard the clear voice of their Mother, they cannot be excused from culpable ignorance, and therefore to them apply without any restriction that principle: submission to the Catholic Church and to the Sovereign Pontiff is required as necessary for salvation.

 Lionel: Se il papa Pio XII approvò veramente questo documento, diceva che p. Leonard Feeney e il Centro Benedettino di Boston, devono affermare BOD, BOB e I.I come lui e avrebbe contraddetto il Principio della Non Contraddizione,Papa Pio XII rifiutato il dogma EENS, avrebbe contraddetto i papi e i Concili di Chiesa del passato (Cantate Domino, Concilio di Firenze 1441) e lui sarebbe ridicolo Lo Spirito Santo con questa irrazionalità.
A lei quindi l’onere della prova.
Quindi ti ho citato il testo della Lettera del Santo Ufficio che dice Therefore, that one may obtain eternal salvation, it is not always required that he be incorporated into the Church actually as a member-Letter of the Holy Office 1949
Lei e tutti i sacerdoti della... sono d'accordo.Quindi la tua conclusione è che i casi invisibili di BOD, BOB e I.I sono eccezioni visibili al dogma EENS.Non dicono che tutti in Italia, ad esempio, devono diventare membri della Chiesa cattolica per evitare l'Inferno e non ci sono eccezioni.
Esistono eccezioni per voi tutti.Ci sono persone conosciute salvate al di fuori della Chiesa per voi.Ci sono persone salvate con visibili per noi BOD, BOB e I.I quindi sono eccezioni.
Quindi non tutti hanno bisogno di entrare nella Chiesa come membro come dice la Lettera del Santo Ufficio.Questo è ciò che tutti i sacerdoti della... credono

Cordialmente...
In Christo con l'amore di Madre,
Lionel

SSPX can correct the Wikipedia error in the interpretation of Vatican Council II related to canonical status for them

The Society of St.Pius X (SSPX ) must note that Pope Francis and Cardinal Ladaria are in manifest heresy for assuming that invisible  baptism of desire (BOD), baptism of blood(BOB)  and invincible ignorance(I.I) are visible exceptions of salvation outside the Church and so contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) according to Fr. Leonard Feeney. Similarly they are in manifest heresy for interpreting Vatican Council II with Cushingism i.e LG 16 etc refer to visible and known cases saved outside the Church, when in reality these cases would only be known to God. In this way Vatican Council II emerges as a rupture with EENS as it was interpreted by the missionaries in the 16th century. Vatican Council II can also be interpreted with Feeneyism(invisible people are not visible) and the Council will not be a rupture with EENS.But they will not do this. They choose the heretical version of the Council and EENS.

It is important to note that  Wikipedia and other Internet reports support the heresy of Pope Francis and Cardinal Ladaria by interpreting all magisterial documents with the irrational theology.
Once this error is corrected by the SSPX they can ask for canonical status.They can asking Pope Francis and Cardinal Ladaria to affirm Vatican Council II and EENS with Feeneyism, or do not make doctrine and theology an issue for the SSPX receiving canonical status.
Presently the SSPX also interprets Vatican Council II with Cushingism and so nothing can done about the Wikipedia reports.
I am the only Catholic who is interpreting all magisterial documents with rational Feeneyism. Even the communities of Fr. Leonard Feeney, the St.Benedict Centers interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism. They do not state that the Council is Feeneyite when invisible cases are not interpreted as being visible.


Feeneyism: It is the old theology and philosophical reasoning which says there are no known exceptions past or present, to the dogmaextra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).There are no explicit cases to contradict the traditional interpretation of EENS.It is practical. There obviously are no known cases of the baptism of desire (BOD),baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) in 2017.So there are no practical exceptions to EENS.Neither was BOD,BOB and I.I an exception to Feeneyite EENS in 1949 when the Letter of the Holy Office was issued to the Archbishop of Boston. The cardinals made an objective mistake.Similarly mentioning BOD and I.I in Vatican Council II (AG 7,LG 14) relative to the traditional teaching on salvation was superfluous.

