Sunday, July 25, 2021

Cardinal Marx and the German Bishops Conference interpret Vatican Council II with the irrational red column.This is an objective mistake.

 

 

 

 














 

 




 
                                              

             




                                                                                           -Lionel Andrades








Posted by at No comments:

You can choose how to interpret Vatican Council II.We can correct the error of Pope Paul VI

 



 
                                                                     -Lionel Andrades


Posted by at No comments:

Traditionis Custode was written with Vatican Council II interpreted with the false premise, and so its conclusion was non traditional.Pope Francis needs to interpret Vatican Council II with the rational premise, affirm Tradition and permit the Latin and Novus Ordo freely for those who do the same.


 

The whole Church is using a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and the whole Church can change.

Every Catholic must interpret Vatican Council II with the rational premise( blue column) and not the irrational premise( red column).


It is divisive and dishonest to use the common fake premise to interpret Vatican Council II and then reject Catholic Tradition( Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, EENS etc).

The SSPX, FSSP, CMRI,ICKSP,MHFM and the religious communities and Catholic organisations all use the irrational premise to interpret Vatican Council II.They also interpret other Magisterial documents with the same error.The same mistake is made by the ecclesiastics at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and the present two popes.


So for Pope Francis to be Magisterial  in the Church Documents he issues, he needs to use the rational premise.It would be dishonest to continue to use the irrational option to create an artificial rupture with Tradition.

Traditionis Custode was written with Vatican Council II interpreted with the false premise, and so its conclusion was non traditional.

Pope Francis needs to interpret Vatican Council II with the rational premise, affirm Tradition and permit the Latin and Novus Ordo freely for  those who do the same.

Now he is interpreting Vatican Council II with the irrational premise, he rejects Tradition as expected.

The he only allows Holy Mass to be offered by those who make the same objective and factual error as himself.

Pope Francis must be asked to issue a correction. -Lionel Andrades




Posted by at No comments:

Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict’s Church Documents were written with both of them interpreting Vatican Council II with the irrational premise instead of the rational option.

 

Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict’s Church Documents were written with both of them interpreting Vatican Council II with the irrational premise instead of the rational option.They chose the red and not the blue column.The New Theology was protected by Cardinal Ratzinger as the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.It depended upon the false premise.

The Joint Declaration on Justification with the Lutherans was put together with Vatican Council II interpreted with the fake premise.

Exceptions during the pontificate of Pope John Paul II was his encyclical letter Ecclesia de Eucharistia in which he affirmed the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and this was not appreciated by Cardinal Walter Kasper in an interview with the magazine 30 giorni.

He also asked Cardinal Ratzinger to reject the ‘theology of religious pluralism’ and so the Notification was issued by the CDF against Fr. Jacques Dupuis sj.-Lionel Andrades

Posted by at No comments:

In Argentina, Fr. Davide Pagliarani was interpretino Vatican Council II with the irrationa premise( red column) instead of the rational premise( blue column) and teaching it to the seminarians at the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) seminary as the Rector.The liberal Cardinal Bergoglio was doing the same.This was, and still is, the norm at all the seminaries in Argentina, when the Mass is held in the vernacular

 In Argentina, Fr. Davide Pagliarani was interpretino Vatican Council II with the irrationa premise( red column) instead of the rational premise( blue column) and teaching it to the seminarians at the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) seminary as the Rector.The liberal Cardinal Bergoglio was doing the same.This was, and still is, the norm at all the seminaries in Argentina, when the Mass is held in the vernacular.-Lionel Andrades


JULY 24, 2021

We do not need the Latin Mass to have a hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/07/we-do-not-need-latin-mass-to-have.html


Posted by at No comments:

Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II with a fake premise so Traditionis Custode cannot be Magisterial. He needs to publicly correct the error.

 


 JULY 25, 2021

Pope Francis must interpret Vatican Council II rationally and so support Tradition and then permit the Holy Mass in all Rites for those who do the same

 

                                                                                             

Pope Francis must interpret Vatican Council II rationally and so support Tradition and then permit the Holy Mass in all Rites for those who do the same.

Now he is interpreting Vatican Council II with the false premise , producing the expected rupture with Tradition( outside the Church there is no salvation) and then  permitting the Mass in all Rites, to only those who do the same.So the norm is a break with Tradition. -Lionel Andrades 


JULY 22, 2021

Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II with a fake premise so Traditionis Custode cannot be Magisterial. He needs to publicly correct the error.





Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II with the red column. Traditionis Custode permits the Latin Mass for communities which interpret the Council with the fake premise.It has banned the Latin Mass because communities in general do not interpret Vatican Council II with the fake premise and then accept the false conclusion, as he does.

This an objective and factual error of his. It is not the action of the Holy Spirit. There is no denial from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) ecclesiastics. They agree with me.

The pope and the CDF contradict the past Magisterium. This is schism.Since they interpret Vatican Council II with the red column,the fake premise, their understanding of the Creeds and Catechisms would be a break with Tradition.It would be schismatic and heretical.

This is a public scandal, not only for the pope and the CDF but  also the cardinals, bishops and priests who accept Traditionis Custode and its false reasoning.

Pope Francis and the CDF need to correct their error and announce that they interpet Vatican Council II with the left hand column ( without the false premise) and so the pope  had made an error in Traditionis Custode, which cannot be Magisterial, in its present form.

With the red column the pope has rejected the Athanasius Creed which says all need the Catholic faith for salvation.It does not mention any exceptions and this was how the past Magisterium accepted, it over the centuries.So this is a mortal sin of faith.He is officialy putting aside a Creed. Those who cooperate with the pope on this error are cooperating with the sin.


In a statement on Traditionis Custode, the FSSP, Institude of Christ the King, Una Voce International etc, have all extended their cooperation and obedience, to the pope, in the interpretation of Vatican Council II with the error.







John Henry Weston at Life Site News and Michael Voris at Church Militant TV are not reporting on this issue and neither are they interpreting Vatican Council II with the blue column ( without the false premise).

I interpret Vatican Council II with the rational premise ( blue column ) so Vatican Council II (AG 7) supports the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), for me.It is in harmony with the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX (without exceptions) and the Athanasius Creed (without known exceptions).

 

Archbishop Thomas E. Gullickson,Fr. Stefano Visintin osb, Fr. Nevus Macello op, the apologist John Martignoni and diocesan priests in Rome also choose the blue column, like me.

If the FSSP priests in France accept and interpret Vatican Council II with the blue column the bishops and the CDF may still not allow them to offer the Latin Mass.They have to accept and interpret Vatican Council II and the Creeds and Catechisms, with the red column to be approved by Pope Francis.

Will not their Mass be a sacrilege unless they officially correct the scandal ? Will not those who attend their Mass and receive the Eucharist be cooperating in the sacrilege? Would it be the same for Pope Francis and Pope Benedict ? 

Would their Mass be a sacrilege since they have changed the meaning of the Creeds and Catechisms, have interpreted Vatican Council II irrationally instead of rationally,rejected the dogma EENS, the Syllabus of Errors and the Athanasius Creed, in public.

ATHANASIUS CREED

Image result for Athanasius Creed pHOTO


'Whosoever will be saved, before all things it is necessary that he hold the catholic faith. Which faith unless every one do keep whole and undefiled, without doubt he shall perish everlastingly...'

They are in an impediment when offering Holy Mass, with the mortal sin of faith.In general this is how the priests offer Holy Mass in different rites. The false premise has spread in the Church like the Arian heresy of past times. -Lionel Andrades






LINKS FROM THE RIGHT HAND BAR.CLICK TO ACCESS


 

Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)