Friday, February 22, 2013

AUSTRALIAN PRIEST SAYS THE DEAD SAVED IN HEAVEN ARE VISIBLE TO US PHYSICALLY ARE EXCEPTIONS TO 'THE ORDINARY MEANS OF SALVATION' AND THIS IS MAGISTERIAL TEACHING

Fr. John George who says we can physically see people in Heaven who are exceptions to  the 'ordinary means of salvation,' now says this is the teaching of the magisterium. He says on the Discussion Forum True Catholic that he is faithful to the magisterium in the Archdiocese of Sydney, Australia.

Not only is he implying that the archbishop of Sydney Cardinal George Pell can see the deceased saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire but this is the teaching of the Holy Spirit who guides the magisterium of the Church.


While those who are faithful to the teachings of the magisterial texts and Catholic Tradition are criticized.
Slideshow Image 4
Known to the Archdiocese Offices over the last few years, the priest is allowed to interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church as a break with Tradition , using his false premise of being able to see the dead ion earth.


He also implies that the magisterium in 1949 in the Letter of the Holy office made the mistake of assuming that the baptism of desire was explicitly known to us and so was an exception to the literal interpretation of Father Leonard Feeney.


He will not affirm the dogma on salvation defined three times and does not consider this a sin. An OMI priest who denied the dogma of the Immaculate Conception of Our Lady was excommunicated by Pope John Paul II.


The Archbishop’s Office is aware of Fr. John George’s interpretation of Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church and his denial of the dogma on salvation, which is a rejection also of the infallibility of the pope ex cathedra.


His error is held by others in the Archdiocese including Superiors and heads of Diocesan Offices in Sydney.

According to the Mission Statement of the Archdiocese of Sydney
We, as Catholics in the Archdiocese of Sydney, part of the universal Church under the successor of St Peter, through our common baptism, are a Eucharistic and sacramental community of Faith, Hope and Love seeking to live and proclaim the Gospel of Jesus Christ. We are committed to work within the framework of Catholic teaching to strengthen Catholic life, foster co-operation and service, and strengthen evangelisation.

-Lionel Andrades

MAJOR THEOLOGICAL ERROR WILL MARK THE PONTIFICATE OF POPE BENEDICT XVI


It would be said that he never knew that there were no exceptions in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and  Vatican Council II to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

Though it is possible he knew about the error but did nothing because of political priorities.


However it seems ludicrous when the Catholic Church's theology says that there are exceptions of the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance to the dogma on salvation when we do not know a single such case in real life.Can anyone name any such exception in 2013?


One must praise him in the writing of the Catechism of the Catholic Church,which does not contradict extra ecclesiam nulla salus but still so much was left unsaid.


The secular media and Catholic religious have been continuously telling us  that the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 corrected Fr.Leonard Feeney for denying the baptism of desire etc., As if the baptism of desire was a known exception to the dogma. The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) never issued a clarification. The pope has now resigned and still there is no correction.


According to the dogma all non Catholics are oriented to Hell unless they convert into the Catholic Church. This was never said clearly by the pope if he really believed in it.


In fact it was openly denied in a front page report in the L'Osservatore Romano written by Cardinal Walter Kaspar.This report was cited by Cardinal Bertone in a Letter to the Chief Rabbinate of Israel.Cardinal Bertone and Pope Benedict vaguely affirmed our faith in Jesus and then denied the necessity for all non Catholics to convert for salvation, they ignored the necessity of the Church.


Later the pope and his Curia would confirm that Jews do not have to convert into the Church in the present times.


This was not just a theological error it was a new doctrine. It was false, since it contradicted the Bible and Tradition.


The pope also allowed the Catholic world to believe that being saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire were exceptions to the dogma on exclusive salvation. In other words, we can see the dead who are saved and  now are in Heaven.

This false premise of the dead man walking was used in the interpretation of Vatican Council II (LG 16 etc) and the Society of St.Pius X (SSPX) was expected to accept this leftist version of the Council, to receive  canonical status. This is a new teaching and was not part of the Deposit of the Faith before the 1940's.It is also irrational and non traditional.It was heresy, since it is putting aside a thrice defined dogma, which is an infallible teaching.


The pope was silently agreeing with Fr.Hans Kung who said that  Vatican Council II had changed the Church's teaching on the infallibility of the pope.Since the dogma was allegedly contradicted by known exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II. This error has been the basis for the 'new theology' and it has been approved by the International  Theological Commission (ITC).
 
Pope Benedict XVI, the present Prefect and Secretary of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and the Vice President of Ecclesia Dei,Vatican have been associated with the ITC and have approved its documents based on an alleged ability to see the dead on earth.-Lionel Andrades


Vatican needs to clarify that there are no known exceptions in the present times to Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and so there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/08/vatican-needs-to-clarify-that-there-are.html#links

St.Maximillian Kolbe is in accord with Vatican Council II the 'ecclesiology of communion' is not
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/08/stmaximillian-kolbe-is-in-accord-with.html#links

INTERNATIONAL THEOLOGICAL COMMISSION USES PREMISE THAT IS FACTUALLY INCORRECT : LIMBO
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/03/international-theological-commission_29.html

The International Theological Commission's position paper Christianity and the World Religions 1997 has an objective factual error and is approved by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger : invincible ignorance is not an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/03/international-theological-commissions.html

INTERNATIONAL THEOLOGICAL COMMISSION ASSUMES ‘SEEDS OF THE WORD’ (VATICAN COUNCIL II ) IN OTHER RELIGIONS ARE KNOWN TO US AND THIS IS AN EXPLICIT EXCEPTION TO THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/03/international-theological-commission.html

VATICAN'S INTERNATIONAL THEOLOGICAL COMMISSION MAKES AN ERROR IN ITS POSITION PAPER CHRISTIANITY AND THE WORLD RELIGIONS
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/03/vaticans-international-theological.html

VATICAN COUNCIL II REJECTS THE THEOLOGY OF RELIGIONS
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/03/vatican-council-ii-rejects-theology-of.html

Former Secretary of the International Theological Commission holds that those saved with the baptism of desire and in invincible ignorance are known to us and so an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/02/secretary-of-international-theological.html#links

BISHOP GERHARD MULLER MADE TWO FUNDAMENTAL MISTAKES ON VATICAN COUNCIL II: HE ASSUMED LG 16 CONTRADICTS EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS AND HE DID NOT KNOW AG 7 SUPPORTS THE DOGMA
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/07/bishop-gerhard-muller-made-two.html#links