Cushingism: It is the new theology and philosophical reasoning.It assumes there are known exceptions, past and present, to the dogma EENS, on the need for all to formally enter the Church.It assumes that the baptism of desire etc are not hypothetical but objectively known.In principle, hypothetical cases are objective in the present times.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/palermo-catholics-tell-archbishop-that.html

Propaganda from Wikipedia on extra ecclesiam nulla salus :

Papal teaching before the Second Vatican Council[edit]

Statements by Popes upholding the dogma that outside of the Church there is no salvation have been given above.(Lionel:There were Feeneyite citations with no BOD, BOB and I.I confusion. There were also citations in which BOD, BOB and I.I were inferred to be physically visible cases) Popes who have made such statements have also said that there are those who without visibly belonging to the Church are related to it and can be saved. Pope Pius IX spoke of them as "able to attain eternal life", and Pope Pius XII said that "they have a certain relationship with the Mystical Body of the Redeemer".(However non of these popes have said that these were physically visible and known people, saved outside the Church. They would not say this since any one who is saved would be in Heaven and known only to God. This is something obvious.)
In his 1863 encyclical letter to the bishops of Italy, Pope Pius IX wrote: "Well known is the Catholic teaching that no one can be saved outside the Catholic Church. Eternal salvation cannot be obtained by those who oppose the authority and statements of the same Church and are stubbornly separated from the unity of the Church and also from the successor of Peter, the Roman Pontiff". In the same letter, he said: "There are, of course, those who are struggling with invincible ignorance about our most holy religion. Sincerely observing the natural law and its precepts inscribed by God on all hearts and ready to obey God, they live honest lives and are able to attain eternal life by the efficacious virtue of divine light and grace since God who clearly beholds, searches, and knows the minds, souls, thoughts, and habits of all men, because of His great goodness and mercy, will by no means suffer anyone to be punished with eternal torment who has not the guilt of deliberate sin." He added: "God forbid that the children of the Catholic Church should even in any way be unfriendly to those who are not at all united to us by the same bonds of faith and love. On the contrary, let them be eager always to attend to their needs with all the kind services of Christian charity, whether they are poor or sick or suffering any other kind of visitation. First of all, let them rescue them from the darkness of the errors into which they have unhappily fallen and strive to guide them back to Catholic truth and to their most loving Mother who is ever holding out her maternal arms to receive them lovingly back into her fold. Thus, firmly founded in faith, hope, and charity and fruitful in every good work, they will gain eternal salvation."
Lionel: We have convered this passage before(in other blog posts). It does 
not state that invisible  people are visible exceptions to EENS or the 
hypothetical cases it refers to are actually known people.
___________________
Pope Pius XII considered not unrelated to the Church "those who do not belong to the visible Body of the Catholic Church", saying that they are in a "state in which they cannot be sure of their salvation. For even though by an unconscious desire and longing they have a certain relationship with the Mystical Body of the Redeemer, they still remain deprived of those many heavenly gifts and helps which can only be enjoyed in the Catholic Church".
Lionel: So Pope Pius XII has not rejected the dogma EENS according to
 Fr. Leonard Feeney since hypothetical and invisible people cannot 
be exceptions to EENS.
It was under Pope Pius XII too that the Catholic Church rejected Feeneyism.
Lionel: It is here where we get the false conclusion based on the false premise.The writer assumes that BOD, BOB and I.I refer to visible instead of invisible people. He concludes that these are known examples of salvation outside the Church. So he has mixed up what is invisible as being visible and accepted the New Theology, with the false conclusion, that, there is salvation outside the Church.So Fr.Leonard Feeney was wrong according to this line of thinking supported by the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.

