Wednesday, April 17, 2013

Error of the SSPX leader

Paul VI acknowledged, we continue, to the extent of our abilities, to proclaim that the Church can change neither her dogmas nor her morality. For no one can meddle with these venerable institutions without provoking a genuine disaster. -Bishop Bernard Fellay

The SSPX has changed the Catholic dogma  extra ecclesiam nulla salus by assuming that the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 says those saved in invincible ignorance and with implicit desire are visible to us. The Letter of the Holy Office does not mention that these cases are visible to us and common sense tells us that they are invisible. So how can these cases be known exceptions to the dogma on exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.

So this is an error of the SSPX. Invincible ignorance cases in Heaven are not visible but invisible for us.

Doubts about the necessity of the Church as the unique source of salvation and about the Catholic Church as the only true religion originating in the Declarations on Ecumenism and Religious Liberty, destroy the authority of the Church’s Magisterium. Indeed, Rome is no longer the unique and necessary “Magistra Veritatis” [“Mistress of Truth”]. -Bishop Fellay
When Vatican Council II says there can be those saved in imperfect communion with the Church we can assume that these cases are visible to us in 2013 or they are not visible.
If they are not visible then they do not contradict Ad Gentes 7 which says all need faith and baptism for salvation. Protestants and Orthodox Christians do not have Catholic Faith.

The SSPX assumes that these cases are visible to us in 2013 and so are an exception to Ad Gentes 7 and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
So this is an error of the SSPX. Those in imperfect communion with the Church are not visible to us but are invisible.-Lionel Andrades

Superior General's
Letter to Friends & Benefactors
#80, March 2013

http://www.sspx.org/superior_generals_news/supgen_80.html

Ask your bishop do you desire every one in the world to be Catholic? Yes or No -Michael Voris

Ask your bishop do you desire every one in the world to be Catholic? Yes or No -Michael Voris

There is a great reluctance on the part of many Church leaders to proclaim the superiority of the Catholic faith .. and this reluctance is a nothing less than astonishing.
When someone is preaching the faith – especially when that someone is a bishop or pastor and they dance around the first principles of what their sacred office is all about –this is a case of red flags if there ever was one.

Any strategy on the part of some in the hierarchy for proclaiming the faith simply cannot position Catholicism as one faith among many.-Michael Voris

Yes or No
http://youtu.be/66fvDnAsu6c

Cardinal Sean O Malley, Archbishop of Boston and other Advisors to Pope Francis accept the evil values of the Jewish Left

The following is available on the Archdiocese of Boston Website.

EandI_image615x100

Resources for Teaching and Preaching the Passion


The Center for Christian-Jewish Learning at Boston College announces a multi-media curriculum for congregational interfaith dialogue

Nostra Aetate: What is it?
Posted: October 20, 2005
In 1965, the Second Vatican Council made historic changes to church policies and theology. Among them was Nostra Aetate, Latin for "In Our Time," a document that revolutionized the Catholic Church's approach to Jews and Judaism after nearly 2000 years of pain and sorrow.
Section four of Nostra Aetate repudiates the centuries-old "deicide" charge against all Jews, stresses the religious bond shared by Jews and Catholics, reaffirms the eternal covenant between God and the People of Israel, and dismisses church interest in trying to baptize Jews.
For the first time in history Nostra Aetate called for Catholics and Jews to engage in friendly dialogue and biblical and theological discussions to better understand each other's faith. After intense debate and some strong opposition, Nostra Aetate was approved by the world's Bishops and Cardinals in Rome on October 28, 1965. Nostra Aetate also calls for the church to dialogue with other world religions. (emphasis added)

ADL online guide: Nostra Aetate: Transforming the Catholic-Jewish Relationship.
(http://www.adl.org/main_Interfaith/nostra_aetate.htm) includes essays by some of the world's leading Jewish-Catholic interfaith experts who analyze the history and significance of Nostra Aetate, (http://www.adl.org/main_Interfaith/nostra_aetate_whatisit.htm) as well as a practical "how-to" guide on teaching the lessons of Nostra Aetate to new generations of Catholics and Jews.
(Nostra Aetate 4 says the Church is ' the new people of God'. Catholics are the new Chosen People.They have the Jewish Messiah who has made an eternal covenant with his Death and Sacrifice.


Nostra Aetate does not state that Judaism is the ordinary means of salvation or that Jews in general do not have to convert into the Catholic Church.
If it did it would be a contradiction of Ad Gentes 7 which says all need faith and baptism for salvation.
Nostra Aetate respects the good and holy things in other religions but does not say that these religions are paths to salvation.)

 

SIDIC: "Service International de Documentation Judeo-Chretienne"
High quality information, documents and book reviews pertaining to Jewish-Christian Relations. Published by the SIDIC center in Rome.


(SIDIC is a pro Jewish Left Documentation Centre whose values are not Catholic.)


These are the views of Cardinal Sean O Malley, Archbishop of Boston . He and other Advisors to Pope Francis accept the evil values of the Jewish Left.
-Lionel Andrades

Pope Francis ' advisor rejects Vatican Council II
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/04/sedevancantists-misinterpret-vatican.html#links

Pope Francis ' advisor rejects Vatican Council II

Vatican Council II says Catholics are the new people of God, the pope's advisor denies it.
 
Vatican Council II says all need to enter the church with faith and baptism for salvation.His advisor denies it. He  says invincible ignorance (LG 16) is a visible,known, exception.So all do not have to enter.Vatican Council II is a revolution in the Catholic Church according to the ADL website, linked to the Archdiocese website, of an advisor of the pope,Cardinal Sean O Malley.
Vatican Council II mentions the need for mission. The Advisor's website says there will be no mission to the Jews.
Vatican Council II says all need to enter the Church as through a door (AG 7).The Advisor's website says Jews do not need to convert.
 
Vatican Council II (Nostra Aetate) does not suggest that Jews in general do not need to convert or that they are saved in general in their religions.The Archdiocese of Boston website suggests it is so.Vatican Council II is a problem for the advisor and so is Catholic Tradition.
Vatican Council II (LG 16) with invincible ignorance is in agreement with St.Robert Bellarmine and Tradition.Vatican Council II(LG 16) is interpreted as visible to us in 2013 and so a break with St.Robert Bellarmine and Tradition.See the website where Cardinal Sean Malley is the Archbishop.
This is also the error of other advisors to Pope Francis and not just the Archbishop of Boston.Others include Cardinal George Pell and the Archbishop of Mumbai who have also rejected Vatican Council II.

They will not say:-
1) All need  faith and baptism for salvation (AG 7)
2)There are no exceptions, since LG 16,LG 8 are not visible to us, they are not personally known, we cannot name any such case.
3)They say  just faith in Jesus is not enough and will never say that one needs to be a formal, visible member of the Church (AG 7-visible Catholic Faith and visible baptism of water).
4)They cannot proclaim in public that all non Catholics need to convert into the Catholic Church for salvation.
 
This was also the postion of Pope Francis when he was a cardinal in Argentina.
All salvation mentioned or indicated in Vatican Council II, was considered visible, instead of invisible, to the naked eye.So this was a rejection of Ad Gentes 7 and Lumen Gentium 14. Vatican Council II for the pope and his advisors, contradicts itself.
-Lionel Andrades