The cardinals and bishops of the Italian Bishops Conference (CEI),1 are unethical. They are dishonest with their political interpretation of Vatican Council II. Since, there can be two interpretations of the Council. One is rational and the other is irrational.They choose the irrational version since it is supported by the Left. The conclusions of the two interpretations are different.The rational version is traditional and the irrational one is nontraditional.So we are in the Catholic Church with two different understandings of the Nicene, Apostles and Athanasius Creeds. There are two versions of the Syllabus of Errors and the Catechisms. There are two interpretations of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance- rational and irrational, without a false premise and with it.
The
liberalism of the CEI comes with the the irrational interpretation of Vatican
Council II. For example.
1. The CEI permits the La Nuova Gerusalemme (LNG) 2 community which has been excommunicated, to function in the churches in Rome. The CEI and Pope Francis allow the Charismatic Renewal office (CHARIS) to permit the LNG as a Catholic Charismatic group.
The Charismatic group uses the LNG promotional material in the churches.
2. Pope Francis and the CEI do not permit the opening of the Franciscans of the Immaculate seminary and church in Boccea, Rome. The Franciscans of the Immaculate go back to Tradition while they reject Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally by the CEI. The CEI in turn, will not affirm Vatican Council II interpreted rationally, which is in harmony with Tradition, as known to the F.I.Cardinal Braz de Avez and Pope Francis want the Franciscans of the Immaculate and all religious community to only interpret Vatican Council II, irrationally.
3. For Lent
they will allow ecumenical services and justify this annual event with Vatican
Council II, interpreted irrationally.So there is a break with the past
exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church, which is approved by the globalists.
The CEI is unable to affirm Vatican Council II
interpreted rationally since then they would have to interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG
16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as being invisible and hypothetical cases. So then LG 8 etc would not be objective exceptions for the strict interpretation of the dogma extra eccleisam nulla salus (EENS),
the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors and the Catechisms of Trent and
Pius X.Vatican Council II would have a hermeneutic of continuity with the past.The CEI does not want this. The Council is
no more political. The CEI does not want to state that all people in general need to be
members of the Catholic Church for salvation. All need to convert into the
Catholic Church to avoid Hell (AG 7, LG 14, CCC 845,846 etc).
But now Vatican Council II is a break with Tradition
for Cardinal Matteo Zuppi, the President of the CEI. So innovation can be
justified in the name of a non traditional Vatican Council II. He has approved homosexual
union-events within the churches of Italy. His liberalism comes from Vatican
Council II (Irrational) of course. Ecclesiology has changed for him. The Church
can be liberal.
But this is all deception.
It is political deception from Pope Paul VI to Francis.
Since Vatican Council II can in honesty, be only interpreted rationally, this
would be ethical.Then the Council can only be traditional.
This is reality.
LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, YUR 3, NA 2, GS
22 etc can only be non objective and speculative case in 2023.This is common sense.
The CEI policy on Vatican Council II is dishonest.-Lionel Andrades
https://www.chiesacattolica.it/annuario-cei/regioni-diocesi-e-parrocchie/
2
https://www.nuovagerusalemme.it/en/home-en/
https://www.lanuovagerusalemme.it/hestia-front/
https://www.avvenire.it/chiesa/pagine/scomunica-chiesa-cristiana-universale-nuova-gerusalemme
Posts