It was under Pope Pius XII too that the Catholic Church rejected Feeneyism.
Lionel: By assuming possibilities, unknown people, are real and known in real life that Feeneyism was rejected. The SSPX can correct this error.It is related to their interpretation of Vatican Council II and getting canonical status.

-Lionel Andrades





JUNE 13, 2014


Magisterium: it all depends on how you look at it!

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/magisterium-it-all-depends-on-how-you.html

JULY 22, 2016


Defacto, in real life, practically,BOD does not contradict the Popes on Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/07/defacto-in-real-life-practicallybod.html

 JANUARY 18, 2016

Pope Francis and Cardinal Muller interpret the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Vatican Council II with irrationality : manifest heresy

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/01/pope-francis-and-cardinal-muller_18.html


ANUARY 17, 2016


Pope Francis and Cardinal Muller interpret the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Vatican Council II with Cushingism : 'the Church' is in manifest heresy

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/01/pope-francis-and-cardinal-muller_17.html

___________


Related image
Cardinal Muller has changed doctrine, supports the development of heresy
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/10/cardinal-muller-has-changed-doctrine.html
Related image

Cardinal Gerhard Muller like AP interprets Vatican Council II with the error from the Baltimore Catechism

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/10/cardinal-gerhard-muller-like-ap.html

Related image
ARCHBISHOP GERHARD MULLER ASSUMES THAT THE DEAD WHO ARE SAVED ARE VISIBLE ON EARTH AND SO EVERY ONE DOES NOT NEED TO ENTER THE CHURCH : NCR interview 
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/10/archbishop-gerhard-muller-assumes-that.html#links
Cardinal Gerhard Muller's doctrinal error was placed on the Vatican website and found on Edward Pentin's webpage.The editors at the National Catholic Register approved it
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/01/cardinal-gerhard-mullers-doctrinal.html
JANUARY 13, 2015


Cardinal Gerhard Muller used a false premise and he is to evaluate Medugorje http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/06/cardinal-gerhard-muller-used-false.html
http://ingodscompany2.blogspot.it/2016/01/medjugorje-documental.html

Cardinal Muller has alleged apparitions like Medugorje : apparition theology for the SSPX and the Franciscans of the Immaculate http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/12/cardinal-muller-has-alleged-apparitions.html

MEDUGORJE PHENOMENON AT THE CDF OFFICE

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/11/medugorje-phenomenon-at-cdf-office.html

THERE CAN BE TWO INTERPRETATIONS OF THE CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH AND CARDINALS WHO USE THE IRRATIONAL ONE ARE TO JUDGE MEDUGORJE

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/12/there-can-be-two-interpretations-of.html

CARDINALS WHO HAVE CHANGED THE FAITH FOR POLITICAL REASONS ARE TO EVALUATE MEDUGORJE

MANELLI FAMILIES STOP THE COERCION : ITS ILLEGAL
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/01/manelli-families-stop-coercion-its.html

Manelli lawyers must clarify with Apostolic Commissioner Fr.Fidenzio Volpi

No acknowledgment from the Vatican Press Office to 12 questions :Franciscans of the Immaculate

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/07/no-acknowldgement-from-vatican-press.html



January 16, 2015
Catholics threatened by their bishop or the Vatican
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/01/roberto-de-mattei-wants-franciscan.html

Doctrinal error within the SSPX too ?

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/01/doctrinal-error-within-sspx-too.html

In this way we undo the damage done by Fr.Karl Rahner and others who did not make the explicit-implicit, visible-invisible distinction.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/01/in-this-way-we-undo-damage-done-by.html

Pope Pius XII, Cardinals Ottaviani, Cardinal Francesco Marchetti Selvaggiani and Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre were factually wrong

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/01/pope-pius-xii-cardinals.html


Toronto Catholic Witness uses same theology as Pope Francis and the liberal Curia http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/01/toronto-catholic-witness-uses-same.html




CDF would be telling a falsehood,if it continued to promote Cushingism http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/10/cdf-would-be-promoting-falsehoodif-it.html

CDF hiding the truth still
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/11/cdf-hiding-truth-still.html

Meeting needed between Ecclesia Dei/CDF, SSPX,CMRI and others: all agree that the baptism of desire is not an exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salus

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/08/meeting-needed-between-ecclesia-deicdf.html


AP repeats lie about Vatican Council II
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/11/ap-repeats-lie-about-vatican-council-ii.html

The present Magisterium supports the political Left on doctrine and has also made a factual mistake http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/09/the-present-magisterium-supports.html

Immagine correlata

OATH AGAINST MODERNISM : MAGISTERIUM IS IN HERESY

 http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/09/oath-against-modernism-magisterium-is.html

CDF could soon fault the SSPX for not accepting the Cushing interpretation of Vatican Council II http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/10/cdf-could-soon-fault-sspx-for-not.html

Vatican Council II is traditional: SSPX should ask Ecclesia Dei to accept the Council without the Richard Cushing Error
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/06/vatican-council-ii-is-traditional-sspx.html

Richard Cushing Confusion at the Vatican
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/06/richard-cushing-confusion-at-vatican.html

Pro SSPX supporters should protest at the CDF on their irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/06/pro-sspx-supporters-should-protest-at.html


Cardinal Luiz Ladaria S.J uses the false premise : here is the proof!


http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/06/archbishop-augustine-di-noia-was-using.html#linkCardinal Luiz Ladaria S.J Secretary of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith is still in heresy :visible to us baptism of desire and invincible ignorance contradicts a defined dogma http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/06/cardinal-luiz-ladaria-sj-secretary-of.html

THERE IS AMBIGUITY IN VATICAN COUNCIL II ONLY WITH THE FALSE PREMISE: THE COUNCIL IS TRADITIONAL OTHERWISE http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/06/there-is-ambiguity-in-vatican-council.html

Archbishop Di Noia's the Church is always right is becoming controversial: How can the Holy Spirit say that we can see the deceased saved?
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/11/archbishop-di-noias-church-is-always.html#links
FANTASY THEOLOGY : PILTDOWN MAN THEOLOGY AT THE CDF
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/11/fantasy-theology-piltdown-man-theology.html#links
For nearly 20 years the Holy Office(CDF) and the Archbishop of Boston did not lift the excommunication of Fr.Leonard Feeney when the baptism of desire was never ever an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/10/for-nearly-20-years-holy-officecdf-and.html#links
Tuesday, April 10, 2012
HOLY FATHER ASSUMES THOSE SAVED IN INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE ARE KNOWN TO US: CONTRADICTS VATICAN COUNCIL I AND II
 http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/04/holy-father-assumes-those-saved-in.html

INTERNATIONAL THEOLOGICAL COMMISSION OBJECTIVELY WRONG ON INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/02/international-theological-commission.html#links   

IF THE CDF DOES NOTHING WHOM CAN WE APPEAL TO, POPE FRANCIS ?: PUBLIC ERRORS BY VATICAN OFFICIALS INCLUDING THE CONGREGATION FOR THE DOCTRINE OF THE FAITH http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/05/if-cdf-does-nothing-whom-can-we-appeal.html

January 13, 2013
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/01/the-last-sesecret-doctrinal-talks-were.html#links

ITALIAN PRIEST CRITICIZES BAGNASCO FIASCO: THE BIBLE TEACHES THAT JEWS NEED TO CONVERT http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2009/10/italian-priest-criticizes-bagnasco.html


Implicit intention, invincible ignorance and a good conscience (LG 16) in Vatican Council II do not contradict extra ecclesiam nulla salus –John Martignoni


JOHN MARTIGNONI SAYS VATICAN COUNCIL II IS IN AGREEMENT WITH EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS AND THE SYLLABUS: WHEN WILL THE SSPX AND THE VATICAN CURIA ACKNOWLEDGE IT?